Jump to content

User talk:King of Hearts/Archive/2014/04

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Dear King of Hearts

[edit]

I truly appreciate that at least this part of witch-hunt is over. I'm being bashed on another incident that was caused by my adding of one-sided links to fashion sites I love. I apologized there but also argued in a nice way , why I believe the links must be on Wikipedia [1]. I love fashion more than anything in the world and I love to share my passion with other users. In this case I probably shared to much, but I thought that after the links to FMD (the site in question) made of half of the references in the profiles, it should be legit to offer the wiki-user a more specific and neutral profile about a designer/model or whatever. Now imagine, you love a couple of websites like crazy - I for example spend a lof of time on style.com, models.com and of course FMD, and because you are so much into this, you want to provide the users much more information about a designer like Dries van Noten (like in my example in the defense linked above), and you link it of course. I linked it because on FMD you have besides much more biographical information also an image of him, but also over 600 fashion works of him. Isn't this a good reason to link to it (and the links are in compliance with WP:EL and RS). The most terrible thing is actually, that they are now talking about punishing a fashion database - which besides has delivered Wikipedia so much information - just because of my behaviour. This is pure injustice. Sorry for flooding you with my concern, but you were the first to something good to me in proving that I am not a sockpuppet (this was part of the withc-hunt that came from there), and I would truly appreciated if you could have a look at the issue there. ► robomod 15:20, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I also wanted to add that after reading the talk's page of user Vituzzu , who is an official Wikipedia administrator and also the accuser of me being a spambot/spammer, the language he is using there, especially the Italian , is so much below a serious and educated (he is calling users dickheads and other real bad things!), that I would love to file a complaint on a superiors Wikipedia-entity. Could you guide me to a website that allows the de-administration of users? I couldn't find one so far. ► robomod 15:26, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Doctornickel

[edit]

Hi, Your Majesty. I re-opened the Doctornickel thread that you had closed ("Boomerang"), because I'd discovered it was a sock and have indeffed the account accordingly. Anybody can re-close it, but maybe you'd like the honour? Bishonen | talk 23:34, 4 April 2014 (UTC).[reply]

 Done -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 23:39, 4 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

sockspuppets

[edit]

Thank you for you help in banning the sockpuppets and the user who made the sockpuppets that affected the ufo phil page.172.56.17.16 (talk) 08:33, 5 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 02 April 2014

[edit]

Tech News: 2014-15

[edit]

Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please inform other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.

Recent software changes

  • The latest version of MediaWiki (1.23wmf21) was scheduled to be deployed to test wikis and MediaWiki.org on April 3, however it was temporarily put on hold due to localization issues. (calendar).
  • Typography Refresh was enabled on non-Wikipedia wikis on April 1, and on all Wikipedias on April 3. You'll only see it if you use the Vector skin.
  • CirrusSearch was enabled as the primary search method on over 400 non-Wikipedia wikis on April 2. [2]

Future software changes

  • A new special page (Special:TrackingCategories) will soon list all the tracking categories on a wiki. [3] [4]
  • All Wikiquote projects will start using language links from Wikidata on April 8. [5]
  • The Hovercards feature will soon work with right-to-left languages. [6] [7]
  • You will soon be able to download files directly from MediaViewer, the new multimedia tool. [8]
  • MediaViewer will be enabled for all users on MediaWiki.org on April 10. Comments are welcome.
  • You can help check that users can read CAPTCHAs in your language. [9]

Tech news prepared by tech ambassadors and posted by MediaWiki message delivery • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.

08:00, 7 April 2014 (UTC)

Where has it moved to?

[edit]

Morning I wish to ask where the content of the latest enquire has gone to? ie dated March 2014 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/FanforClarl I have looked at the notes and it suggests it was moved to here but that is not the case since it wasnt; https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/FanforClarl/Archive Fanforclarl so where has the details been moved to? Thanks --Crazyseiko (talk) 12:58, 7 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Detroit Joseph

[edit]

Could you have another quick look at this please? I've added diffs. The question isn't whether they are sockpuppets (they pretty much admit as much, and both accounts were created the day after the master was topic banned from the subject), but whether a CU would be useful to see if there are any more. Black Kite (talk) 22:10, 8 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah; it's just that CU's tend to be pretty inflexible about the diff requirement regardless of the case. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 22:13, 8 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
No problem, thanks for doing that. Black Kite (talk) 22:18, 8 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

