User talk:Kadhaasuntold

Nomination of Vishnu Venu for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Vishnu Venu is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vishnu Venu until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Monhiroe (talk) 07:04, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Monhiroe,

The page "Vishnu Venu" is about a Nationally acclaimed person from India who made movies that won National Awards and State awards. Please do the Undo/Undeletion process of the same page and we can improve the page with more details with the help of lots of articles about the same person. Please don't assume and don't do this prejudice activities and that may lead to make people to hate this platform.

I hope you can Undertsand..

Regards,

Kadhaas Kadhaasuntold (talk) 11:32, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You are not allowed to blank an AFD. Do not do it again. -- Whpq (talk) 12:31, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, and thankyou Whqp. Please help me to improve the page of Vishnu Venu Kadhaasuntold (talk) 14:12, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Vishnu Venu

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Vishnu Venu requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, such as at Articles for deletion. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. 2A00:23EE:1510:6CAE:C0A5:6BFF:FEDF:5D04 (talk) 13:31, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have declined the speedy deletion. G4 doe snot apply to articles that were deleted as "soft delete". -- Whpq (talk) 13:36, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I too declined the deletion process.

https://g.co/kgs/jPXHvS

Above link is the Knowledge panel of Vishnu Venu, and anybody can see hundreds of articles and Newses about 'Vishnu Venu'. Please check the above link and contribute more. Kadhaasuntold (talk) 14:09, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your Google search linked above is not sufficient to determine notability as it is defined on the English-language Wikipedia. If English isn't your first language, you may find it easier to work on the Wiki that is your primary language; also, the English-language wiki has a different set of policies than other language Wikis. This is a good essay about what is required on this site. Good luck! - UtherSRG (talk) 15:54, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Vishnu Venu for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Vishnu Venu is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vishnu Venu (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

UtherSRG (talk) 15:57, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

July 2023

Welcome to Wikipedia. Because we have a policy against usernames which give the impression that the account represents a group, club, organization, company, or website, I have blocked this account from editing. You are welcome to continue editing after you have chosen a new username that complies with Wikipedia's username policy.

You should also read our conflict of interest guideline and be aware that promotional editing is not acceptable, regardless of the username that you choose. Additionally, if your contributions to Wikipedia form all or part of work for which you are, or expect to be, paid or compensated in any way, you must disclose who is paying you to edit here.

Please take a moment to either create a new account, or request a username change of your current account here. The new username that you choose must represent you as an individual person, and it must comply with Wikipedia's username policy.

To create a new account with a different username, simply log out of this account and then click here to make a new one.
If you prefer to change the username on this account, you may do so by adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock-un|new username|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Please note that the new username you choose cannot already be taken or in use by another account. You can go here to search and see if the username you'd like to choose is available. If the search returns that no global account with that username exists, that means it is available to be taken.

Please also note that you are permitted to use a username that contains the name of a company or organization if it also identifies you individually, such as "Sara Smith at XYZ Company", "Mark at WidgetsUSA", or "FoobarFan87", but not "SEO Manager at XYZ Company".

Appeals: If your username does not represent a group, organization, website, or other entity described above, and if you believe that this block was incorrect or made in error, you may appeal this block by adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Thank you. Whpq (talk) 19:14, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I see a lot of "Produced by Vishnu Venu under the banner Kadhaas Untold" when looking for sources for "Vishnu Venu". See below for the notice about paid editing. -- Whpq (talk) 19:15, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Kadhaasuntold. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to Vishnu Venu, gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Kadhaasuntold. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Kadhaasuntold|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Whpq (talk) 19:16, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not a paid editor. Just contributing for adding information regarding cinema field and about people working in South Indian Cinema industry! Kadhaasuntold (talk) 11:12, 4 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Are you Vishnu Venu? Are you employed by Venu or by his production company Kadhaas Untold? - UtherSRG (talk) 19:27, 4 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]