User talk:Jugwinder20

Welcome!

Hello, Jugwinder20, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits did not conform to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may have been removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or in other media. Always remember to provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask a question on your talk page. Again, welcome. Abecedare (talk) 16:28, 22 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Arya

The term "Arya" is not used in English for the Indo-Aryan languages so please stop adding it there. If you believe it should be added, feel free to explain that on the article's talk page. Thanks! – Uanfala (talk) 17:29, 22 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Jugwinder20, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Jugwinder20! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Cordless Larry (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:04, 23 September 2018 (UTC)

September 2018

Hello, I'm Kautilya3. I noticed that you made one or more changes to an article, Dogra, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Kautilya3 (talk) 18:52, 26 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

June 2019

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Maurya Empire, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. utcursch | talk 01:46, 1 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 22

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Bangalore, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Christian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:06, 22 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

July 2019

Hello, I'm VibeScepter. I noticed that you recently removed content from Micromax Informatics without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. VibeScepter (talk) (contributions) 06:49, 8 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did on Khariboli dialect. This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. utcursch | talk 15:56, 12 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add defamatory content to Wikipedia, as you did to Hard Kaur, especially if it involves living persons. Thank you. samee converse 16:19, 19 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 13

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Tata Group, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Telecom (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:22, 13 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

August 2019

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at IndiGo. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Jetstreamer ^Talk 16:37, 21 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

For the record, regarding the above warning you keep changing the name to ″Gurugram″ when the target article is named ″Gurgaon″.--Jetstreamer ^Talk 16:41, 21 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

October 2019

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Dogra. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Kautilya3 (talk) 17:12, 8 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you recently removed maintenance templates from List of people from Haryana. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Please see Help:Maintenance template removal for further information on when maintenance templates should or should not be removed. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Dl2000 (talk) 19:29, 27 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did at Pan-Indianism, here you may be blocked from editing. In more detail: I realize this edit was back in September, and you've been warned since then. Someone really should have caught this before now. As I noted in my revert, the article describes the history of the Pan-Indian movement. It is a North American Indigenous thing, not a global history. As Wikipedians, we are here to document, not create neologisms. - CorbieVreccan ^☊ ☼ 00:45, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

December 2019

Hello, I'm Toddy1. I noticed that you recently made an edit to United Bengal in which your edit summary did not appear to describe the change you made. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Toddy1 (talk) 03:14, 7 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not change Allahabad to Prayagraj in the article on Allahabad. Do not change the name of Allahabad in this article, without discussing it first at the Talk page. There is consensus that the article should use the name Allahabad in accordance with WP:COMMONNAME. This has been explained on the Talk page. If you wish to change the name of this article to Prayagraj (or anything else), please discuss it first at Talk. Toddy1 (talk) 03:14, 7 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Citizenship (Amendment) Act, 2019, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. Kautilya3 (talk) 15:45, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

February 2020

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Manchu Manoj, you may be blocked from editing. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 17:54, 5 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

April 2020

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Nova Scotia killings. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Love of Corey (talk) 10:17, 22 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 1

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Allan Octavian Hume, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page British (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 12:42, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

May 2020

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to Technopark, Trivandrum, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. {{replyto|Can I Log In}}'s talk page! 20:06, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 14

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Indian Americans, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Washington (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:17, 14 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 21

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sindoor, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bindi (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:28, 21 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 3

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited ShareChat, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Indian languages (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:21, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 10

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ladakh, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Himalayan (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:17, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

July 2020

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to KP Sharma Oli. Your edits could be interpreted as vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Cannolis (talk) 01:05, 14 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Ashok Swain, you may be blocked from editing. Ohsin 09:10, 14 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

July 2020

Hello, I'm Debitpixie. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Pharmaceutical industry in India, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Debitpixie 💬 10:36, 25 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, if you need any help getting used to wikipedia, its various guidelines and rules do feel free to message me on my talk page. I'll be glad to help you! Debitpixie 💬 10:48, 25 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Important notice

