User talk:Khalid Bin Abdulaziz

This is Khalid Bin Abdulaziz's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mohammed S. Gaber (actor) (September 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Greenman was:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Mohammed S. Gaber (actor) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Greenman (talk) 09:05, 11 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Khalid Bin Abdulaziz! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Greenman (talk) 09:05, 11 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Mohammed S. Gaber (actor) has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Mohammed S. Gaber (actor). Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 10:34, 11 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much it is well understood KH (talk) 10:43, 11 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mohammed S. Gaber (actor) (September 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Ingenuity was:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Almost all of the sources are unreliable. Please remove all IMDb, Instagram, Twitter, Wikipedia, Youtube, Spotify, and Fandom sources and add reliable sources instead.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Mohammed S. Gaber (actor) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

— Ingenuity (talk • contribs) 01:45, 17 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: HGM Moe Ji One has been accepted

HGM Moe Ji One, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Mattdaviesfsic (talk) 09:22, 9 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

HGM Moe Ji One moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, HGM Moe Ji One, is not suitable as written to remain published. It appears there is a WP:UPE or WP:COI conflict. Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, and have addressed the UPE/COI issue, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. As per WP policy, please do not move into mainspace yourself. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 10:43, 9 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

My article has been accepted today but then now it is removed and i do not know why? i am fixing all the issues the reviewers have been giving me. i have been submitting it for the last 6 month and each time it is rejected a reason is there in the comments and i have fixed it.

can you please let me know what should i do? KH (talk) 10:54, 9 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Onel5969, even if the article needs some minor cleaning, I'm not sure why a COI issue (whatever that may be) need force it back into draftspace, if everything looks fine (as it did when I accepted it)? Feel free to post a message here with any issues you have found - or send the user an email off-wiki - if it would help (and I do think this may require some elaboration, in any case). Mattdaviesfsic (talk) 16:44, 9 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Mattdaviesfsic, when I'm reviewing I do not always see that it has been accepted through AfC. If I do, I usually contact the AfC reviewer, to see if they knew about the UPE/COI editing. By all means, move it back if you feel it is neutral enough, you do excellent work at AfC. To me it looks too much like a promotional brochure, that is simply my opinion, but my main concern was the UPE/COI. However, the editor still needs to address the UPE/COI issue, by following the procedures on the links I provided them. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 17:15, 9 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Good day, Onel5969

Just to clarify everything, i have been editing this article to be as neutral as possible for the longest that is like 6 months or so, and i have submitted it for review for like 4 times and the reviewers always told me what is the issue and commented on how to fix it and i have fixed everything the reviewers have been telling me to fix for the longest.

All I have written are information that can be easily found on google and i have no conflict nor been paid to do this. His life part was from his website and socials, his voice acting was from IMDB and TMDB, everything that was done was general knowledge from google and some research only.

Wikipedia Rules wise, i was following everything the reviewers have asked me for and i have indeed fixed everything they asked me to fix. until it was finally approved and accepted yesterday.

So now after i have explained everything to you Mr. Onel5969, Is there anything else that i can answer for you?

Thank you, Regards. KH (talk) 09:54, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

HGM Moe Ji One

Hi Khalid Bin Abdulaziz. I have raised a number of serious concerns about the above article at Talk:HGM Moe Ji One. I am concerned that a number of sources appear to have been for the wrong person, and some have more serious problems than that. At this stage I am still considering how best to proceed, but you may wish to comment. - Bilby (talk) 12:25, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of HGM Moe Ji One for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article HGM Moe Ji One is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/HGM Moe Ji One until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Bilby (talk) 23:55, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

March 2023

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bilby (talk) 00:37, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Khalid Bin Abdulaziz, after looking into the HGM Moe Ji One article, there are clearly only two possibilities. Either you were hired to add the content and did so, presumably without knowing that much of it was false - including sources that were blatantly incorrect - or you were not hired and you used hoax material. Of particular concern were the two photos you uploaded, both of which were clearly hoaxes yet you claimed to have created them - either you did not create them, or you did and knew that they were hoaxes. Eitehr way, we have a problem. - Bilby (talk) 02:17, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]