User talk:Kikikrisr

Welcome!

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Contributing to Wikipedia
How to edit a page
Editing tutorial
Picture tutorial
How to write a great article
Naming conventions
Simplified Manual of Style
Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia:

Respect copyrights – do not copy and paste text or images directly from other websites.
Maintain a neutral point of view – this is one of Wikipedia's core policies.
Take particular care while adding biographical material about a living person to any Wikipedia page and follow Wikipedia's Biography of Living Persons policy. Particularly, controversial and negative statements should be referenced with multiple reliable sources.
No edit warring or abuse of multiple accounts.
If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to do so.
Do not add troublesome content to any article, such as: copyrighted text, libel, advertising or promotional messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject; doing so will result in your account or IP being blocked from editing.
Do not use talk pages as discussion or forum pages as Wikipedia is not a forum.

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! — Diannaa (talk) 16:17, 20 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

March 2022

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to GIC (Singaporean sovereign wealth fund), did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Justanothersgwikieditor (talk) 09:33, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

Can you tell me how are my contributions not constructive? I've added updated and useful information about GIC, with appropriate citations. Kikikrisr (talk) 09:37, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This is Kpddg. You added a paragraph about 'GIC buying Starbucks Korea'. That was fine and backed by reliable sources. However, the other additions were related only to Starbucks, and not related in any way to the subject in question. Hence, I feel that is why Justanothersgwikieditor reverted it. I have pinged them. Kpddg ^(talk ^• ^contribs) 09:43, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kpddg, thanks for replying on my behalf and you got my intentions correct. Kikikrisr has been copying and pasting similar content to any companies who have a stake in Starbucks and had copied without attribution to Kikikrisr's original content at Starbucks itself which was left untouched. --Justanothersgwikieditor (talk) 09:46, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No problem, I accidently came by this page and decided to respond. Kpddg ^(talk ^• ^contribs) 09:54, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Kikikrisr, I hope you understood why your edit was reverted. Kpddg ^(talk ^• ^contribs) 09:49, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:EmilyEquitas per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/EmilyEquitas. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. --Blablubbs (talk) 14:28, 19 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Kikikrisr (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I don't have multiple accounts, only this one from which I'm posting Kikikrisr (talk) 08:50, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Simple denial is not sufficient. You need to address the concerns raised at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/EmilyEquitas/Archive, including your spamming. Yamla (talk) 10:19, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.