User talk:Jj137/Archive 21
 | This is an archive of past discussions about User:Jj137. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 15 | ← | Archive 19 | Archive 20 | Archive 21 | Archive 22 | Archive 23 | → | Archive 25 |
I Love You
Just as my username says! Iloveyouyesidoyay (talk) 03:58, 14 September 2008 (UTC)
- /facepalm jj137 (talk) 04:51, 14 September 2008 (UTC)
Lol?
Howso? · AndonicO Engage. 04:04, 14 September 2008 (UTC)
- I just think it's funny that you have an autograph book, because you seem like the last person to have one. jj137 (talk) 13:57, 14 September 2008 (UTC)
- What's that supposed to mean? · AndonicO Engage. 15:08, 14 September 2008 (UTC)
Enough randomness
Thanks for re-protecting randomness and adding move=sysop. I was more than a bit puzzled why the previous protection wore off so soon! Hope that's fixed the random vandals for a while. Regards, Qwfp (talk) 19:02, 14 September 2008 (UTC).
IP editor forging a signature
Hello Jj137. I notice you recently blocked 141.209.133.251 (talk · contribs) for 31 hours, but in this edit he forged the signature of User:Greg D. Barnes. The latter complained in a post at WP:RFPP. I lengthened this editor's block to 1 month. (Feel free to undo my action if you already knew about this forgery business and felt 31 hours was right). See this post on Greg's talk. I did not notice even a single good contribution in the history of this IP. 141.209.49.11 (talk · contribs) looks to be the same person, since he also forged Greg's signature here. EdJohnston (talk) 01:24, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
Congratulations!!
 | Congratulations! You have won the WikiCup, your username has been automatically put forward, as the same country, to defend your title. |
weburiedoursecretsinthegarden 19:12, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
- To be a winner you have to be gracious in victory, but more so, gracious in defeat. Congratulations on
crushingbeating me in the final. :) Sunderland06 (talk) 19:31, 15 September 2008 (UTC)- Thanks to both of you, and very good match Sunderland, maybe we'll compete again next year :) jj137 (talk) 23:20, 22 September 2008 (UTC)
Military history WikiProject coordinator election
The September 2008 Military history WikiProject coordinator election has begun. We will be selecting nine coordinators to serve for the next six months from a pool of fourteen candidates. Please vote here by September 30!
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 22:24, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
Rollback request
I am currently requesting approval to use the rollback feature as I've been trying to fight vandalism for the past two weeks. I may not be an experienced editor but I do know which edits are vandalism and which are AGFs. I hope you can agree with me and hope you get your FLC promoted. Cheers! -- K. Annoyomous24[c] 18:26, 16 September 2008 (UTC)
- Done, I see no reason you shouldn't be trusted with rollback. :) jj137 (talk) 23:23, 22 September 2008 (UTC)
Thank you
Hi Jj137. I would like to thank you for your support in my RfA and the confidence expressed thereby. It is very much appreciated. :) The RfA was closed as successful with 73 supports, 3 opposes and 4 neutral. I would especially like to thank WBOSITG for nominating me. Best wishes and thanks again, —αἰτίας •discussion• 23:15, 18 September 2008 (UTC)
Signpost updated for September 15, 2008.
 |
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 4, Issue 37 | 15 September 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 05:43, 21 September 2008 (UTC)
Evan Palmer
what would it be classified as then?hda3ku (talk) 05:04, 27 September 2008 (UTC)
- I'd say it would have been A1-- notice that G1 does not include poor writing, more things like "sdhcshdgbhsfvjh". jj137 (talk) 14:46, 27 September 2008 (UTC)
ok thank you very much hda3ku (talk) 15:13, 27 September 2008 (UTC)
My RfA
-_Good_pic.jpg)
|
Thank you for supporting me in my RfA, which passed with a count of (154/3/2). I appreciate the community's trust in me, and I will do my best to be sure it won't regret handing me the mop. I am honored by your trust and your support. Again, thank you. –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 19:35, 27 September 2008 (UTC) |
User talk:69.115.89.140
Hi Jj137, you may want to take a second look at Mario West and retract the warnings; it seems the anon was making good-faith edits and the bot made a mistake. I reverted the article to an earlier version. Regards, Accurizer (talk) 01:43, 30 September 2008 (UTC)
- Aah, I see there was already vandalism there, but I will not retract my warnings, as that guy was most definitely not a good-faith editor. jj137 (talk) 01:47, 30 September 2008 (UTC)
You're right, I retract my request. Regards, Accurizer (talk) 01:49, 30 September 2008 (UTC)
RE: Wikicup
Ha! Fixed :P Garden. 21:26, 2 October 2008 (UTC)
- Heh, but you never alerted yourself :P Oh well. Also, how exactly does the "Please to read afore you post here please" thing show up when I edit your talk page? jj137 (talk) 21:47, 2 October 2008 (UTC)
Invitation to Shoutbox
Hi! I'm Vinson and I invite you to post in my shoutbox! You can post anything you want and get a chance to communicate with others. It is located at User:Vinsfan368/Shout. I hope to see you there! Vinson 02:50, 3 October 2008 (UTC)
mark solms
93.172.31.240 (talk) 01:05, 3 October 2008 (UTC) hello - I added the (uncategorized) Mark Solms article to the psychoanalysis and psychoanalyst categories, only to have it reverted a few minutes later. what am I doing wrong?
