Jump to content

User talk:Jo-Jo Eumerus/Archive 48

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 45Archive 46Archive 47Archive 48Archive 49Archive 50Archive 55

Hi, you deleted this article at AfD a few weeks ago. Can you tell if the new version falls under WP:G4? PC78 (talk) 20:30, 6 July 2019 (UTC)

Greetings PC78. Seems someone has redirected it already. JoJo Eumerus mobile (talk) 12:41, 7 July 2019 (UTC)

I was going through my AfD log and noticed this article and I'm considering taking it to DRV after the result of the natural language processing outcome here Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2019 June 6 which rejected the notion of outlines as WP:OR, though not necessarily about redundant forks - since you closed the XfD, wondering if you have any thoughts on the matter? Thanks! SportingFlyer T·C 00:20, 7 July 2019 (UTC)

Greetings. First, I am currently on holiday in a place with snail WLAN so I can't much inspection. Second, in the AFD I closed the key arguments were about redundancy not OR but RoySmith point about a RFC might apply, so...flip a coin? JoJo Eumerus mobile (talk) 12:21, 7 July 2019 (UTC)
I haven't spent too much time on this, but my initial impression is that DRV is the wrong tool. It looks to me that there's a general debate going on about outlines and portals in general, and the right way to discuss that would be in some sort of RFC, as noted above. -- RoySmith (talk) 14:51, 7 July 2019 (UTC)

20:12, 8 July 2019 (UTC)

Subpages III

Hey JJE, I saw you were the deleting admin. on the MfD's of Portal:Ankara. That portal has a bunch of subpages as well; can you take care of them or do I have to tag each subpage with CSD G8 myself instead? Thanks. UnitedStatesian (talk) 16:08, 4 July 2019 (UTC)

Nah, report them here. I've zapped these. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 16:52, 4 July 2019 (UTC)
Portal:British Rail, Portal:UK Railways and Portal:UK railways are 3 more. UnitedStatesian (talk) 17:04, 4 July 2019 (UTC)
Done as well. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 17:08, 4 July 2019 (UTC)
Last ones: Portal:Central Asia. UnitedStatesian (talk) 17:43, 4 July 2019 (UTC)
It's gone as well. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 18:33, 4 July 2019 (UTC)
Portal:East Midlands England. UnitedStatesian (talk) 19:17, 4 July 2019 (UTC)
Gone. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:18, 4 July 2019 (UTC)
Portal:Inland Empire and Portal:Las Vegas. Can you tell I am working through in alphabetical order? UnitedStatesian (talk) 03:39, 5 July 2019 (UTC)
Now I can. Both disposed of. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 06:09, 5 July 2019 (UTC)
Portal:Mitochondria and Portal:Origami are two more. UnitedStatesian (talk) 22:46, 8 July 2019 (UTC)
Done and done. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 07:26, 9 July 2019 (UTC)

Re: Springer

The section was archived faster than I expected. Do you still need access to [6]? If so, please send me an email so I can email it you. Compassionate727 (T·C) 14:16, 11 July 2019 (UTC)

@Compassionate727: Replied. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 13:28, 12 July 2019 (UTC)
Yes Sent, I believe. Compassionate727 (T·C) 13:45, 12 July 2019 (UTC)
Thanks, received. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 14:01, 12 July 2019 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Sega/archive1

Need to follow up to comments there. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 21:37, 12 July 2019 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Tacora, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Fault (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 11:56, 13 July 2019 (UTC)

Resolved. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 12:07, 13 July 2019 (UTC)

Work needed

Tacora. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 13:39, 11 July 2019 (UTC)

With https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-662-57384-6_5, https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0895981119300471, http://bosques.ciren.cl/handle/123456789/26648 and https://scielo.conicyt.cl/scielo.php?pid=S0717-73562017005000108&script=sci_arttext. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 14:01, 12 July 2019 (UTC)
Viedma (volcano) and Incahuasi as well as Purico complex with [7]. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 12:55, 13 July 2019 (UTC)

Merging "Abdul Sattar (Maharashtra politician)" into "Abdul Sattar Abdul Nabi" and then deleting "Abdul Sattar (Maharashtra politician)"

Hi Jo-Jo, I had nominated "Abdul Sattar (Maharashtra politician)" (a wikipage about an Indian politician) for deletion because a duplicate page ("Abdul Sattar Abdul Nabi") already existed. After the Afd discussion, consensus was to merge the nominated page with "Abdul Sattar Abdul Nabi". I've done just that, i.e. I merged all the info from "Abdul Sattar (Maharashtra politician)" to "Abdul Sattar Abdul Nabi". I wonder what happens to the redundant "Abdul Sattar (Maharashtra politician)" page now? How do I delete it? Would love any help in this regard.

