Talk:Pipeline Pilot
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Pipeline Pilot article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Individuals with a conflict of interest, particularly those representing the subject of the article, are strongly advised not to directly edit the article. See Wikipedia:Conflict of interest. You may request corrections or suggest content here on the Talk page for independent editors to review, or contact us if the issue is urgent. |
Please contribute
[edit]Hi, yes I work at Accelrys (now BIOVIA) (cf. my user page, which is transparent), I try to keep the content I append with a NPOV as much as possible, avoiding copyright violation, adding technical and usage content (cf. discussions with WP moderators on my talk page), please criticize, please contribute Stooof (talk) 10:10, 1 March 2013 (UTC)
Incorrect Reference
[edit]The reference below is incorrect..... Please see article attached to link. Simeonov is not an author on this article
Simeonov, Anton; Paveley, Ross A.; Mansour, Nuha R.; Hallyburton, Irene; Bleicher, Leo S.; Benn, Alex E.; Mikic, Ivana; Guidi, Alessandra; Gilbert, Ian H.; Hopkins, Andrew L.; Bickle, Quentin D. (2012). "Whole Organism High-Content Screening by Label-Free, Image-Based Bayesian Classification for Parasitic Diseases". PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases 6 (7): e1762. doi:10.1371/journal.pntd.0001762. ISSN 1935-2735.
Regards
194.80.229.244 (talk) 13:16, 29 May 2013 (UTC)Ross Paveley
Lists of users and partners removed
[edit]Such indiscriminate lists should be avoided (see WP:NOTDIRECTORY), the company has an official website where such details can be hosted. Specific information about noteworthy partnerships and users should be covered in prose with additional encyclopedic context. Such information must also be based on non-promotional independent sources, not on the company's or their users' say-so. GermanJoe (talk) 17:56, 19 July 2018 (UTC)