User talk:Josheard

Welcome!

Hello, Josheard, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Lisa Dalton (Lisa Loving), may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Rankersbo (talk) 08:40, 27 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Lisa Dalton (Lisa Loving)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Lisa Dalton (Lisa Loving) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Rankersbo (talk) 08:40, 27 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Just to clarify- this notice applies to the brief version that's in the main encyclopaedia. It doesn't relate to the fuller draft article that you have submitted for review which will be judged by its own merits. Rankersbo (talk) 08:42, 27 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

There were two versions of this page, one in "mainspace" that I tagged for deletion, and one in draft space here: Draft:Lisa_Dalton. You are welcome to contribute to getting the draft one into shape, which will be moved to the encyclopaedia when it is ready. You could work in your user area if you like but it's best if you keep the efforts in one place. Rankersbo (talk) 18:32, 27 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Draft:Lisa Dalton (July 18)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.
Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Lisa Dalton.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.

Thank you for your
contributions to Wikipedia!

You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Onel5969 (talk) 15:42, 18 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lisa Dalton (March 27)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Graeme Bartlett was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability—see the guidelines on the notability of people and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing, so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia.
What you can do: Add citations (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners) to secondary reliable sources that are entirely independent of the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Lisa Dalton and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:28, 27 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Teahouse, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:28, 27 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Lisa Dalton

A tag has been placed on Lisa Dalton requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Speedy deletion per Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/Orangemoody/Articles without prejudice to recreation. Administrators: please read the LTA page before undeleting. indirect recreation by spas

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. DGG ( talk ) 23:04, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Josheard

A tag has been placed on User:Josheard requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Attempted evasion of Speedy deletion per Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/Orangemoody/Articles without prejudice to recreation. Administrators: please read the LTA page before undeleting.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. DGG ( talk ) 23:06, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

==explanation==- This page is [part of an attempted evasion Speedy deletion per Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/Orangemoody/Articles without prejudice to recreation. Administrators: please read the LTA page before undeleting. Not a genuin re-creation by established editor--see user's contibutions. DGG ( talk ) 23:09, 17 December 2020 (UTC)`[reply]

Nomination of National Michael Chekhov Association for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article National Michael Chekhov Association is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/National Michael Chekhov Association until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

DGG ( talk ) 20:28, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]