IP socks

[edit]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/121.217.220.179

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/124.179.85.140

I saw this. I thought you might want to know that there is definitely IP socking by DJFryzy at chiropractic. I think the chiropractic page should be semi-protected. QuackGuru (talk) 19:21, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Done King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 23:35, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I just remembered because of the persistent problems the status quo was semi-protection. QuackGuru (talk) 02:36, 10 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Fixed. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 02:38, 10 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. There was another suspicious account that might be a sock. I'm not sure if it is DJFryzy or another chiropractor fan. QuackGuru (talk) 02:42, 10 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Feel free to open a new SPI, and be sure to include relevant diffs from both the master and the suspected sock. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 02:47, 10 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Since I'm not sure on this one I will move on for now until there is hard evidence. QuackGuru (talk) 02:50, 10 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sally Kellerman.

[edit]

King of <3. Could you please assign me a mentor to assist in making the Sally Kellerman article worthy of GA consideration. I have been hard at work in gathering legit sources to provide information on her career. In addition, I did take apply the assessor's comments to the article. Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Avario87 (talk • contribs) 03:32, April 10, 2014‎

You can look on WP:GAN for users who have made many reviews. They would likely have a good understanding of how to get articles up to GA status. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 21:42, 10 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

SockPuppet Investigation Immediately closed by an administrator when the accused requested him to close it- Need Immediate attention

[edit]

Hi User:King of Hearts ,

I had opened a sock puppet investigation on two users Shriram and Lihaas on India General election page- Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Shriram. One of them suddently made a request to another Administrator ( RequestMadeHere ) to close the investigation and the page was immediately closed.

Excerpt- User:JamesBWatson, I would think canvassing around for his view is turning disruptive. (Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Shriram) How about a topic ban?Lihaas (talk) 14:44, 10 April 2014 (UTC)


The immediate closure of topic looks suspicious. Please do the necessary.


Thanks Soorejmg (talk) 15:52, 10 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Soorejmg has sent this message to six different administrators. See User talk:Soorejmg#Canvassing. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 19:30, 10 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Hi KoH, The accused user Lihaas asked another Amdinistrator JamesBWatson to close the SockPuppet INvestigation and he immediately did that. This is supisicios. Please have a look. As the page Indian general election, 2014 is a high profile page in India now due to ongoing election, there is very high chance of paid editing in WIkipedia by political parties in a wide manner to make page look advantage for them. I would request your kind intervention in this case.

Excerpt of request made by the accesed Lihas to JamesBWatson- "User:JamesBWatson, I would think canvassing around for his view is turning disruptive. (Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Shriram) How about a topic ban?Lihaas (talk) 14:44, 10 April 2014 (UTC)"

Thanks SoorejSoorejmg (talk) 06:06, 11 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppets of Techastrax

[edit]

Hi, I would like to point you back to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Ichek where I have provided diffs as requested. The currently suspected puppets are those of Techastrax, the mastersock. It seems you have moved the mastersock to Ichek, but I would say that Techastrax is a different sock despite sharing similarities with the currently suspected socks and Ichek. The main aim of the current socks are to revert the prevailing consensus of legitimate users' concern to use PPPs instead of exchange rates on List of countries by average wage, where they seem to use hit and run guerrilla tactics with random IPs that have no edit history. Massyparcer (talk) 20:29, 10 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A new sock has showed up again which is an IP with no prior edit history other than emulating the mastersock. I'm starting to fear that these socks are trying to evade the system by generating random IPs..the new IP sock emulates its prior socks perfectly..I'm not sure what to do here but have updated the closed case with diffs. Massyparcer (talk) 15:45, 11 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
64.134.231.154 has been blocked. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 22:33, 11 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I think we need to protect the article (List of countries by average wage) from new users to allow the process of gaining a legitimate consensus take place without abuse. Otherwise, I fear that the socks will keep inventing new IPs to evade the Wikipedia system.. Massyparcer (talk) 20:28, 12 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
 Done King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:47, 13 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The socks seem to have found a new way to evade the measures put in place..after you protected the page from new users on April 16th, a new sock was immediately created, User:Linxar75[10], who has gone around editing other very related pages to pretend to be "different" since he needs time to be autoconfirmed. After that time was up, he finally showed his real agenda by emulating the mastersock once again by reverting the page against consensus without any prior discussion: [11] This was subsequently reverted by a good-faithed editor but the situation has gone even more complicated - He created a separate page titled List of countries by average wage (nominal) in an attempt to override the exiting article List of countries by average wage - [12]. Another duplicate one titled List of countries by average wage (PPP) was created as well. I'm afraid that the situation will get out of control if we don't deal with this sock soon.. Massyparcer (talk) 08:43, 22 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I have blocked the sock and reverted/deleted all their edits. Unfortunately, there is no good way of completely stopping sleepers from popping up. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 21:25, 22 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The IP's for E4024 haven't been blocked yet

