Jump to content

User talk:JustBerry/Archive 9

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 5←Archive 7Archive 8Archive 9Archive 10

AWB: Continued Discussion/Follow-up by JustBerry

@BU Rob13: @Samwalton9: @Koavf: @Enterprisey: To those that have previously demonstrated concern (involved in the discussion above), in addition to the replacing Trump's article photos with the official photo (which BU Rob13 gave me the okay and perform per RfC consensus referenced at WP:BTR), I have performed a series of AWB edits from January 24, 2017 2:51-3:00 (see Special:Contributions/JustBerry). What do you think? --JustBerry (talk) 15:09, 24 January 2017 (UTC)

Samwalton9 mentioned that the edits look fine to him from "a quick glance." I'll wait for a few more replies before proceeding with making AWB edits. --JustBerry (talk) 15:28, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
Looks fine.~ Rob13Talk 15:51, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
@BU Rob13: Thanks. On IRC btw? Have a semi-lengthy technical thing I'm trying to figure out. --JustBerry (talk) 15:52, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
On mobile currently, so no IRC. ~ Rob13Talk 15:54, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
@BU Rob13: Ah, okay. --JustBerry (talk) 15:55, 24 January 2017 (UTC)

New Page Reviewer

Hello JustBerry. Your account has been added to the "New page reviewers" user group, allowing you to review new pages and mark them as patrolled, tag them for maintenance issues, or in some cases, tag them for deletion. The list of articles awaiting review is located at the New Pages Feed. New page reviewing is a vital function for policing the quality of the encylopedia, if you have not already done so, you must read the new tutorial at New Pages Review, the linked guides and essays, and fully understand the various deletion criteria. If you need more help or wish to discuss the process, please join or start a thread at page reviewer talk.

  • URGENT: Please consider helping get the huge backlog (around 15,000 pages) down to a manageable number of pages as soon as possible.
  • Be nice to new users - they are often not aware of doing anything wrong.
  • You will frequently be asked by users to explain why their page is being deleted - be formal and polite in your approach to them too, even if they are not.
  • Don't review a page if you are not sure what to do. Just leave it for another reviewer.
  • Remember that quality is quintessential to good patrolling. Take your time to patrol each article, there is no rush. Use the message feature and offer basic advice.

The reviewer right does not change your status or how you can edit articles. If you no longer want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. In case of abuse or persistent inaccuracy of reviewing, the right can be revoked at any time by an administrator. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 10:48, 24 January 2017 (UTC)

@Kudpung: Thanks again! I actually archived the initial notice you left on my talk page (identical to this one). Should I leave this up? Or, did you happen to give me another one because you thought you had forgotten before? --JustBerry (talk) 01:30, 25 January 2017 (UTC)
I was checking upon the recent additions to the user group and because I could not see the message on your talk page I thought the script had malfunctioned. Of course you can delete it. I do hope that you will be able to do some work on the huge backlog. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 01:56, 25 January 2017 (UTC)
@Kudpung: No rush to remove it, I just removed it before for organization purposes. As far as the backlog goes, though, I have certainly been chipping away at it. Are you on IRC? --JustBerry (talk) 01:58, 25 January 2017 (UTC)
I never use IRC except for testing it from time to time. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 02:04, 25 January 2017 (UTC)

Thanking me at WP:CHUS

I appreciate the wikilove, but can you please refrain from thanking me for (almost) every edit I make on WP:CHUS? It would greatly reduce the amount of redundant spam I get in my notifications. It also dilutes the weight of each "thank" you send me; one thank is better than fifty thanks. Thanks, —k6ka 🍁 (Talk · Contributions) 21:54, 27 January 2017 (UTC)

I suppose. The thanks was really to acknowledge my appreciation for renaming users that I had specifically checked over (not just random renames). --JustBerry (talk) 21:57, 27 January 2017 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
For doing a great job fighting vandals! ThePlatypusofDoom (talk) 00:16, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
@ThePlatypusofDoom: Thank you! --JustBerry (talk) 00:18, 1 February 2017 (UTC)

Message from Editorsproof

Hi, JustBerry.

WOWIE ZOWIE, WOWIE ZOWIE!!!!!!!!!!!! I can't believe you gave me a "Barnstar of Diligence"!!!!!!! That is so cool!!! Not to mention hilarious!!!

