User talk:Karlhard

Karlhard is busy on weekend due to work and may not respond swiftly to queries.

Archives

2014

Hi, welcome to my talk page, please be patient when talking with me. I won't answer to rude messages. Don't forget to sign your posts by typing four tildes (~~~~) Please click New Section for a message. Thanks

Excellent New Editor Barnstar

		The Excellent New Editor's Barnstar A new editor on the right path
		Amazing! You've only been with us for 3 months and already have over 300 unique pages edited! Please do not be discouraged by the nominations for deletion. I will try to help you defend the existence of these articles, but next time try to keep in mind guidelines such as WP:Notability, WP:Independent, and WP:NOT before writing. In any case, great job and keep up the good work! Even experienced editors like me have articles deleted. If you really think a subject you're written about should meet the above guidelines but you don't have time to fight it, don't be afraid to request that the article be moved to your WP:userspace so you can work on it at your own pace. —CodeHydro 18:29, 18 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hydro is right here - despite the above templates I'd be more than happy to help you out improving these others you've created, as I believe most can be easily expanded:

A couple of others may have notability issues but I can discuss those with you before taking any further action. Let me know what you think, Nik thestunned 12:38, 19 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your support, I will keep adding more and improving the existents. I would appreciate your help. Have a happy new year.

Done. Karlhard ^{(talk to me)} 19:23, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your experience with Wikipedia so far

Welcome to Wikipedia! I am conducting a quick survey about newcomer support and I would like to hear about your experience so far. Your response will go a long way to help us build a better experience for newcomers like yourself. The survey will take you around 10 minutes to complete.

To learn more about the study, visit this link: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Co-op

To take the survey, visit this link: https://syracuseuniversity.qualtrics.com/SE/?SID=SV_2bnPZz0HelBaY85

Thanks!

Gabrielm199 (talk) 03:55, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Karlhard ^{(talk to me)} 19:23, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A beer for you!

Hi, thanks for create that page [skull and Bones (band) ]. Please take a look at bio that I updated . And about the need of more links to integrate on wikipedia, how can we do that? Please help with that . Thank you very much. Carlossilva1971 (talk) 23:31, 17 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Bijoux 22

The article Bijoux 22 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NALBUMS

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Logical Cowboy (talk) 17:29, 7 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Forte Sounds

The article Forte Sounds has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Weakly sourced article fails WP:CORPDEPTH

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Logical Cowboy (talk) 17:40, 7 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of EastGate Pharmaceuticals for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article EastGate Pharmaceuticals is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/EastGate Pharmaceuticals (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Logical Cowboy (talk) 18:40, 7 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Bikini Luxe for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bikini Luxe is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bikini Luxe (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Logical Cowboy (talk) 01:55, 8 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of David Banks (American actor) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article David Banks (American actor) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Banks (American actor) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Boleyn (talk) 17:21, 8 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I was wondering why you would think (per your edit summary) that an article can't have both {{refimprove}} and {{notability}} tags. The shortcomings that the two tags flag can easily coexist. I might doubt the notability of a subject, even if I believe the subject exists. But suppose the article makes a lot of strong statements that are a bit suspicious and that really call for in-article references for support. I'm going to tag it for notability and also for improved referencing. —Largo Plazo (talk) 17:37, 8 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Bijoux 22 for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bijoux 22 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bijoux 22 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Logical Cowboy (talk) 11:33, 11 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Impulcity for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Impulcity is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Impulcity until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Logical Cowboy (talk) 11:42, 11 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Forte Sounds

A tag has been placed on Forte Sounds requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Logical Cowboy (talk) 13:23, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

March 2015

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you use Wikipedia for soapboxing, promotion or advertising. The extent of your promotional editing is truly massive. Here are some of the warnings you deleted from your talk page. [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8]. Also, it is really obvious that several of your articles were commissioned on an external website for pay, by Bikiniluxeswim, Forexearly, etc. Logical Cowboy (talk) 13:47, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Logical Cowboy, I did not get paid for those articles nor any articles. I removed warnings because they got expired. What is your problem with me. --Karlhard (talk) 02:40, 15 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

