User talk:Johnkatz1972

Welcome!

Hello, Johnkatz1972, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! -=Elfin=-³⁴¹ 07:18, 26 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Kazuko Kojima

A tag has been placed on Kazuko Kojima requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Closedmouth (talk) 07:35, 26 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

"Bringing forth new life"

Another editor has added the {{prod}} template to the article "Bringing forth new life", suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the {{prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 20:59, 28 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sadako Kurihara

Another editor has added the {{prod}} template to the article Sadako Kurihara, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the {{prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 21:00, 28 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Toranosuke Takeshita

Hi! It seems you recently created an unreferenced biography of a living person: Toranosuke Takeshita. Our verifiability policy requires that all content be cited to a reliable source. Please add references as soon as possible. Thanks! --LaraBot (talk) 00:13, 14 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hiroshi Miyazawa

Hi! It seems you recently created an unreferenced biography of a living person: Hiroshi Miyazawa. Our verifiability policy requires that all content be cited to a reliable source. Please add references as soon as possible. Thanks! --LaraBot (talk) 00:13, 14 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome, and an Invitation

Hi Johnkatz1972,

Thanks for helping with Japan-related articles on Wikipedia, including Governors of Hiroshima. Here's an invitation to visit Wikipedia:WikiProject Japan. There, you can meet other Wikipedians working on articles related to Japan. You'll find lists of new articles, projects, and links to resources such as

Wikipedia:Manual of Style (Japan-related articles), with decisions the community has made about how to format articles
Template:Newest Japan-related articles, where you can list the articles you create so the community can see them
Portal:Japan, a collection of resources on Japan

You'll also learn about {{WikiProject Japan}}, a template you can place on the talk page of any relevant article, and find instructions for assessing articles.

Hope to see you there!

Best regards, Fg2 (talk) 11:33, 14 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sadaaki Senda

Hello Johnkatz. The citation was intended for controversial claim. It should be directly cited. Don't remove that ref., please. Thank you. --Vejvančický (talk) 14:04, 20 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. Have a nice day. --Vejvančický (talk) 14:15, 20 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

User:Unitanode removed that sentence: His most ambitious project was the construction of Ujina port (later to become Hiroshima Port), which cost the lives of thousands of peasants from the area. This needs direct citation. --Vejvančický (talk) 14:23, 20 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Peace Declaration

A tag has been placed on Peace Declaration requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.) or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. — The Man in Question (gesprec) · (forðung) 08:20, 22 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Johnkatz1972! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 290 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

Hiroshi Miyazawa - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 19:20, 17 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Shin Ebihara

Good work, you created published references that support the significance of the subject. I see you removed the prod template, but next time you remove a prod template from any other article that you create please explain why in an edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Anyway, keep it up with your contributions. Minima c (talk) 20:52, 28 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of List of Japanese Diplomatic Representatives to Czechoslovakia and Czech Republic

I have nominated List of Japanese Diplomatic Representatives to Czechoslovakia and Czech Republic, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Japanese Diplomatic Representatives to Czechoslovakia and Czech Republic. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Cynof Gavuf 11:05, 11 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yorozu Oda

Could you please reference your information? It is likely to be removed otherwise. Ironholds (talk) 11:27, 20 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Treaty articles

You've been repeatedly told and warned about this. Reference your articles; people who churn out unreferenced articles and stubbornly refuse to follow our guidelines are likely to be blocked. Ironholds (talk) 11:40, 1 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I add notes to League of Nations Treaty Series. If I find the same publication online, I shall certainly add reference to that. Johnkatz1972 (talk) 11:43, 1 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I just added a link to Agreement between Great Britain and Denmark Relating to the Suppression of the Capitulations in Egypt (1921) Johnkatz1972 (talk) 11:53, 1 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Here's another linked article. Agreement between Great Britain and Greece Relating to the Suppression of the Capitulations in Egypt (1920). Johnkatz1972 (talk) 11:58, 1 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

International Peoples Tribunal

Ryuichi Shimoda v. The State is an article about a court case. It is not an article about the atomic bombings. Only material directly relevant to the court case should be in the article. I have removed the paragraph about the "For example in 2007, an unofficial panel of scholars" paragraphs like this should be placed into the article Debate over the atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki -- PBS (talk) 23:47, 21 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

See Talk:Debate over the atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki#International Peoples Tribunal -- PBS (talk) 23:58, 21 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Comment

John, let me first reassure you that the articles you're creating are generally good articles. They're about topics that should be in an encyclopedia.

