User talk:KiwiSpike1

Welcome!

Hi KiwiSpike1! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! Nick-D (talk) 02:23, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks!

Thanks for the links, looking foward to joining wikipedia's ranks!

Your submission at Articles for creation: Southern Katipo (January 13)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Tagishsimon was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Subject may be notable, but you have not provided anything like a sufficiency of references to evidence it.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Southern Katipo and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Southern Katipo, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Tagishsimon (talk) 10:21, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, KiwiSpike1! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Tagishsimon (talk) 10:21, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Southern Katipo

G'day, Spike, welcome to Wikipedia. Just so you know, I have published your draft on Southern Katipo now -- it is at the following link: Exercise Southern Katipo. I have found a few photos on Commons (one of which I have included in the article) and added a few sources. Please feel free to keep expanding the article. Thank you for your efforts so far. Regards, AustralianRupert (talk) 06:52, 26 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for expanding the sources and improving the article! KiwiSpike1 (talk) 21:40, 26 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Useful sources

Hi, I saw your post on the Milhist page about RNZN ships. If you are not already aware of them, the New Zealand official war histories are a useful source. For example, Maunganui is mentioned several times, particularly in the volumes dealing with the medical services. I work mainly with NZ Milhist articles myself and often use the official histories. If I may make a suggestion, it would be to select existing articles to improve as a way of getting to grips with Wiki practices and processes, rather than creating them from scratch (which is kinda leaping into the deep end!). Sing out if you have any questions or need some advice/help, just drop me a line on my talk page or ping me if replying to this post. Zawed (talk) 09:25, 26 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much for the advice! Looking foward to helping out here and there cheers. KiwiSpike1 (talk) 21:38, 26 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

2021 Military History Newcomer of the Year

		2021 Military History Newcomer of the Year
		As voted by your peers within the Military history WikiProject, I hereby award you the WikiProject Barnstar for being nominated for the 2020 Military History Newcomer of the Year Award. Congratulations, and thank you for your efforts throughout the year. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 21:56, 3 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on German auxiliary raider Adjutant

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page German auxiliary raider Adjutant, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 08:59, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on German auxiliary raider Adjutant

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page German auxiliary raider Adjutant, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 12:30, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lyttelton (steam tug) has been accepted

Lyttelton (steam tug), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Theroadislong (talk) 07:42, 17 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: TEV Rangatira (1930) has been accepted

TEV Rangatira (1930), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

DoubleGrazing (talk) 11:08, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]