Thanks -- GreaterPonce665 (talk) GreaterPonce665 22:46, 13 July 2019 (UTC)

Greetings, GreaterPonce665. The last step remaining would be to redirect the redundant article to the target. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 12:17, 14 July 2019 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

Views/Day Quality Title Tagged with…
7 Quality: Low, Assessed class: NA, Predicted class: Start Except the Dying (novel) (talk) Add sources
104 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Quincy, Florida (talk) Add sources
60 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Aptana (talk) Add sources
35 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: NA, Predicted class: C Stack-oriented programming (talk) Add sources
8 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Rocklin Unified School District (talk) Add sources
31 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Yahoo! Pipes (talk) Add sources
78 Quality: High, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: GA Islamization and Turkification of Xinjiang (talk) Cleanup
62 Quality: High, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: FA Migration to Xinjiang (talk) Cleanup
434 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Reactive programming (talk) Cleanup
5 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: NA, Predicted class: C West Gadsden High School (talk) Expand
112 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: NA, Predicted class: B Public image of George W. Bush (talk) Expand
5 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Florida State Road 12 (talk) Expand
10 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: C Uqturpan County (talk) Unencyclopaedic
22 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: C Pipeline Pilot (talk) Unencyclopaedic
14 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: B History of the eastern steppe (talk) Unencyclopaedic
30 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: NA, Predicted class: C Mill architecture (talk) Merge
47 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: C Iceland hotspot (talk) Merge
245 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: C Low-code development platform (talk) Merge
97 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Two Worlds (video game) (talk) Wikify
37 Quality: Low, Assessed class: NA, Predicted class: Start Synchronous programming language (talk) Wikify
14 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Signal programming (talk) Wikify
26 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Start Kambo Boys (talk) Orphan
59 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Adau Mornyang (talk) Orphan
8 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Registration of Intellectual Property in Ghana (talk) Orphan
234 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start Jonny Harris (talk) Stub
2 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Lake Tallavana, Florida (talk) Stub
17 Quality: Low, Assessed class: NA, Predicted class: Start Thomas Brackenreid (character) (talk) Stub
8 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Start Pressure ridge (lava) (talk) Stub
10 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start Poor Tom Is Cold (talk) Stub
5 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start Chattahoochee High School (Florida) (talk) Stub

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:50, 14 July 2019 (UTC)

Good reasons to bypass redirects include: .... Links on the Main Page. The Rambling Man (talk) 10:38, 15 July 2019 (UTC)

Huh. For a moment I was thinking that link was noincluded. Anyhow, remedied it. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 10:41, 15 July 2019 (UTC)

15:29, 15 July 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Salton Buttes

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Salton Buttes you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Ganesha811 -- Ganesha811 (talk) 03:41, 17 July 2019 (UTC)

TFA

Thank you and those who helped for Tutupaca, "a volcano in Peru, which is notable as the site of one of the major historical mega-landslides on active volcanoes during a major eruption in 1802 or so and still potentially a threat"! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:23, 16 July 2019 (UTC)

Thanks, but it seems like I'll need to update the article soon-ish; a significant source has been published on it. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 12:38, 16 July 2019 (UTC)
Did a partial update but will need to do another sweep post holidays I think. JoJo Eumerus mobile (talk) 07:11, 17 July 2019 (UTC)

Two articles to work on

Homeric Minimum and Cyclonic Niño. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 08:39, 17 July 2019 (UTC)

Invitation to talk page watchers

If anyone's interested, I've sent Horizon Guyot to Featured article candidates (FAC), in case anyone has opinions on the quality of the article. For those unfamiliar with FAC, the criteria an article has to comply with are these. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 12:13, 18 July 2019 (UTC)

GA Review of Salton Buttes

Hey Jo-Jo,

Just letting you know I finished my first run-through of the review of Salton Buttes that you nominated for Good Article. Let me know if you have any questions. Do you have time this week to make a few minor edits? Overall, the page is in great shape! Just a couple of things I noticed.

