Jump to content

User talk:Kitcatx/Archives/ 1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


August 2018

Please Assume good faith

Please assume good faith in your dealings with other editors, which you did not do on Communion and Liberation. Assume that they are here to improve rather than harm Wikipedia. If you have been editing Wikipedia long enough to know what vandalism is, you have been editing Wikipedia long enough to know that a content dispute, even a content dispute in which the other editor is completely wrong, is not vandalism. Continuing to refer to the edits of another editor as vandalism is a personal attack and may result in a block. Robert McClenon (talk) 01:46, 23 August 2018 (UTC)

Perfect okay, understood =)) Lawtheagoraphobic (talk) 18:37, 27 August 2018 (UTC)

Creating talk page archives

Please do not archive complete talk pages. Please leave at least the last few months content as it may still be relevant. Only archive sufficient text to render the page relatively easy to navigate, nothing more. Thank you.  Velella  Velella Talk   16:56, 24 August 2018 (UTC)

Thanks =)) Lawtheagoraphobic (talk) 19:43, 24 August 2018 (UTC)

Information icon Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Talk:Oscar Pistorius, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. General Ization Talk 00:14, 27 August 2018 (UTC)

You were warned above about removing or archiving entire Talk pages. Stop now please. General Ization Talk 00:15, 27 August 2018 (UTC)

Stop icon You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at Talk:Joe Son. General Ization Talk 00:18, 27 August 2018 (UTC)

My mistake sorry, peace Lawtheagoraphobic (talk) 00:19, 27 August 2018 (UTC)
Once is a mistake. Do it again and it will be either incompetence or vandalism. General Ization Talk 00:20, 27 August 2018 (UTC)
I won't do it anymore, I promise sorry again, best regards :)) Lawtheagoraphobic (talk) 00:22, 27 August 2018 (UTC)

Società Italiana per Condotte d’Acqua moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Società Italiana per Condotte d’Acqua, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 06:23, 19 August 2018 (UTC)

CASSIOPEIA Thanks, the page has been regenerated since a week and re-edited, it's much better now =) Lawtheagoraphobic (talk) 18:37, 27 August 2018 (UTC)
Hi Lawtheagoraphobic, Greetings I have just checked there is no changes since I last edit - see HERE. You content need to support by independent, reliable sources (secondary independent sources). Thank you. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 01:05, 28 August 2018 (UTC)
Thanks I'm willing to improve it! =) Lawtheagoraphobic (talk) 20:22, 28 August 2018 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Rugby Clube Montemor, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Rugby (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:17, 31 August 2018 (UTC)

Thanks! I'll pay more attention next time =) Lawtheagoraphobic (talk) 09:40, 31 August 2018 (UTC)

September 2018

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Kitcatx/Archives (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I'm sorry, years ago I used different accounts, I didn't know the rules, I'm very sorry for that, I was very unexpert user. By the I didn't know about the standard offer so I created a new account last year (it was banned) and a new one this year (I didn't know there was the standard offer rule and so it was banned). And plus the static ip of my office was legally used by some coworkes that were banned too because the problem is that they were using the same static ip. Peace. I'm now using this account and I won't do create any new account. I wrote many email to ask WP help with the past email account and it was told me that without loggin in (I didn't had anymore any WP account psws) wasn't possible to do anything to the blocked user. I think my edits and contributions were constructive. I won't create new users anymore, I just would like to use this and positively contribute on WP. Thanks anyways Lawtheagoraphobic (talk) 22:06, 11 September 2018 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Now that you know about the standard offer, you can ask for it in six months. Do not edit Wikipedia at all for the next six months – under this or any other accounts. Do not create new accounts, do not use any old accounts, do not edit as an IP. If you can follow those simple instructions, we will consider unblocking you. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 07:02, 12 September 2018 (UTC)

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I'll do thanks. See you on March 2019! Thanks :) Lawtheagoraphobic (talk) 07:07, 12 September 2018 (UTC)

October 2018

Archiving Talk Pages

Hello. Please stop archiving talk pages that do not need it, such as Talk:Liz Fraser. At Help:Archiving a talk page, the lead states "It is customary to periodically archive old discussions on a talk page when that page becomes too large." Hers was far from it. Thank you. — Wyliepedia @ 11:58, 3 October 2018 (UTC)

Your email

March 2019

Standard Offer Request by the Interested Wikipedian

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Kitcatx/Archives (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I promise that my edits will be constructive and I'll assume good faith from other Wikipedians. I'd like to be more talkactive and comprensive and using more the talk sections of the articles before editing an article. I committed errors during past years using SP on WP, but at least 3 suspected users still in the investigation after this six months belongs to someone else (Same Static IP technical issue) and this doesn't help much or speed up the eventual unblocking proccess for the standard offer for my situation. I'm open to listen and to be constructive and to move on after this six month pause and now that I know the consequences; I'm still sorry for creating several accounts during the past and I promise I'll do my best to follow the policies and respecting the WP rules and talk with people, I really desire to move on now. Lawtheagoraphobic (talk) 23:41, 2 April 2019 (UTC)

Accept reason:


If unblocked, what edits will you be looking to do? I will be honest however, just saying "it's six months, unblock me" is not a very convincing reason to unblock you. RickinBaltimore (talk) 19:51, 28 March 2019 (UTC)

