User talk:Judahgreg

April 2017

Hello, I'm ScrapIronIV. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Jamai Raja (TV series) have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Scr★pIron^IV 18:44, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Judahgreg, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Judahgreg! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like 78.26 (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

22:04, 24 April 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Niyati Joshi

The article Niyati Joshi has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Nat Gertler (talk) 13:15, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Reach For The Stars (TV series)

The article Reach For The Stars (TV series) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No references right now and fails WP:GNG right now as there is no "significant coverage of the subject in reliable independent sources".

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. -KAP03(^{Talk • Contributions • Email}) 19:08, 14 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Married Again

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Married Again requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. reddogsix (talk) 22:47, 14 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Sacred Ties

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Sacred Ties requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. reddogsix (talk) 22:48, 14 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of The promise

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on The promise requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. reddogsix (talk) 22:49, 14 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Krishi

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Krishi requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. reddogsix (talk) 22:50, 14 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of The Welcoming Committee

A tag has been placed on The Welcoming Committee requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organized event (tour, function, meeting, party, etc.), but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. TheGracefulSlick (talk) 17:08, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of The Welcoming Committee

A tag has been placed on The Welcoming Committee, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, such as at Articles for Deletion. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discusion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. REEEEEbbon Salminen(talk) 03:53, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The Welcoming Committee

You need to help expand The Welcoming Committee with good information and sources. Mr. C.C.^{Hey yo!}_{I didn't do it!} 05:32, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Married Again

Hello Judahgreg,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Married Again for deletion, because it's too short to identify the subject of the article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Nick Moyes (talk) 14:09, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of The Welcoming Committee

A tag has been placed on The Welcoming Committee, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, such as at Articles for Deletion. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discusion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Nikki♥311 15:52, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Married Again

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Married Again requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. — Smjg (talk) 16:55, 23 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your contributed article, Ek Nayi Chhoti si Zindagi

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Ek Nayi Chhoti si Zindagi. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Ek Nayi Chhoti Si Zindagi. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Ek Nayi Chhoti Si Zindagi. If you have new information to add, you might want to discuss it at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Jupitus Smart 19:15, 26 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

July 2017

Hello, I'm KGirlTrucker81. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Banoo Main Teri Dulhann— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. KGirl ^{(Wanna chat?)} 14:48, 25 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ek Nayi Chhoti Si Zindagi

We already have an article on Ek Nayi Chhoti Si Zindagi. I've made the page you created into a redirect to it. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 20:46, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

September 2017

Hello, I'm Eurodyne. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Zee World— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Eurodyne (talk) 23:38, 11 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Kasamh Se. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. ^{My name is}not^dave (talk/contribs) 19:12, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Jamai Raja (TV series), you may be blocked from editing. Serols (talk) 18:58, 13 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Zee World. Serols (talk) 18:59, 13 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Widr (talk) 19:09, 13 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Twist of Fate Zee World

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Twist of Fate Zee World requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. TheGracefulSlick (talk) 22:07, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Mala Saasu Havi for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mala Saasu Havi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mala Saasu Havi until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DrStrauss talk 22:27, 12 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 13

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Savita Prabhune, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Serial (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:59, 13 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

OK Judahgreg (talk) 19:12, 13 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

October 2017

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Zee World, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. Pkbwcgs (talk) 19:23, 15 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Zee World. LakesideMiners (talk) 11:56, 16 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Widr (talk) 12:21, 16 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Articles about dubs

Hi there, I see you're currently blocked for disruptive behavior. That's unfortunate. I've redirected Destiny (TV series) to Ghar Ki Lakshmi Betiyann, because it looks to me like you created an article about a dubbed series. I don't see why you would do that. A dub of a television series is not likely to have standalone notability, and any article you create would need to properly establish independent notability, as notability is not inherited. SpongeBob SquarePants is probably dubbed into 3 dozen languages across the globe, but we only have articles about the primary English-language version. Thank you, Cyphoidbomb (talk) 14:45, 16 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

October 2017

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 3 months for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Widr (talk) 07:46, 31 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I apologize

Please unban me Judahgreg (talk) 17:52, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You must have a reasoning to your request. 68.106.0.77 (talk) 17:57, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I know I've been doing disruptive editing, but I am sorry,I acknowledge my mistake and I am truly sorry and plus today's my birthday so please unban me, I promise I'll behave, and if I don't then you can permanently ban me from editing Judahgreg (talk) 18:00, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Judahgreg (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I know I've been doing disruptive editing, but I am sorry,I acknowledge my mistake and I am truly sorry and plus today's my birthday so please unban me, I promise I'll behave, and if I don't then you can permanently ban me from editing Judahgreg (talk) 18:00, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This is your fourth block for disruptive editing. Why should we believe you'll behave now, when you haven't in the past? I'd suggest sitting it out until this block expires and then proving yourself with good, non-disruptive edits. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆 𝄐𝄇} 19:53, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Please forgive me

I humbly ask to be unblock from editing, please Judahgreg (talk) 18:22, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

(Non-administrator comment) You need to make a formal unblock request, and a good rationale that sets out the problems with your past edits, and a plan of your own that would prevent you from making disruptive edits again. Or you could wait three months per the advice above (I would know what I would do). ^{My name is}not^dave (talk/contribs) 20:04, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kasamh se and Saat Phere

Please do me a favour since I cannot edit, please edit the mistakes I've been and help improve the Saat Phere-Saloni ka safar page and also please edit that Kasamh is the story of three sisters Judahgreg (talk) 20:02, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Enough

I'm tired of pleading to he unblocked, wikipedia is cruel Judahgreg (talk) 20:18, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Selfish

The people on wikipedia are very cruel and selfish, and heartless.I just asked for one more chance but no,they refused Judahgreg (talk) 05:06, 12 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock

I demand to be unbanned from editing Judahgreg (talk) 00:24, 14 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please please please

I plead with everyone to please allow me to edit on wikipedia Judahgreg (talk) 10:49, 14 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please unblock me

I've realised my mistakes, please unban me from editing 😔 Judahgreg (talk) 13:06, 28 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock me please

I kindly request to be unblocked from wikipedia please Judahgreg (talk) 09:38, 11 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for sockpuppetry

This account has been blocked indefinitely from editing for sock puppetry per evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Judahgreg. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you believe that this block was in error, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Bbb23 (talk) 15:42, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]