User talk:Kamal Afghan01

March 2023

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits such as on Lodi dynasty and Dilawar Khan appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you.Sutyarashi (talk) 09:00, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Also please don't remove cited content again, even if you don't agree with it as this is against Wikipedia's guidelines.Sutyarashi (talk)

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. HistoryofIran (talk) 16:35, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (March 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was:

We're sorry, but we cannot accept blank submissions. If in fact you did include text within the article, but it isn't showing, please make sure that any extra text above your entry is removed, as it may be causing it to hide and not be shown to the reviewer.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Kamal Afghan01/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 12:45, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Kamal Afghan01! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DoubleGrazing (talk) 12:45, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Pakhli Sarkar

The flag of Pakhli Sarkar is of safavids because that's Our parent kingdom , 2nd the official language was Persian not pashto . Gibari Sultan (talk) 15:55, 7 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Tell me the origin of the Safavid Dynasty? Safavid itself not a Persian Dynasty but a Kurdish origin so what is the link of Kurdish originated empire and Swatis tribe? The origin of Safavid itself is Disputed so how you put a Kurdish originated Empire flage into the Flage of a Sarkar? Pakhal is also a pashto word. Kamal Afghan01 (talk) 17:43, 7 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Persian Pakhli Sarkar

First go and read history Don't destroy Swatis history. Read babur Nama ,Our language was Gabari which is dialect of DARI Persian Gibari Sultan (talk) 15:56, 7 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Persian is nothing to do with Swatis. Gabri language is a Afro-Asiatic language not Dari and According to Cambridge press report research paper, Swatis is one of the official pashtun tribe that came from Afghanistan with in 13th century. The basic language of Swati is Pashto not Persian or Dari. The Swatis are mainly found in pashtun Heartland called pashtonistan like swat, Bajour, Mansehra etc. Blackwood's Edinburgh Magazine Volume 165 (page 810) mentioned the Swatis as Pathan. Kamal Afghan01 (talk) 17:39, 7 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Help Needed

salam brother, I hope you are doing well. I have submitted a draft Mughal Khel here on Wikipedia, which has not been accepted yet(It's been rejected once). As an experienced editor, I request your review and feedback on the article to improve its quality and meet Wikipedia's guidelines. I am open to constructive criticism and willing to make revisions as needed. Thank you for your time and assistance. 2400:ADCC:134:6C00:35A4:B3BC:EECB:759A (talk) 17:46, 19 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Battle of Akora

Battle of Akora Khattak is a Sikh victory. Sources like Hari Ram Gupta literally say that the Sayyid's force repullsed. Just because the Sikhs lost more men doesn't mean it's an Afghan victory. Ronnie Macroni (talk) 05:23, 30 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 30

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Khilji Tribe, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Afghan. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 30 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, a topic designated as contentious. This standard message is designed as an introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially-designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

Abecedare (talk) 18:40, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have provided all the references, and in all references, it was mentioned that Afghans successfully launched military attacks and inflicted many casualties on their enemies. The casualties of Sikhs were 10–14 times greater than those of Pashtuns. The camps were completely looted. I have provided all the references. Where's the issue? @Slatersteven should mention... Kamal Afghan01 (talk) 17:41, 3 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A case was made on the talk page that there is a different version of the events, that is where we discuss it. Slatersteven (talk) 11:37, 4 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Administrator note I noticed that at Battle of Akora Khattak you repeatedly reverted Slatersteven's edit without responding to their talk-page comments. Please discuss the issue at the article talk-page and reach a consensus instead of simply edit-warring to retain your edit. Continuation of the latter approach is likely to get you topic-banned from this area. Abecedare (talk) 18:44, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You did not read wp:editwar did you, try wp:brd and WP:ONUS. Slatersteven (talk) 17:34, 3 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Stop reverting without discussion, and make a case at talk. If you revert once more I will report you. Also read wp:minor, your latest revert was not a minor edit, it removed a tag. Slatersteven (talk) 10:01, 7 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Also read wp:or, as it seems the source you are edit warring to add back in does not even mention the battle. Slatersteven (talk) 10:12, 7 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Battle of Kandahar (1834)

Hello, Kamal Afghan01,

Thank you for creating Battle of Kandahar (1834).

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Please see questions on the article talk page.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Mccapra}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Mccapra (talk) 04:07, 4 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Removing "unreliable source" and other tags without addressing the issue

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 14:16, 18 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kamal, you have been previously warned about exactly this type of disruption. The next time you do this, you are likely to be topic-banned from the India-Pakistan-Afghanistan topic-area. Abecedare (talk) 14:26, 18 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Ponyo^{bons mots} 21:19, 18 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Also editing as Yousufzai033.-- Ponyo^{bons mots} 21:19, 18 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

UTRS appeal #74195

is closed. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 09:50, 31 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Battle of Kandahar (1834)

The article Battle of Kandahar (1834) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

There is already a page for this battle that is much more detailed and reliably sourced at Expedition of Shuja ul-Mulk

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Noorullah (talk) 19:22, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Battle of Herat (1719) (July 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Tutwakhamoe was:

Currently the article is too short to justify a stand alone article. If the content here can not be expanded (context, battle details, ramifications), consider merging it into other articles, such as the history of the groups involved, or the blp pages for one of the participant.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Battle of Herat (1719) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Tutwakhamoe (talk) 19:08, 9 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding User:Kamal Afghan01/sandbox

Hello, Kamal Afghan01. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that User:Kamal Afghan01/sandbox, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 13:02, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of User:Kamal Afghan01/sandbox

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. The page User:Kamal Afghan01/sandbox has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appeared to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, or you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:49, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Battle of Akora Khattak for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Battle of Akora Khattak is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Battle of Akora Khattak until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Slatersteven (talk) 16:27, 7 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]