User talk:Kapitan110295/Archive. Tennis 1

Placement of w/o

I see you are moving "w/o" from winner to loser in tennis draws. Is that based on a guideline or what? It seems more natural to me to write it at the winner. PrimeHunter (talk) 04:08, 16 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I think w/o at winner is at least a Wikipedia convention although it may be an unwritten convention. If you want to change it then I suggest posting to Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Tennis or Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Tennis/Article Guidelines (I don't know how many are watching the latter). It's best if there is a consistent system in draw articles so I don't think you should make changes without discussion. I'm not sure what comparable sources do. Many sources only write the winners name in a draw after round 1 and then w/o has to be near the winner. A source like http://2010.usopen.org/en_US/scores/cmatch/12ws.html skirts the issue by writing Walkover between the names but we don't have that option with our table formatting.

The "v d e" links in {{Top Australian female doubles tennis players}} earlier lead to a redirect because the name parameter was not the actual template name. I have fixed this: [1][2]. Before the fix you could have clicked the "Edit" tab on a page where the template is used, and then clicked the template name on the list of transcluded templates at the bottom of the window. PrimeHunter (talk) 13:16, 16 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Number 1 Ranking

Please add references to the dates from the related ATP site. For example this for Roger Federer at July 6, 2009. Lajbi ^{Holla @ me • CP} 09:58, 26 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop creating qualify round pages

Qualifying tennis rounds belong on the appropriate singles/doubles pages...not in a separate article. Thanks. Fyunck(click) (talk) 00:05, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the note, and thanks for creating those qualifiers to begin with. Very tedious job that I don't like to do. Fyunck(click) (talk) 00:41, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Lazy?

I am not lazy, I just don't nor will ever do diacritics because of my severe disagreement with them used here on the English language Wikipedia.HotHat (talk) 10:20, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve 2006 Fed Cup Americas Zone Group I – Pool A

Hi, I'm Puffin. Kapitan110295, thanks for creating 2006 Fed Cup Americas Zone Group I – Pool A!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. This page has references, but no in-text citations. Puffin ^{Let's talk!} 00:15, 3 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Fed Cup

What the hell is wrong with what i did, can you kindly explain. Because if it is done do Davis Cup, why not Fed Cup. It doesn't mean that if it isn't way it is done before it isn't right. It is an improvement, giving more information to the readers. Dencod16 (talk) 10:33, 7 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Lol what is less information about it, it gives the detail on each ties. Fed Cup and Davis Cup follows the same structure, much like each slams are. And Yes i could imagine it being done. The idea came from this page 2012 Davis Cup Europe Zone Group III. Your infos gives questions to what are the results, who played who. Since there are inks already, why not just place the champions s and summary of resultin the likes of Hopman Cup and Davis Cup since you can just link them. Dencod16 (talk) 11:17, 7 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If you just said that what i made were duplicates, then you wouldn't have gotten any arguments from me. I didn't know that individual pages from each pools were already available made. Dencod16 (talk) 11:30, 7 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I only made them because i didn't know that details infos exist, that my only point. i didn't know. that's it. We were both wrong, me for not exploring it, as i didn't see they were links, and you for not just saying such details already exist. Dencod16 (talk) 11:40, 7 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Sport in Pörtschach

Category:Sport in Pörtschach, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Pichpich (talk) 17:39, 11 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]