[edit]

Will they be blocked? Are we waiting for something? Étienne Dolet (talk) 18:18, 11 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I blocked the entire range, which includes those listed IPs. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 22:30, 11 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Can I revert all the disruptive editing the IP has caused in the AA2 topic area? After all, the master puppet is indefinitely banned from AA2. Étienne Dolet (talk) 21:24, 12 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
As long as the edits were made after the master was blocked, feel free to revert per WP:EVADE. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:44, 13 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 09 April 2014

[edit]

Help needed

[edit]

Dear, Death and adjustment hypotheses was deleted previously under due circumstances, but now it has been recreated and I believe it is not the same way as before. I earnestly request you, as an experienced editor at wiki please help me improve the article. Bolton007 (talk) 06:25, 14 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Tech News: 2014-16

[edit]

Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please inform other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.

We are looking for contributors to help write new issues every week. If you would like to help, please contact us.

Recent software changes

  • The latest version of MediaWiki (1.23wmf22) was added to test wikis and MediaWiki.org on April 10. It will be added to non-Wikipedia wikis on April 15, and all Wikipedias on April 17 (calendar).
  • MediaViewer was enabled for all users on MediaWiki.org on April 10. It will be enabled for all users on the Catalan (ca), Hungarian (hu) and Korean (ko) Wikipedias and English Wikivoyage on April 17. Comments are welcome. [13] [14] [15]
  • Font issues caused by Typography refresh for Windows users were fixed on April 7. [16] [17]

VisualEditor news

  • You will now see only three options when you try to add a template parameter in VisualEditor; you will see other options after a click. [18]
  • The size changing controls in VisualEditor media editing dialog were simplified further.
  • The wikitext editor tab will now fold into a drop-down menu in the Vector skin if there is not enough space on your screen. [19] [20]

Future software changes

  • The font used for body text on Wikimedia wikis will change to your system default sans-serif font. This temporary change will be enabled on all non-Wikipedia wikis on April 15, and on all Wikipedias on April 17. [21] [22]
  • Files from Commons seen on another wiki will soon have a tab saying "View on Wikimedia Commons". The create tab will change to "Add local description" (see screenshot). [23]
  • You will soon be able to hide Notification and Hovercards pop-ups by pressing the Esc key. [24] [25] [26] [27]
  • Shorter lists of language links will soon work in right-to-left languages. Languages that you have used before will be shown in the list. [28]
  • You will soon be able to send messages with the MassMessage tool to all pages in a given category. [29] [30]
  • The date format user preference will soon be moved to the appearance tab. [31] [32]
  • An IRC discussion with the Wikimedia Foundation Multimedia team will take place on April 16 at 18:00 UTC on the channel #wikimedia-office on Freenode (time conversion). [33]

Problems

Tech news prepared by tech ambassadors and posted by MediaWiki message delivery • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.

07:18, 14 April 2014 (UTC)

Tech News: 2014-17

[edit]

Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please inform other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.

Tech News updates

Recent software changes

  • The latest version of MediaWiki (1.24wmf1) was added to test wikis and MediaWiki.org on April 17. It will be added to non-Wikipedia wikis on April 22, and all Wikipedias on April 24 (calendar).
  • CirrusSearch was enabled as a beta feature on 27 new wikis on April 18. [36] [37]
  • Problems with various fonts in SVG files were fixed last week. Files that use DejaVu Sans Condensed, DejaVu Serif Condensed, DejaVu Sans Light, Kochi Gothic and Kochi Mincho fonts now show correctly. [38] [39] [40] [41]
  • The page view statistics site developed by Henrik (stats.grok.se) should now work faster. [42]
  • You can read a summary of the Wikimedia technical report for March 2014. [43]

