User talk:John Meadow

Welcome!

Hello, John Meadow, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Romanz (Singers), may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! –
→Davey2010→→Talk to me!→ 10:02, 28 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Romanz (Singers)

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Romanz (Singers) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. –
→Davey2010→→Talk to me!→ 10:02, 28 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Pieter Badenhorst (Singer)

A tag has been placed on Pieter Badenhorst (Singer), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Dewritech (talk) 12:52, 28 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

John Meadow, you are invited to the Teahouse

Hi John Meadow! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Theopolisme (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 01:15, 29 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Bobby van Jaarsveld

A tag has been placed on Bobby van Jaarsveld requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content or organised event, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. PK T(alk) 19:49, 14 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Ek Sal Getuig

A tag has been placed on Ek Sal Getuig, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Ghostboy1997 (talk) 19:57, 14 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Warning

This is your last warning; if you create an inappropriate page again, as you did at Ek Sal Getuig, you may be blocked from editing without further notice.

June 2013

Hello John Meadow, and welcome to Wikipedia. While we appreciate your contributing to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from your sources to avoid copyright or plagiarism issues here.

You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and a cited source. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Wikipedia:Copyrights. You may also want to review Wikipedia:Copy-paste.
In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are public domain or compatibly licensed), it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at the help desk before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Wikipedia:Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied without attribution. If you want to copy from another Wikipedia project or article, you can, but please follow the steps in Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. CambridgeBayWeather (talk) 06:12, 15 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:RomanZHouVas.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:RomanZHouVas.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 07:22, 24 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:RomanzOCover.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:RomanzOCover.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 07:22, 24 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 24

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

'n Duisend Drome (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Pop

Juanita du Plessis (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Pop

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:09, 24 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Wees Lig

Hello John Meadow,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Wees Lig for deletion, because it seems to be inappropriate for a variety of reasons.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Ochiwar (talk) 11:13, 24 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Faizan. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made with this edit to Romanz Discography, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Fai zan 12:40, 24 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Hou Vas with this edit, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Fai zan 12:48, 24 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Wees Lig

Hello John Meadow,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Wees Lig for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is significant enough to be included in an encyclopedia, and the artist doesn't have an article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Ochiwar (talk) 20:34, 24 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Wees Lig

Hello John Meadow,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Wees Lig for deletion, because it seems to be inappropriate for a variety of reasons.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Ochiwar (talk) 20:39, 24 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of N Duisend Drome

The article N Duisend Drome has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

WP:NALBUMS

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Uberaccount (talk) 20:58, 24 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Wees Lig

The article Wees Lig has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

WP:NALBUMS

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Uberaccount (talk) 20:59, 24 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Dreamin' Wide Awake

The article Dreamin' Wide Awake has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

WP:NALBUMS

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Uberaccount (talk) 21:00, 24 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of The Edge of the Divine

The article The Edge of the Divine has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

WP:NALBUMS

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Uberaccount (talk) 21:03, 24 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Romanz Discography

A tag has been placed on Romanz Discography requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a musical recording which does not indicate why its subject is important or significant, and where the artist's article has never existed, has been deleted or is eligible for deletion itself. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for music.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Uberaccount (talk) 21:04, 24 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of The Edge of the Divine for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Edge of the Divine is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Edge of the Divine until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Do not remove PROD tags without explanation Uberaccount (talk) 22:15, 24 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Dreamin' Wide Awake for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dreamin' Wide Awake is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dreamin' Wide Awake until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Uberaccount (talk) 22:16, 24 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Removing AfD template

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with The Edge of the Divine. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. This is an automated message from a bot about this edit, where you removed the deletion template from an article before the deletion discussion was complete. If this message is in error, please report it. Snotbot t • c » 12:42, 25 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:RomansDuD34.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:RomansDuD34.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 20:05, 25 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Romanz - Hou Vas.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Romanz - Hou Vas.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ALH (talk) 01:32, 26 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:HouVasR099.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:HouVasR099.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ALH (talk) 01:33, 26 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Hou Vas - Romanz.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Hou Vas - Romanz.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ALH (talk) 01:33, 26 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The Edge of the Divine

John, have you seen Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/The_Edge_of_the_Divine? I don't think that the reason given is good enough for it to be deleted, but if you don't want the article to be deleted, it would be good to add a lead section. --Musdan77 (talk) 05:13, 26 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:RomanZHouVas.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:RomanZHouVas.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 08:22, 26 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Removing AfD template

Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages, as you did with Dreamin' Wide Awake. Doing so won't stop the discussion from taking place. You are, however, welcome to comment about the proposed deletion on the appropriate page. This is an automated message from a bot about this edit, where you removed the deletion template from an article before the deletion discussion was complete. If this message is in error, please report it. Snotbot t • c » 11:33, 27 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Removing AfD template

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to remove Articles for deletion notices or comments from articles and Articles for deletion pages, as you did at The Edge of the Divine, you may be blocked from editing. This is an automated message from a bot about this edit, where you removed the deletion template from an article before the deletion discussion was complete. If this message is in error, please report it. Snotbot t • c » 12:15, 27 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:RomansDuD34.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:RomansDuD34.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:14, 29 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Pieter Badenhorst (singer)

A tag has been placed on Pieter Badenhorst (singer) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Taroaldo ✉ 09:59, 15 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of My Angel (song) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article My Angel (song) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/My Angel (song) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. --Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^{Talk to me} 15:07, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Corlea Botha

A tag has been placed on Corlea Botha requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content or organised event, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^{Talk to me} 19:56, 18 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:Theodore Jantjies97.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Theodore Jantjies97.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that this media item is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails the first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media item could be found or created that provides substantially the same information or which could be adequately covered with text alone. If you believe this media item is not replaceable, please:

Go to the file description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
On the file discussion page, write the reason why this media item is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Fut.Perf. ☼ 08:01, 20 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Corlea Botha

A tag has been placed on Corlea Botha requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Sam 🎤 18:21, 22 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Zita Pretorius

A tag has been placed on Zita Pretorius requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content or organised event, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^{Talk to me} 08:56, 25 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

July 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Juanita du Plessis may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

Africa]] for her work.[http://afrikaans.news.com//Nuus/Afrikaanse-kunstenaars-tops-by-Samas-20100417 Afrikaanse

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 23:05, 26 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 25

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Overcomer (song), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Christopher Stevens (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:09, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 8

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Capital Kings discography, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Essential Records (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:48, 8 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hurricane (Natalie Grant album)

Hurricane (Natalie Grant album) is still not notable. When it gets reliable sources, please revert to your last edit. I don't want to have to go through an AfD debate as it's clearly just too soon for this to be an article.Walter Görlitz (talk) 18:01, 16 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:HurricaneNGrant.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:HurricaneNGrant.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:05, 17 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

September 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Raymond Cilliers discography may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

The discography),<ref>{{cite web|url=http://http://www.amazon.com/s?ie=UTF8&field-artist=Raymond%20Cilliers&page=1&

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 18:30, 17 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:YouCarryMe.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:YouCarryMe.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 17:05, 7 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Amplified by Faith

A tag has been placed on Amplified by Faith requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. reddogsix (talk) 21:33, 24 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Amplified by Faith

A tag has been placed on Amplified by Faith requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Harry the Dog WOOF 17:29, 6 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:00, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of André Venter singer

The article André Venter singer has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no reliable references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Cahk (talk) 09:51, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, John Meadow. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 5

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Raymond Cilliers, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gloryland. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:09, 5 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:Raymond Cilliers.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Raymond Cilliers.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

Go to the file description page and add the text {{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. -- Marchjuly (talk) 06:06, 21 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (I'm Still Here (Mandisa song)) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating I'm Still Here (Mandisa song), John Meadow!

Wikipedia editor Boleyn just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

To reply, leave a comment on Boleyn's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Boleyn (talk) 13:07, 1 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, John Meadow. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, John Meadow. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Still Rolling Stones Still moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Still Rolling Stones Still, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 13:02, 22 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Still Rolling Stones Still

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Still Rolling Stones Still requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Boleyn (talk) 16:10, 22 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

November 2018

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Regarding your edits to Trust (Jaci Velasquez album), please use the preview button before you save your edit; this helps you find any errors you have made and prevents clogging up recent changes and the page history. Below the edit box is a Show preview button. Pressing this will show you what the article will look like without actually saving it.

The "show preview" button is right next to the "publish changes" button and below the edit summary field.