April 2019

Hi User:RickinBaltimore, thanks for reaching out, I'd like to make constructive edits on Economical and Political WP Articles. Thanks again for asking, have a good day Sir. Lawtheagoraphobic (talk) 23:41, 2 April 2019 (UTC)
Ponyo As the blocking admin, how would you feel about unblocking this user? It appears they have refrained from socking, and this appears to be a good faith effort to return. RickinBaltimore (talk) 15:13, 5 April 2019 (UTC)
@RickinBaltimore: I don't see an issue as long as they adhere to a single account.-- Jezebel's Ponyobons mots 16:15, 5 April 2019 (UTC)
@Ponyo: This user is seeking a rename. Does it look okay for you to rename this account with such a restriction? Sometimes people request renames in an attempt to avoid scrutiny or hide previous bad conducts. -★- PlyrStar93 →Message me. ← 14:32, 9 April 2019 (UTC)
@PlyrStar93: I appreciate you bringing this to my attention. Lawtheagoraphobic, if your account is renamed, do you intend to include that information on your user page (for example, using Template:User previous account or similar)?-- Jezebel's Ponyobons mots 16:04, 9 April 2019 (UTC)

Nope, thanks for asking tho. Lawtheagoraphobic (talk) 20:47, 9 April 2019 (UTC)

In that case I see this an an end-run on your single account restriction and would not support a rename.-- Jezebel's Ponyobons mots 20:50, 9 April 2019 (UTC)
To add, I realize that my lack of support doesn't actually prevent a rename, but I do find it extremely worrisome when a former indef-blocked account requests a new username as their first edit outside of userspace, and they explicitely reject linking the accounts in anyway, especially when there are restrictions on the account. There were many concerns with the edits made by your previous accounts, including edit warring and copyright violations. I'm not confident that you should be attempting a clean start (which your username change request implies) given your history and extremely recent unblock.-- Jezebel's Ponyobons mots 21:02, 9 April 2019 (UTC)
I have to agree with Ponyo with respect to this editor's past record. Without even digging deep into their other accounts, the recent block history as well as a request to rename right after conditional unblock particularly raises a red flag. While there is no technical limitation in renaming this specific account, renamers are bound by a number of rules and are expected to make judgments regarding if a rename would potentially make it easy for the editor to hide previous misbehavior or otherwise evade sanctions. In this case I see these as barrier to renaming and have therefore rejected the request. -★- PlyrStar93 →Message me. ← 22:22, 9 April 2019 (UTC)

Your attention needed at WP:CHU

Hello. A renamer or clerk has responded to your username change request, but requires clarification before moving forward. Please follow up at your username change request entry as soon as possible. Thank you. -★- PlyrStar93 →Message me. ← 14:29, 9 April 2019 (UTC)

Let me know if is okay now PlyrStar93, thanks much appreciated. Lawtheagoraphobic (talk) 17:05, 9 April 2019 (UTC)
The username you chose looks fine; can you also follow up with Ponyo's question in the above section (do you intend to use a statement such as template {{User previous account}} to indicate your old username)? -★- PlyrStar93 →Message me. ← 17:16, 9 April 2019 (UTC)

I prefer it's not indicated, thanks PlyStar93. Lawtheagoraphobic (talk) 20:47, 9 April 2019 (UTC)

June 2019

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (June 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Drewmutt was:
We're sorry, but we cannot accept blank submissions. If in fact you did include text within the article, but it isn't showing, please make sure that any extra text above your entry is removed, as it may be causing it to hide and not be shown to the reviewer.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Drewmutt (^ᴥ^) talk 20:46, 4 June 2019 (UTC)
Teahouse logo
Hello, Lawtheagoraphobic! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Drewmutt (^ᴥ^) talk 20:46, 4 June 2019 (UTC)
Yes, I'm sorry, I have messed the sandbox doing my editing experiments. Lawtheagoraphobic (talk) 08:43, 5 June 2019 (UTC)

Your username change

I find it fairly disingenuous that you failed to mention that your previous CHU request was objected to by the blocking admin (me) and previously declined by PlyrStar93 when you made your new CHU request. I'm sure that 1997kB was unaware of the concerns regarding your checkuser block and the unblock condition of sticking to a single account. At this time there are many links in the history that point back to your previous username; please ensure you don't make any efforts to obfuscate them.-- Jezebel's Ponyobons mots 18:41, 26 June 2019 (UTC)

Thanks for pinging me to this discussion Ponyo. I wasn't aware about the condition. @Kitcatx: Could you please mention your old username on userpage using Template:User previous account? ‐‐1997kB (talk) 07:55, 27 June 2019 (UTC)
Hi everybody, I've added the userbox mentioning my old username in my userpage. I won't obfuscate any links pointing to my old Username, thanks! Kitcatx (talk) 12:21, 27 June 2019 (UTC)
Thank you, that alleviates my concerns.-- Jezebel's Ponyobons mots 15:54, 27 June 2019 (UTC)

July 2019

Duferco moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Duferco, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. Almost all of the sources are primary sources. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 TT me 12:14, 29 July 2019 (UTC)

Okay, thanks. Kitcatx (talk) 18:24, 29 July 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

Your draft article, User:Kitcatx/sandbox

Hello, Kitcatx. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "sandbox".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! JMHamo (talk) 12:03, 26 December 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Duferco concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Duferco, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:32, 30 December 2019 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Duferco

Hello, Kitcatx. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Duferco".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Bkissin (talk) 16:31, 29 January 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:59, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:51, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

Italian Data Protection Authority moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Italian Data Protection Authority, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three, to be safe. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 TT me 13:03, 18 April 2023 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Italian Data Protection Authority

Information icon Hello, Kitcatx. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Italian Data Protection Authority, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 14:00, 18 September 2023 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Kitcatx/Archives/_1&oldid=1178328362"