User talk:Jkrn111

Welcome!

Hello, Jkrn111, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! -🐦Do☭torWho42 (📼) 19:44, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Prove it

WP:RS - please - it is not a horror movie JarrahTree 13:58, 1 June 2017 (UTC) - Hello, In that case, Categories "British horror films" and "Supernatural horror films" are wrong. I apologize. (Jkrn111 (talk) 14:12, 1 June 2017 (UTC))[reply]

Dont to be too quick to apologise - the challenge I am offering you is - is there a WP:RS or more than one that actually determines that the movie is in fact adequately termed 'horror' ? In the days of video stores, maybe some poor bored clerk put it in horror, or - if someone got freaked out by out it, and maybe thought it was not a psychological thriller .. for me the use of Vienna. Keith Jarret and Art Garfunkel was not horror but psych thriller perhaps... Maybe there is a lot more to categories than are at first sight JarrahTree 14:40, 1 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Jkrn111. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

unclassified vs unclassifiable

Hi Jkrn,

A lot of the langs you added to the family list as "unclassified" are actually "unclassifiable" per Glottolist. By that they mean that the lang is extinct and not enough was recorded to ever classify it -- perhaps some words or names might resemble other languages, but we can't tell if they're loans, or none of the words look like anything else, but w more data we might've discovered regular sound correspondences (as recently with the reclassification of Bijago, once a better look was taken), or maybe all we have is an observation that those people over there used to speak differently than we do -- that is, that the language is unattested. But I think by "unclassified" linguists usually mean something rather different -- there's no consensus over how to classify it for some reason, such as most of the vocab and morphology appearing to belong in one family, but with some divergent core vocabulary, or it's been classified but the evidence is weak, poorly analyzed, or has never been published, or there are competing "classifications", none of which are convincing, etc., but, with further investigation, it should be possible to classify it. — kwami (talk) 05:17, 8 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Question

Are you the user HeartSpin/PanLeo - Apollo 80.111.230.60 (talk) 17:20, 17 April 2018 (UTC) No, I am not. (Jkrn111 (talk) 17:23, 17 April 2018 (UTC))[reply]

Macro-Mayan

I don't think it is a good idea to categorize language articles with membership in proposed families that do not yet have broad support in the linguistic community. Macro-Mayan is one such group and Totozoquean is another.·maunus · snunɐɯ· 13:45, 18 April 2018 (UTC) OK. I Will Stop (Jkrn111 (talk) 13:55, 18 April 2018 (UTC))[reply]

Basque

I appreciate your doing some work on categories but you really need to slow down and focus on an area you're familiar with. There are often reasons for stuff that aren't obvious to a non-specialist. Not everyone who has ever produced a paper on Basque is a vasconist, even though some sure fancy themselves vasconists. Akerbeltz (talk) 08:58, 25 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Many thanks!

Thanks for the barnstar Jkrn111! — Stevey7788 (talk) 14:12, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Responding to your question

I cannot block users as I am not a admin Abote2 (talk) 09:36, 23 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Jkrn111. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Armenian art films has been nominated for discussion

Category:Armenian art films, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. --Bsherr (talk) 00:40, 15 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Czech art films has been nominated for discussion

Category:Czech art films, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. --Bsherr (talk) 00:40, 15 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Greek art films has been nominated for discussion

Category:Greek art films, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. --Bsherr (talk) 00:40, 15 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Norwegian art films has been nominated for discussion

Category:Norwegian art films, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. --Bsherr (talk) 00:40, 15 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Category:South Korean art films has been nominated for discussion

Category:South Korean art films, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. --Bsherr (talk) 00:40, 15 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Art films

Hey there. I'd like to recommend that you pause a bit and only classify films which have been described by reliable sources as being art films. From art film: "An art film is typically a serious, independent film, aimed at a niche market rather than a mass market audience". You are currently classifying some mass-market Icelandic films as being art films, when that doesn't seem to fit. If the article itself doesn't mention things belonging to a category, the article should really not be categorized as such. Thank you :) – Þjarkur (talk) 22:30, 10 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I do not agree. Those were art films. Both. Could you please add some art films into Category:Icelandic art films ? It is empty now. Thanks. (Jkrn111 (talk) 01:25, 11 March 2019 (UTC))[reply]

Hi. Please do not add this category to ALL films associated with an individual director, regardless if that director is noted for this genre. Each and every individual film must have reliable sources to confirm this. Thanks. Lugnuts ^{Fire Walk with Me} 09:24, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Since you don't have a reliable source classifying them as art films, your categorizations are original research. (Incorrect original research, at that). Please do take better care and only categorize things if the text in the article specifically mentions them as being such, categories also need to have a citation. Friðrik mainly made experimental films early on in his career. – Þjarkur (talk) 09:58, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Look at the List of directors associated with art film. For example Charlie Chaplin, Buster Keaton, J. L. Mankiewicz, Vincente Minnelli and Howard Hawks (they all have references). Are their films for niche audience ? Of Course, No. It is quite easy to recognize art film, i think. (Jkrn111 (talk) 11:09, 11 March 2019 (UTC)).[reply]