It is strongly recommended that you use this before saving. If you have any questions, contact the help desk for assistance. Thank you. Walter Görlitz (talk) 11:21, 23 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The Comeback (song)

Please do not remove {{1r}} or {{nn}} without first resolving the issue, like you did at The Comeback (song). --Jax 0677 (talk) 23:23, 4 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Capitalization

Not sure why you think that "Christian" should be lower case, but MOS:CAPS, specifically MOS:CAPS#Religion, is the place that you should argue for that position, not by adding it to articles. Walter Görlitz (talk) 16:10, 5 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (On My Knees (Jaci Velasquez song)) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating On My Knees (Jaci Velasquez song).

I have just reviewed the page, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Barbara (WVS)}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Best Regards, Barbara ✐✉ 23:52, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

April 2019

Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to On My Knees (Jaci Velasquez song), without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. Walter Görlitz (talk) 14:40, 24 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

July 2019

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Look Up Child, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Magnolia677 (talk) 19:12, 9 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 10

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Back to You (Mandisa song), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page David Garcia (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 19:55, 10 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Doug Anderson (singer)

A tag has been placed on Doug Anderson (singer) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, such as at Articles for deletion. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. --Nahal^(T) 12:15, 13 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Raymond Cilliers for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Raymond Cilliers is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Raymond Cilliers until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Magnolia677 (talk) 18:26, 13 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

July 2019

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Raymond Cilliers. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. Magnolia677 (talk) 13:11, 14 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Steven Malcolm

Hello, John Meadow,

Thanks for creating Steven Malcolm! I edit here too, under the username Kudpung and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:-

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Kudpung}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 23:26, 14 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Conflict of interest policy

Hello, John Meadow. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the COI guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your COI when discussing affected articles (see WP:DISCLOSE);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. --Ronz (talk) 16:59, 19 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

August 2019

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks! Eagleash (talk) 17:47, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, you really need to use edit summaries. I was perplexed by your mass removal of material on Jaci Velasquez until I looked and realized you'd created a new article. Please try to communicate and let people know what you are up to. Elizium23 (talk) 21:55, 14 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, you really need to use edit summaries. Please try to communicate and let people know what you are up to. Walter Görlitz (talk) 21:28, 18 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You recently reverted me without an edit summary. I'm not sure why you did so. Please start explaining your edits. Cheers. Walter Görlitz (talk) 02:47, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Rescue (Lauren Diagle song).jpeg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Rescue (Lauren Diagle song).jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:49, 7 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:16, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 21

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited A Million Lights (Michael W. Smith song), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page CBN.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:41, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 8

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Rocco Reed, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Christian.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:21, 8 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Chart table titles

Your statement “All other single pages include this format” is not true. In fact, most don’t have titles at all, the ones that do just say “chart performance for”, and I’ve corrected others that use the incorrect phrasing without being reverted. Thanks. Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^{Talk to me} 21:33, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Refer to [[Cry Pretty (album), Rain on Me etc John Meadow (talk) 10:04, 15 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Cry Pretty (album) Rain on Me (Lady Gaga song) John Meadow (talk) 10:08, 15 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Most infact do have this format however is limited when they do not have a year end chart. John Meadow (talk) 10:12, 15 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Even the examples you give completely disprove your point. I looked up every other Carrie Underwood album and Lada Gaga song and your examples are the only ones with "Weekly chart performance for". Most don't use a table title at all, and I saw uses of "Chart performance for" and "Peak weekly chart performance for" just as often. All I'm saying is that "Weekly chart performance for" is not an accurate statement because it implies its week by week chart performance and not its peak performance. So what I am changing it to, and what you will find on some other articles as well, describe the song or album's peak performance on weekly charts and NOT its weekly chart performance. Those are not synonymous. Thanks. Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^{Talk to me} 16:53, 15 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you say so John Meadow (talk) 18:58, 15 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

And makes you happy. John Meadow (talk) 19:01, 15 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Latin

What do you mean recorded in Latin? Do you mean a Spanish version? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:C7:C201:C640:7877:DB57:298C:D265 (talk) 19:53, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 23

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited No Stranger (album), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Andrew Holt.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:19, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:34, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You've done it again