- Looks like Jj137 reverted himself a while later. In other words, your edits that you made were placed back. Hope this helps. « Milk's Favorite Cøøkie » 01:12, 3 October 2008 (UTC)
- Oops, I forgot to reply to this (MFC saves the day :P) jj137 (talk) 03:33, 4 October 2008 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of 2009 Baltimore Orioles season
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article 2009 Baltimore Orioles season, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. TallNapoleon (talk) 00:02, 4 October 2008 (UTC)
- See Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Baseball#2009 Seasonal articles. jj137 (talk) 00:28, 4 October 2008 (UTC)
Baseball newsletter
A September issue is in the works and can be found here. Feel free to add anything. I apoligize for such short notice, but would like to send it out before the playoffs start tomorrow; as it is a template, we can change things even after delivery if we need to. Thanks! Blackngold29 19:19, 30 September 2008 (UTC)
- I created it here. Since the list is alphabetical, why don't you take A–M and I'll do N to the end. Maybe we could get the list re-designed so we could use a bot, we'll havet to bring it up sometime. Thanks! Blackngold29 22:02, 4 October 2008 (UTC)
- Sounds good to me; I can open an RFBA for JJBot to do this. :) Any idea when it will be ready for delivery? jj137 (talk) 22:17, 4 October 2008 (UTC)
- I already started delivering them. If we want to make it look nicer we can (since it's a temp they all update), but there's no sense in killing ourselves with little stuff. I think we should do a Roll Call too, theres a lot of low activity users. Blackngold29 22:20, 4 October 2008 (UTC)
- That also sounds like a good idea- it's sometimes hard to tell if someone is even still here or not. I'll go ahead and get A-M. jj137 (talk) 23:44, 4 October 2008 (UTC)
- I already started delivering them. If we want to make it look nicer we can (since it's a temp they all update), but there's no sense in killing ourselves with little stuff. I think we should do a Roll Call too, theres a lot of low activity users. Blackngold29 22:20, 4 October 2008 (UTC)
- Sounds good to me; I can open an RFBA for JJBot to do this. :) Any idea when it will be ready for delivery? jj137 (talk) 22:17, 4 October 2008 (UTC)
October Baseball WikiProject Newsletter
The Baseball WikiProject Newsletter | |
List of New York Mets Opening Day starting pitchers, List of Colorado Rockies Opening Day starting pitchers, List of Florida Marlins Opening Day starting pitchers, Nashville Sounds seasons, List of Tampa Bay Rays Opening Day starting pitchers, List of Seattle Mariners Opening Day starting pitchers, List of Boston Red Sox Opening Day starting pitchers, List of Arizona Diamondbacks Opening Day starting pitchers, New York Yankees seasons
All the Way (Eddie Vedder song), Cy Young, Dan Brouthers, Harmon Killebrew, Rickey Henderson, Billy Pierce, Kinston Indians, Three Rivers Stadium, Bill Lange, Calgary Cannons, Hugh Daily, Homer at the Bat This month's newsletter was designed and written by Wizardman, jj137, and Blackngold29. If you would like to contribute to future newsletters, please contact the Baseball WP outreach dept. |
We apologize for not sending out our August newsletter, we have tried to cover some events of the month in this issue. The playoffs have started! The Dodgers and Phillies have won their respective Division Series and will face off in the NL Championship Series. Both series in the American League have yet to be finished. Show your support for your favorite teams by keeping up with their season pages! |
-- jj137 (talk) 00:07, 5 October 2008 (UTC)
Baseball
Dear Jj137, thanks for the October Baseball WikiProject Newsletter. That latter says the Baseball Project promoted 13 lists to Featured status in August and 8 more in September. I also want to get involve in baseball-related articles. Unfortunately, I was busy with other articles. I want to make our Baseball article a Featured article. And I also want to help the Baseball Project as much as possible. Have a nice day! AdjustShift (talk) 13:35, 5 October 2008 (UTC)
- Thanks! Well, you can help out wherever you want, and I think if we have a group effort from WP:MLB we could probably make Baseball an FA. jj137 (talk) 22:45, 5 October 2008 (UTC)
Hey Jj137, this is IMatthew (talk · contribs), co-coordinator of the WikiCup; just informing you of the Featured List contest, starting this coming Friday. You may want to check it out; it will keep you busy for the time being before the WikiCup starts around January. Thanks for listening! iMatthew (talk) 21:47, 5 October 2008 (UTC)
- Hmm, although I probably should enter this, I think I'll stick with reviewing for now. :) jj137 (talk) 22:48, 5 October 2008 (UTC)
Would you like to work on the head coach list for the next collaboration? Come onto Gtalk please. « Milk's Favorite Cøøkie » 22:58, 5 October 2008 (UTC)
- Gok Gi'll Ggo gonto Gtalk. jj137 (talk) 23:00, 5 October 2008 (UTC)
DYK update
Since you are online, could you update T:DYK? – RyanCross (talk) 23:00, 5 October 2008 (UTC)
WikiProject College football October 2008 Newsletter
 Issue XI - October 2008 | ||
|
Welcome to the latest issue of the College football WikiProject newsletter! I hope that you're enjoying regular updates about the goings on of college football on Wikipedia, but if not, feel free to add your name to the "no delivery" section on the newsletter signup page. I encourage everyone to make regular visits to the College Football Portal and perhaps make it your Wikipedia entry page instead of using the Main Page as your gateway. Nominations for selected articles and pictures are always welcome, and can serve as a great way to show off that new article you just shepherded to Good Article status or the great picture you took the last time you were at a game. Comments and suggestions on improving the newsletter are always welcome, and help me improve it on a monthly basis. Keep contributing and editing, and don't hesitate to contact me or post on the College Football Wikiproject talk page if you need help or just want someone to look over your article. | |
| ||
|
To stop receiving this newsletter, or to receive it in a different format, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. | ||