It's not Category:List of Icelandic films directed by someone who has made experimental films, directors have careers spanning decades and can make multiple kinds of movies. "It is quite easy to recognize art film" is original research. When categorizing, please remember to also insert a citation in the article itself. Thank you. – Þjarkur (talk) 11:19, 11 March 2019 (UTC) For Example, film "Pastoral: To Die in the Country" by idiosyncratic filmmaker Shūji Terayama was deleted (from cat. Japanaese art films) I wrote "In a 2011 case for the film's release into The Criterion Collection, Robert Nishimura lauded Pastoral: To Die in the Country as "an important film by an important filmmaker". He cited its "effortless phantasmagorical freedom" and referred to the work as "so unique and spellbinding that it transcends all classification." Is it not enough ? And there are many similar cases in my work. (Jkrn111 (talk) 11:41, 11 March 2019 (UTC))[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Czech art films

A tag has been placed on Category:Czech art films requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. DannyS712 (talk) 01:15, 2 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Icelandic art films has been nominated for discussion

Category:Icelandic art films, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. ToThAc (talk) 00:04, 14 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Linguists of Buyeo languages

A tag has been placed on Category:Linguists of Buyeo languages requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:40, 13 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:20, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Linguists of Nor–Pondo languages

A tag has been placed on Category:Linguists of Nor–Pondo languages requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. UnitedStatesian (talk) 14:53, 19 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Asmat–Marianne Strait languages

A tag has been placed on Category:Asmat–Marianne Strait languages requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. UnitedStatesian (talk) 22:02, 19 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:East Pauwasi languages

A tag has been placed on Category:East Pauwasi languages requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 15:41, 20 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:West Pauwasi languages

A tag has been placed on Category:West Pauwasi languages requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 15:47, 20 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Katla languages

A tag has been placed on Category:Katla languages requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 15:48, 20 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Linguists of Koguryoic languages

A tag has been placed on Category:Linguists of Koguryoic languages requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 15:50, 20 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Inanwatan languages

A tag has been placed on Category:Inanwatan languages requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 15:53, 20 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Konda-Yahadian languages

A tag has been placed on Category:Konda-Yahadian languages requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 15:54, 20 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Taulil-Butam languages

A tag has been placed on Category:Taulil-Butam languages requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 15:54, 20 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Khoe-Kwadi languages

A tag has been placed on Category:Khoe-Kwadi languages requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 15:55, 20 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:North Berau Gulf languages

A tag has been placed on Category:North Berau Gulf languages requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 16:43, 28 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Ottilien–Misegian languages

A tag has been placed on Category:Ottilien–Misegian languages requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. UnitedStatesian (talk) 05:26, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Tor–Kwerba–Nimboran languages

A tag has been placed on Category:Tor–Kwerba–Nimboran languages requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. UnitedStatesian (talk) 01:48, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Western Pauwasi languages

A tag has been placed on Category:Western Pauwasi languages requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. UnitedStatesian (talk) 05:16, 29 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Eastern Pauwasi languages

A tag has been placed on Category:Eastern Pauwasi languages requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. UnitedStatesian (talk) 05:16, 29 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Linguists of Min Chinese

A tag has been placed on Category:Linguists of Min Chinese requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:34, 31 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Extended Baining languages

A tag has been placed on Category:Extended Baining languages requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:37, 31 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Nostraticists

A tag has been placed on Category:Nostraticists requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 15:30, 1 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Awin–Pa–Kamula languages

A tag has been placed on Category:Awin–Pa–Kamula languages requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. UnitedStatesian (talk) 05:24, 4 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Tor–Kwerba languages

A tag has been placed on Category:Tor–Kwerba languages requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. UnitedStatesian (talk) 02:51, 12 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Gumuz languages

A tag has been placed on Category:Gumuz languages requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. UnitedStatesian (talk) 03:58, 16 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Mangarrayi-Maran languages

A tag has been placed on Category:Mangarrayi-Maran languages requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. UnitedStatesian (talk) 04:13, 16 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Nuclear Sentanic languages

A tag has been placed on Category:Nuclear Sentanic languages requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. UnitedStatesian (talk) 04:20, 16 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Kakua-Nukak languages

A tag has been placed on Category:Kakua-Nukak languages requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. UnitedStatesian (talk) 04:22, 16 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Linguists of Indo-Pacific languages