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Mar4d (talk) 03:01, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Jugwinder, the above notice means that action will be taken against you if you continue to disregard Wikipedia policies as you did here. You need to understand and employ the basic requirements of Wikipedia editing, such as supplying reliable sources and no original research. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 10:17, 25 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

August 2020

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Markham, Ontario. Magnolia677 (talk) 10:18, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

September 2020

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Anadolu Agency. There will be no more warnings — kashmīrī ^TALK 12:27, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Kautilya3. Your recent edit(s) to the page 1947 Jammu massacres appear to have added incorrect information, so they have been removed for now. If you believe the information was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Kautilya3 (talk) 22:35, 24 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

And here [1] your edit summary claimed you had "fixed a typo" when in fact you had altered a quote to make it claim Pakistan was a terrorist state. Please take heed of the multitude of warnings you've received so far. That sort of editing is unlikely to be tolerated for long. – Uanfala (talk) 14:19, 26 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

October 2020

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Shyamala Gopalan. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Please read WP:ETHNICITY Fowler&fowler «Talk» 23:57, 7 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 20

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Preity Zinta, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Himachali.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:11, 20 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

October 2020

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but a recent edit of yours to the page Mesut Özil has an edit summary that appears to be inaccurate or inappropriate. The summaries are helpful to people browsing an article's history, so it is important that you use edit summaries that accurately tell other editors what you did. Feel free to use the sandbox to make test edits. Thank you. Walter Görlitz (talk) 01:26, 22 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 1

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Assamese people, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jammu and Kashmir.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:25, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:59, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours to prevent further vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Daniel Case (talk) 07:10, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Barnstar of Diplomacy
	Great Editing! Jaydan20 (talk) 22:50, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

March 2021

Hello, I'm Fowler&fowler. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to British Raj have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. This is an old article written by people well-versed in the history of the British period in India. The phrasing of the lead is carefully chosen. Fowler&fowler «Talk» 21:21, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi

I just wanted to say that on the White South Africans page, the wording/linking before was correct. The source specifically states that certain immigrants from Western Asia's Levant region were originally classified as "Asian" in South Africa, but they would successfully argue that they shouldn't be classified as "Asian". The Middle East is a broader term also encompassing part of North Africa (Egypt) and a small part of Europe (through Turkey) and the source doesn't mention anything about them. Clear Looking Glass (talk) 18:58, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 17

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Indo-Fijians, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Fijian.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:15, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

March 2021

Hello, I'm ThanosYourGod. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. --ThanosYourGod (talk) 06:22, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at African Americans. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Please use correct edit summaries. Rsk6400 (talk) 07:58, 21 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for Ignoring warnings on your talk page and using inappropriate edit summaries.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Doug Weller talk 18:57, 25 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

which article did I inappropriately edit? Jugwinder20 (talk) 19:03, 25 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I can't speak for other articles, but I just undid you on Indo-Canadians since your claim that Gujaratis are the second-largest group of Indo-Canadians contradicts the cited source. Meters (talk) 19:59, 25 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Gujaratis are the second largest group Jugwinder20 (talk) 20:01, 25 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not according to the cited Canadian census source. That's the point. You are making a claim that directly contradicts the reliable source that the article cites. If you cannot be bothered to even look at the sources you should not be making such edits. Meters (talk) 20:16, 25 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

After Punjabi, the next Indo-Aryan language with most speakers is Urdu, which would imply as a language of mostly Pakistanis. Hindi follows, but there are multiple ethnic groups who speak Hindi. Gujaratis are therefore the next largest Indian ethnic group. Jugwinder20 (talk) 20:19, 25 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Go look at the source yourself. If it's not the Gujaratis, which group is the second largest population of Indian Canadians? As most Urdu speakers are Pakistani, they won't count, and most Hindi speakers come from various ethnic groups and states, they wouldn't count either. Jugwinder20 (talk) 20:25, 25 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not going to argue this with you. Read WP:OR. Meters (talk) 20:27, 25 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It seems like you can't answer my questions or provide an answer. Jugwinder20 (talk) 20:28, 25 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Can you not provide a reasonable answer? Jugwinder20 (talk) 20:30, 25 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This is an academic discussion. As a member of the Indian Canadians community, I would say my points have been validated. They have not been proven as incorrect as you suggested. Thank you and good day. Jugwinder20 (talk) 20:33, 25 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Again, read WP:OR. That is your answer. Meters (talk) 20:43, 25 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Jugwinder20 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hello, why was I blocked?

