User talk:K18s/Archive 2
 | This is an archive of past discussions about User:K18s. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 | Archive 2 |
August 2016
Hello, I'm Oshwah. I noticed that in this edit to Pellucid marginal degeneration, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 23:14, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
- Okay. you were too fast and I was going to edit it... k18s (talk) 23:17, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
Are you associated with them? And if so do you think they would be willing to consider moving to an open license? Currently they are not [1] Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 06:51, 6 November 2016 (UTC)
- James, I am not. I contacted them a while ago for permission to use their images, but I did not received any response. I will write again. their email is eyewiki@aao.org if you would like to try too. k18s (talk) 14:31, 6 November 2016 (UTC)
November 2016
Thank you for your contributions. It seems that you may have added public domain content to one or more Wikipedia articles, such as Corneal collagen cross-linking. You are welcome to import appropriate public domain content to articles, but in order to meet the Wikipedia guideline on plagiarism, such content must be fully attributed. This requires not only acknowledging the source, but acknowledging that the source is copied. There are several methods to do this described at Wikipedia:Plagiarism#Public-domain sources, including the usage of an attribution template. Please make sure that any public domain content you have already imported is fully attributed. Thank you. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 12:51, 7 November 2016 (UTC)
- User:Diannaa I do not think this[2] is in the public domain. It is produced by Avedro, Inc. and approved by the US government. It is not written by the US government directly. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 13:18, 7 November 2016 (UTC)
- I was going by the website's copyright page. I see what you mean though. Does it have to be removed as copyvio? — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 13:22, 7 November 2016 (UTC)
- That website says "Government information at NLM Web sites is in the public domain." with the key being government". I think that stuff counts as non government information. I have paraphrased some of it so I think we are okay. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 14:24, 7 November 2016 (UTC)
- Thanks James and Diannaa. I shouldn't have used that without any change. k18s (talk) 04:16, 8 November 2016 (UTC)
- That website says "Government information at NLM Web sites is in the public domain." with the key being government". I think that stuff counts as non government information. I have paraphrased some of it so I think we are okay. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 14:24, 7 November 2016 (UTC)
- I was going by the website's copyright page. I see what you mean though. Does it have to be removed as copyvio? — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 13:22, 7 November 2016 (UTC)
- User:Diannaa I do not think this[2] is in the public domain. It is produced by Avedro, Inc. and approved by the US government. It is not written by the US government directly. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 13:18, 7 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
Hello, K18s. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Rare Disease Day Logo.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Rare Disease Day Logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. — kashmiri TALK 12:33, 20 April 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
Hello, K18s. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Nomination of EyeWiki for deletion
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/EyeWiki until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.