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 21:59, 6 October 2008 (UTC)
The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXXI (September 2008)
The September 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 22:54, 6 October 2008 (UTC)
- Kthx Brownbot. :) jj137 (talk) 00:22, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
Colm Anthony Clancy
That guy's intention was to add a hangon tag to his page, the best thing to do would be to correct his edit, and let him know. Thanks Res2216firestar 02:50, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
- Doesn't matter now, the page has been deleted. jj137 (talk) 02:52, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
- Just wanted to tell you for future use. Thanks--Res2216firestar 02:53, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
- Come on, I'm not that stupid ;) jj137 (talk) 02:53, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
- Just wanted to tell you for future use. Thanks--Res2216firestar 02:53, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
Thanks
I just wanted to thank you for the barnstar. My first barnstar and my first DYK article within a couple weeks -- I'm starting to feel like I'm actually part of things around here! :-D . -Dewelar (talk) 00:30, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
- Glad I could give it to you, and nice job on the DYK. Simply how often you show up in my watchlist made me realize how hard at work you've been at those articles. One question though- what exactly does "xact" mean? I've never been able to figure that out. :) jj137 (talk) 00:36, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
- Heh..."xact" is short for "transaction". Something I picked up in my days working in corporate retail. -Dewelar (talk) 00:42, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
- Aah, OK. That makes sense now. :) jj137 (talk) 00:45, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
- Heh..."xact" is short for "transaction". Something I picked up in my days working in corporate retail. -Dewelar (talk) 00:42, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
RFA Thanks
Jj137, I'd like to thank you for voting in my RFA. Thanks also for expressing your trust in me, and I hope that I live up to your expectations. Don't forget, if you have any questions (or bits of advice), please leave a message on my talk page. Thanks again, SpencerT♦C 02:44, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
AAU reminder notice
 |
Hey there Jj137! This is a friendly reminder to update your status at Wikipedia:Adopt-a-User/Adoptee's Area/Adopters whenever it is appropriate in order to provide new users with the most up-to-date information on available adopters. Also please note that we will be removing adopters who have not edited in 60 days. If you become active again (and we hope you do!) please feel free to re-add yourself. Cheers! |
- Notice delivery by xenobot 14:23, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
- That last sentence may have been the funniest thing I've heard all day. Lawl. :P jj137 (talk) 00:14, 9 October 2008 (UTC)
RE: Newsletter
Yea I would thanks.
No offense but it sucks. Bad. You guys need much more info on it and maybe some analysis. Less news about the project and more news about the actual game, if you get my drift. HPJoker Leave me a message 00:08, 5 October 2008 (UTC)
- Yeah, I completely see what you mean- I was hoping to update it with some of that as soon as I deliver it to everyone. Hey, if you want to, go ahead and add a bit yourself- the page is at Wikipedia:WikiProject Baseball/Outreach/newsletteroct08. (Try not to add anything too crazy though, it'll show up on like 250 people's talk pages :)). jj137 (talk) 00:12, 5 October 2008 (UTC)
- The more the merrier.
- I'm updating my iPod with the help of limewire and all the CDs I have. HPJoker Leave me a message 01:22, 5 October 2008 (UTC)
- Country, classic rock, and Dropkick Murphys. HPJoker Leave me a message 04:17, 5 October 2008 (UTC)
- The Dropkick Murphys are pretty good. I'm not much of a fan of country, but I'll listen to just about any kind of rock. jj137 (talk) 23:42, 5 October 2008 (UTC)
- Country, classic rock, and Dropkick Murphys. HPJoker Leave me a message 04:17, 5 October 2008 (UTC)
- ATTA BOY! 23:44, 5 October 2008 (UTC)
- I'm reading about Ryan Howard HPJoker Leave me a message 23:46, 5 October 2008 (UTC)
(unindent) LOL, I wonder how well he'll do in the NLCS... jj137 (talk) 23:49, 5 October 2008 (UTC)
- I guess that he'll do horrble. He's way overrated. He hits 50 homers a year but at what cost? A .248 average, and I thought .267 was bad... HPJoker Leave me a message 00:19, 6 October 2008 (UTC)
- Yeah, he pretty much strikes out or hits a homerun every time. :P jj137 (talk) 02:21, 6 October 2008 (UTC)
- Just like Adam Dunn did for my Reds... Burner0718 Jibba Jabba! 05:40, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
- Yeah, he pretty much strikes out or hits a homerun every time. :P jj137 (talk) 02:21, 6 October 2008 (UTC)
- At least Dunn hit .268....
- Well, yeah. Then again, he did break the strikeout record a few years ago (although it has been broken since). I still don't know whether trading Dunn from the Reds turned out to be a good thing or bad thing... jj137 (talk) 00:10, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
- From what I saw online, the Reds played better after the Griffey/Dunn trades. Votto and Bruce look really good. Burner0718 Jibba Jabba! 05:12, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
- Yeah, I think they'll turn out to be pretty good. The main reason they haven't been playing for the Reds before is simply because Dunn and Griffey were still there. jj137 (talk) 20:53, 10 October 2008 (UTC)
- From what I saw online, the Reds played better after the Griffey/Dunn trades. Votto and Bruce look really good. Burner0718 Jibba Jabba! 05:12, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
- Well, yeah. Then again, he did break the strikeout record a few years ago (although it has been broken since). I still don't know whether trading Dunn from the Reds turned out to be a good thing or bad thing... jj137 (talk) 00:10, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
- At least Dunn hit .268....
