User talk:Jonnmann

Hello, Jonnmann, and Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by using four tildes (~~~~) or by clicking

if shown; this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field with your edits. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Ronz (talk) 22:04, 21 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
A tutorial • Our five pillars • Getting mentored How to: Edit a page • Upload and use images • Create your first article Intuitive guide to Wikipedia • Article Creation Wizard
Getting help
Frequently asked questions • Tips Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention Help desk: A Wiki Styled page to ask questions on Help directory: A comprehensive list-style help contents page
Policies and guidelines
Neutral point of view • No original research Verifiability • Reliable sources • Citing sources What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons List of policies • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • List of guidelines Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The community
Build consensus • Resolve disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Community portal • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists
Writing articles
Be bold in editing • Develop an article The perfect article • Simplified manual of style Stubs • Categories • Disambiguation Peer review • Featured content
Miscellaneous
User pages • Talk pages Awards a registered contributor can achieve and award Clean up: General • Spam • Vandalism Join a WikiProject • Translation Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

MOS:IMAGES

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, when adding images to articles please take care to follow our guidelines for images Thank you. --Ronz (talk) 22:07, 21 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello?

Could you please respond indicating that you've noticed the comments here? I've yet to find an image you've added that clearly meets MOS:IMAGES. Please take a look at our conflict of interest policy as well.

Wikipedia could gain a great deal with contributions from a talented photographer such as yourself. However, images need to be added so that they are indeed of value to the respective articles. --Ronz (talk) 03:46, 23 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Yes hello, yes I have seen your mail, am I doing wrong, I just uploaded my old press photos and some others, what is the MOS: IMAGES, Regads "Jonnmann (talk) 05:36, 23 December 2012 (UTC)"[reply]

Thanks for responding. I'm guessing there may be a language barrier here. Do you want to discuss MOS:IMAGES? --Ronz (talk) 17:38, 23 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If I understand you correctly, my categorization of the images are not the best, and you are right, I have a little trouble with spelling in English, but with the help of google translator it works quite ok I think,"Jonnmann (talk) 02:44, 24 December 2012 (UTC)"[reply]

I've reviewed your additions of images to articles, and have yet to find any additions that clearly meet MOS:IMAGES. Generally, you're adding images that are highly redundant to images already in the articles. I've been giving more specific concerns in my edit-summaries now that you've responded. --Ronz (talk) 17:53, 24 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The image you added to Pigeon racing is worth keeping in my opinion. The article doesn't have any such images, and I think it is relevant enough to have them. The image displays rather blurry in the article. I'm not sure how to fine-tune it. I'd have thought that the 320 × 118 pixel version would alleviate the problems, but perhaps it's a bit too large to be totally effective? --Ronz (talk) 18:02, 24 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Have i done something wrong, or what is this, i don't understand. . . . Jonnmann (talk) 00:02, 22 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Jonnmann. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Jonnmann. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Jonnmann. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:15, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:32, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The Hand of God

Hi. I've reverted your addition to The Hand of God as it was unsourced and there is already an article for this sculpture: The Hand of God (Carl Milles). Regards --John B123 (talk) 16:30, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, I dident now that.. Regads... Jonnmann (talk) 17:12, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 14

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Tavastia Club, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages HIM, Amoral and The Gazette. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 05:59, 14 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:36, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for my edit summary

Sorry for this edit summary [1]. I said "you" when I should have checked whether you were really the one who had uploaded the picture on commons. My apologies. JBchrch talk 20:33, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 12

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Bang & Olufsen, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Struer.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 12 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Birgitte Bonnesen moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Birgitte Bonnesen, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 20:32, 6 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Alan Messer for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Alan Messer is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alan Messer until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

KSAWikipedian (talk) 06:57, 1 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Instead of deleting the article, if you can find more credible information, I think it's better to complete it, feel free to do so. - Jonnmann (talk) 05:52, 4 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Margaret French

Hello, Jonnmann,

Thank you for creating Margaret French.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Thanks for the article on Margaret French. Please consider expanding the references into fully formed citations.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Netherzone}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Netherzone (talk) 15:50, 3 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Unfortunately, there is very little on MF to be found on the web, her husband Jared French and their friends mentioned in the article there are several biographies about, but she has somehow disappeared from history, I have searched but I can not find more than what I have written, Sorry. - Jonnmann (talk) 20:18, 3 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"In 1937 she married Jared French who was fifteen years younger"