Cheers, Ganesha Ganesha811 (talk) 14:50, 18 July 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Salton Buttes

The article Salton Buttes you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Salton Buttes for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Ganesha811 -- Ganesha811 (talk) 19:02, 18 July 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Salar de Punta Negra

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Salar de Punta Negra you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Ganesha811 -- Ganesha811 (talk) 16:21, 19 July 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Salar de Punta Negra

The article Salar de Punta Negra you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Salar de Punta Negra for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Ganesha811 -- Ganesha811 (talk) 18:21, 21 July 2019 (UTC)

13:07, 22 July 2019 (UTC)

Sources to use

These for Lunar Crater volcanic field and these for White River Ash. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:42, 23 July 2019 (UTC)

Salar de Punta Negra needs work. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 16:38, 29 July 2019 (UTC)
"tabernacle hill" -"ice springs" -"pavant butte" -"pahvant butte". Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 12:16, 30 July 2019 (UTC)

Undeleting an AFD you closed as delete

Hi, I've just gotten a request to undelete the article deleted at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Best Picture milestones, which you closed. Is this all right with you? When I explained the process (link for the exchange in question), the user said basically he wants to put it in his sandbox and use some of the content in other articles, so I referred to WP:CWW and noted that it couldn't stay in a user sandbox.

If you're all right with undeletion, I suspect that I'll redirect it to Academy Award for Best Picture (unless you or the other user has a better idea) and repeat to him my instructions to attribute the source page (I'll use the template that's put on the talk page, if I can remember what it's called). Is all of this all right with you? And if not, would you explain what you think is the wisest course of action? Thank you. Nyttend (talk) 03:38, 24 July 2019 (UTC)

Greetings. Undeletion and redirect seems OK to me. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 08:44, 24 July 2019 (UTC)
Thank you. Here is my note to the user, in case you're interested. Nyttend (talk) 11:03, 24 July 2019 (UTC)

Hello Jo-Jo, you recently closed Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dušan Stojanović as delete. I bundled Dušan Stoiljković (investor) in the nomination as it was a duplicate article, would you mind deleting it as well? – Teratix 08:30, 26 July 2019 (UTC)

Greetings; it's gone. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 08:34, 26 July 2019 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mount Hasan, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Fault, Crater and Monogenetic (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:04, 29 July 2019 (UTC)

Thanks, but as that article is not finished yet I'll leave them for the time being. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 09:05, 29 July 2019 (UTC)

21:42, 29 July 2019 (UTC)

The Signpost: 31 July 2019

(Custom header) Qais Qandil deletion

Qais Qandil (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) Good Day

in regards of Qais Qandil page deletion, what is the reason behind deleting this article.

also what is needed to restore it?


Best Regards

ood Day in regards of Qais Qandil page deletion, what is the reason behind deleting this article. also what is needed to restore it?

Best Regards— Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.50.176.219 (talkcontribs)

Greetings, we'd need evidence that this person is notable by Wikipedia's particular definition of the concept. Also not having the article be written by undisclosed paid editors might also help. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 08:22, 1 August 2019 (UTC)

Possibly relisting an old AfD or outright deleting an article

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


A couple of months ago you closed Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bernard Wojtkowiak with the consensus being to merge the article with Erie County, New York. However, I don't really think its possible to merge a one line article about a county legislator who only served in said legislature for one year into Erie County. Is it possible to re-list the article for deletion again or even just outright delete it given the subject was found not to have passed notability standards? Best, GPL93 (talk) 19:16, 2 August 2019 (UTC)