I needed BIG SMILES today, and I also really do appreciate the help you gave me along the bumpy road of trying to understand the intricacies of creating a WikiLand article!!!!!

Wishing you a superlative day! Editorsproof (talk) 18:22, 1 February 2017 (UTC)

@Editorsproof: My pleasure! Keep up the great work. --JustBerry (talk) 18:35, 1 February 2017 (UTC)

Question, and thanks

Just a question, could you please change my Editor of the Week thing to say WikiProject Equine, not the Horse racing one? Of my six GAs/one FA, only Naborr was a racehorse. The rest were show horses, their trainers, and the one major horse show. I sort of hate to ask, but I'm afraid if I changed it myself it'd look like I'm trying to say I did things I didn't. I do participate in the racing project, but not as much as the equine one (the horse racing project deals with only horse races, racehorses, people who train racehorses, and jockeys; the equine one deals with all other types of horse activity, breeds, gear, horses in the Olympics, etc.) Thanks for putting me in the Hall of Fame! I'm very excited about it! ☺😆😃😄 White Arabian Filly Neigh 23:09, 1 February 2017 (UTC)

@White Arabian Filly: Not a problem! I have made the change. You may need to purge the pages which display the infobox for the updated template to appear. --JustBerry (talk) 23:12, 1 February 2017 (UTC)

New Page Review - newsletter No.2

Hello JustBerry,
A HUGE backlog

We now have 804 New Page Reviewers!
Most of us requested the user right at PERM, expressing a wish to be able to do something about the huge backlog, but the chart on the right does not demonstrate any changes to the pre-user-right levels of October.

Hitting 17,000 soon

The backlog is still steadily growing at a rate of 150 a day or 4,650 a month. Only 20 reviews a day by each reviewer over the next few days would bring the backlog down to a managable level and the daily input can then be processed by each reviewer doing only 2 or 3 reviews a day - that's about 5 minutes work!
It didn't work in time to relax for the Xmas/New Year holidays. Let's see if we can achieve our goal before Easter, otherwise by Thanksgiving it will be closer to 70,000.

Second set of eyes

Remember that we are the only guardians of quality of new articles, we alone have to ensure that pages are being correctly tagged by non-Reviewer patrollers and that new authors are not being bitten.

Abuse

This is even more important and extra vigilance is required considering Orangemoody, and

  1. this very recent case of paid advertising by a Reviewer resulting in a community ban.
  2. this case in January of paid advertising by a Reviewer, also resulting in a community ban.
  3. This Reviewer is indefinitely blocked for sockpuppetry.

Coordinator election

Kudpung is stepping down after 6 years as unofficial coordinator of New Page Patrolling/Reviewing. There is enough work for two people and two coords are now required. Details are at NPR Coordinators; nominate someone or nominate yourself. Date for the actual suffrage will be published later.

Discuss this newsletter here. If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the mailing list MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:11, 5 February 2017 (UTC)

Notice

Please see Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard#Arbitration motion regarding JustBerry regarding your request to lift your one-account restriction. Regards, Mkdw talk 17:34, 7 February 2017 (UTC)

@Mkdw: Thank you! I saw your ping yesterday. About an hour after you pinged me onwiki, your client logged off #wikipedia-en not even 1 second after I joined (legitimately one second). Hope to chat with you some other time. --JustBerry (talk) 01:30, 8 February 2017 (UTC)

Message from Bubblefett

why did u edit my last item, why do uedit everything i do? its nt over...yet — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bubblefett (talk • contribs)

@Bubblefett: Are you referring to this? After seeing your edit here, I am questioning your intentions, even though I do generally assume good faith in other editors. The previous edit was unreferenced, placed on a category page (rather than an article), and out of context. If you want to edit Wikipedia constructively, I am happy to help, but I'm not so convinced that that is the case, unfortunately. --JustBerry (talk) 15:18, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
ya know that all those big words mean nothing...and u dont rule wikipedia, im just having fun, and ur not my parent at all, ill stp, but if i stop, u have to look at and read all of my page, plus id didnt know where to type my earlier comment. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bubblefett (talk • contribs) 15:55, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
User:Bubblefett - Talk page stalker here. If your edit has no straightforward good-faith explanation and has the straightforward bad-faith explanation, it is not a good idea to ask why another editor was checking it. Robert McClenon (talk) 15:58, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
ill talk later but i tried to put in the OFFICIAL nuka quantum page as a link so ok look at my page and ill be happy :)
(and i used cite your sources, <ref> so it WAS valid) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bubblefett (talk • contribs) 16:01, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
to that guy u were talking about just berry....tried to correctme and said the same thing u said, so im tired of hearing it and why did u link me to him?
2 more things, r u robert mclenon justberry? and STOP LECTURING ME!!
and ill ask all the editors in the world why they were checking it, ill do it sooo much that the world will be sooo fuL OF THOSE QUESTIONS, THAT ITLL EXPLODE!!!!!
pant...pant...pant...phew, ie had a bad day, just give me that plz, AND LOOK AT MY PAGE!!!thats all...phew.....sigh.... I need mental help, andfriends ;(----------- (crying emoji) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bubblefett (talk • contribs)

