User talk:Justwanaedit
Hi Justwanaedit, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like it here and decide to stay. Our intro page provides helpful information for new users—please check it out! If you have any questions, you can get help from experienced editors at the Teahouse. Happy editing! ~EdGl talk 22:17, 12 December 2020 (UTC)
October 2024
[edit]Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Science. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.
- If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
- If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Remsense ‥ 论 02:15, 30 October 2024 (UTC)
- I explained my edit in the summary that science isn’t limited to this world so I would like to know how it is you find my edit disruptive? If anything you’re being disruptive by preventing me from improving the article. I most certainly didn’t deserve the snide remark. Justwanaedit (talk) 03:04, 30 October 2024 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing.
- If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
- If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Science, you may be blocked from editing. Frost 12:27, 30 October 2024 (UTC)
- I was merely doing what is required of me in my pursuit of a third opinion, as follows.
- Be sure to provide a notification of your request on the page where the dispute is occurring. Justwanaedit (talk) 12:43, 30 October 2024 (UTC)
October 2024 block
[edit]{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. Valereee (talk) 14:39, 30 October 2024 (UTC)- I was merely following instructions, but it doesn't matter. The edit I initiated was handled by another user who agreed with me. What's more I wasn't warring with anyone the user Remsense was keeping me from improving the page so I sought out another avenue. All my activity was done within the scope of the user agreement. Justwanaedit (talk) 14:53, 30 October 2024 (UTC)
- Hi. The reverts done by users have a reason why they have reverted your edit. If a user reverts your edit it does not necessarily mean that they are trying to prohibit your editing. did you look at the edit summaries of the reverts? Thanks, ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°) Cooldudeseven7 join in on the tea talk 17:55, 30 October 2024 (UTC)
- Another thing to add on to my comment- If your edit seems controversial you might want to first go to consensus before performing the edit. Thanks, ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°) Cooldudeseven7 join in on the tea talk 17:56, 30 October 2024 (UTC)