What do you think of this? Burner0718 Jibba Jabba! 03:24, 11 October 2008 (UTC)
- *obnoxiously overused annoying You've got mail voice* jj137 (talk) 03:54, 11 October 2008 (UTC)
- HAHAHA!!! Good one. Burner0718 Jibba Jabba! 04:03, 11 October 2008 (UTC)
- Burner0718 had told Moose that he could tell me to stop posting on his page, and was free to revert any edits I made after he told me, so I figured that was a general rule and I could tell others, too. RafaelRGarcia (talk) 04:04, 11 October 2008 (UTC)
- Sorry, I meant to say "ask". Burner0718 Jibba Jabba! 04:06, 11 October 2008 (UTC)
- Precisely- my mistake though, Rafael did in a way ask, but just for future reference, it isn't really a good idea to flat out tell someone to not post on their talk page (although I know you didn't). jj137 (talk) 04:09, 11 October 2008 (UTC)
- Sorry, I meant to say "ask". Burner0718 Jibba Jabba! 04:06, 11 October 2008 (UTC)
Wallamoose continues to nettle and stalk me, in contravention of his Level 4 Warning: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:RafaelRGarcia&diff=244508955&oldid=244508416 AND http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:RafaelRGarcia&diff=244506106&oldid=244504717 . Please tell him to stop. RafaelRGarcia (talk) 04:17, 11 October 2008 (UTC)
- I'd prefer to stay out of this, really; I don't know much of the complete situation, but the best advice I can give is just to completely avoid one another. jj137 (talk) 04:19, 11 October 2008 (UTC)
But isn't it true that there is a Level 4 warning against Wallamoose, and that he was told to stop disruptive editing? It's continuing, and his verbal abusiveness has not stopped: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Wallamoose&diff=244510320&oldid=244507456 RafaelRGarcia (talk) 04:23, 11 October 2008 (UTC)
- Yes, there might be, I'm not sure; as far as I know, the best (and maybe quickest) way to deal with this would be for one of you to take this to WP:ANI. That way, several admins will probably look at what's going on and make the appropriate decision, as I'm generally not someone that resolves disputes. jj137 (talk) 04:26, 11 October 2008 (UTC)
Why is this user so concerned with what I'm doing? He seems obsessed. He's followed me onto several boards and I've had to file a WikiAlert against him. Sorry he's disturbing you here. If I knew how to stop the madness I would!!! I tried to ignore it, but it didn't go away. Have a happy every day! (Wallamoose (talk) 04:38, 11 October 2008 (UTC))
- Well, thanks. I would read the above conversation to "catch up"; I don't really know who's right and who's wrong, which is why I am continuously suggesting just taking it to ANI. jj137 (talk) 04:43, 11 October 2008 (UTC)
- Good idea, I agree. Burner0718 Jibba Jabba! 04:45, 11 October 2008 (UTC)
This is another reason why was I contemplating retiring from WP. Too much drama, too soon. RC-0722 361.0/1 04:47, 11 October 2008 (UTC)
- Scared me there for a second. :) (Although I do agree with your opinion, there is WAY too much drama on WP.) jj137 (talk) 17:01, 11 October 2008 (UTC)
- Oh yeah... Burner0718 Jibba Jabba! 17:52, 11 October 2008 (UTC)
I sent you an email. You might find it interesting. Burner0718 Wutsapnin? 21:10, 11 October 2008 (UTC)
Re:Hi again
Things are going quite well! I will admit I was blocked for a time from January to July of this year (and rightly so) for being a royal dumbass to a couple users. I have since come back and am working hard to re-earn everyone's respect and I seem to have done so. I am back working on radio stations and TV stations. Am updating the State of Virginia's radio station pages to make sure they all have infoboxes and working with the TV station WikiProject to get the "market" templates back and updated.