Sterilized by cupcake

You think Sterilized by cupcake (talk · contribs) is Cynulliad? Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 01:51, 31 January 2017 (UTC)

@Flyer22 Reborn: Perhaps, but which diffs are you referring to specifically? Also, I have tagged one of the socks here per the rationale in my diff's edit summary (confirmation indicated at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Motivação/Archive). Other socks of that master seem to be already tagged. Analyzing the editor interaction between Sterilized by cupcake (talk · contribs) and Cynulliad in terms of the number of contributions made to mutually edited articles, though, the evidence doesn't seem overwhelming (although suggestive/suspicion-provoking). Any pairs of diffs you may have to demonstrate precise behavioral comparison would be helpful. Also, please be careful in wikilinking a user's userpage, as the linking can ping them. Please use Template:noping, Template:noping, etc. instead. I have already replaced this talk page section's heading and your initial message accordingly to remove any potential pings. --JustBerry (talk) 02:25, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
Looking at Sterilized by cupcake, it is highly likely that he is Cynulliad. I don't have any diff to point to in order to make a really strong case. I decided to ask your opinion. I don't see the pinging as a problem since it gives the editor a chance to defend himself, but I understand not wanting any unnecessary drama. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 03:10, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
@Flyer22 Reborn: What specifically makes you think that this is highly likely (if not pairs of diffs)? To make a worthwhile SPI case, some analysis, whether that be through diffs or an alternate extensive examination at other characteristics/editing patterns, would be needed. As far as the ping goes, it's often best to not ping a user you highly suspect of socking (as you mentioned), as their creation of multiple socks in the past suggests their possible seeking of attention. In such cases, it's often best to WP:DENY. --JustBerry (talk) 03:13, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
I am very good at recognizing editing patterns, even when an editor tries to disguise their editing pattern. In this case, the editing pattern is the same. This is seen, for example, when comparing edits and edit summaries such as this and this one. The interests are the same, and this includes what Sterilized by cupcake states on his user page. And creation of the Sterilized by cupcake account came right after the Sheila Ki Jawani (talk · contribs) account was indefinitely blocked. As for pinging an editor I suspect as a sock, it's worked for me in the past because it trips the sock up in ways I can't begin to explain. All that stated, GeneralizationsAreBad has more experience with identifying this particular sock. So it would be good to get his opinion. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 03:30, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
@Flyer22 Reborn: Sounds good. GAB seems to have seen this conversation (per their changing my recent tagging). I have left GAB a message here. Let's see what xe has to say without any further ado. --JustBerry (talk) 03:38, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
From what I'm seeing, there actually is a strong enough case to support the belief that Sterilized by cupcake is Cynulliad, but I'll leave this to GeneralizationsAreBad. And, yeah, I do think that the Cynulliad account should be blocked or at least tagged as a suspected sock. Cynulliad is clearly Cynulliad2 and so on. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 04:01, 31 January 2017 (UTC)

@Flyer22 Reborn: Regarding the tagging, kindly see GAB's note here. Also, to clarify, Cynulliad is not CU-confirmed to Cynulliad2, but proven per behavioral analysis. --JustBerry (talk) 04:03, 31 January 2017 (UTC)

I disagree with him in this case since Cynulliad is the master account and is clearly Cynulliad2 and so on. It makes no sense to me to allow this account to remain unblocked. I know that the Cynulliad account is not CU-confirmed; this doesn't stop the fact that the account should be blocked. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 04:12, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
@Flyer22 Reborn: In that case, you may want to consider reaching out to GeneralizationsAreBad directly. --JustBerry (talk) 04:13, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
Nah, GeneralizationsAreBad is aware of my feelings after having read this section. And it was Bbb23 who decided not to block the Cynulliad account. I could pursue having the account blocked, but I don't feel strongly about this sock to do so. Besides, I'm sure an administrator will block that account one day. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 04:20, 31 January 2017 (UTC)