What interested you in writing an article on Bikini Luxe? Do you buy your bathing suits there? It seems like a real coincidence that Bikiniluxeswim is advertising on another website for someone to write a promotional article, and there are you writing a promotional article for them. The exact same thing has happened with several of the promotional articles you have written. Logical Cowboy (talk) 03:04, 15 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Karlhard, your editing appears to be promotional, and with a suspected COI. Please refrain from personalising the suspicions concerning these edits. Care to answer the question put to you by Logical Cowboy? Widefox; talk 17:57, 29 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Do you have a connection with User:Harshul88 ? The Asian Entrepreneur was previously deleted and then recreated by you, and then edited by them. Have you disclosed any connections with this subject or other editors? Widefox; talk 18:07, 29 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ditto User:Ryjane re the promo article you created Joe Ciminera. I have marked that account and the article COI, and up for deletion. Widefox; talk 19:35, 29 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ditto User:Carlossilva1971 re promo Skull and Bones (band). Widefox; talk 10:01, 30 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ditto User:Fatkarl27 Uplike. Widefox; talk 18:48, 30 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of The Asian Entrepreneur

The article The Asian Entrepreneur has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

zero evidence for notability of this online magazine

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DGG ( talk ) 00:18, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Bikini Luxe logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Bikini Luxe logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 21:07, 22 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Karlhard/Satesh Singh

A tag has been placed on User:Karlhard/Satesh Singh, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. DGG ( talk ) 08:13, 25 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

IP edit

Was this you editing logged out? Everymorning talk 20:09, 25 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, sorry, forgot to log in. --Karlhard (talk) 20:11, 25 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

My Fairy Tales

Hello Karlhard,

I will address your concerns regarding this page within the next 7 days and edit accordingly. I do think, that the page is relevant as this is not the first album of this artist and she is well known and established all over Europe especially in France, Germany, Belgium, Poland etc.

All the best,

Lara Janssen — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lara Janssen (talk • contribs) 21:32, 25 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Late Night Tales presents After Dark: Nocturne

Hi - can you please explain why you've flagged this for deletion? The series is long running and both of Bill's previous releases have had no problems from other wiki members. It's a relatively new release so there isn't much press on it yet but you can see various sources that I've used for previous releases.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Late_Night_Tales_Presents_After_Dark:_Nightshift https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Late_Night_Tales_Presents_After_Dark

The label's main releases here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Late_Night_Tales

Thanks

Johnnybeverton (talk) 13:05, 26 March 2015 (UTC) johnnybeverton[reply]

Late Night Tales is the main release, which is why I am current nominating to Redirect those articles (which individually have no significance) to the main page. Including Nightshift, Nocturne and After Dark. If my proposed deletion got declined. --Karlhard (talk) 13:08, 26 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Late Night Tales is a record label, not a release - see the description on the main article. The three articles are separate releases on the label, another example of LNT presents is Tom Findlay (Groove Armada)'s Late Night Tales presents Automatic Soul. Johnnybeverton (talk) 13:22, 26 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

That being the case, the album for the only reason of being an album does not deserve a Wikipedia article. The albums that do not have enough references and do not establish the notability of the article are going to be proposed as an article for deletion. This may be WP:TOOSOON. Karlhard (talk) 13:25, 26 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

So the best course of action would be to wait until there are some notable press quotes about the release? They are forthcoming. Are you planning to go through every single release on the Late Night Tales page and propose deletion for articles that you don't see fit? Johnnybeverton (talk) 13:29, 26 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Here in Wikipedia we don't "wait until there is some press release", the contributors are there to create an article that is notable by itself and deserves an article. Yes, I am going to go through every single release and propose it to redirect to the main article (which is the label). Karlhard (talk) 02:44, 27 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Live from Patrick Street