All and all....things are going well. Hope things are going well in your neck of the 'pedia as well. Take Care...NeutralHomer • Talk • October 11, 2008 @ 17:25
RfA thanks
|
Hello JJ. Thank you very much for your support in my recent Request for Adminship, which was successful with 111 supports, 0 opposes, and 0 neutral. I have to say I am more than a little overwhelmed by this result and I greatly appreciate your trust in me. I will do my best to use the tools wisely. Thanks again. Regards. Thingg⊕⊗ 00:38, 12 October 2008 (UTC) |
I'm going to tack onto Thingg's thanks, and use the opportunity to thank you as well. Also, thank you for participating in WikiProject France; and, helping the project become more organized. Regards, Lazulilasher (talk) 00:00, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
Removing stat table blocks from team-season articles
I noticed you removing some of the stat tables I've been working with on some team-season articles (most recently, the 1882 and 1883 Cincinnati pages). I can understand why you might remove some of the pitching tables due to the small number of pitchers on the early teams, but why remove the "Other batters" table? I'm just going to have to re-add it later when I get to that part of the project. -Dewelar (talk) 02:40, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
- Just to make it, well, simpler. I first added the stat tables to all of the Reds pages last year, and gradually have been going back and "simplifying" them ever since, when I realized there was no point in having two divisions for batters and three for pitchers. I originally copied the stats tables from User:Soxrock (he "created" them, I think) without really thinking twice about it. Since I have thought about it, I sort of realized all of that. (If you think about it, all batters do the same thing, there's no point dividing it into two random groups; same with the pitchers, except it is two main/separate groups instead of three, starting and relief.) jj137 (talk) 02:57, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
- I like the current setup (with my tweaking of the headers) for two reasons: 1) The batters can be split up into the "Starters by position" and "Other batters", which highlights the more important ones in their own place, and 2), the "Other pitchers" table can hold those pitchers who were both starters and relievers. It also mirrors the breakdown on Baseball Reference, making it easier to enter the data. I've been using those tables to help standardize all 2500+ team-season articles as well. -Dewelar (talk) 03:04, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
- Ah, OK, I like your reasoning. I always thought the stat tables just randomly divided up the players, but I guess not. I'll stop "simplifying" them from now on, but instead try to change it around to how you have it. jj137 (talk) 03:05, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
- That's just it -- the old Soxrock version did kind of randomly divide them up. That's why I tweaked the headers so they made more sense before porting them into other pages. -Dewelar (talk) 03:41, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
- Well, yeah. Sorry for the misunderstanding; when I work on the stats tables in the future, I'll be sure to change them around to the tweaked version of the headers. jj137 (talk) 02:12, 14 October 2008 (UTC)
- No worries, and thanks. If you need one, there's a blank version (at least for now) of my stat tables at 1997 Colorado Rockies season that I use to copy from. I should probably make a subpage for it, I suppose. -Dewelar (talk) 02:24, 14 October 2008 (UTC)
- OK, thanks. I guess you could put it in a subpage, although either way it would be easy for copying and pasting, I think. jj137 (talk) 03:14, 14 October 2008 (UTC)
- No worries, and thanks. If you need one, there's a blank version (at least for now) of my stat tables at 1997 Colorado Rockies season that I use to copy from. I should probably make a subpage for it, I suppose. -Dewelar (talk) 02:24, 14 October 2008 (UTC)
- Well, yeah. Sorry for the misunderstanding; when I work on the stats tables in the future, I'll be sure to change them around to the tweaked version of the headers. jj137 (talk) 02:12, 14 October 2008 (UTC)
- That's just it -- the old Soxrock version did kind of randomly divide them up. That's why I tweaked the headers so they made more sense before porting them into other pages. -Dewelar (talk) 03:41, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
- Ah, OK, I like your reasoning. I always thought the stat tables just randomly divided up the players, but I guess not. I'll stop "simplifying" them from now on, but instead try to change it around to how you have it. jj137 (talk) 03:05, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
- I like the current setup (with my tweaking of the headers) for two reasons: 1) The batters can be split up into the "Starters by position" and "Other batters", which highlights the more important ones in their own place, and 2), the "Other pitchers" table can hold those pitchers who were both starters and relievers. It also mirrors the breakdown on Baseball Reference, making it easier to enter the data. I've been using those tables to help standardize all 2500+ team-season articles as well. -Dewelar (talk) 03:04, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
Xymmax RfA
I'd like to take a minute to let you know that I appreciate your support in my recently-closed RfA, which passed with a count of 56 in support, 7 in opposition, and 2 neutrals. I'll certainly try to justify your faith by using the tools wisely. And I do intend to do some serious article work as well. Happy editing, and thanks again! Xymmax So let it be written So let it be done 00:12, 15 October 2008 (UTC)
Wikicookie
- Thanks :) jj137 (talk) 01:07, 15 October 2008 (UTC)
As the admin that gave this editor rollback privileges, I just wanted to briefly mention that although the majority of the reverts this user has done have been good, he/she may be a little too quick on the trigger: examples include re-adding vandalism, reverting good faith edit, reverting capitalization correction, reverting my reversion of completely original research/fiction, and a handful of incidents where the user reverted and correctly reverted back. Most of these incidents are minor and have been mentioned to the user, but I can't tell if any have been acknowledged. Can you just drop by the user's page and let them know to take a bit more care with the rollback button? Many thanks, --Jh12 (talk) 04:24, 16 October 2008 (UTC)
- Sure, I'll go by and let him know. Thanks. jj137 (talk) 20:15, 16 October 2008 (UTC)
French commune
You have continued "updating" French commune tags after I posted my comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject France. My post was on October 13, and your last "update" on Oct 15 (or later). Would you mind taking part in the discussion before continuing this unilateral update with which I disagree? Thank you. olivier (talk) 14:15, 19 October 2008 (UTC)
- I commented there. Thanks, jj137 (talk) 17:01, 19 October 2008 (UTC)
- Thank you. I have replied in return. olivier (talk) 17:47, 19 October 2008 (UTC)
- I replied again. Thanks, jj137 (talk) 17:52, 19 October 2008 (UTC)
- Thank you. I have replied in return. olivier (talk) 17:47, 19 October 2008 (UTC)
Upcoming World Development contest
Penubag has been hard at work developing awards for this project. He has completed a very professional looking medal, and is almost done with a trophy that is truly awesome - both of these awards are visually stunning.
I and a few others have been working steadily on the country outlines that will be the focus of the contest - an outline for every country of the world! They're shaping up nicely. So far, 28 of them have been moved to article space - these aren't complete, but they are complete enough to be made available for readers to benefit from them. The rest of the set still includes temporary data that was generated by template (because it matched most but not all of the countries), and before those lists can be moved to article space, all the temporary data needs to be checked for accuracy, and if incorrect it needs to be replaced with correct information.
The effort on the lists has been on 3 fronts:
- Working on the lists in article space to complete them so they will be good examples for editors working on the rest of the set (during the contest).
