User talk:Kai Phillips

Welcome!

Hi Kai Phillips! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing!

Login Name

If 'Kai Phillips' is your real name, you might want to consider a login ID on Wikipedia that is not your real name (e.g. LordPercyOfThePigLand if the Lord Dictator is a fan of Percy Pigs), and does not allow people to make trouble for you, especially if you are aged under 18. There are plenty of people on the Internet who do not have good intentions. Anything you do on Wikipedia will likely be public knowledge and searchable by Google forever Pmbma (talk) 00:38, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Airport Route Map

There was a discussion about 8 years ago on wikipedia about whether airport pages should have route maps. I can't find any trace of it, but seem to recall the conclusion was that route maps should not appear on airport pages because while the Airline/Destination tables were regularly updated, the route maps tended not to be because people were a little bit lazy (to add a new airport you need to find its coordinates, etc...) and thus wikipedia ended up with route maps that were not accurate. Furthermore, it was felt better not to have them at all than have significantly bad data. It is indeed a shame that that was the conclusion which was reached, but there are plenty of people on wikipedia who think that an airport shouldn't even include the Airline/Destination table because that is non-encyclopaedic and might be out of date. Yes, wikipedia has its own faction-based wars.... If you want the Southampton airport page to have a route map, you should probably stick something on the talk page for the airport (or even at WP:AIRPORT if you are super-ambitious !) and try to get consensus. Otherwise, expect random wiki-editors to delete your route map... Pmbma (talk) 12:39, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, thats annoying Kai Phillips (talk) 16:07, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I only did it because teesside airport had one, weird how that one is not been deleted. Kai Phillips (talk) 16:09, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your contributions to airline articles

Please refrain adding or changing content within aviation articles before making yourself more familiar with our content guidelines. You borderline started several edit wars which will lead to a fast block of your account. We have rules on what to add to articles and how it is supposed to look, e. g. as per consensus we do not use destination maps whatsoever and also do never state charter operators (only the main brand they are operating for - so its not TUI Group operated by Volotea, its simply TUI Airlines). Best regards. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:A61:1095:7801:1188:2E36:DE27:21AB (talk) 07:52, 28 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Kai Phillips

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Kai Phillips, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 21:11, 17 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

April 2021

Welcome, and thank you for your attempt to lighten up Wikipedia. However, this is an encyclopedia and articles are intended to be serious, so please don't make joke edits, as you did to Kai Phillips. Readers looking for accurate information will not find them amusing. If you'd like to experiment with editing, please use your sandbox instead, where you are given a certain degree of freedom in what you write. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 21:39, 17 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This is not false info, therefore its information. Kai Phillips (talk) 21:42, 17 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 6

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of TUI Airways destinations, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cork. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 6 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:04, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Southampton Airport

I just removed a large chunk of text that you added at Southampton Airport. Without references from reliable and verifiable sources (Wikipedia:Reliable sources & Wikipedia:Verifiability) what you have added is nothing more than original research (Wikipedia:No original research). Feel free to re-add the content with supporting references for all the facts added and points made. Do not add your own personal analysis. 10mmsocket (talk) 15:01, 18 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You did nothing about referencing it, so why add it all over again? --10mmsocket (talk) 10:05, 21 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:50, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]