@bubblefett: how can you get sterilized by a cupcake?, and in the source it says a user was indefinatly blocked, what does that mean? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bubblefett (talk • contribs) 15:46, 1 February 2017 (UTC)

After I logged off two days ago, I saw that Neonorange and Anna Frodesiak also discussed this. Neonorange also easily recognized Cynulliad. Anna Frodesiak tried to give Cynulliad a chance to reform, but ultimately ended up indefinitely blocking the Sterilized by cupcake account. From now on, though, I will ignore Cynulliad when I see him...unless it's necessary not to ignore him. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 21:54, 2 February 2017 (UTC)

A question

I was just wondering, I saw that my user page was deleted. For what reasons was it deleted? I would like to know so that I can improve it to Wikipedia's standards. Timeflow X (talk) 08:08, 1 February 2017 (UTC)

@Timeflow X: Your user page had been deleted for "misuse of Wikipedia as a web host" by RHaworth. I do not remember the exact content of your page. However, the article section "What may I have in my user pages?" may help address some of your questions. --JustBerry (talk) 18:45, 1 February 2017 (UTC)

I have unreviewed a page you curated

Thanks for reviewing Lindokuhle Modi, JustBerry.

Unfortunately Fabrictramp has just gone over this page again and unreviewed it. Their note is:

None of the sources are legit, and the article was already deleted via afd.

To reply, leave a comment on Fabrictramp's talk page.

Fabrictramp | talk to me 21:50, 5 February 2017 (UTC)

@Fabrictramp: Wasn't there a CSD on the page? That's probably the circumstances under which I reviewed the page. --JustBerry (talk) 19:54, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
There was a CSD. The problem with marking it reviewed is the page becomes searchable on Google. Not a huge deal, just better to leave those as unreviewed.--Fabrictramp | talk to me 02:21, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
@Fabrictramp: By default, Twinkle marks CSD pages as reviewed. As a result, many other editors are doing this similarly. This may need to be a point of discussion at Twinkle's talk page. --JustBerry (talk) 02:35, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
Agreed. It's something of a pain in the butt when I use Twinkle. I'm sure it's a widespread issue. :( Cheers!--Fabrictramp | talk to me 17:22, 7 February 2017 (UTC)

Invitation.

Hello JustBerry,

I have noted, that you have contributed to the good Wikipedia article Courage, therefore, as a participant of the WikiProject Wikipedia Awards, I’m inviting you to have a look at the page Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Wikipedia Awards https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Wikipedia_Awards.

As this project currently regarded as semi-active, and not visited by many Wikipedians, it makes sense to invite Editors, who contributed right to the field, for which new Barnstar have been created.

The Editor Dennis Pietras offered the idea to create the Bravery Barnstar, and I did my best to help with design of this, as I think much needed Barnstar; thus if you will appreciate both, the idea and the design, please, let other Editors know about that by writing words of support. Regards.Chris Oxford (talk) 21:52, 12 February 2017 (UTC)

@Chris Oxford: Thanks for the invitation, even though the most recent edit I made to Courage seems to be a passing one. Speaking of awards, though, I have been involved in coordinating the Editor of the Week Award. Perhaps there might be an area where the two projects can collaborate? --JustBerry (talk) 02:31, 13 February 2017 (UTC)

@JustBerry That is very interesting idea, I think that it possible, and it will be good to know how do you see the ways of collaboration of these two projects. Regards, Chris Oxford.Chris Oxford (talk) 13:28, 13 February 2017 (UTC)

@Chris Oxford: Surely. I'll have to sleep on it, but certainly keep in touch! I can introduce you to the other project coordinators if you'd be interested in such exploring potential collaboration. --JustBerry (talk) 23:34, 13 February 2017 (UTC)