- Adding or correcting other data (fixing redlinks, filling in blanks, etc.). The main type of work participants in the contest will be doing. The reason we're doing this is to get a feel for it, to develop the fastest methods for each type of task, etc.
- Improving the overall design and implenting changes on all 247 pages, whether in article space or not.
There has been some opposition to us running the contest based on edit counts or iterations. The concern is that we should reward quality work and not quantity, for fear of crappy edits done quickly without thought just to earn an award. I pointed out that the collection of pages are drafts in the Wikipedia namespace (therefore posing no danger to article space) and that most of the work needs to be done with power tools like AWB and Linky (which are specifically designed for repetitive volumnous work), but the reply was that we shouldn't set the precedent of rewarding barnstars for numerically-based tasks, and implied the threat of continuously MfD'ing the contest if we attempted to do so (like they did with the Awards Center - I was very surprised and disappointed that participants didn't step up to defend it). So we need to be careful in determining what exactly the awards will represent, and how they will be awarded.
Since rewarding iterations (passes with AWB on all of the pages in the set) are out, we really don't need the globe-in-stand (award we were working on) anymore. Two awards should suffice.
Once we get started with the contest, I'd like to kick the whole thing off with a round of medals for those dedicated few who have worked hard on the project so far.
What do you think of all of this?
Your comments and suggestions are most welcome.
The Transhumanist 00:26, 23 October 2008 (UTC)
Team
We make a good one HPJoker Leave me a message 16:23, 21 October 2008 (UTC)
- Ah, yes. I'm assuming you watched the game(s)? :( jj137 (talk) 23:32, 21 October 2008 (UTC)
- Yes. =( HPJoker Leave me a message 00:27, 22 October 2008 (UTC)
- Never thought I would say it, but I think the Rays are bigger threats to us now than the Yankees. jj137 (talk) 02:16, 22 October 2008 (UTC)
- Yes. =( HPJoker Leave me a message 00:27, 22 October 2008 (UTC)
- and thats why i hate them more now lol. i hate these people HPJoker Leave me a message 02:47, 22 October 2008 (UTC)
- Who doesn't? :P jj137 (talk) 00:42, 25 October 2008 (UTC)
- and thats why i hate them more now lol. i hate these people HPJoker Leave me a message 02:47, 22 October 2008 (UTC)
2008 World Series
JJ, could you take a look at the 2008 World Series article? We've got a user edit warring over styles that are incorrect per MOS. He's citing his own work, refusing to defer to the original style, and he warned me for vandalism (level 4) for trying to fix it. I'd appreciate some help. Thanks! KV5 • Squawk box • Fight on! 02:32, 23 October 2008 (UTC)
- Sorry it took so long to get back to you here... I've left the guy a message, so hopefully he'll stop. jj137 (talk) 22:46, 24 October 2008 (UTC)
Baseball
Dear Jj137,
I want to know about Portal:Baseball. I've never done anything related to portal. There is a "Did you know" section in the portal. I started and developed Baseball Before We Knew It, an article about a baseball book. It appeared on the "Did you know". Can I include that article on the "Did you know" section in the portal? Have a nice day! :-) AdjustShift (talk) 14:31, 23 October 2008 (UTC)
- Sure, sounds good to me. I don't keep up with the portal much any more, but feel free to update it. jj137 (talk) 22:35, 24 October 2008 (UTC)
- Thanks for the reply. I'll update it. AdjustShift (talk) 06:41, 25 October 2008 (UTC)
re:Languages
Heh, lolz. —Ceran(Sing) 23:50, 24 October 2008 (UTC)
- I think that was my reaction. Lolz indeed. jj137 (talk) 23:51, 24 October 2008 (UTC)
- Thank you for that brief... conversation. Its always nice to have someone to talk to. Now get back to building and maintenance work! —Ceran(Sing) 00:49, 25 October 2008 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.
P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- ForteTuba (talk) 16:49, 17 October 2008 (UTC)
- LOL, KFC. jj137 (talk) 16:51, 17 October 2008 (UTC)
RFPP
Uhhhh... which one do you want to stick with? :P Master of Puppets Call me MoP! :) 00:47, 25 October 2008 (UTC)
- Great minds think alike, my friend! And how do you enable time with seconds? Master of Puppets Call me MoP! :) 00:49, 25 October 2008 (UTC)
- Nevermind, I found it. Though technically you beat me by one second. Only this time. :P Anyway, I'm going to go head off to work. Cheers! Master of Puppets Call me MoP! :) 00:51, 25 October 2008 (UTC)
Re:Signature
I follow your advice. --KANESUE 22:34, 25 October 2008 (UTC)
Re: Gleb Yakunin
Thank you. It seems to be my fault. User_talk:219.84.125.224. 03:32, 28 October 2008 (UTC)
who are you? why are you bothering me? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.191.116.109 (talk) 20:21, 28 October 2008 (UTC)
Re: Stat script
Thanks for the tip. Now that I'm back from vacation, I can resume working on some of this stuff. Now, I just need to figure out how to run scripts :) . -Dewelar (talk) 22:45, 29 October 2008 (UTC)
- OK, I've added the script (had to create the monobook page). Now, what is supposed to happen? I've tried editing a page (and sections of a page), but nothing seems to be different -Dewelar (talk) 02:31, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
- I followed the instructions about bypassing the cache, but I'm still not seeing anything. I tried editing the whole article, the whole stats section, and various subsections, but saw no extra tab. Is the tab a regular IE tab below the menu bar, or is it inside the window somewhere? You may have to walk me through this. -Dewelar (talk) 16:27, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
- I use Firefox for everything *but* Wikipedia, for one reason: I need to override my colors due to a visual impairment I have (working too long with a white background gives me headaches), but with Wikipedia I can't do that, because if I do I can't see redlinks. It really, really sucks, because otherwise I'm a huge fan of Firefox. So, I have IE set up to use Wikipedia's colors.