A tag has been placed on Category:Linguists of Indo-Pacific languages requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. UnitedStatesian (talk) 05:50, 19 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Indo-Pacific languages

A tag has been placed on Category:Indo-Pacific languages requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:47, 28 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Arafundi–Piawi languages

A tag has been placed on Category:Arafundi–Piawi languages requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:48, 28 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Tibor–Omosa languages

A tag has been placed on Category:Tibor–Omosa languages requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:14, 5 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Kumilan languages

A tag has been placed on Category:Kumilan languages requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:15, 5 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Croisilles languages

A tag has been placed on Category:Croisilles languages requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. UnitedStatesian (talk) 05:25, 9 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category renames

Hello, Jkrn111,

If you believe a category would be suitable with a different name, please propose it at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion#Add requests for speedy renaming and merging here. You'll find instructions on that page for how to do this. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:08, 22 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

COPYVIO and OR

Please follow Wikipedia's policies and guidelines concerning Verfiability at List of language families. I've twice reverted your changes, in a request for you to provide sources. If you continue, I will take you to the Administrator's Noticeboard for edit warring. Secondly, and more importantly, you may not "just cop[y] information from 'language articles' " as you stated in your edit summary at the article. The burden is not on others to "correct [your] errors", or provide sources; it's on you. Copying information is prohibited by Wikipedia's licensing requirements; see WP:COPYVIO for details. If you persist in doing this, you may be blocked. If you are copying from Wikipedia articles, that is permitted, with proper attribution; see WP:CWW for details. Thanks, Mathglot (talk) 18:18, 25 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Papi languages

A tag has been placed on Category:Papi languages requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 16:02, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

source/authority

You have recently changed more language articles and categories than people have breakfast in a year - you need to offer a source/claim of authority, otherwise there is no knowing why or how you are making the changes. I would suggest a speedy reply and adequate WP:RS for others to see otherwise, the process of disruptive editing looms, and ultimately blocking, if you cannot verify why and how your changes are substantiated. In anticipation of a WP:AGF and clear reply, thanks for your help. JarrahTree 06:18, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, 1) I create categories exclusively with the same name as existing "language group (family)" articles on English Wikipedia. For example I created Category:Kanyara languages after existing article "Kanyara languages". Is it forbidden ? I did not know that. 2) For example Category:Galgadungic languages differed from main article "Kalkatungic languages", so i created a new category with proper name "Kalkatungic". I made many categories this way before (i think more than one hundred) and that was ok for admins. I have done about 7000 changes (almost everything is categorization). I am confused now, could You please help ? (Jkrn111 (talk) 09:19, 31 March 2020 (UTC)).[reply]

You are not saying anything about the source of the information - it simply does not come out of the ether - there has to be something to establish there is something that can verify WP:V JarrahTree 09:23, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I dont understand, therefore I decided to stop editing Wikipedia and I will just read it. (Jkrn111 (talk) 09:34, 31 March 2020 (UTC)).[reply]

Jkrn asked me to chime in. I don't see the problem either. Categories are simply a navigation device -- it doesn't matter what we call them, any more than templates or image files. We could give them binary numbers in order of creation, if that wouldn't be inconvenient for editors to use. What do RS's have to do with them?

Now if Jkrn were moving them to inconvenient or unintuitive names (like binary numbers), that would be disruptive. And it may be inconvenient to have so many nested sub-categories, rather than more articles in fewer higher-level categories. But that's POV philosophy of use, and has nothing to do with sources. If the name of an article that Jkrn has used is bad, then the article needs to be moved, but that's not Jkrn's doing.

Skimming WP:CAT, the only thing I see is, Particularly for technical subjects, use words and phrases which exist in reliable sources, so that those sources may be used to support inclusion of articles. But he's taking the names directly from the articles, so they should already be supported per the requirements of WP:TITLE, and category use is secondary. And the language articles being included are those already listed in the family articles, so there's no question as to which they should be (though of course you could always put a hat note at the top of a cat saying we're following one list or another, since no matter which source we follow, some other source will disagree with it).

