User talk:KTnow

Welcome!

Hello, KTnow, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Below are some pages you might find helpful. For a user-friendly interactive help forum see the Wikipedia Teahouse.

Introduction
The five pillars of Wikipedia
How to edit a page
How to write a great article
Simplified Manual of Style
Your first article
Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community
Feel free to make test edits in the sandbox
and check out the Task Center, for ideas about what to work on.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on my talk page or place {{Help me}} on this page and someone will drop by to help. Again, welcome! Burrobert (talk) 15:09, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks @Burrobert – yes I read a bunch of these articles and guides already when I first registered. I might have to go back to them though, it's quite a lot to ingest! I didn't know about the tildes, thanks for pointing that out. And I'd missed the sandbox, that will be very handy.

On the task center, yes I've had a look at the suggestions there but some of the suggested articles felt very far from my expertise. Initially at least, I feel more comfortable editing articles which are in line with my areas of knowledge. I know about think tanks and UK public policy (I used to work in that sector), and also European and Middle Eastern history (through studies and personal interest). So those were the kind of articles I'm looking for. I noticed a few articles already which were out of date, which is actually what prompted me to register.

Thanks for taking the time, I appreciate it! KTnow (talk) 12:55, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

In case you missed it, I posted a link to a tutorial on the Chatham House page in response to your enquiry. Hope it helps. Burrobert (talk) 13:00, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Perfect – will have a look when I get a mo. Thank you, appreciated. KTnow (talk) 13:41, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Noor Abdulmajeed

Article created in 2016 and has existed without references since then (aside from social media accounts like FB, Twitter). Article should probably be AFDed. 69.117.172.84 (talk) 01:00, 12 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Are you suggesting I should have a look at updating this page? KTnow (talk) 22:11, 12 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No. I am thinking it should be AFDed as it has been unsourced since 2016 and the only remotely reliable reflinks I was able to find via Google search were this one and this one but perhaps I missed something. I brought this to your attention as you are on the WikiProject Biography team. Yours. 65.88.88.56 (talk) 23:32, 14 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for bringing it to my attention. I'd be happy to have a look at it over the break. One last thing – would you mind spelling out what 'AFded' means? Still learning all the terms! KTnow (talk) 11:30, 18 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AFD means Articles for Deletion. 65.88.88.56 (talk) 23:15, 20 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Asthma + Lung UK moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Asthma + Lung UK. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 14:12, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. I'm still working on it! KTnow (talk) 15:19, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please see WP:THREE and WP:NCORP. It has the notability requirements listed for organizations. Happy editing <3 Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 16:12, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you @Jeraxmoira. I've updated the draft article, I'm done (for today, at least). My starting point was that articles on Asthma UK and the British Lung Foundation already existed, i.e. they had both passed the notability test in the past. This felt like a reasonable indicator that Asthma + Lung UK – which is the product of a merger between these two organisations – would likely be notable enough for a page.

In addition to this, I feel that the organisation's recent influence of government policy by shaping the parliamentary debate should be enough. Happy to discuss this, however!

The alternative, though, is either to leave two out-of-date articles (in that these organisations are now both defunct). Or to delete them. I wouldn't feel comfortable recommending to delete Asthma UK in particular, given the influence it has had historically in getting asthma recognised as an issue across society. I'm open to advice though :-) KTnow (talk) 19:00, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Notability cannot be inherited WP:INHERITORG. However, in the case of Asthma and Lung UK merging, then I would advise you to make a merge request here WP:PROPMERGE. If you are not familiar with making a merge request, then I would advise you to ask for help at the Wikipedia:Teahouse. Articles about notable companies/organizations will not be deleted even if they become defunct. Based on my assessment, merging the article and adding the latest content to the merged article is the way to go. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 19:38, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Jeraxmoira, I've finally found some time to look into this. I've now performed the merger, with the assistance of a few other editors. I've (hopefully) addressed the issues you had tagged the article with – i.e. I've sourced references from third-party publications where possible, and have made the tone more neutral. (I agree that some of my initial copy did probably sound too 'marketing-y', though this was to justify notability – it's a delicate balance!) Can you take a look at Asthma + Lung UK? And, if you're satisfied that these issues have been addressed, maybe remove the tags? Or happy to discuss if you think it still needs work. KTnow (talk) 12:01, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 20

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Matt Chorley, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Broadcaster. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 06:17, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That's ok, thanks for flagging. Noted! KTnow (talk) 11:27, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Chris Stark (climate expert) (July 13)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by SafariScribe were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Chris Stark (climate expert) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 15:26, 13 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, KTnow! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 15:26, 13 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Chris Stark (climate expert) has been accepted

Chris Stark (climate expert), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 19:15, 7 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]