- Anyway..."watch button"? I don't see a "watch button". I see a watch checkbox (under the edit box) and I see a watch hyperlink (which is at the very bottom of the page). I see nothing that says "hit" in either place. Is it possible that I'm not seeing it because I don't use the default skin (I use Cologne Blue)? -Dewelar (talk) 03:12, 31 October 2008 (UTC)
- Yep, that was the problem. I switched to Monobook and it worked fine. It still doesn't work in Cologne Blue, though. When I get a chance, I will ask around at that board you pointed out and see what I can find out. Thanks! -Dewelar (talk) 22:41, 31 October 2008 (UTC)
- I followed the instructions about bypassing the cache, but I'm still not seeing anything. I tried editing the whole article, the whole stats section, and various subsections, but saw no extra tab. Is the tab a regular IE tab below the menu bar, or is it inside the window somewhere? You may have to walk me through this. -Dewelar (talk) 16:27, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
Flamingo Recordings
Hi,
You deleted the information regarding Flamingo Recordings as you said it did not exist but if you search on google it is the 1st link that comes up.
- I didn't decide the reason, I just deleted it. I have done a lot of routine cleanup deletions in the past, and I have really no involvement with that article at all. jj137 (talk) 02:52, 31 October 2008 (UTC)
Moth stubs
A whole chunk of these seem to be butterflies, rather than moths; for example, Rhinelephas, which is in the (butterfly) family Lycaenidae. Alai (talk) 04:39, 2 November 2008 (UTC)
- *slaps self with trout* All of the ones in the Lycaenidae family, it seems? jj137 (talk) 22:30, 2 November 2008 (UTC)
- Yes, all the ones I've noticed, certainly. Alai (talk) 01:38, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
- OK, thanks for giving me a heads up about that. I'll go back sometime in the next couple of days (whenever I have some free time to get it done) and fix all of those. jj137 (talk) 03:09, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
- I may be able to save you some trouble there: I was planning on bot-retagging them from moth-stub to {{Lycaenidae-stub}} anyway, so I should be able to tweak that to correct the text while I'm about it. (After that I'll have the task of puzzling out what to do with the increasingly enormous Category:Lycaenidae stubs; but, one step at a time...) Alai (talk) 04:19, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
- That's running now. Had to upgrade my version of pywikipediabot and make some tweaks, so let's hope the bot doesn't go roooooogue. Alai (talk) 04:31, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
- I may be able to save you some trouble there: I was planning on bot-retagging them from moth-stub to {{Lycaenidae-stub}} anyway, so I should be able to tweak that to correct the text while I'm about it. (After that I'll have the task of puzzling out what to do with the increasingly enormous Category:Lycaenidae stubs; but, one step at a time...) Alai (talk) 04:19, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
- OK, thanks for giving me a heads up about that. I'll go back sometime in the next couple of days (whenever I have some free time to get it done) and fix all of those. jj137 (talk) 03:09, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
- Yes, all the ones I've noticed, certainly. Alai (talk) 01:38, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
Hey man
Check my userpage. and lol look at [1]. and i thought that trade meant nothing. HPJoker Leave me a message 20:25, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
- Ah, cool to see you're keeping up with your userpage again :) Lol, I forgot about trade though! I really thought that meant nothing too, but, wow... jj137 (talk) 01:09, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
Administrators noticeboard thread that may be of interest to you
Hello. You may be interested in this thread. Tennis expert (talk) 21:40, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
Deletion of Page
I noticed today that your userid deleted the page Canadian Institute of Portrait Artists with the reason stated that thorough research had been done and no notability items could be provided. I could have provided many notability articles about this organization. I asked in the discussion area for the page for some information on where this information should be stored, but the person who quite curtly told me that there were no notable items in the article, did not respond. This experience has definitely soured my on any future contributions to Wikipedia. I have read on various websites that Wikipedia is always looking for more editors and content contributors. Before the disappointing lack of response from the person who labelled my article as not notable, I wanted to contribute to this endeavour and do my part to further it. As a new contributor, he offered me no help when I asked him to clarify what he meant and was really not very encouraging, but bordering on rude. I know that I will not be contributing anything further - I don't really have time to receive this kind of treatment. If new people like me are likewise discouraged, you will have a hard time getting new editors and contributors. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.73.167.7 (talk) 05:47, 5 November 2008 (UTC)
- Wow. Just, wow. Maybe before you go ranting on my talk page, you could pay attention to what I actually did. Firstly, I deleted that article almost a year ago. Secondly, I didn't even decide the reason. I just go through the old Prod articles and delete them, and have absolutely nothing to do with the article itself. jj137 (talk) 23:58, 5 November 2008 (UTC)
RfA thanks
|
Thank you for participating in my RfA, which recently passed with 126 in support, 22 in opposition and 6 neutral votes.
