User talk:Julie Saeger Nierenberg

Welcome!

Hello, Julie Saeger Nierenberg, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially what you did for Bis-choline tetrathiomolybdate. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{Help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 19:46, 8 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Julie Saeger Nierenberg, you are invited to join other new editors and friendly hosts in the Teahouse. The Teahouse is an awesome place to meet people, ask questions and learn more about Wikipedia. Please join us!

Welcome, but be careful

Welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed your edits to Bis-choline tetrathiomolybdate and related articles. Here are suggested readings: WP:SECONDARY and WP:COI. The gist of these guidelines are:

Wikipedia prefers citations to reviews and books, not primary journal references (tens of thousands appear annually). Citing secondary sources is the encyclopedic style and it is essential for matters medical.
Do not cite yourself or your colleagues. It's called conflict of interest. Many new editors cite themselves or their colleagues mainly. That behavior is inappropriate.

If you have questions, many editors can offer advice. Happy editing. --Smokefoot (talk) 01:57, 13 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wilson's disease

I have previously moved your additions to the talk page because I was not convinced that they added much to what the article was already saying. You have not responded to this, instead simply adding the same stuff again. Please take a minute to read WP:MEDMOS and WP:MEDRS, which is consensus guidance on how we present medical science and how we select our references. However fascinating, we cannot say much more about molybdate treatment than that it is (still) considered experimental but has some supportive data. I'm afraid that you're going to need to convince me that what you're adding meets the MEDMOS/MEDRS criteria.

Rather than reinsert the same content, please respond to my post on Talk:Wilson's disease. JFW | T@lk 09:12, 25 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I think we have had discussions before about adding content on ongoing trials. Can you explain why you now again added discussions about ongoing studies on the Wilson's disease article? JFW | T@lk 14:22, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your message, Dr. Wolff. If references about ongoing investigations of bis-choline TTM are inappropriate to use, even in the specific context of that wording, then I'm happy to take those off the article. Julie Saeger Nierenberg (talk) 15:09, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Draft:Wilson Therapeutics (June 29)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.
Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

.

To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.

Thank you for your
contributions to Wikipedia!

You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Onel5969 (talk) 23:57, 29 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Reference Errors on 5 August

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the Draft:Wilson Therapeutics page, your edit caused a cite error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:31, 6 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Wilson Therapeutics has been accepted

Wilson Therapeutics, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Fiddle Faddle 16:31, 17 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: UserTesting (April 12)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Millermk was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:UserTesting and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Millermk (talk) 09:09, 12 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: UserTesting (April 27)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Wikiisawesome was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:UserTesting and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

wia (talk) 22:51, 27 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Meditope (September 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Onel5969 was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Meditope and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:25, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:UserTesting concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:UserTesting, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:38, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:UserTesting

Hello, Julie Saeger Nierenberg. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "UserTesting".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. samtar ^{t} 13:23, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Meditope concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Meditope, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:35, 7 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Meditope (February 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by LaMona was:

Neologisms are not considered suitable for Wikipedia unless they receive substantial use and press coverage; this requires strong evidence in independent, reliable, published sources. Links to sites specifically intended to promote the neologism itself do not establish its notability.

The comment they left was:

As other reviewers have said, you have not shown that this is a commonly used term in the field. In addition, I suspect that the purpose of this is to use Wikipedia to promote the company that is named in the article. Promotional use of WP is not allowed.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Meditope and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

LaMona (talk) 23:02, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Meditope

Hello, Julie Saeger Nierenberg. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Meditope".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 16:31, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Meditope Biosciences Inc.

Hello, Julie Saeger Nierenberg. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Meditope Biosciences Inc.".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. —MRD2014 talk contribs 00:51, 7 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Cytokinetics

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Cytokinetics requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from http://globenewswire.com/news-release/2016/11/07/887461/0/en/Cytokinetics-Announces-New-Results-From-COSMIC-HF-to-be-Presented-at-the-American-Heart-Association-Scientific-Sessions-2016.html?culture=fr-ca. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 00:23, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I do apologize for any and all infractions. I have no intention of plagiarizing others' materials. I was in the process of composing a draft and thought that was mine to do without it being submitted for review or publication at this time. How do I get to the draft and make the wording changes I need to make at this point? Should I move it to another place? Please advise! Julie Saeger Nierenberg (talk) 13:55, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Just create a new one, rewritten from scratch. We can't have the copyrighted version anywhere on Wikipedia. Dlohcierekim (talk) 16:24, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia and copyright

Hello Julie Saeger Nierenberg, and welcome to Wikipedia. All or some of your addition(s) to Draft:Cytokinetics have been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. While we appreciate your contributing to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from your sources to avoid copyright or plagiarism issues here.

