User talk:Kielcerin

Kielcerin, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Kielcerin! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like 78.26 (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:01, 23 June 2021 (UTC)

June 2021

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Hi-5 (Australian TV series) have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Hi-5 (Australian TV series) was changed by Kielcerin (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.874433 on 2021-06-29T14:45:00+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 14:45, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Daily Mail reference at Lauren Brant

Hi. Please do not use the Daily Mail as you did at Lauren Brant. It is not a reliable source. See WP:DAILYMAIL. Kind regards, Robby.is.on (talk) 22:42, 24 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not using the edit summary

Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Thanks! TheHotwiki (talk) 05:55, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

October 2021

Hello, I'm Ctrlwiki. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Bubble Gang, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Ctrlwiki (talk) 04:15, 15 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not using the edit summary

Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Thanks! TheHotwiki (talk) 04:52, 17 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:05, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Tumbok Official Poster.jpg

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as Tumbok Official Poster.jpg, to Wikipedia. Doing so is considered vandalism and is prohibited. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Hasan (talk) 13:36, 6 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia: check out the Teahouse!

Hello! Kielcerin, you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us! Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 14:28, 6 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia and copyright

Hello Kielcerin! Your additions to MYMP have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.

You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
We have strict guidelines on the usage of copyrighted images. Fair use images must meet all ten of the non-free content criteria in order to be used in articles, or they will be deleted. To be used on Wikipedia, all other images must be made available under a free and open copyright license that allows commercial and derivative reuse.
If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into either the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps described at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. See also Help:Translation#License requirements.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 17:08, 12 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 31

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of Regal Entertainment films, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gloria Romero. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 31 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not posting references

Please do not add or change content without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you.TheHotwiki (talk) 16:26, 8 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

WP:NOTDIR

Do you understand that your edit here is contrary to the guideline linked in the heading of this section? Why would you revert an edit without acquainting your self with the situation in which you are injecting yourself? Tiderolls 18:37, 5 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I've just noticed that you've never posted to any talk page. Are you refusing to communicate? This behavior could jeopardize your editing privilege. Please address my concern. Tiderolls 21:56, 5 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

February 2022

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Katya Santos, you may be blocked from editing. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 07:59, 6 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Links to draft articles

Please do not introduce links in actual articles to draft articles, as you did to List of Goin' Bulilit cast members. Since a draft is not yet ready for the main article space, it is not in shape for ordinary readers, and links from articles should not go to a draft. Such links are contrary to the Manual of Style. These links have been removed. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 14:31, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

March 2022

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at We Are the World, you may be blocked from editing. Binksternet (talk) 00:44, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

April 2022

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Regine Velasquez, you may be blocked from editing. Pseud 14 (talk) 14:48, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Noticeboard discussion

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Pseud 14 (talk) 21:22, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

May 2022

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Tiderolls 13:09, 4 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]