User talk:Julius503

Julius503, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Julius503! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Rosiestep (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:02, 4 February 2021 (UTC)

Welcome!

Hi Julius503! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing!

The beginning may be difficult, sorry about that. Mozart: while I completely agree with you point of view - I made the infoox for Beethoven - two things: when you are reverted, never revert back, that's edit-warring. To avoid that we have WP:BRD, - please read and ask if you have questions. Secondly: if you make an infobox, please follow the template instructions. On top: the common name, below: birth_name, other_names, to mention just one. When reverted - which will happen soon, and justified because of the warring - take it to the talk if you feel strongly about it, and listen to others. It has been debated (not without hurt feelings) over the years and is a mine field: please use civil language, which also goes for edit summaries. It may be a good idea to just drop that topic and contribute something less hot. Happy editing! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 12:17, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom notification

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in discussions about infoboxes and to edits adding, deleting, collapsing, or removing verifiable information from infoboxes. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

213.205.194.149 (talk) 13:55, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

April 2021

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, articles should not be moved, as you did to British Rail Class 373, without good reason. They should have a name that is both accurate and intuitive. Wikipedia has some guidelines in place to help with this. Generally, a page should only be moved to a new title if the current name doesn't follow these guidelines. Also, if a page move is being discussed, consensus needs to be reached before anybody moves the page. If you would like to experiment with page titles and moving, please use the test Wikipedia. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you.

I also reverted your move of British Rail Class 374. Please see Wikipedia talk:WikiProject UK Railways/Archive 20#Naming convention, this is an agreed naming convention which has been in place for over ten years; there are also the more specific discussions at Wikipedia talk:Naming conventions (British railway locomotive and multiple unit classes)#International trains and Talk:British Rail Class 373#Name of this article. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 09:10, 10 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

What a load of bullshit, how convenient that Brits gets to decide that the name used should be "British railway locomotive". This is nothing more than English wiki bias, as usual, and the pathetic nationalism from Brits, as usual. Julius503 (talk)

If you want to go against an agreed guideline, you should obtain consensus first; at the very least, start a move discussion on the talk pages of the articles concerned, or a central discussion at WT:TRAINS or WT:UKRAIL. But as for English wiki bias, this is the English Wikipedia, after all. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 12:05, 10 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I have to agree that the articles should be renamed (Julius503 can initiate a move request if they wish). The e320 is not a British train and it wasn’t made in Britain, and the WP:COMMONNAME for both trains is the e300/e320. SK2242 (talk) 19:08, 10 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I have initiated a move request for both Julius503 (talk) 08:34, 17 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not move a page to a title that is harder to follow, or move it unilaterally against naming conventions or consensus, as you did to Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine. This includes making page moves while a discussion remains underway. We have some guidelines to help with deciding what title is best for a subject. If you would like to experiment with page titles and moving, please use the test Wikipedia. The common name is used as Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine and a prior move discussion affirmed this. Please review talk pages prior to moving and in regards to this one specifically, open a new move discussion if you still want this move. -- Dane ^talk 06:38, 20 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

dj ti raj pejt ksn razred postreltJulius503 (talk) 18:10, 20 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Undiscussed page moves

Please do not move articles without discussion, and most certainly don't move pages twice without discussion. Acroterion (talk) 18:11, 20 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DS Alert

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in any gender-related dispute or controversy and associated people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

--Jorm (talk) 17:39, 10 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

May 2021

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Chad (slang), you may be blocked from editing. —valereee (talk) 20:10, 10 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please try to work collaboratively with other editors. Edit summaries like "What a fucking joke of an article" and "No shit you fucking petty nationalists" aren't helpful. I can see that you are trying to make constructive changes, but do not do this again. —valereee (talk) 20:15, 10 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 15

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Triumphal arch, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bavarian. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 15 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

June 2021

Hello. This is a message to let you know that you have made an edit summary, to STMicroelectronics that did not appear to be appropriate, civil or otherwise constructive, and it may have been removed. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Illrunwithyou (talk) 02:46, 18 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

October 2021

Hello. This is a message to let you know that you have made an edit summary, to Markus Persson that did not appear to be appropriate, civil or otherwise constructive, and it may have been removed. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Nixinova T C 20:11, 26 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

December 2021

Please refrain from making abusive or otherwise inappropriate edit summaries, as you did to Primark. Your edit summary may have been removed. Please look at pages regarding Civility and Personal attacks in your spare time. Thank you. Verbcatcher (talk) 23:12, 12 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A note about edit summaries

As you have no doubt seen before, there are quite a few folks who are concerned about your edit summaries and the rather inappropriate language you use to express your displeasure at the "mistakes" people make on Wikipedia. If you continue to use crass and harassing edit summaries, you will be blocked. Primefac (talk) 09:42, 3 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]