@ JustBerry Thank you very much for your willingness to introduce me to other coordinators of the Editor of the Week Award Project: in the abstract any joint efforts can bring positive results, but, usually someone who has been introduced with the purpose to benefit a project, should have the clear idea and plan how to do it, that is why I asked you how the collaboration, which you are offering, can work practically, because personally I can’t see the ways of the non theoretical realizations of this idea: these two projects pursue quite dissimilar goals and WikiProject Wikipedia Awards simply designed to offer idea/design of the Barnstars, which could be awarded to appreciate the contributions of Editors to the coverage of different subjects on Wikipedia. Thus, I simply can’t figure out exact answer on their question: “What idea do you want to offer to benefit both projects?” So, if someone of coordinators from the Editor of the Week Award Project will have a concrete actions plan, they are always welcome to let me know on my talk page. Regards, Chris Oxford.Chris Oxford (talk) 22:03, 15 February 2017 (UTC)

New Page Review-Patrolling: Coordinator elections

Your last chance to nominate yourself or any New Page Reviewer, See Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Coordination. Elections begin Monday 20 February 23:59 UTC. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:17, 19 February 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Kabirul1990/Kabirul Islam

A tag has been placed on User:Kabirul1990/Kabirul Islam requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free Web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. lNeverCry 01:26, 21 February 2017 (UTC)

New Page Review - newsletter No.3

Hello JustBerry,

Voting for coordinators has now begun HERE and will continue through/to 23:59 UTC Monday 06 March. Please be sure to vote. Any registered, confirmed editor can vote. Nominations are now closed.

Still a MASSIVE backlog

We now have 804 New Page Reviewers but despite numerous appeals for help, the backlog has NOT been significantly reduced.
If you asked for the New Page Reviewer right, please consider investing a bit of time - every little helps preventing spam and trash entering the mainspace and Google when the 'NO_INDEX' tags expire.

Discuss this newsletter here. If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the mailing list. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:35, 21 February 2017 (UTC)

Hello

Hello User:JustBerry please vote me on my page Shah Aqeeq Baba because this page is necessary for Pakistanis I'll pray for you and hope for the best and waiting for your reply thank you Hammadsaeed (talk) 05:59, 27 February 2017 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – March 2017

News and updates for administrators from the past month (February 2017).

Administrator changes

Amortias • Deckiller • BU Rob13
Ronnotel • Islander • Chamal N • Isomorphic • Keeper76 • Lord Voldemort • Shereth • Bdesham • Pjacobi

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

  • A recent query shows that only 16% of administrators on the English Wikipedia have enabled two-factor authentication. If you haven't already enabled it please consider doing so.
  • Cookie blocks should be deployed to the English Wikipedia soon. This will extend the current autoblock system by setting a cookie for each block, which will then autoblock the user after they switch accounts under a new IP.
  • A bot will now automatically place a protection template on protected pages when admins forget to do so.
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:14, 1 March 2017 (UTC)

RfC on the type of treemap

Hello JustBerry. There is a discussion going on about using which type of treemap for 2016 United States presidential election in each state articles. Please join the discussion, so the dispute can be resolved. Thank you. Ali 03:42, 7 March 2017 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – April 2017

News and updates for administrators from the past month (March 2017).

Administrator changes

added TheDJ
removed Xnuala • CJ • Oldelpaso • Berean Hunter • Jimbo Wales • Andrew c • Karanacs • Modemac • Scott

Guideline and policy news

  • Following a discussion on the backlog of unpatrolled files, consensus was found to create a new user right for autopatrolling file uploads. Implementation progress can be tracked on Phabricator.
  • The BLPPROD grandfather clause, which stated that unreferenced biographies of living persons were only eligible for proposed deletion if they were created after March 18, 2010, has been removed following an RfC.
  • An RfC has closed with consensus to allow proposed deletion of files. The implementation process is ongoing.
  • After an unsuccessful proposal to automatically grant IP block exemption, consensus was found to relax the criteria for granting the user right from needing it to wanting it.

Technical news

  • After a recent RfC, moved pages will soon be featured in a queue similar to Special:NewPagesFeed and require patrolling. Moves by administrators, page movers, and autopatrolled editors will be automatically marked as patrolled.
  • Cookie blocks have been deployed. This extends the current autoblock system by setting a cookie for each block, which will then autoblock the user if they switch accounts, even under a new IP.
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 10:54, 1 April 2017 (UTC)

Dispute Resolution Noticeboard Volunteer Roll Call

This is a volunteer roll call sent to you on behalf of the current Dispute Resolution Noticeboard Coordinator, Robert McClenon, and is being sent to you because you have listed yourself as a volunteer at DRN. If you remain interested in helping at DRN and are willing to actively do so by taking at least one case (and seeing it through) or helping with administrative matters at least once per calendar month, please add your name to the roll call list. Those who do not add their name on the roll call list will be removed from the principal volunteer list after May 31, 2017 unless the DRN Coordinator chooses to retain their name for the best interest of DRN or the encyclopedia. Individuals whose names are removed after May 31, 2017, should feel free to re-add their names to the principal volunteer list, but are respectfully requested not to do so unless they are willing to take part at DRN at least one time per month as noted above. No one is going to be monitoring to see if you live up to that commitment, but we respectfully ask that you either live up to it or remove your name from the principal volunteer list.

