User talk:Kanishk1zero1

Welcome!

Hello, Kanishk1zero1, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits to the page Satyarth Prakash did not conform to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may have been removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations verified in reliable, reputable print or online sources or in other reliable media. Always provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to The Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Introduction tutorial
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• Simplified Manual of Style
• Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need personal help ask me on my talk page, or . Again, welcome.  GirthSummit _(blether) 16:55, 29 January 2021 (UTC)

Adding to this, please see WP:RS in particular - the sources that you are adding are not reliable by Wikipedia standards. Also, some of your edits (example) can be considered outright vandalism. utcursch | talk 04:04, 30 January 2021 (UTC)

January 2021

Hello, I'm MrOllie. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Dayananda Saraswati, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. MrOllie (talk) 15:20, 30 January 2021 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. MrOllie (talk) 18:52, 30 January 2021 (UTC)

February 2021

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Varanasi. If you can't read references then don't complain about something being unreferenced. —SpacemanSpiff 13:51, 15 February 2021 (UTC)

March 2021

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for disruptive editing, not adhering to policies regarding sourcing, addition of POV.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  —SpacemanSpiff 11:43, 13 March 2021 (UTC)

On Vishvarupa page, edits by me were legit true Kanishk1zero1 (talk) 13:22, 13 March 2021 (UTC)