That said, I'd like to ask that you change your behavior just a little. In addition to making sure to always cite your sources, I strongly suggest that you read the Manual of Style -- in particular, the part about the Lead section.

This is just to help make things a little easier for everyone. I apologize for any hurt feelings I may have caused.</s DS (talk) 13:23, 25 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Bleh, it seems you've already done that and I'm acting on information from a few weeks ago. Oops. DS (talk) 13:25, 25 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Autopatrolled

Hello, this is just to let you know that I have granted you the "autopatrolled" permission. This won't affect your editing, it just automatically marks any page you create as patrolled, benefiting new page patrollers. Please remember:

This permission does not give you any special status or authority
Submission of inappropriate material may lead to its removal
You may wish to display the {{Autopatrolled}} top icon and/or the {{User wikipedia/autopatrolled}} userbox on your user page
If, for any reason, you decide you do not want the permission, let me know and I can remove it

If you have any questions about the permission, don't hesitate to ask. Otherwise, happy editing!HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 02:13, 28 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Holy See-Israel relations

hi, i was just looking at the additions to the said article. if you look at the discussion page there, i feel that the possibility of having an interesting case study on diplomacy is being hijacked by the israel-palestinian thing. although - of course - the catholic church has a vested interest in this, i don't know if it's nearly as interesting as how 2 states that should not recognize eachother get around doing just that. would you agree that perhaps we concentrate all the palestinian-slash-peace process part at the end under separate headings and devote the biulk of the article to how relations between these 2 entities have developed over the years?Oferdesade (talk) 15:25, 6 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I accept the criticism, and added some new sections on bilateral relations. I shall update them as I find more information on the subject. I still think a lot of work is to be done by me on the subject. Johnkatz1972 (talk) 13:46, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

good grief, forget criticism. katonti!! this is the first time i've ever done something like this. i havent the foggiest idea of what i'm doing. i'm only a dabbler in the topic. the israeli ambassador has taken an interest in this article (surprise surprise). he's a walking encyclopedia (you might want to click on the link to lewy) and more of an intellectual than a diplomat. would you like his help? also, are you in contact with vatican people (john allen is a great source) or minerbi in jerusalem (a true radical in the best sense of the word)? do you know who initiated this article? who added all the palestinian stuff and if that person might be interested in separating the two? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Oferdesade (talk • contribs) 16:07, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It's pleasure to know that someone is interested in my articles in Wikipedia. I understand you are from Israel, and so am I. I am not in touch right now with anyone from the Vatican, but I would like to have some contacts.Johnkatz1972 (talk) 16:25, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

hiya, i've expanded on the new chapter and taken the liberty (i get paid to edit) of copy editing some of your material. dont you prefer that - instead of the stuff on the peace process and the palestinians getting burried in the chronological history of the popes - it all be put under the heading of "the palestinians and the peace process".Oferdesade (talk) 12:08, 14 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I took your recommendation seriously, and decided that it be best to start a new entry, Holy See attitude towards the peace process. Any new information on the Vatican and the peace process will be added from now on to that section. Johnkatz1972 (talk) 14:14, 14 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

i saw. brilliant!! also i saw that there's a separate rtcl on the holy "c' & palestine (which hardly makes any mention of the christian constituency thereof, the splits into & of various churches... this is pure soap opera material). are you going to transfer all the material from HC-Is or leave at elast some reference. if the latter, do you want me to edit it down to what (italics)I consider pertinent or will you? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Oferdesade (talk • contribs) 08:18, 15 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

also, rgd peace process, i suggest rename to middle east peace process. there is a regional aspect to this since the term holy land is a rather amorphous one: traditionally, it refers to all those locations where the testament took place , ie jordan, parts of egypt,syria, much wider than merely israel/palestine. considering the wildfire regarding christians in many of these locations, is there a vatican aspect of the "peace process" in iraq, egypt... that applies and has inner repurcussions (ie on their opinions vis-a-vis israel/palestine). it would be worth millions to get hold of the protocols of the synod ie what was said BEHIND closed doors and not to the press for the sake of appeasing host governments...Oferdesade (talk) 08:26, 15 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I think it might be best to shorten references to Holy See positions regarding the peace process in the article on Israel-Vatican relations, now that the subject is treated in a separate entry. As for what was said behind closed doors at the synod, I have no way of knowing. Regarding other countries in the region, I think there might be other peace processes, like a possible peace process between the Iranian and Iraqi governments, but of course the Arab-Israeli peace process is the longest of them all, since it has not been resolved on the Syrian and Palestinian fronts. Of course some supporters of the Israeli government will claim that the Holy See's positions regarding the peace process derive from fear not to antagonize Arab governments, but the problem is that those who support the Israeli position do so in order not to risk their economic ties with Jerusalem, so in politics - be it pro or anti Israeli - there is no moral perfection but interests. And this is also true of Israeli policies and positions, so I really can't accept the position of depicting pro Israeli policies as good and ideal while anti Israeli policies as deriving from cold interests. Both derive from interests. Johnkatz1972 (talk) 15:19, 15 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