VisualEditor news

  • If you try to add a category which redirects to another category, VisualEditor will now suggest adding the target category directly. [44] [45]
  • VisualEditor tabs will no longer appear on Education Program pages. [46] [47]
  • You can now use VisualEditor on Meta-Wiki and the French Wikinews by enabling it in your preferences. [48] [49] [50]

Future software changes

  • MediaViewer will be enabled for all users on the Czech (cs), Estonian (et), Finnish (fi), Hebrew (he), Polish (pl), Romanian (ro), Slovak (sk), Thai (th) and Vietnamese (vi) Wikipedias on April 24. Feedback is welcome. [51]
  • Edits by anonymous users will now be marked with a new CSS class (mw-anonuserlink). This way, you can easily make those edits use a different color, font or background. [52] [53]
  • The user preference to remember login will soon be removed from all wikis. The edit review preferences will be moved to the recent changes tab, and the preference for the WikiLove tool will be moved to the editing tab. [54] [55] [56] [57]
  • You will soon be able to give parameters to preloaded templates. [58] [59]
  • You will soon be able to use CodeEditor in read-only mode on pages that you cannot edit. [60] [61]
  • It is now proposed to replace Bugzilla, Gerrit and other tools by a single tool called Phabricator. You can test Phabricator and add your opinion on MediaWiki.org. [62]
  • An IRC discussion about Phabricator will take place on April 22 at 03:30 AM UTC on the channel #wikimedia-office on freenode (time conversion). [63]

Problems

  • For about 40 minutes on April 17, there were problems with page loading due to high server load.
  • There is a problem with the rendering of formulas with MathJax. If you enabled MathJax in your preferences, you might need to turn it off and on again. [64]

Tech news prepared by tech ambassadors and posted by MediaWiki message delivery • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.

08:34, 21 April 2014 (UTC)

CU request via UTRS

[edit]

Hi KoH, I've responded to your CU request at UTRS. Cheers, --Jezebel'sPonyobons mots 21:56, 22 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

User:Fredin323 and User:Chessandcheckers

[edit]

You recently advised User:Fredin323 and User:Chessandcheckers about WP:SHARE in closing their SPI here. However, now that User:Chessandcheckers is blocked for edit warring, User:Fredin323 is back here continuing the same edit warring and using the same language in the edit summary. Do you have any suggestions on how to handle this? Thanks, Bahooka (talk) 22:41, 22 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I have blocked him for edit warring. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 23:17, 22 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for your help. Bahooka (talk) 23:18, 22 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Less than 7 hours after this block for edit warring ended, User:Fredin323 started edit warring again with 3 quick reversions at California State University, Fresno (05:34, 24 April 2014‎; 05:50, 24 April 2014; 06:53, 24 April 2014). It seems User:Fredin323 is thumbing his/her nose at Wikipedia, but whatever the motive, would you please follow-up with the appropriate sanctions? Thank you. Contributor321 (talk) 17:41, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Well, right now a lot of time has passed since the reverts, which would make a block punitive rather than preventative. Let me know if he reverts again. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 17:43, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
User:Chessandcheckers is active again right now removing content here. And now he has specifically called me racist against WP:NPA. Bahooka (talk) 19:31, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I have blocked both users for 72 hours per WP:SHARE. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 20:17, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you. I had set up a case on the edit warring noticeboard because I didn't know if you were on Wikipedia right now, so I will go ahead and remove that. Best, Bahooka (talk) 20:19, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 23 April 2014

[edit]

Could you please restore the talk page history as well?

[edit]

I'm referring to Talk:Hold 'Em (Windows), of course. I did mention that I would like this history restored as well in my original request. Dogmaticeclectic (talk) 09:24, 23 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Done King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 18:22, 23 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Regarding your comment to me on this matter at WP:REFUND (to which I replied there), I think it's an excellent idea to start a new discussion to clarify the appropriateness of restoring history under redirects, when that history was deleted via AFD. ~Amatulić (talk) 19:27, 23 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Lord of Rivendell SPI

[edit]

Hello,

I'd like to know whether you IP range blocked the sockpuppet IP's of Lord of Rivendell. He's coming out with new IP address almost every time he edits (example [65]). Thanks, Étienne Dolet (talk) 04:03, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

