User talk:Jo1807
January 2023
[edit]
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Your user page may not meet Wikipedia's user page guidelines. It is intended for basic information about yourself, your interests, and goals as they relate to editing Wikipedia; as well as disclosures of conflicts of interest and paid editing. Although a lot of freedom is allowed in personalizing your user page, it is not:
- an encyclopedia article (and should not be styled to look like one)
- a workspace for a draft article
- a personal website, blog, or social media site
- a space for self-promotion or other advertising
- a CV, resumé or lengthy autobiography
The user page guidelines have additional information on what is and what is not considered acceptable content. Please use your user sandbox or the draft article space to practice editing or create new articles. Thank you. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 20:45, 1 January 2023 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of User:Jo1807
[edit]
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. A tag has been placed on User:Jo1807 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 20:45, 1 January 2023 (UTC)
AfC notification: Draft:René Peters (Chemist) has a new comment
[edit]
AfC notification: Draft:René Peters (Chemist) has a new comment
[edit]Paid editing
[edit]
Hello Jo1807. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.
Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.
Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Jo1807. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Jo1807|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Theroadislong (talk) 09:51, 3 January 2023 (UTC)
- Dear Sir / Madam, thank you for your comments. Your impression of an undisclosed financial stake is wrong though. I am a history student from the University of Regensburg and will not receive and have not received any money for writing and posting this article. It is simply an exercise for me, because I wish to contribute more articles about people relevant for science and history. I am sorry that not everything was perfect right from the start, but as I said I am a freshman.
- However, I know that the Peters research group is doing internationally relevant research work and is also attracting much international interest. All scientific claims in this article are confirmed by scientific references from peer-reviewed journals of high impact factor. The links to Google Scholar and ORCID demonstrate that this research group is scientifically relevant. Jo1807 (talk) 10:32, 3 January 2023 (UTC)
Ways to improve René Peters (chemist)
[edit]Hello, Jo1807,
Thank you for creating René Peters (chemist).
I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:
We really need sources not written by the subject to show notability
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Graeme Bartlett}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.
Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
Graeme Bartlett (talk) 00:03, 6 January 2023 (UTC)
- Thank you. References [11-14] and [22-23] were not written by the subject and are review articles in internationally reputed journals. Which references by the subject do you consider as irrelevant to be listed here? Jo1807 (talk) 11:16, 10 January 2023 (UTC)