You know, I admit that the merge proposal made relatively little sense; @Path slopu and Otr500:? Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:23, 2 August 2019 (UTC)
The current politics of AFD usually leans to the literal meanings of !votes. I feel that anything other than "keep" is an indication the article does not warrant stand lone status and feel that policies and guidelines should be taken into account. For some reason this seems logical to me and possibly involves some common sense. However, it tends to get confusing in closings. Sometimes my intentions work but others not so much.
At the time I failed to sign my !vote (went mental) there was the Nom of "Delete" and a "Merge". If I !voted delete and someone else "Merge" then past closings indicate a "No consensus" would have occurred so I added merge. This prompted me to !vote "Delete" with a secondary to "Merge" if possible. The article is a one paragraph two sentence BLP with one reference so fails NPOL, any basic notability criterion, is a dictionary mention, and pseudo biography likely never to be expanded. That would seem to be enough to warrant deletion but is not necessarily how it works. The fiasco of keeping blank articles and that !voting can be a head count over policy has led to some dismay. Merge was a better option of keep or keep by confusion. I feel "Delete" was warranted and if a reconsideration of closing is opted for would support deletion. If that is not possible I would reaffirm "Delete" on a renomination. Otr500 (talk) 14:43, 3 August 2019 (UTC)
Personally, I'd be inclined to allow renomination or a relist. Even considering WP:ATD the material isn't mergeable without some substantial rework of the target article. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 15:05, 3 August 2019 (UTC)
I just re-nominated. It's probably the easiest way to sort this out. Best, GPL93 (talk) 15:40, 4 August 2019 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

13:24, 5 August 2019 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Black Rock Desert volcanic field (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to Fault, Crater, Beaver County and Crust

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:46, 6 August 2019 (UTC)

Thanks, I'll get them sorted when the article's finished. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 08:47, 6 August 2019 (UTC)

Bulldogge Brasileiro merge

Hello Jo-Jo, further to the consensus Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bulldogge Brasileiro I merged the article to the article [20] However, one editor named User:Atsme keeps reverting it. I left him a message on his talk page, but he is refusing to follow the consensus to merge the article. Would you please get involved, I do not want to get involved an edit war. Thank you Aquatastetalk 18:31, 6 August 2019 (UTC)

Greetings. I don't think that the AFD does automatically imply that all content should be merged over, just that which can be reliably sourced. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 18:35, 6 August 2019 (UTC)
Hi, all of it had sources it was notability that was the issue. You closed the deletion discusssion with the following statement: The result was merge to Bulldog breeds. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 15:35, 28 July 2019 (UTC). I agree with the consensus to merge, but one person User:Atsme keeps reverting the entire merge. Aquatastetalk 21:48, 6 August 2019 (UTC)
I think that a discussion would be needed on Talk:Bulldog breeds, there. AfDs like Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bulldogge Brasileiro prescribe the fate of one page - Bulldogge Brasileiro - but they are not necessarily binding on editors of another page. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 21:52, 6 August 2019 (UTC)
Diff with explanation; Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bulldog breeds - where the article is now. Atsme Talk 📧 21:54, 6 August 2019 (UTC)

Bots Newsletter, August 2019

Bots Newsletter, August 2019

Greetings!

Here is the 7th issue of the Bots Newsletter, a lot happened since last year's newsletter! You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future newsletters by adding/removing your name from this list.

Highlights for this newsletter include:

ARBCOM
  • Nothing of note happened. Just like we like it.
BAG

BAG members are expected to be active on Wikipedia to have their finger on the pulse of the community. After two years without any bot-related activity (such as posting on bot-related pages, posting on a bot's talk page, or operating a bot), BAG members will be retired from BAG following a one-week notice. Retired members can re-apply for BAG membership as normal if they wish to rejoin the BAG.

We thank former members for their service and wish Madman a happy retirement. We note that Madman and BU Rob13 were not inactive and could resume their BAG positions if they so wished, should their retirements happens to be temporary.

