User talk:Khalafyare

Welcome!

Hello, Khalafyare, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as User:Khalafyare, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's content policies and may not be retained. In short, the topic of an article must be notable and have already been the subject of publication by reliable and independent sources.

Please review Your first article for an overview of the article creation process. The Article Wizard is available to help you create an article, where it will be reviewed and considered for publication. For information on how to request a new article that can be created by someone else, see Requested articles. If you are stuck, come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can help you through the processes.

New to Wikipedia? Please consider taking a look at our introductory tutorial or reviewing the contributing to Wikipedia page to learn the basics about editing. Below are a few other good pages about article creation.

Article development
Standard layout
Lead section
The perfect article
Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, ask me on my talk page. You can also type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 23:46, 27 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Khalafyare

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. A tag has been placed on User:Khalafyare requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Waqar💬 14:03, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (February 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Star Mississippi were:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Khalafyare/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Star Mississippi 02:09, 3 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Khalafyare! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Star Mississippi 02:09, 3 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Abshir Muse said (February 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Qcne were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Abshir Muse said and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Qcne (talk) 16:25, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

February 2024

Hello, I'm Swatjester. I noticed that you recently removed content from Somalia without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Please refrain from removing sourced material from the infobox without explanation. ⇒SWATJester ^{Shoot Blues, Tell VileRat!} 17:03, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give a page a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into Abshir Muse Said. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases for registered users, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. Wikishovel (talk) 09:58, 17 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you move a page disruptively again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Please stop moving the draft about Said all over the project. It should remain in draft space until the tone and sourcing issues have been addressed. Star Mississippi 15:29, 17 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia. Please make an attempt to become familiar with how Wikipedia editing works before making any further attempts at large-scale edits, as your last several have all been either policy violations, or disruptive editing that degraded the quality of articles. If you persist in this manner, you will be blocked from further editing. ⇒SWATJester ^{Shoot Blues, Tell VileRat!} 17:28, 17 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Falsifying references and re-creating articles is disruptive. Please stop or you will be blocked. Star Mississippi 03:07, 22 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Abshir Muse Said (February 18)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Abshir Muse Said instead.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This draft appears to have been copied into article space without attribution, known as a copy-paste. A history merge has been requested in order to provide attribution to the contributions for this draft.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Abshir Muse Said and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 05:34, 18 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Abshir Muse Said has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Abshir Muse Said. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 15:26, 18 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Abshir Muse Said has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Abshir Muse Said. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 15:34, 18 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Abshir Muse Said moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Abshir Muse Said, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) In addition, there appears to be a WP:UPE or WP:COI conflict. Information that can't be referenced by reliable, independent sources should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, and have addressed the UPE/COI issue, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. As per WP policy, please do not move into mainspace yourself. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 22:10, 18 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Abshir Muse Said for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Abshir Muse Said is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abshir Muse Said until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Star Mississippi 03:00, 22 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Aamir Mahamed (clan) moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Aamir Mahamed (clan). Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and Concerns about verifiability. Information is lifted from Osman Mohamoud (clan). I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Star Mississippi 03:08, 22 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

February 2024

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing certain namespaces ((Article)) for abuse of editing privileges.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Star Mississippi 03:36, 22 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have discovered source falsification and repeated copying from one article to another (cc @Wikishovel who led the charge here) with just some names changed. Until this can be addressed, you may no longer edit in mainspace. This is inappropriate and disruptive. Star Mississippi 03:37, 22 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Request for Account Reinstatement on Wikipedia

Dear Wikipedia Administrators,

I am writing to respectfully appeal the decision to block my account on Wikipedia. I understand that my actions may have violated Wikipedia's policies, and I sincerely apologize for any inconvenience or disruption caused.

I acknowledge the importance of adhering to Wikipedia's guidelines and standards of conduct in maintaining the integrity of the platform. I assure you that I am committed to upholding these principles and contributing positively to the Wikipedia community.

I recognize the privilege of being a part of such a renowned platform for knowledge-sharing and collaboration. I value the opportunity to contribute constructively to the wealth of information available on Wikipedia.

I am prepared to learn from any mistakes made and to adhere strictly to Wikipedia's policies moving forward. I assure you that I will conduct myself with the utmost professionalism and respect for the community guidelines.

I kindly request that you reconsider the block on my account and grant me another chance to demonstrate my commitment to the principles and values of Wikipedia.

Thank you for considering my appeal. I appreciate your time and attention to this matter.

Sincerely,

[Khalafyare] Mahir (talk) 21:15, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

PLease use {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} so an administrator can review your request. You are currently only blocked from editing articles, and are welcome to edit in draft space. However if you continue to falsify sources and create copyright violations, you risk being blocked further. Star Mississippi 00:29, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Aamir Mahamed (clan)

Hello, Khalafyare. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Aamir Mahamed".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:35, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (September 16)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bhairava7 was:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Khalafyare/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

--- Bhairava7 • (@píng mє-tαlk mє) 10:08, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Aamir Mahamed (clan) (September 16)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Bobby Cohn were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Aamir Mahamed (clan) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Bobby Cohn (talk) 11:24, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]