This is completely wrong, their age only differed by one (1) year, they were born in 1905 and 1906 respectively, they were all almost the same age... Jonnmann (talk) 20:30, 3 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Birgitte Bonnesen

Hello, Jonnmann. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Birgitte Bonnesen, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:01, 9 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Birgitte Bonnesen

Hello, Jonnmann. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Birgitte Bonnesen".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:14, 6 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

John Deere 8530 moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, John Deere 8530, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. MB 05:49, 6 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Gustav Johansson

Hello Jonnmann,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Gustav Johansson for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly indicate why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

0xDeadbeef 04:55, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

October 2022

Hi Jonnmann! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor at Gustav Johansson that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. Paulpat99 (talk) 02:40, 2 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jonathan Power (November 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Timtrent were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

While it is perfectly possible that Power is notable, your references fail to show it.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Jonathan Power and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 14:19, 11 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Jonnmann! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 14:19, 11 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Roger Jaskoviak moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Roger Jaskoviak, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Jamiebuba (talk) 09:51, 28 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:09, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Dover Sun House

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Dover Sun House requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://www.sciencehistory.org/distillations/the-sun-queen-and-the-skeptic-building-the-worlds-first-solar-houses. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. TheManishPanwar (talk) 14:07, 13 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"" If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.""

No, it's far from the first I've written, neither in English nor Swedish, or any other language for that matter. Jonnmann (talk) 17:30, 13 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Failed verifications

I've noted a few failed verifications on your edits to Dover Sun House. The articles you've cited do discuss the house, but they do not verify the facts that you are citing, such as the reason for the solar system's ultimate failure or the demolition date of the house. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 18:15, 13 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

For obvious reasons I don't have more info than what I can find in a number of different articles that form the basis of my version, nor does the German article have more info. As for the exact reason why the system was removed, apart from what I wrote, it can probably only be found in the MIT archives, which I do not have access to. The house was a type of experiment as I understood it, built of wood and glass, and after 62 years it was perhaps time to tear it down. Jonnmann (talk) 18:27, 13 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Understood. But if you add a citation, that citation is expected to actually verify the article content. If you cannot find a citation to verify a statement, then perhaps the statement should be removed. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 13:48, 14 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have added another reference, where it says that the house was demolished around 2010, I can't get further information ...Jonnmann (talk) 14:24, 14 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

December 2022

Hi Jonnmann! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor at Amelia Peabody (philanthropist) that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. Kj cheetham (talk) 11:54, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 21

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Beer, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kwak.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 21 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:John Deere 8530

Hello, Jonnmann. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:John Deere 8530, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 13:04, 13 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:John Deere 8530

Hello, Jonnmann. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "John Deere 8530".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 16:09, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Well . . . . then it is good that the ones I wrote in Danish and Norwegian are still there, and the original in Swedish, (not by me), so English speakers can read them after they have translated them into English with Google's translator. Jonnmann (talk) 17:33, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Bedmet

The article Bedmet has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NCORP, WP:SIRS. No indication of being notable.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. scope_creep^Talk 13:01, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ventusky moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Ventusky. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it has no sources and it needs more sources to establish notability. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Jamiebuba (talk) 14:16, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ira Jefferson (photographer) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Ira Jefferson (photographer), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three, to be safe. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:47, 7 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Jonathan Power

Hello, Jonnmann. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Jonathan Power, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 13:08, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Roger Jaskoviak

Hello, Jonnmann. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Roger Jaskoviak, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:43, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 14

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Medley swimming, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Crawl.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:11, 14 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Jack Beers

Hello, Jonnmann. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Jack Beers, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 23:06, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jack Beers (November 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by WikiOriginal-9 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Jack Beers and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

~WikiOriginal-9~ (talk) 07:27, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:42, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Ventusky

Hello, Jonnmann. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Ventusky, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 09:06, 7 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Ventusky

Hello, Jonnmann. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Ventusky".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 08:00, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]