You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Wikipedia:Copyrights. You may also want to review Wikipedia:Copy-paste.
If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. However, there are steps that must be taken to verify that license before you do. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are public domain or compatibly licensed), it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at the help desk before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Wikipedia:Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you can, but please follow the steps in Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Dlohcierekim (talk) 06:09, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I do apologize for any and all infractions. I was in the process of composing a draft and thought that was mine to do without it being submitted for review or publication at this time. How do I get to the draft and make the wording changes I need to make at this point? Should I move it to another place? Please advise! Julie Saeger Nierenberg (talk) 13:53, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Conflict of interest and paid editing in Wikipedia

Hi Julie. I work on conflict of interest issues here in Wikipedia, along with my regular editing, which is mostly about health, medicine, and biotech. Your edits to date are promotional with regard to the biotech companies you have edited about. I'm giving you notice of our Conflict of Interest guideline and Terms of Use, and will have some comments and requests for you below.

We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. Editing for the purpose of advertising or promotion is not permitted. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (see the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your COI when discussing affected articles (see WP:DISCLOSE);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Also please note that editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you.

Comments and requests

Wikipedia is a widely-used reference work and managing conflict of interest is essential for ensuring the integrity of Wikipedia and retaining the public's trust in it. As in academia, COI is managed here in two steps - disclosure and a form of peer review. Please note that there is no bar to being part of the Wikipedia community if you want to be involved in articles where you have a conflict of interest; there are just some things we ask you to do (and if you are paid, some things you need to do).

Disclosure is the most important, and first, step. While I am not asking you to disclose your identity (anonymity is strictly protecting by our WP:OUTING policy... but you appear to be editing under real name so this is not an issue, really) would you please disclose if you have some connection with Twist, Cytokinetics, MediTope, etc, directly or through a third party (e.g. a PR agency or the like)? After you respond (and you can just reply below), if there is any conflict of interest I can walk you through how the "peer review" part happens and then, if you like, I can provide you with some more general orientation as to how this place works, especially writing about biotech, which is somewhat tricky here. Please reply here, just below, to keep the discussion in one place. Thanks! Jytdog (talk) 21:03, 18 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Jytdog. I am a bit of an old fogey and not as tech savvy as I would like to be. I apologize for any oversight in my disclosure re: professional connections to the article content I create. Many years ago I worked as a biomedical research assistant for some significant PhD and MD contributors in the fields of virology, immunology, and diabetes. I am no longer working in these field, though I have an abiding interest and curiosity about advancements being made. I am now a freelance writer, working on my own and clients' projects, among which are and have been creating articles for Wikipedia. Please do walk me through the COI "peer review" process. Any assistance is greatly appreciated. Julie Saeger Nierenberg (talk) 18:09, 20 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for replying! Quick note on the logistics of discussing things on Talk pages, which are essential for everything that happens here. In Talk page discussions, we "thread" comments by indenting - when you reply to someone, you put a colon in front of your comment, which the Wikipedia software will render into an indent when you save your edit; if the other person has indented once, then you indent twice by putting two colons in front of your comment, which the WP software converts into two indents, and when that gets ridiculous you reset back to the margin (or "outdent") by putting this {{od}} in front of your comment. This also allows you to make it clear if you are also responding to something that someone else responded to if there are more than two people in the discussion; in that case you would indent the same amount as the person just above you in the thread. I hope that all makes sense. And you already understand this but at the end of the comment, please "sign" by typing exactly four (not 3 or 5) tildas "~~~~" which the WP software converts into a date stamp and links to your talk and user pages when you save your edit.)

