User talk:Joshelijim

Welcome!

Hi Joshelijim! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! Voltmend (talk) 16:58, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much! Joshelijim (talk) 17:04, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Termination of employment in Argentina

Hello Joshelijim! I saw your article (mentioned in the header as it's very long to type), and while I respect that you likely put in hours of effort into the article, I don't think it is suitable for inclusion on Wikipedia, as it may violate WP:INDISCRIMINATE, or that Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information. Sungodtemple (talk) 03:19, 7 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @Sungodtemple! Thank you for your insight but I'm a bit confused about it. I checked the link you gave me about Wikipedia not being an indiscriminate collection of information and I don't see how my article could fall into any of those examples. Besides that, this article is a traslation from an article already posted on the Spanish Wikipedia, therefore it must have gone through a rigorous community review process which should have established that it is not Indiscriminate. Could you provide clarification about why you feel this way, please? Joshelijim (talk) 22:29, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Joshelijim, different Wikipedias have different review processes which could mean that one thing that is notable on one language Wikipedia is unacceptable in another. The thing I have against this article is that it may only interest a select few people, and there is no WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS to point to for this one. Sungodtemple (talk) 00:07, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The interpretation of policies and guidelines is subjective. One thing you can be sure is that not all editors have the same understanding of them. It's normal for editors to be in opposing sides of discussions over them. But, in this case, the editor who contacted you would have to go through a deletion request process to see if they find consensus to what they said. The article is still online. Thanks for your hard work! Thinker78 (talk) 00:46, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Sculpture in the Renaissance Period

The article Sculpture in the Renaissance Period has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This article appears to duplicate Italian Renaissance sculpture. Discuss.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Whiteguru (talk) 20:58, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Joshelijim

Thank you for creating Topographical relief of Spain.

User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Good article! Thanks for the article!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 08:32, 16 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much! Joshelijim (talk) 14:29, 16 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

History of nude art

Hey, just letting you know that there is currently a proposal to merge an article you created into Nude (art). See Talk:Nude (art) 𝕱𝖎𝖈𝖆𝖎𝖆 (talk) 21:17, 7 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. I'll look into it. Joshelijim (talk) 23:30, 7 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Joshelijim

Thank you for creating Hijacking of the Playa de Bakio.

User:Bruxton, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Requires more references but thanks for the article

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Bruxton}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Bruxton (talk) 19:04, 28 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! It is a translation from an existing page on Eswiki so I only got its references. Joshelijim (talk) 19:08, 28 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sanctuary of Urkiola moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Sanctuary of Urkiola, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) In addition, it needs a ton more footnotes. It's definitely notable, but if the uncited information is taken out, that pretty much guts the article. Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. I thought that was better than removing the uncited material. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 11:09, 19 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Unfortunatelly, I just translated the article from Spanish. It's difficult to add sources when you're not the main creator but I will do my best. It was one of my first articles translated so I'll take the chance to take a look and improve it, I guess. Joshelijim (talk) 17:07, 22 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Joshelijim. Thank you for your work on Sanctuary of Urkiola. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for creating the article!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 01:17, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! Joshelijim (talk) 01:48, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

OVERLINKING

Hi, thanks for your work. But please remember that en.WP doesn't normally link years, centuries, dates, or common terms. It's a low-linking regime. Tony (talk) 07:46, 26 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the reminder! I'll be more carefull from now on Joshelijim (talk) 18:26, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:56, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Joshelijim. Thank you for your work on Walls of Cuéllar. User:Onel5969, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Very nice job on the article. Keep up the good work!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Onel5969}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 14:07, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! Joshelijim (talk) 02:16, 29 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Colegio de Calatrava, Salamanca moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Colegio de Calatrava, Salamanca,is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:16, 30 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Colegio Mayor de San Bartolomé, Salamanca moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Colegio Mayor de San Bartolomé, Salamanca, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:17, 30 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Joshelijim. Thank you for your work on Oca River, Biscay. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for creating the article!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 05:35, 17 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

thank you! Joshelijim (talk) 01:43, 19 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Joshelijim. Thank you for your work on Constitution of Venezuela (1811). User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Hello, your article Constitution of Venezuela (1811) might be notable, but as now it is unreferenced. Please add some references.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 06:11, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for letting me know. My mistake! It's fixed now Joshelijim (talk) 02:39, 9 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Espigüete

Hello, Joshelijim,

Thank you for creating Espigüete.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Thank you for creating the article Espigüete. It seems an interesting article but lacks more inline citations. If you could add some, this would be good

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Paradise Chronicle}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Paradise Chronicle (talk) 02:38, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the recomendation. I'll look into it right away :) Joshelijim (talk) 16:13, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Joshelijim. Thank you for your work on Somosaguas fossil site. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for creating the article! I encourage you to create more article. Have a good day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 03:16, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much! <3 Joshelijim (talk) 16:12, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Constitution of Venezuela (1893) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Constitution of Venezuela (1893), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:25, 9 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Constitution of Venezuela (1936) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Constitution of Venezuela (1936), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:26, 9 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Espigüete moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Espigüete, is not suitable as written to remain published. While it appears to be notable, it needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. There are large sections which are wholly uncited. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. I did this rather than removing the uncited material in the article, which I felt would be more disruptive. If you have any questions, do not hesitate to ask on my talk page. When you have the required sourcing (and every assertion needs a source), and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Or feel free to ping me to take another look.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:37, 16 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Classical Monetary System of the Oriental Republic of Uruguay moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Classical Monetary System of the Oriental Republic of Uruguay, is not suitable as written to remain published. While it appears to be notable, it needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. There are large sections which are wholly uncited. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. I did this rather than removing the uncited material in the article, which I felt would be more disruptive. If you have any questions, do not hesitate to ask on my talk page. When you have the required sourcing (and every assertion needs a source), and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Or feel free to ping me to take another look.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:04, 16 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Article translations

Hi Joshe... I see you translate some articles and I'd like to add some are fairly expanded. But several of them are very poorly sourced, some section lack sources entirely. If you could add some to the articles, it would be good. And for future translations, I suggest you choose articles that have enough sources, at least one for a paragraph. No worries, this is just a comment by a friendly reviewer which is meant to make my work easier. Happy editing, Paradise Chronicle (talk) 20:43, 24 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Colegio de Calatrava, Salamanca

Hello, Joshelijim. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Colegio de Calatrava, Salamanca, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 13:02, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

		The Content Creativity Barnstar
		Historical configuration of the province of Granada is a very good article, thank you! Dylan \| ✉ \| ✓ 16:39, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Colegio Mayor de San Bartolomé, Salamanca

Hello, Joshelijim. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Colegio Mayor de San Bartolomé".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗plicit 14:06, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Joshelijim. Thank you for your work on Híjar River. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, I had the following comments:

Hey there! Hope you're having a great day. Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia with your article. I'm happy to inform you that your article has adhered to Wikipedia's policies, so I've marked it as reviewed. Have a fantastic day for you and your family!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 08:59, 24 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I never saw this so it's a very very very late response but thank you so much for taking the time to leave a message! I hope you and your family are having a wonderfull day as well. Happy holidays :) Joshelijim (talk) 20:09, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Joshelijim. Thank you for your work on Impunity laws (Argentina). User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Nice work

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 20:05, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much! Joshelijim (talk) 20:06, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: First Congress of the PSOE has been accepted

First Congress of the PSOE, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 15:11, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]