BOTDICT

Two new entries feature in the bots dictionary

BOTPOL
  • Activity requirements: BAG members now have an activity requirement. The requirements are very light, one only needs to be involved in a bot-related area at some point within the last two years. For purpose of meeting these requirements, discussing a bot-related matter anywhere on Wikipedia counts, as does operating a bot (RFC).
  • Copyvio flag: Bot accounts may be additionally marked by a bureaucrat upon BAG request as being in the "copyviobot" user group on Wikipedia. This flag allows using the API to add metadata to edits for use in the New pages feed (discussion). There is currently 1 bot using this functionality.
  • Mass creation: The restriction on mass-creation (semi-automated or automated) was extended from articles, to all content-pages. There are subtleties, but content here broadly means whatever a reader could land on when browsing the mainspace in normal circumstances (e.g. Mainspace, Books, most Categories, Portals, ...). There is also a warning that WP:MEATBOT still applies in other areas (e.g. Redirects, Wikipedia namespace, Help, maintenance categories, ...) not explicitely covered by WP:MASSCREATION.
BOTREQs and BRFAs

As of writing, we have...

  • 20 active BOTREQs, please help if you can!
  • 14 open BRFAs and 1 BRFA in need of BAG attention (see live status).
  • In 2018, 96 bot task were approved. An AWB search shows approximately 29 were withdrawn/expired, and 6 were denied.
  • Since the start of 2019, 97 bot task were approved. Logs show 15 were withdrawn/expired, and 15 were denied.
  • 10 inactive bots have been deflagged (see discussion). 5 other bots have been deflagged per operator requests or similar (see discussion).
New things
Other discussions

These are some of the discussions that happened / are still happening since the last Bots Newsletter. Many are stale, but some are still active.

See also the latest discussions at the bot noticeboard.

Thank you! edited by: Headbomb 17:24, 7 August 2019 (UTC)


(You can subscribe or unsubscribe from future newsletters by adding or removing your name from this list.)

ugspub utah files

Regarding Wikipedia:WikiProject_Resource_Exchange/Resource_Request/Archive_71#ugspub.nr.utah.gov, all the links work just fine for me. I can send you the pdfs if you'd like. Galobtter (pingó mió) 20:17, 7 August 2019 (UTC)

@Galobtter:Thanks, but it seems like I managed to get to them via Wayback. It seems like that website had an outage, the last few days. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 20:18, 7 August 2019 (UTC)

File:Meir Kahane.jpg

I noticed that you moved the discussion regarding File:Meir Kahane.jpg to Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2019 August 8. You may not have noticed that the other file was renamed, which means that the discussion is now redundant. If you'd be so kind to review the discussion and consider to close it as redundant, I'd appreciate it. Debresser (talk) 10:56, 8 August 2019 (UTC)

Greetings, the reason why I didn't close it is because it's not clear if your argument would address WP:NFCC#1; either we need to demonstrate that the Commons file is of someone else or that only the non-free file is fit for purpose, and the reasons you gave there are kinda vague. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 11:08, 8 August 2019 (UTC)
Hm. Perhaps I didn't express myself clearly. Although I thought I was clear enough. The file nominated is a well known picture, recognizable as belonging to the person mentioned in the title. The file at Commons is unknown to the large public, and not recognizable as being Meir Kahane. Therefore it is useless. Debresser (talk) 12:43, 8 August 2019 (UTC)

DYK for Meers Fault

On 10 August 2019, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Meers Fault, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the Meers Fault in Oklahoma was active during the last 3,000 years and features a scarp that reaches 16 feet (5 m) in height? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Meers Fault. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Meers Fault), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

 — Amakuru (talk) 02:01, 10 August 2019 (UTC)

18:19, 12 August 2019 (UTC)

Your help desk question

You didn't get a response to this question. What do you want to do? I don't have an answer for you.— Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 18:34, 12 August 2019 (UTC)

Well, it seems like that question is moot now as an uninvolved editor closed the discussion. But thanks. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 18:38, 12 August 2019 (UTC)
I marked the question resolved.— Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 18:46, 12 August 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Lake Tecopa

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Lake Tecopa you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Reaper Eternal (talk) 22:36, 12 August 2019 (UTC)

Regarding the link to the discussion you included in Clarification and Amendment#Statement by JJE, the discussion and decision was archived. The link is now: IncidentArchive1015. Pyxis Solitary yak 06:56, 13 August 2019 (UTC)

Remedied and shifted the link into a more useful position, thanks. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 14:59, 13 August 2019 (UTC)