User talk:King.parker3

Welcome!

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

King.parker3, you are invited to the Teahouse

Hi King.parker3! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Please join other people who edit Wikipedia at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space on Wikipedia where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Benzband (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your friendly neighborhood HostBot (talk) 01:12, 21 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, King.parker3. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by McDoob AU 93 03:19, 21 September 2012 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).[reply]

I shortened the subhead for your question, but left the full question intact. Hope this helps! --McDoob AU 93 03:19, 21 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, King.parker3. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by ^{Brambleberry of RiverClan}_meow 23:25, 29 September 2012 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).[reply]

Please fill out our brief Teahouse guest survey

Hello fellow Wikipedian, the hardworking hosts at WP:Teahouse would like your feedback! We have created a brief survey meant to help us better understand the experience of new editors on Wikipedia. You are being selected to participate in our survey because you edited the Teahouse Questions or Guests pages sometime in the last few months.

Click here to be taken to the survey site.

The survey should take less than 10 minutes to complete. We really appreciate your feedback, and we look forward to your next vist to the Teahouse!

Happy editing,

Jonathan and Sarah, Teahouse hosts 02:16, 2 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits

I'm concerned not only that your primary motive is to write an article about John J. Ensminger, whose notability isn't conclusively established through objective reliable sources, but that you also are introducing his name and publications into multiple Wikipedia articles. It looks like the intent may be promotional, and I'm going to request further eyes on your edits from other contributors. Thank you, 76.248.149.47 (talk) 03:34, 10 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ANI discussion

Hello. There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. 76.248.149.47 (talk) 03:48, 10 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

On reflection, I've withdrawn the discussion at ANI, but have removed some of the links you've added to other articles. It appears as if WP:COI is a concern, and perhaps WP:AUTOBIOGRAPHY is relevant. Please feel free to discuss this here, or at the talk page for John J. Ensminger. I notice that earlier you removed maintenance templates re: primary sources and notability, but the same issues remain, which is why I restored them. Thank you, 76.248.149.47 (talk) 12:09, 10 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Teahouse talkback

Hello, King.parker3. Your question has been answered on the Teahouse Q&A Board.
Feel free to leave us a reply there! –– Anonymouse321 (talk • contribs) 15:56, 12 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Want to opt-out of talkback messages? Use Template:User notification preference.

Talkback

Hello, King.parker3. You have new messages at Anonymouse321's talk page. –– Anonymouse321 (talk • contribs) 21:49, 13 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Want to opt-out of talkback messages? Use Template:User notification preference.

In response to your feedback

Have you tried to post on that user's talk page? I am going to check that page out now. see WP:COI and WP:BLP for additional information on the policies in question.

Tazerdadog (talk) 02:21, 14 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

Hi, King.parker3. In keeping with Wikipedia's guidelines and conventions regarding talk page formatting, I've relocated a recent post of yours. In the event you have difficulty locating the post, you may click here to be taken to the post directly. Regards Tiderolls 09:01, 14 October 2012 (UTC) I have included more than one citation to Mr. Ensminger's published articles and books that I believe are independent of the subject. I have to assume that by subject you mean Mr. Ensminger. For instance, the last citation by Jan Shubert who cites his definition of service dog is by a person who is independent of Ensminger and the several citations about his article on the therapeutic significance of the civil commitment hearing are by persons who are independent of Ensminger and one of them, Mr. Wexler, has a biography in Wikipedia. As I mention, Mr. Wexler quotes the entire Ensminger, Liguori article in his book. If these are not citations of the type you are looking for then I do indeed completely fail to understand what it is that you mean by a reliable, independant source. King.parker3 (talk) 04:10, 15 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 19

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited John J. Ensminger, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page St. John's University (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:51, 19 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, King.parker3. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by Writ Keeper ⚇♔ 14:59, 20 October 2012 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).[reply]

Supreme Court's dog sniff cases

Hi there, I came across your profile quite by happenstance. I see that you are familiar with Mr. Ensminger's work... I've just written a pair of articles on Florida v. Jardines and Florida v. Harris. I suspect they will be getting a lot of traffic tomorrow evening (er, actually, tonight (Tues)), from 7pm to 3am, because they will be featured on the Wikipedia home page in the "Did You Know" section. If you have a moment, I'd love a critical set of eyes on the articles. I plan flesh out more of the arguments in Harris tomorrow, Feel free to provide raw feedback and I'll incorporate your comments, or you can make edits directly, whichever you'd prefer.

I've come across two relevant articles or Mr. Ensminger's: "Cueing and Probable Cause: Research May Increase Defense Attacks on and Judicial Skepticism of Detection Dog Evidence", and "Canine Tracking and Scent Identification: Factoring Science into the Threshold for Admissibility", and hope to add some material and cites tomorrow morning. I also noticed that he wrote a recent article for the New York Law Journal, "U.S. Supreme Court to Hear Two Police Canine Cases in Fall Term", but alas, I don't have an account on that site... If you happen to have a copy of that article, I'd love to give it a read.... I can also be reached at my gmail account, which is the same as my username.