Not only have you failed to leave an edit summary, but you steadfastly refuse to discuss based on the provided documentation. John, I do not appreciate your behaviour. How would you like to address this situation? Will you respect WP:STATUSQUO while we discuss or are you going to be difficult and insist on your own preference? Please explain what part of the content at template:Infobox_album#genre you disagree with or do not understand? The same goes for the note there? Walter Görlitz (talk) 04:49, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Good day

I already explained. Much better articles uses the list format (it seem to only be Christian albums who uses the , format). However since it is so important for you to have a different format (than most other articles). You can revert it. I wont try to fix it again. Thank you! John Meadow (talk) 09:55, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I already explained to you, that's not the guideline. It's not only Christian albums that use the format, it's all articles. It's not that I want a different article, it's that you unilaterally decided to ignore the guideline, did so without discussion or explanation, and only when pressed are you admitting that you could be wrong. You will restore it as I do not want to be blocked for edit warring and it will show that you not only understand the issue, but that you can correctly used edit summaries on all edits. Walter Görlitz (talk) 17:59, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If it makes you happy then I am glad. Wont touch the article again. If it bothers you you can go change it thanks. John Meadow (talk) 20:30, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You're just not letting it go though. Walter Görlitz (talk) 05:28, 10 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Better written articles uses the bullet list. They also only have three items. You seem to be the only person on Wiki to want to implement the , format. Please read better articles to use as examples. John Meadow (talk) 05:33, 10 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

They are not better written, they are larger. I can show you feature articles with comma-separated lists. You seem to be the only person on Wikipedia who refusesa to read or recognize documentation. Walter Görlitz (talk) 05:38, 10 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

For instance: The Allman Brothers Band (album), Astral Weeks, Boz Scaggs (album). So please read the documentation and don't capriciously change the formatting because newer articles show a preference for it. Understand why the change was made and when it should be applied. Thanks. Keep up the good work of creating and maintaining articles. Walter Görlitz (talk) 05:48, 10 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

These are not well written articles. John Meadow (talk) 06:28, 10 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

They are feature articles. If you think that they are not well written, please take them to feature article review. Besides, the documentation is clear. Stop your edit war. Walter Görlitz (talk) 17:35, 11 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

What's more, there are hundreds of feature articles that follow the documentation for the infobox and use commas, just as there are many that have elected to use lists. If they are following the documentation, there is no reason to change it. And again, stop your edit war.

One thing further, it saddens me that you have also gone back on your word. Walter Görlitz (talk) 17:37, 11 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I havent

I haven't touched Look Up Child. You changed No Stranger to your own format. John Meadow (talk) 17:53, 11 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Furthermore you have changed No Stranger to your own format. Even though there is no law that states it needs to be in the comma list. What you showed me is purely an outline not a law. Also why did you delete all the genre's? John Meadow (talk) 17:56, 11 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

~~https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=No_Stranger_(album)&diff=993567803&oldid=993485314 was just this morning (my time).~~ My mistake. You were concerned about Look Up Child and then No Stranger.

Once your sock block is over, we can discuss the formatting on the article's talk page. I looked at the history and you started it with commas, which is why I keep returning it to that correct version. Walter Görlitz (talk) 18:19, 11 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

My mistake on the article. Again, it's not my format, it's the project's. Walter Görlitz (talk) 18:30, 11 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Stay away from me from now on. John Meadow (talk) 21:25, 12 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Livelikemusic reverted your edit for using the comma format. You did not go change it and it also has only three genres. Why do you think it is okay to revert all my edits and no other peoples? John Meadow (talk) 14:05, 26 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Multiple accounts

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 18:12, 11 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed to RaquelCarlit.-- Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 18:12, 11 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Natalie Grant label

This edit https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=My_Weapon&curid=64215743&diff=995045139&oldid=994097678 is correct. The editor probably copied an old work. According to https://www.allmusic.com/artist/natalie-grant-mn0000372986/discography she had one release on Curb/Word. Walter Görlitz (talk) 08:28, 19 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Now I see that you restored the second label. I know some are signed to Curb/Word, some to Word/Curb but I think you're right that Grant is signed only to Curb. My album is trapped at the border and can't confirm on my copy. Are you sure? Walter Görlitz (talk) 07:20, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

IN checking sources, three [1], [2], and [3] are all the same press release, but the press release calls her a Curb recording artist, but I trust you if state that the single is on both labels. Walter Görlitz (talk) 07:24, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