i was actually refering to just that - shortening the israel holyc aspects of peace process. as for the interests bit - i agree of course. in fact, id go one further: i dont believe that - except in the scatological sense - the holy c has any interests whatsoever except financial (a reason why they place more stress on the taxes and property issues than on the visas in discussions) as can be seen in their silence on so many things they should not be silence on. if anyone has vested interests in local governments it is the clergy representing host governments rather than their local parishes. this is oh-so clear regarding najuib and his about-face half way through the egypt thing, karkuk of iraq etc. ad nauseum. its not their anti israel stance that infuriates me but their total abandonment of the interests of their own parishes in order to stay on the good side of their host governments. if anything, i would have expected the holy c 2 say something about this now and then. as for their stances on the peace procvess, i have yet to hear something meaningful that doesnt straddle the fence. i'm not one who thinks they're anti-israel at all , in this regard. but to deny the input (be it quite impotent, at the end of the day) of palestinian christians into the general melange of spoken words would be boring.Oferdesade (talk) 08:31, 16 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

OK. I now understand, and I think it might be good to rename the entry "Holy See Attitude to the ME peace process". In the section about Pius XII I added some reference to George Hakim (1908-2001) who advocated some pro Israeli policies in the 1950s, but I need some more information about him. Johnkatz1972 (talk) 09:51, 16 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

hang on a bit w/p12. will be adding stuff over the next coupla days when i find some spare itme. it should have additional; refs. Oferdesade (talk) 11:05, 16 February 2011 (UTC) (keep forgetting to sign...)[reply]

as promised - added lotz 2day. please dont be deleting until beofre tuesday, by which time i'll be able to get some feedback before i cut it down myself. the rtcl is beginning to look like a 3rd testament :-) Oferdesade (talk) 15:43, 17 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I looked at the new additions made, and I must say they are very informative and contributing to knowledge on these matters. The only change I made was to move one sentence about Pius XII to the beginning of the section, as it gives his regnal dates (1939-1958). Johnkatz1972 (talk) 14:34, 18 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

tnx. much more 2 come on B16Oferdesade (talk) 08:22, 21 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

just added stuff on JP2 & B16 visits from the diplomacy POV (ie the actual tachles of the visits themselves). i'd like 2 start cutting down the actual size. how much text do you think can be placed in the reference section - can these be actual footnotes or does it make the encylcopedia entry look 2 much like an academic rtcl? if you could take a look at some of those i've entered and let me know what you think (not content - form: too much?)Oferdesade (talk) 12:07, 21 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

how does the idea strike you that - in order to prevent claims of duplication - the peace process sections under the various popes (JP2 & B16, actually) be renamed "multilateral affairs". that way they can encompass additional elements (not tht i can think of any right now, but egypt, iran - the vatican maintains ties; israel and the US are not thrilled, i take it - etc are possibilities)Oferdesade (talk) 12:26, 21 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I really think that references to the peace process in the article on relations with Israel can now be reduced, while keeping the link to the article on Holy See attitudes about the peace process. I think it was very good to add a separate section on the two Papal visits to Israel (2000 and 2009). I was looking for some information about the Papal visit in 1964. It is important to remember that Paul VI visited Israel without mentioning its name, and that he held a brief meeting with President Shazar. Johnkatz1972 (talk) 10:02, 23 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

sent you an email with proposal to change entire structure. take a look & let me know wot u think. also intend to add some stuff from wikileaks(?)Oferdesade (talk) 12:35, 23 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

DONE!!! take a look. i even managed to put in all the cross references to other articles (eg from specific popes on peace process to specific location in that article, relations with PA...) only thing - been asked not to refer to the ITF fiasco... i think i'll put it into that article? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Oferdesade (talk • contribs) 08:17, 24 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