Best regards, TransporterMan (TALK) 21:54, 27 April 2017 (UTC) (Not watching this page)

Administrators' newsletter – May 2017

News and updates for administrators from the past month (April 2017).

Administrator changes

added Karanacs • Berean Hunter • GoldenRing • Dlohcierekim
removed Gdr • Tyrenius • JYolkowski • Longhair • Master Thief Garrett • Aaron Brenneman • Laser brain • JzG • Dragons flight

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

Miscellaneous

  • Following an RfC, the editing restrictions page is now split into a list of active restrictions and an archive of those that are old or on inactive accounts. Make sure to check both pages if searching for a restriction.
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:19, 2 May 2017 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – June 2017

News and updates for administrators from the past month (May 2017).

Administrator changes

added Doug Bell • Dennis Brown • Clpo13 • ONUnicorn
removed ThaddeusB • Yandman • Bjarki S • OldakQuill • Shyam • Jondel • Worm That Turned

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

Miscellaneous

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:40, 1 June 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Template:Acknowledged

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, Template:Acknowledged, was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 01:09, 5 June 2017 (UTC)

New Page Review - Newsletter No.4

Hello JustBerry,

Since rolling out the right in November, just 6 months ago, we now have 804 reviewers, but the backlog is still mysteriously growing fast. If every reviewer did just 55 reviews, the 22,000 backlog would be gone, in a flash, schwoop, just like that!

But do remember: Rather than speed, quality and depth of patrolling and the use of correct CSD criteria are essential to good reviewing. Do not over-tag. Make use of the message feature to let the creator know about your maintenance tags. See the tutorial again HERE. Get help HERE.

Stay up to date with recent new page developments and have your say, read THIS PAGE.

If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:43, 21 May 2017 (UTC)

Confused

I apologize that I do not understand your answer to my previous questionNewfocusnow (talk) 16:29, 6 July 2017 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – July 2017

News and updates for administrators from the past month (June 2017).

Administrator changes

added Happyme22 • Dragons flight
removed Zad68

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

Miscellaneous

  • A newly revamped database report can help identify users who may be eligible to be autopatrolled.
  • A potentially compromised account from 2001–2002 attempted to request resysop. Please practice appropriate account security by using a unique password for Wikipedia, and consider enabling two-factor authentication. Currently around 17% of admins have enabled 2FA, up from 16% in February 2017.
  • Did you know: On 29 June 2017, there were 1,261 administrators on the English Wikipedia – the exact number of administrators as there were ten years ago on 29 June 2007. Since that time, the English Wikipedia has grown from 1.85 million articles to over 5.43 million.
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:59, 6 July 2017 (UTC)

New Page Reviewer Newsletter

Hello JustBerry, thank you for your efforts reviewing new pages!

Backlog update:

  • The new page backlog is currently at 18,511 pages. We have worked hard to decrease from over 22,000, but more hard work is needed! Please consider reviewing even just a few pages a a day.
  • Some editors are committing to work specifically on patrolling new pages on 15 July. If you have not reviewed new pages in a while, this might be a good time to be involved. Please remember that quality of patrolling is more important than quantity, that the speedy deletion criteria should be followed strictly, and that ovetagging for minor issues should be avoided.

Technology update:

  • Several requests have been put into Phabractor to increase usability of the New Pages Feed and the Page Curation toolbar. For more details or to suggest improvements go to Wikipedia:Page Curation/Suggested improvements
  • The tutorial has been updated to include links to the following useful userscripts. If you were not aware of them, they could be useful in your efforts reviewing new pages:

General project update:

If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. TonyBallioni (talk) 03:48, 14 July 2017 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – August 2017

News and updates for administrators from the past month (July 2017).