Sorry for the short notice, but it's ok if you don't have time, for I'm sure the articles will get a whole lot more traffic after the Supreme Court's decisions are announced. Thanks! Grollτech (talk) 09:15, 13 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Draft:Tadeusz A. Jezierski (June 16)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.
Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

.

To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.

Thank you for your
contributions to Wikipedia!

Please remember to link to the submission!

You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Onel5969 (talk) 23:28, 16 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tadeusz A. Jezierski (November 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Tadeusz A. Jezierski and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Hell in a Bucket (talk) 10:41, 1 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Tadeusz A. Jezierski concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Tadeusz A. Jezierski, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:32, 2 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Tadeusz A. Jezierski concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Tadeusz A. Jezierski, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:32, 2 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Tadeusz A. Jezierski

Hello, King.parker3. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Tadeusz A. Jezierski".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by one of two methods (don't do both): 1) follow the instructions at WP:REFUND/G13, or 2) copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Draft:Tadeusz A. Jezierski}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, and click "Save page". An administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 19:28, 20 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, King.parker3. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by Yunshui ^雲 _水 14:50, 29 June 2015 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).[reply]

How to alert other editors

When someone is posting on your talk page you get an automatic notification. That notification is a red square followed by a long yellow box (for most browsers and settings). In all other cases you have to alert the other editor in some way, either by "ping" or by mentioning them in a link. This will result in just the red box notification on that users pages. So even if you respond on your talk page you still have to alert the editor you are addressing. If you want to get hold of me you write {{ping|W.carter}} resulting in @W.carter: or [[User:W.carter|W.carter]] resulting in W.carter and sign with the four "squiggles" ~~~~ at the end and hit "Save". There are some more, but these are the basics. And when you ask something on someone's talk page, you also create a new section so your question don't get entangled in some other conversation. If you are having a conversation with another user on some page, it is also customary to add that page to your Watchlist in case someone in the discussion forgets to alert.

The policy is to leave an answer on the same page as the question, keep the conversation intact unless there is some reason for moving it elsewhere. Like complicated questions at the Teahouse can be continued on the appropriate talk page. w.carter-Talk 14:51, 29 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

thanks

Many thanks Nthep for your help. There is something about a redirect that I do not understand...not surprising as I am getting too old for this and missed entirely the fact that there exists the "New section" heading on a User page so I even had to ask how to respond to your reply.King.parker3 (talk) 18:58, 1 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:59, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Origin of the dog and wolf

Hi King.parker3, I saw this article and thought you might be interested: http://www.nytimes.com/2016/01/19/science/the-big-search-to-find-out-where-dogs-come-from.html?_r=2 The flagship report will be published before September, and anybody who is anybody in this field will be co-signing it. Regards, William Harris • talk • 03:22, 27 January 2016 (UTC) (Origin of the domestic dog)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, King.parker3. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Scent Lineups

Hello, King.parker3. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Scent Lineups".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. 1989 (talk) 14:14, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Complex structured finance transactions

The article Complex structured finance transactions has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Simple dictionary definition.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Toddst1 (talk) 21:36, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, King.parker3. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, King.parker3. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:15, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi King.parker3! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, How to contact an editor, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread.

The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:04, 30 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Search and rescue dog

Hi! I've reverted some of your edits at Search and rescue dog because you seemed to have just copied material from non-free external sources into Wikipedia. You simply may not do that. There is some scope for very limited use of quotations if the quoted text is the subject of some discussion in the text, but that wasn't the case here. Please ensure that everything you write in Wikipedia is entirely in your own words. Thank you, Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 20:23, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

February 2021

Hello, I'm Firefly. I noticed that you recently removed content from John J. Ensminger without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ƒirefly ( t · c ) 13:30, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Conflict of interest noticeboard discussion

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident with which you may be involved. Thank you. Possibly (talk) 19:27, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of John J. Ensminger

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on John J. Ensminger, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. (See section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.
It is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. (See section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Wikipedia has standards for the minimum necessary information to be included in short articles; you can see these at Wikipedia:Stub. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.
It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. 5a5ha seven (talk) 22:04, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Do not remove speedy deletion notices

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to remove speedy deletion notices from pages you created yourself, as you did at John J. Ensminger, you may be blocked from editing. Melcous (talk) 00:20, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of John J. Ensminger for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article John J. Ensminger is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John J. Ensminger until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Possibly (talk) 03:25, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello King.parker3, please stop blanking this article. It is very disruptive. As Possibly pointed out already, a deletion discussion is going on at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John J. Ensminger. – NJD-DE (talk) 16:24, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello King.parker3, to clarify, we have procedures for deletion. In the case of John J. Ensminger, the article will be discussed for a week and then kept or deleted. You have the opportunity to participate in that discussion, at the link above. Alternately, if you continue to blank the page,you can expect to be blocked and therefore not be able to participate at all in Wikipedia while blocked. Possibly (talk) 16:36, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]