What is ITF fiasco? Johnkatz1972 (talk) 14:48, 24 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

did i not correct that? i was asked not to include it, so there's a link under "uneven policy marked by changes of personnel" ... :-) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Oferdesade (talk • contribs) 16:12, 24 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

hey! good 2 c u back. now that u r, if you have the time to go over all the deletions i made (under the ip address & put back what u think may be pertinent). like your addition of 7:03. was surprised by the lustiger story - not because we dont all know that lau is a feces-seeking headline hound but because lustiger was always so admired amongst most vatican operatives. minerbi and motti truly admired the man. can send u an article i received upon his death... problem with the 6:27 - some of it seems to me to be editorializing, but that's the journalist in me. i dont know what's acceptable in academic circles. Oferdesade (talk) 07:21, 5 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you have any article about Lustiger, I would be happy to read it. I myself remember that in 1995 some students from Tel Aviv University held a demonstration against Lustiger's visit. I am also looking for informationa about that.Johnkatz1972 (talk) 07:32, 5 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

lost your email. if u still have mine, drop me a line (rtather than posting it here, i would think) 93.44.208.188 (talk) 07:09, 6 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Philokalia

Hi, as helpful as it was to have an external link to an online version of Ware and Sherrard's version of the Philokalia, that's a copyright violation, so I removed the link. Too bad, because it's the best resource for that book, in my opinion. See WP:ELNEVER for an explanation of why. First Light (talk) 16:38, 20 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

July 2011

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Before saving your changes to an article, please provide an edit summary, which you forgot to do before saving your recent edit to John Calvin. Doing so helps everyone understand the intention of your edit (and prevents legitimate edits from being mistaken for vandalism). It is also helpful to users reading the edit history of the page. Thank you. Cognate247 (talk) 01:05, 20 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. I'll remember to do so. My change was just to add another link about the biography of Calvin by Beza.Johnkatz1972 (talk) 09:13, 20 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

August 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Joseph Ivor Linton may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

March 5, 2005; retrieved May 20, 2011</ref> (December 26, 1952–August 1, 1957), [[Thailand]] (non-resident, 1954-1958 and [[Switzerland]] (1958-1961). In 1961 served as head of the Israeli

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 20:47, 14 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 24

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ramallah, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Disengagement Plan. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:57, 24 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:47, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Johnkatz1972. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keiichi Suzuki (governor of Hiroshima)

Unsourced. Xx236 (talk) 14:17, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ichisho Inuma, Aijiro Tomita

Unsourced.Xx236 (talk) 07:20, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

issue with article Asada Tokunori

Hello, Johnkatz. Your article Asada Tokunori has an error. The Japanese Wikipedia states he was the governor of Kanagawa from 1898 to 1900, so he was not governor of Hiroshima at that time. Also, can you create some articles for the governors of Tochigi and Saitama? thank you. Zee money (talk) 07:34, 5 January 2017 (UTC) I made the required correction. Thank you for notifying me. ~[reply]

Dates

Please note that there is a standard format for birth and death dates in the lead of English Wikipedia articles. Where both birth and death dates are known, we don't use the words, just the two dates separated by a dash. We don't abbreviate month names. I've just stub-sorted Nakamura Junkuro and tidied up his dates, but I see you're creating a lot of these articles. Please use the standard format to save other editors the trouble of cleaning up after you. See MOS:DOB for more detail. Thanks. PamD 09:48, 9 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Asano Nagataka

The article Asano Nagataka has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. PamD 20:38, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problem: Holy See and the Arab–Israeli peace process

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Holy See and the Arab–Israeli peace process, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images from either web sites or printed works. This article appears to contain work copied from http://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/jsource/judaica/ejud_0002_0020_0_20338.html, and therefore to constitute a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policies. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are liable to be blocked from editing.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:

If you have permission from the author to release the text under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Holy See and the Arab–Israeli peace process and send an email with confirmation of permission to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". Make sure you quote the exact page name, Holy See and the Arab–Israeli peace process, in your email. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
If you hold the copyright to the work: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License and GNU Free Documentation License, and note that you have done so on Talk:Holy See and the Arab–Israeli peace process. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for instructions.
If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted "under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), version 3.0", or that the work is released into the public domain, or if you have strong reason to believe it is, leave a note at Talk:Holy See and the Arab–Israeli peace process with a link to where we can find that note or your explanation of why you believe the content is free for reuse.

It may also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at this temporary page. Leave a note at Talk:Holy See and the Arab–Israeli peace process saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved.

Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) (talk) 20:19, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Holy See and the Arab–Israeli peace process

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Holy See and the Arab–Israeli peace process requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from http://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/jsource/judaica/ejud_0002_0020_0_20338.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) (talk) 07:29, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Johnkatz1972. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 1

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Rex Tillerson, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Sullivan (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:43, 1 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problem on International Grains Council

Content you added to the above article back in 2010 appears to have been copied from http://www.igc.org.uk/en/downloads/brochure/igcbrochure.pdf. Copying text directly from a source is a copyright violation. Unfortunately, for copyright reasons, the content had to be removed. All content you add to Wikipedia must be written in your own words. Please leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 20:30, 19 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Johnkatz1972. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:10, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:40, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Yukika Sohma for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Yukika Sohma is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yukika Sohma until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Cupper52 (talk) 19:07, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:25, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Walter Wallace McLaren moved to draftspace

Hi Johnkatz1972, I've moved Walter Wallace McLaren to draft space because it only contained two sources, and neither of them are considered reliable. Find a Grave is considered at RSP to be unreliable (Wikipedia:RSP#Find_a_Grave) and Prabook is a mix of user generated content and content scraped from other Who's Who sites (like Marquis Who's Who) that are themselves considered to be unreliable at WP:RSP. I didn't want to leave the article in mainspace with no sources at all, so I've moved it to draft. Best, Politanvm ^talk 23:02, 6 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Devin O'Malley for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Devin O'Malley is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Devin O'Malley until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

BD2412 T 21:09, 30 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Soshi

Please note that disambiguation pages like Soshi are meant to help readers find a specific existing article quickly and easily. For that reason, they have guidelines that are different from articles. From the Wikipedia:Disambiguation dos and don'ts you should:

Only list articles that readers might reasonably be looking for
Use short sentence fragment descriptions, with no punctuation at the end
Use exactly one navigable link ("blue link") in each entry that mentions the title being disambiguated
Only add a "red link" if used in existing articles, and include a "blue link" to an appropriate article
Do not pipe links (unless style requires it) – keep the full title of the article visible
Do not insert external links or references - these should be in the relevant article

I removed your addition to Soshi because I couldn't find any article that mentions that use, but I think it would be an interesting article if you feel like writing it! Leschnei (talk) 13:29, 16 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

November 2022

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Ariane Koizumi, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Indignant Flamingo (talk) 08:51, 23 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:43, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Walter Wallace McLaren

Hello, Johnkatz1972. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Walter Wallace McLaren, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:01, 25 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Caren Kaye edit

I have reverted your addition of a date of birth to Caren Kaye, along with the accompanying citation to IMDb. That source is not reliable. Please see WP:IMDB. You might want to read WP:USERGENERATED to see other sources that are similarly not reliable. Eddie Blick (talk) 00:45, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Help with Draft:Mikeiri and Draft:Itsuse

Hello! I noticed you made the article on Inahi and I'm interested in whether you'd be up for helping me with the drafts on Draft:Mikeiri and Draft:Itsuse the other two brothers of Jimmu. I really appreciate your contributions, thank you. Immanuelle ❤️💚💙 (talk to the cutest Wikipedian) 21:55, 30 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I will try to find information about these subjects Johnkatz1972 (talk) 05:51, 1 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mikeiri no Mikoto (October 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Brachy0008 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

The section titles seem to not be of manual of style. Not enough reliable sources for me to warrant a pass.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Mikeiri no Mikoto and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Brachy08 _(Talk) 09:31, 1 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Johnkatz1972! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Brachy08 _(Talk) 09:31, 1 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mikeiri no Mikoto (October 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Brachy0008 was:

The proposed article does not have sufficient content to require an article of its own, but it could be merged into the existing article at Emperor Jimmu. Since anyone can edit Wikipedia, you are welcome to add that information yourself. Thank you.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Two sources are added, but does not change anything. Furthermore, it requires more cleaning up.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Mikeiri no Mikoto and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Brachy08 _(Talk) 00:48, 2 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:32, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Pharaohs

The template currently has a malformed format.

2601:249:9301:D570:C8F3:FCDB:9310:2406 (talk) 16:32, 3 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know how to correct this, as my experience is limited Johnkatz1972 (talk) 08:27, 4 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 6

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 155, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Anicetus. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 17:59, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ITN recognition for Anouk Aimée

On 22 June 2024, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Anouk Aimée, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Step hen 11:35, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 28

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Consulate General of the United States, Jerusalem, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page William Coffin.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:45, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately, I was unable to find detailed information about the diplomat by that name mentiond. Johnkatz1972 (talk) 10:16, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of George Noll

The article George Noll has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NBIO. Diplomats are not notable by default. This one is below ambassador level.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

Also:

Chris Hodges

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:01, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Chris Hodges for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Chris Hodges, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chris Hodges (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]