Administrator changes

added Anarchyte • GeneralizationsAreBad • Cullen328 (first RfA to reach WP:300)
removed Cprompt • Rockpocket • Rambo's Revenge • Animum • TexasAndroid • Chuck SMITH • MikeLynch • Crazytales • Ad Orientem

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:11, 1 August 2017 (UTC)

New Page Reviewer Newsletter

Hello JustBerry, thank you for your efforts reviewing new pages!

Backlog update:

  • The new page backlog is currently at 16,991 pages. We have worked hard to decrease from over 22,000, but more hard work is needed! Please consider reviewing even just a few pages a a day.

Technology update:

  • Rentier has created a NPP browser in WMF Labs that allows you to search new unreviewed pages using keywords and categories.

General project update:

  • The Wikimedia Foundation Community Tech team is working with the community to implement the autoconfirmed article creation trial. The trial is currently set to start on 7 September 2017, pending final approval of the technical features.
  • Please remember to focus on the quality of review: correct tagging of articles and not tagbombing are important. Searching for potential copyright violations is also important, and it can be aided by Earwig's Copyvio Detector, which can be added to your toolbar for ease of use with this user script.
  • To keep up with the latest conversation on New Pages Patrol or to ask questions, you can go to Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Reviewers and add it to your watchlist.

If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. TonyBallioni (talk) 20:33, 24 August 2017 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – September 2017

News and updates for administrators from the past month (August 2017).

Administrator changes

added Nakon • Scott
removed Sverdrup • Thespian • Elockid • James086 • Ffirehorse • Celestianpower • Boing! said Zebedee

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

  • You will now get a notification when someone tries to log in to your account and fails. If they try from a device that has logged into your account before, you will be notified after five failed attempts. You can also set in your preferences to get an email when someone logs in to your account from a new device or IP address, which may be encouraged for admins and accounts with sensitive permissions.
  • Syntax highlighting is now available as a beta feature (more info). This may assist administrators and template editors when dealing with intricate syntax of high-risk templates and system messages.
  • In your notification preferences, you can now block specific users from pinging you. This functionality will soon be available for Special:EmailUser as well.

Arbitration

  • Applications for CheckUser and Oversight are being accepted by the Arbitration Committee until September 12. Community discussion of the candidates will begin on September 18.
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:35, 1 September 2017 (UTC)

New Page Reviewer Newsletter

Hello JustBerry, thank you for your efforts reviewing new pages!

Backlog update:

  • The new page backlog is currently at 14304 pages. We have worked hard to decrease from over 22,000, but more hard work is needed! Please consider reviewing even just a few pages a day.
  • Currently there are 532 pages in the backlog that were created by non-autoconfirmed users before WP:ACTRIAL. The NPP project is undertaking a drive to clear these pages from the backlog before they hit the 90 day Google index point. Please consider reviewing a few today!

Technology update:

  • The Wikimedia Foundation is currently working on creating a new filter for page curation that will allow new page patrollers to filter by extended confirmed status. For more information see: T175225

General project update:

  • On 14 September 2017 the English Wikipedia began the autoconfirmed article creation trial. For a six month period, creation of articles in the mainspace of the English Wikipedia will be restricted to users with autoconfirmed status. New users who attempt article creation will now be redirected to a newly designed landing page.
  • Before clicking on a reference or external link while reviewing a page, please be careful that the site looks trustworthy. If you have a question about the safety of clicking on a link, it is better not to click on it.
  • To keep up with the latest conversation on New Pages Patrol or to ask questions, you can go to Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Reviewers and add it to your watchlist.

If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. TonyBallioni (talk) 02:16, 19 September 2017 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Discussion in progress

Template:Discussion in progress has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 19:56, 27 September 2017 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – October 2017

News and updates for administrators from the past month (September 2017).

Administrator changes

added Boing! said Zebedee • Ansh666 • Ad Orientem
removed Tonywalton • AmiDaniel • Silence • BanyanTree • Magioladitis • Vanamonde93 • Mr.Z-man • Jdavidb • Jakec • Ram-Man • Yelyos • Kurt Shaped Box

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

Arbitration

  • Community consultation on the 2017 candidates for CheckUser and Oversight has concluded. The Arbitration Committee will appoint successful candidates by October 11.
  • A request for comment is open regarding the structure, rules, and procedures of the December 2017 Arbitration Committee election, and how to resolve any issues not covered by existing rules.
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:23, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:JustBerry/Archive_9&oldid=1140473179"