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 20:56, 25 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I just think you don't know too much about ethnicity or the Indian Canadian community. Anyways, no point of continuing this conversation since you don't have a definite answer. Jugwinder20 (talk) 20:47, 25 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You were given a definite answer several times. To the point that I worry WP:IDHT applies here. How many more times do you expect to be linked to WP:OR before you understand that is your definite answer? --Yamla (talk) 20:57, 25 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Seriously. I read the census and Gujaratis are the second largest community of Indian Canadians. How is that original work? Jugwinder20 (talk) 21:02, 25 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Excellent. Please show where you cited this information in your edits, as you are required to do. Which specific edits that you made included this citation to the census? You can find your list of edits here. You'll also need to address your inappropriate edit summaries. --Yamla (talk) 21:05, 25 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

For sure. I'll add the citation now. Am able to do so, or am I still blocked? Jugwinder20 (talk) 21:09, 25 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You are still blocked. You need to make a new unblock request (WP:GAB explains how) and address the concerns which lead to your block. You have most certainly not addressed these concerns yet. This will be my last response to you; another admin will review any future unblock request. --Yamla (talk) 21:13, 25 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

(ec)The cited census does not show that the Gujaratis are the second largest community of Indian Canadians. It states that it is the third largest Indo-Aryan language spoken in Canada. The rest is the user's WP:OR. And this edit is not why the user was blocked. As I said, I can't speak to the other edits that led to the block. Given the apparent difficulty understanding the issue with this one edit this may be WP:CIR Meters (talk) 21:16, 25 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Going by your argument, where does the cited census take Punjabis to be the largest group of Indians? This is going on the fact that Punjabi is the largest Indo-Aryan language, but says nothing about ethnicity. Jugwinder20 (talk) 21:44, 25 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't add the material or the original ref, but since you've pointed out the problem I've improved the ref to one which does specify ethnicity. Meters (talk) 01:24, 26 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

In the source you provided it says East Indian with 1,374,715 is the main ethnic group for Indian Canadians. You can't say Punjabis are the majority Indian Canadian population as this reference does not state this. Jugwinder20 (talk) 02:27, 26 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This text must be deleted as in the reference it can not be proven Punjabis are the largest Indian Canadian group, as the most replied answer was "East Indian". Jugwinder20 (talk) 02:30, 26 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Fine, have it your way. They are the largest group by language, and the largest specifically named East Indian ethnicity, but I've removed it completely. I don't know that it belongs in the lead, and I really don't care if we mention it in the article at all. I'm tired of all the to and fro editing and fake numbers associated with similar edits on various East Indian groups in Canadian demographic articles. Meters (talk) 05:06, 26 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I'm glad I proved my point. Good day Jugwinder20 (talk) 05:10, 26 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not sure what you think you proved... your improperly sourced or WP:OR claim about Gujaratis is not in the article, you are still indefinitely blocked. As I said, I'm tired of the incessant to and fro over which particular East Indian language/religion/ethnicity is better/more common/more important in Canada. Meters (talk) 06:52, 26 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

As a member of the Indian Canadian community, I'd like to see all diverse groups represented in this article. However, it's better this section was deleted as the claims could not be proven for both Punjabis and Gujaratis with the reference provided. Jugwinder20 (talk) 11:39, 26 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I used the data on language to justify why Punjabis and Gujaratis would be the first and second largest groups (as Hindi and Urdu can represent multiple groups, so they do not count as ethnicity). Punjabi and Urdu are both also spoken in Pakistan and so their is overlap with Pakistani Canadians who can make those numbers higher. Overall, this was not an adequate enough method or source to use in regards to ethnicity. I'm satisfied that the statement on largest group has been deleted. I would also advise that you take a rest from Wikipedia since you are so tired. Jugwinder20 (talk) 11:46, 26 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]