That is how we know who said what. I know this is insanely archaic and unwieldy, but this is the software environment we have to work on. Sorry about that. Will reply on the substance in a second... Jytdog (talk) 02:15, 21 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks again for replying! Sorry for the delay in replying to you. Before we go further, the disclosure needs to get fleshed out a bit further. Would you please identify the articles that you have worked on as a freelancer? Thanks. I will reply faster next time; I got caught up in some bigger issues. :) Jytdog (talk) 02:17, 21 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Jytdog. Thank you for your patience. I apologize for my time lapse here. I would like to answer your question. For the time being I am very tied up with the caretaking of my husband, who is undergoing chemo and transfusions (Stage IV pancreatic cancer) and I need to be here now for him. I'll answer you as soon as life permits.Julie Saeger Nierenberg (talk) 18:05, 30 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Twist Bioscience Company Logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Twist Bioscience Company Logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:43, 23 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Julie Saeger Nierenberg. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Robert I. Blum

Hello, Julie Saeger Nierenberg. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Robert I. Blum, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:

edit the page
remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Icewhiz (talk) 14:37, 8 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Icewhiz. I have added more sources and information about Robert Blum to make this article more encyclopedic. Please consider that he is a noteworthy and well respected individual in the biotech/biomed field, as well as a generous philanthropist, and worthy of being featured in Wikipedia. Julie Saeger Nierenberg (talk) 21:46, 14 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

What you need is in-depth, independent, coverage that focuses on him as an individual. I took this to AfD, I suggest you attempt to present sources there.Icewhiz (talk) 07:08, 15 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

January 2018

Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but a recent edit of yours has an edit summary that appears to be inaccurate or inappropriate. The summaries are helpful to people browsing an article's history, so it is important that you use edit summaries that accurately tell other editors what you did. Feel free to use the sandbox to make test edits. Thank you.

Thank you for your contributions. Please mark your edits as "minor" only if they are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you.

In relation to removing a PROD, while adding a reference.Icewhiz (talk) 06:53, 15 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Robert I. Blum for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Robert I. Blum is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robert I. Blum until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Icewhiz (talk) 07:05, 15 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Copy and pasting

We run "copy and paste" detection software on new edits. One of your edits appear to be infringing on someone else's copyright. See also Wikipedia:Copy-paste. We at Wikipedia usually require paraphrasing. If you own the copyright to this material please follow the directions at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials to grant license. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 19:16, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

https://www.wilsontherapeutics.com/en/symptoms/#

Welcome

Welcome to Wikipedia and Wikiproject Medicine

Welcome to Wikipedia! We have compiled some guidance for new healthcare editors:

Please keep the mission of Wikipedia in mind. We provide the public with accepted knowledge, working in a community.
We do that by finding high quality secondary sources and summarizing what they say, giving WP:WEIGHT as they do. Please do not try to build content by synthesizing content based on primary sources. (For the difference between primary and secondary sources, see WP:MEDDEF.)
Please use high-quality, recent, secondary sources for medical content (see WP:MEDRS). High-quality sources include review articles (which are not the same as peer-reviewed), position statements from nationally and internationally recognized bodies (like CDC, WHO, FDA), and major medical textbooks. Lower-quality sources are typically removed. Please beware of predatory publishers – check the publishers of articles (especially open source articles) at Beall's list.
The ordering of sections typically follows the instructions at WP:MEDMOS. The section above the table of contents is called the WP:LEAD. It summarizes the body. Do not add anything to the lead that is not in the body. Style is covered in MEDMOS as well; we avoid the word "patient" for example.
More generally see WP:MEDHOW
Reference tags generally go after punctuation, not before; there is no preceding space.
We use very few capital letters and very little bolding. Only the first word of a heading is usually capitalized.
Common terms are not usually wikilinked; nor are years, dates, or names of countries and major cities.
Do not use URLs from your university library's internal net: the rest of the world cannot see them.
Please include page numbers when referencing a book or long journal article.
Please format citations consistently within an article and be sure to cite the PMID for journal articles and ISBN for books; see WP:MEDHOW for how to format citations.
Never copy and paste from sources; we run detection software on new edits.
Talk to us! Wikipedia works by collaboration at articles and user talkpages.

Once again, welcome, and thank you for joining us! Please share these guidelines with other new editors.

– the WikiProject Medicine team Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 19:16, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

April 2018

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for violating copyright policy by copying text or images into Wikipedia from another source without evidence of permission. You have been previously warned that this is against policy, but have persisted. Please take this opportunity to ensure that you understand our copyright policy and our policies regarding how to use non-free content.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 19:17, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Cytokinetics Company Logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Cytokinetics Company Logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:24, 19 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:UserTesting

Hello, Julie Saeger Nierenberg. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "UserTesting".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 16:27, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]