According to the radio release it is both Word and Curb. Although according to ITunes the album is only released under Curb John Meadow (talk) 09:12, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Do you know if Praise You In this Storm and No Stranger are singles. I can only find relevant information proving Face to Face is a single. As it was released to radio but no records that Praise You In this Storm or No Stranger have that titles of singles? John Meadow (talk) 09:10, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

[[Rescue (Lauren Daigle song)

hey christian wikipedian, I made an edit two months ago on this article. Since I saw a wikipedia of another christian song that had the infobox with multiple genres and one of them was CCM (contemporary christian) (listed as the first one), on this article, there was two genres listed, one of them was "contemporary christian", and the second one was "soul". why was the edit reverted on shortening contemporary christian to ccm? AKK700 03:26, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:HouVasR977.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:HouVasR977.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:30, 22 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

April 2021

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from For King & Country (band) into For King & Country discography. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. Bennv123 (talk) 16:27, 23 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I've already provided the required attribution via this dummy edit, so there's nothing further you need to do in this particular case. But do keep the above in mind for future edits. Regards. Bennv123 (talk) 16:35, 23 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 26

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Jaci Velasquez discography, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Feliz Navidad and Reinas.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:56, 26 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reliable sources and other issues at Overcomer

Hi John. Tunefind.com is not a reliable source. I suspected that was the case when I looked it as it is essentially an open wiki, and WP:RS doesn't allow those. When I checked at WP:RSN, it was discussed twice and both times my suspicion was supported: it's not reliable. Finally, the source only supports its inclusion on the soundtrack, not in the film. Please find a reliable source that supports that it was in the film, ideally one that supports its role in the film. Simply being used as background music or music for a scene is less impressive than it being a plot point in the film. Walter Görlitz (talk) 21:24, 19 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Good day Walter. I watched the film and know it is used in it. Unfortunately I can't find any sources confirming its use in the movie (other than the soundtrack). What do you recommend? Deleting entire line or reliable source for inclusion in Soundtrack? John Meadow (talk) 19:55, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Image without license

Unspecified source/license for File:RaymondCilliers.png

Thanks for uploading File:RaymondCilliers.png. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 18:00, 27 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:RaymondCilliers.png

A tag has been placed on File:RaymondCilliers.png requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement of https://sanotify.com/raymond-cilliers/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Whpq (talk) 18:45, 27 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Nightbirde for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Nightbirde is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nightbirde until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Psiĥedelisto (talk • contribs) ^{please always ping!} 00:43, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:39, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:26, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Closer to Your Heart.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Closer to Your Heart.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:47, 2 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You Say

Excuse me John, but why won't you let me keep my edits? I mean that song did chart on those charts. Shouldn't we include all the charts the song charted on? Jamgorham (talk) 12:29, 28 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Once a song has charted on the Billboard Hot 100 we no longer use component charts.

This is also indicated in the Wikipedia guidelines.

For example we do not add hot 100, radio 100, digital songs etc...

Similar to the Christian songs.

We do not add streaming and christian digital songs.

This is also a way to prevent lengthy and unnecessary information.

Please look at other articles such as major single releases for Taylor Swift or even Adele. John Meadow (talk) 18:01, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Furthermore, if a song peaked on the Billboard hot 100 whats the point of the digital songs or radio songs. As it is incorporated in the hot 100. John Meadow (talk) 18:06, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The Radio Songs chart deserves a mention no matter what! Jamgorham (talk) 12:44, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Well your guidelines stink! Every chart deserves a mention no matter what! If you won't let me keep the Christian airplay charts, then I won't let the other airplay charts stay either! Jamgorham (talk) 12:29, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Jamgorham. I do not appreciate your cyber bullying. You have not read the rules and regulations from Wikipedia's guidlines. Clearly you do not want to learn and keep to the required guidelines. I recommend you read those guidelines set by Wikipedia.

I will not engage in a war with you regarding this matter. The guidlines is clear. John Meadow (talk) 16:51, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:BILLBOARDCHARTS do yourself a favour and read the guidelines. It's not my rules or opinions but Wikipedia's. I can also see you have been told multiple times, by multiple users about these guidelines. Yet, you continue to ignore them. John Meadow (talk) 13:20, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:43, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:ComingHomeR.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:ComingHomeR.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:17, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:LatelyRayCill.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:LatelyRayCill.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:23, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]