I've created or moved hundreds of categories, and although ppl have sometimes reverted me or moved them to something else, AFAICR no-one's ever said anything about RS's. — kwami (talk) 12:24, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It is less to do with RS, and more V - there are considerable changes which have no sense of where or how any clarification can be made, I find that extraordinarily frustrating, specially when there are so few editors with either the capacity or enthusiasm to help out in clarifying or verifying the considerable volume of changes. sad. JarrahTree 12:42, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Jkrn, I think it's reasonable for Jarrah to ask you to consult others on mass changes (though the threat of a block seems a bit much for first contact). I'm sure the two of you could work something out. Maybe just the two of you, if there aren't enough people interested for a formal discussion to be productive. E.g., 'I plan on adjusting cat X to match the hierarchy in article Y, any objections?' or s.t. like that. Personally, I find it inconvenient for navigation to have layer after layer of nested cats, each with only a few article, but it wasn't important enough to me for me to say anything to you. — kwami (talk) 13:46, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

thanks

the edit summaries are helpful - thanks - cheers... JarrahTree 12:43, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

hahaha not at all - there is nothing to require anything like that - JarrahTree 12:55, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Western Indonesian languages

Hi, I think it is premature to create a Western Indonesian category. The proposal is much less secure than Greater North Borneo, and still in its initial stages. –Austronesier (talk) 14:37, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Western Idonesian languages

A tag has been placed on Category:Western Idonesian languages requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. UnitedStatesian (talk) 19:41, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You're the language category master now!

		The Categorisation Barnstar
		Thank you for constantly updating categories for linguistics articles. Truly appreciated! — Sagotreespirit (^talk) 09:53, 20 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Western Indonesian languages

A tag has been placed on Category:Western Indonesian languages requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 15:25, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Linguists of Enggano

A tag has been placed on Category:Linguists of Enggano requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 16:16, 2 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Linguists of Temotu languages

A tag has been placed on Category:Linguists of Temotu languages requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. UnitedStatesian (talk) 16:59, 8 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Molbog-Bonggi languages

A tag has been placed on Category:Molbog-Bonggi languages requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 13:41, 28 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:52, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Tomui languages

A tag has been placed on Category:Tomui languages indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 15:32, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:47, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:33, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Kategorie:Kritici objektivismu

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Kategorie:Kritici objektivismu requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Shoerack (talk) 19:17, 30 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Kategorie:Kritici objektivismu

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Kategorie:Kritici objektivismu, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a foreign language article that has essentially the same content as cs:Kategorie:Kritici objektivismu, an article on another Wikimedia Foundation project. Please see Wikipedia:Translation to learn about requests for, and coordination of, translations from foreign-language Wikipedias into English.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. BangJan1999 19:33, 30 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Vasconic languages has been nominated for renaming

Category:Vasconic languages has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. ★Trekker (talk) 23:53, 6 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Misogynists has been nominated for deletion

Category:Misogynists has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. ★Trekker (talk) 16:34, 14 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Misanthropists has been nominated for deletion

Category:Misanthropists has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. - car chasm (talk) 01:34, 31 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Misanthropy has been nominated for deletion

Category:Misanthropy has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. - car chasm (talk) 01:36, 31 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Fundamental theology has been nominated for deletion

Category:Fundamental theology has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 05:48, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

September 2023

Before adding a category to an article, as you did to Hope Sandoval, please make sure that the subject of the article really belongs in the category that you specified according to Wikipedia's categorization guidelines. The category being added must already exist, and must be supported by the article's verifiable content. Categories may be removed if they are deemed incorrect for the subject matter. Thank you. Binksternet (talk) 03:54, 19 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Breweries in Thailand

A tag has been placed on Category:Breweries in Thailand indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. ✗plicit 12:44, 25 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:49, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Kategorie:Transgenderová studia

Hello Jkrn111,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Kategorie:Transgenderová studia for deletion in response to your request.

If you didn't intend to make such a request and don't want the article to be deleted, you can edit the page and remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Josey Wales^Parley 17:47, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Cheondoists has been nominated for merging

Category:Cheondoists has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 06:30, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Cinephiles has been nominated for deletion

Category:Cinephiles has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. QuietHere (talk | contributions) 14:21, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Philosophers of theodicy has been nominated for merging

Category:Philosophers of theodicy has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 02:44, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Linguists of proto-human language

A tag has been placed on Category:Linguists of proto-human language indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:43, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Proto-human language

A tag has been placed on Category:Proto-human language indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:55, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

August 2024

Before adding a category to an article, as you did to Category:Iberians, please make sure that the subject of the article really belongs in the category that you specified according to Wikipedia's categorization guidelines. The category being added must already exist, and must be supported by the article's verifiable content. Categories may be removed if they are deemed incorrect for the subject matter. Please don't overcategorize by adding non-defining categories Mason (talk) 20:46, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Theologians of theosis has been nominated for merging

Category:Theologians of theosis has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. ^SMason_Garrison 02:13, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Sacramental theologians has been nominated for merging

Category:Sacramental theologians has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. ^SMason_Garrison 02:13, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Linguists of Shompen has been nominated for deletion

Category:Linguists of Shompen has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. — Sagotreespirit (^talk) 06:43, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Shompen language has been nominated for deletion

Category:Shompen language has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. — Sagotreespirit (^talk) 06:44, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]