User talk:Kingaayaan

Say hi

Write me here Kingaayaan (talk) 10:08, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

February 2023

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Jashwant Gangani, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 08:44, 20 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Amit Bhadana LL.B

Hello Kingaayaan,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Amit Bhadana LL.B for deletion, because it's a redirect that seems implausible or is an unlikely search term.

If you don't want Amit Bhadana LL.B to be deleted, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Mattdaviesfsic (talk) 20:40, 15 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"Amit Bhadana LL.B" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Amit Bhadana LL.B has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 May 15 § Amit Bhadana LL.B until a consensus is reached. Mattdaviesfsic (talk) 20:44, 15 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Bangur Nagar metro station

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Bangur Nagar metro station requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bangur Nagar metro station. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 04:23, 22 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Surat Metro stations has been nominated for deletion

Category:Surat Metro stations has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Bearcat (talk) 18:04, 25 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of List of hospitals in Surat

The article List of hospitals in Surat has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Wikipedia is not a directory. The grouped hospitals must be notable together for some other reason than simply existing in Surat.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Darcyisverycute (talk) 16:39, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Darcyisverycute similer articles are already there ..see List of hospitals in India there are many articles like this on wikipedia. i don't this i have done something that should not be on wikipedia Kingaayaan (talk) 14:19, 3 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Compared to list of hospitals in India, which has a specific inclusion criteria (all listed entries must be notable enough for their own article) and is about an entire country, list of hospitals in Surat is about just one city and there is no clear inclusion criteria. You are of course free to object by removing the PROD, but I do believe WP:NOTDIRECTORY applies here and I may open an WP:AFD later. You are of also free to just add entries to list of hospitals in India instead, which I think may be preferable. Darcyisverycute (talk) 14:42, 3 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about List of hospitals in Surat

Hello Kingaayaan, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

While your contributions are appreciated, I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, List of hospitals in Surat, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of hospitals in Surat.

Deletion discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. Our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. The most common issue in these discussions is notability, but it's not the only aspect that may be discussed; read the nomination and any other comments carefully before you contribute to the discussion. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|MPGuy2824}}. And don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

-MPGuy2824 (talk) 04:49, 20 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Kingaayaan. Thank you for your work on British Cemetery of Surat. North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Good start

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 22:27, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks @North8000 Kingaayaan (talk) 11:08, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"Bimrad metro station" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Bimrad metro station has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 March 18 § Bimrad metro station until a consensus is reached. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 05:01, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Thatbombayboy per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/ArjunKR92. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Vanamonde93 (talk) 01:45, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Kingaayaan (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I haven't denied that Starcruexz, Kingaayaan, Dravensturban and Filmyherald are my accounts, I assure Wikipedia that I use these accounts just for writing articles and learning & improving Wikipedia editing skills. you can check my contributions on all accounts since 2014, I have always trying to improve Wikipedia for readers , most of the articles I have created have proper citations and I have tried to improve Wikipedia as a knowledge source. if I have done anything against the Wikipedia terms unknowingly, I assure you I won't do it again

Decline reason:

This does not address all the findings over at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Thatbombayboy and I cannot see where you declared your alternate accounts. Yamla (talk) 12:13, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Lists of schools in Gujarat

A tag has been placed on Category:Lists of schools in Gujarat indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:43, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]