Thank you for withdrawing your nomination of the subject article for deletion.
Please would you therefore remove the template, at your earliest convenience?
Thanking you in advance.
With kind regards;
Patrick. ツ Pdebee.^(talk) 15:09, 26 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

No need to do this now; it's since been closed by Gene93k. Patrick. ツ Pdebee.^(talk) 16:33, 26 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Tina Huang vs Twitter

I'm puzzled why you thought an editor's creation of an article on the above lawsuit was vandalism or a hoax. The lawsuit is quite real, a class action employment discrimination suit against Twitter recently filed in San Francisco. See, for example, this news story: http://www.businessinsider.com/ex-twitter-employee-tina-huang-sues-over-gender-discrimination-in-promotions-2015-3 --Pechmerle (talk) 09:10, 29 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of The Asian Entrepreneur for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Asian Entrepreneur is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Asian Entrepreneur until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Widefox; talk 18:35, 29 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Skull and Bones (band) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Skull and Bones (band) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Skull and Bones (band) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Widefox; talk 19:02, 29 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Joe Ciminera

The article Joe Ciminera has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

BLP fails WP:GNG. Film is also not notable and outside that are orphans.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Widefox; talk 20:04, 29 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Frank-Michael Preuss

The article Frank-Michael Preuss has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

n-n person. BLP with major source issues: sources are all press releases. (Creator is mass promo & COI editor)

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Widefox; talk 20:23, 29 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Stale Drafts

May I suggest you either submit your old drafts to AfC or delete them. One is a promo article deleted twice in mainspace. I've marked them as userpages in the mean time. Considering your promo account, I don't consider them as useful to have, and encourage anyone tag them for deletion to clear up the disruption here. Widefox; talk 20:46, 29 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

.livesport24.net

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you insert a spam link. Persistent spammers may have their websites blacklisted, preventing anyone from linking to them from all Wikimedia sites as well as potentially being penalized by search engines. [9]

See also WP:COI in case it might apply. --Ronz (talk) 17:55, 30 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note that after reviewing your editing further as well as the warnings you've received, I went ahead and reported it at WP:AIV. --Ronz (talk) 18:22, 30 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ronz Yes, you beat me to it. This editor has ignored our urgent questions above and continued to spam/abuse editing privilege. Without dialogue this account need blocking for prevention of this disruption. I will CSD the draft (spam) pages. Widefox; talk 18:32, 30 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Karlhard/The Forex Heatmap

A tag has been placed on User:Karlhard/The Forex Heatmap, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Widefox; talk 18:40, 30 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Karlhard/Emanuele Congeddu

A tag has been placed on User:Karlhard/Emanuele Congeddu, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Widefox; talk 18:40, 30 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Uplike

The article Uplike has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

non-notable - fails WP:CORPDEPTH (minor awards are two a penny nowadays)

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Widefox; talk 18:54, 30 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Karlhard/draft/Urban Artist Soap

A tag has been placed on User:Karlhard/draft/Urban Artist Soap, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which articles can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Widefox; talk 19:11, 30 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Karlhard/draft/David Banks (American actor)

A tag has been placed on User:Karlhard/draft/David Banks (American actor), requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which articles can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Widefox; talk 19:12, 30 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Karlhard/draft/Furvah

A tag has been placed on User:Karlhard/draft/Furvah, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which articles can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Widefox; talk 19:14, 30 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Karlhard/draft/Tim White

A tag has been placed on User:Karlhard/draft/Tim White, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which articles can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Widefox; talk 19:17, 30 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Urban Artist Soap for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Urban Artist Soap is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Urban Artist Soap until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Widefox; talk 19:42, 30 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Skull and Bones logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Skull and Bones logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 21:47, 13 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for abusing Wikipedia to promote your clients, violating the Terms of Use and repeated lying about the latter

Diffs for lying: [10][11]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or promotion. From your contributions, this seems to be your only purpose. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. MER-C 11:37, 17 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Impulcitylogo.png

The file File:Impulcitylogo.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 14 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Joe Ciminera.jpg

The file File:Joe Ciminera.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]