No, I did not. And it looks like too large of a range to block. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 16:41, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sock

[edit]

Hi .. you just closed as "no consensus" an AfD where (you may not have seen it; probably didn't have notice of it) in addition to the nom having been indef-blocked, one of the remaining two d !votes was by a what was (before your close) found to be a sock of the indef banned sockmaster nom. I wonder if under the circumstances you could review that -- the sock's !vote should not therefore be counted, and without it I believe the AfD should be a keep close. Tx for your consideration. --Epeefleche (talk) 04:11, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Done King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 16:46, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Many thanks. Epeefleche (talk) 17:48, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jean Shafiroff

[edit]

Just curious, but isn't it customary to relist AfD's at least once before closing as "no consensus?" -Ad Orientem (talk) 15:48, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

No. See WP:RELIST: That said, relisting should not be a substitute for a "no consensus" closure. If the closer feels there has been substantive debate, disparate opinions supported by policy have been expressed, and consensus has not been achieved, a no-consensus close may be preferable. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 16:48, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Aaahhh -Ad Orientem (talk) 17:00, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Blocking an editor prior to vandalism after final warning

[edit]

Hello King of Hearts,

I find it very concerning that you blocked Marilena82 despite the fact that she did not vandalize after my fourth warning. On the contrary, she stopped vandalizing and apologized on my talk page. I would appreciate an explanation for your adminstrative action.

Thanks,

TheCascadian 21:58, 25 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I must not have looked at the timestamps closely enough. I have unblocked her. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 23:01, 25 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Great, thanks. I removed the block template from her talk page. TheCascadian 01:01, 26 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Special:Contributions/189.189.56.162

[edit]

Would you please block Special:Contributions/189.189.56.162 for three months and sockpuppet to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Andrewbf? It is very similar of Special:Contributions/Andrewbf. 183.171.176.174 (talk) 07:58, 26 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Request

[edit]

Can you also delete Alfredo Gonzalez (baseball player)?--Yankees10 00:25, 28 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Charles Branham-Bailey

[edit]

why did you close early? the relist had not gone 7 days. LibStar (talk) 07:22, 28 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A relist does not have to run the full 7-day course. As long as 7 days has passed since the original nomination and consensus is clear, the AfD can be closed. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 20:10, 28 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Tech News: 2014-18

[edit]

Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please inform other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.

Recent software changes

  • The latest version of MediaWiki (1.24wmf2) was added to test wikis and MediaWiki.org on April 24. It will be added to non-Wikipedia wikis on April 29, and all Wikipedias on May 1 (calendar).
  • You can now use interwiki prefix c: to link to pages on Wikimedia Commons. [66]

VisualEditor news

  • You will soon be able to set content language and direction with VisualEditor. [67]
  • VisualEditor now works on all Wikipedias after broken MediaWiki:Common.js pages (and similar) were fixed last week. [68]
  • VisualEditor dialogs now use an animation of moving lines rather than animated GIF images.

Future software changes

  • CirrusSearch will be enabled as a beta feature on 41 new wikis, including Meta-Wiki and the Swedish (sv), Russian (ru), Polish (pl), Japanese (ja) and Chinese (zh) Wikipedias next week. This change means that CirrusSearch will now be enabled on all Wikimedia wikis.
  • MediaViewer will be enabled for all users on the French (fr) and Dutch (nl) Wikipedias on May 1. Feedback is welcome. [69]
  • The mobile version of Wikimedia wikis will soon include filters to limit the number of uploaded files that are copyright violations. [70]
  • CodeEditor will soon have a status bar about errors and warnings. [71] [72]
  • You can test a new version of Winter, a proposal to have a fixed toolbar at the top of wiki pages. Comments are welcome. [73]

Problems

  • For about 30 minutes on April 21, there were problems with image scaling due to a high server load. [74] [75]
  • On April 22, it was not possible to use the Collection extension for about 90 minutes due to a server move. [76] [77]

Tech news prepared by tech ambassadors and posted by MediaWiki message delivery • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.

07:23, 28 April 2014 (UTC)

Aimperator and the Yardley of London article

[edit]

Aimperator has resumed edit warring on the Yardley of London article by again adding uncited material to the article. Nightscream (talk) 16:07, 30 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 23:38, 30 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:King_of_Hearts/Archive/2014/04&oldid=1139069608"