Thanks for your support in my RFA!!
|
I created a page that you may like to use in the future. -- SRE.K.Annoyomous.L.24[c] 07:41, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
- That seems like a good idea. jj137 (talk) 02:05, 11 November 2008 (UTC)
Rollback
I was looking through here and picked your name at random. I am requesting rollback feature part to revert vandalism quicker and part so I can use Huggle. I've already read the entire rollback page and this. If denied, I'm content with how I have been reverting vandalism, but it would be a nice step forward. Rtyq2 (talk) 23:00, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
- You can has rullbawk. :) jj137 (talk) 23:28, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
- Thank you! Rtyq2 (talk) 00:04, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXXII (October 2008)
The October 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 00:10, 14 November 2008 (UTC)
Pedroia
WOOOOOOOO HOOOOOOO HPJoker Leave me a message 20:59, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
- Yep :D I was pretty happy to hear it. jj137 (talk) 23:26, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
- So mate how have ya been? HPJoker Leave me a message 01:28, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
BTW you don't have to, don't feel obligated to. But if you want some action check out Mike Mussina's page. It's Johan Santana Part II! HPJoker Leave me a message 15:17, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
- That asshole hijacked my thread! Lets make him a new one! Ah thats better, yet offensive. The ultimate pleasure for me. HPJoker Leave me a message 04:32, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
- MUHAHAHHAHAHAHHA you better keep it that way lol. HPJoker Leave me a message 04:36, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
- Oh BTW do you know a recent play that was released? I'm making a page for a new play and am wondering if we have a info box for plays. HPJoker Leave me a message 04:41, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
Some Cunt spamming JJ
You did not give a valid reason for deleting Gaucho_theory. The best reason would have been notability, but that is not the reason you gave, please unprotect the page. I will be putting a request in the protection log if a better reason is not provided. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Shinynew (talk • contribs) 03:48, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
- I have never even touched that article before. /facepalm jj137 (talk) 22:19, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
Signpost updated for November 17, 2008 and before.
Because the Signpost hasn't been sent in a while, to save space, I've condensed all seven issues that were not sent into this archive. Only the three issues from November are below.
|
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 4, Issue 42 | 8 November 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| ||
| Volume 4, Issue 43 | 10 November 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| ||
| Volume 4, Issue 44 | 17 November 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 11:09, 23 November 2008 (UTC)
Hello
Hello! Nice to meet you. Rogerchocodiles Talk to me 19:38, 28 November 2008 (UTC)Rogerchocodiles
- ... jj137 (talk) 03:08, 29 November 2008 (UTC)
- Lol, just browsing around when I found this. Friendly people are always great, encourage! —Ceranthor 22:21, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
- I guess the hello seemed pretty random :P jj137 (talk) 00:55, 6 December 2008 (UTC)
- Lol, just browsing around when I found this. Friendly people are always great, encourage! —Ceranthor 22:21, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
Help, dumb gits are wanting to delete the content on my user page.
I told one of them to buzz off and look at my archives that they've tried this crap already and it got SLAMMED DOWN. Now some easily offended jerk off is tattling on me. Wanna help? BTW PEOPLE BUGGING JJ: STOP IT NOW OR HE'LL TURN INTO THE HULK AND GO ALL OUT MIKE TYSON ON YOU. lol. Thanks bro. HPJoker Leave me a message 21:39, 29 November 2008 (UTC)
Hello
I see you have a Wikibreak template on your userpage. Do you still plan on being in the Wikicup in January 2009? Please reply on my talk page. If I don't have a response by January 1, you will be removed. Cheers, iMatthew 23:39, 30 November 2008 (UTC)
- Yep, I should be back here plenty by then. Maybe I "over-exaggerated" my wikibreak template, as I guess I'll fully come back in around three weeks or so. (Also, as you're probably wondering how I replied so quickly, I still check my talk page for new messages every couple of days.) jj137 (talk) 03:15, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
- Good to hear your not leaving us. :-) And the wikicup starts this January?? That was quick... I better get prepared. ;-) – RyanCross (talk) 03:18, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
- Yep, considering how much time I've spent on here it would take a lot of effort to leave permanently. :) Also, I think the Wikicup is a good incentive to come back here and edit at least somewhat frequently again. jj137 (talk) 03:31, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
- Good to hear your not leaving us. :-) And the wikicup starts this January?? That was quick... I better get prepared. ;-) – RyanCross (talk) 03:18, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
Deleted Page
I was wondering if you could get me the text from the deleted pages http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Masters_%28Group%29 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Master_Plan. I made them as a joke to my friend a while back and we were talking about them and wondering what I had written. Thanks.-SaigonTheDon (talk) 05:38, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
JJ, It's Joker.
I need you're help now more than ever. Someone under an IP vandalized a usertalk page (The one who I insulted) and added other insults and now they think it is me. This is me from my school address (Fairview High School (Boulder, Colorado). Please help me. 161.97.198.130 (talk) 20:22, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
WikiProject College football December 2008 Newsletter
|
Issue XIII - December 2008 | ||
|
Welcome to the latest issue of the College football WikiProject newsletter! I hope that you're enjoying regular updates about the goings on of college football on Wikipedia, but if not, feel free to add your name to the "no delivery" section on the newsletter signup page. I encourage everyone to make regular visits to the College Football Portal and perhaps make it your Wikipedia entry page instead of using the Main Page as your gateway. Nominations for selected articles and pictures are always welcome, and can serve as a great way to show off that new article you just shepherded to Good Article status or the great picture you took the last time you were at a game. Comments and suggestions on improving the newsletter are always welcome, and help me improve it on a monthly basis. Keep contributing and editing, and don't hesitate to contact me or post on the College Football Wikiproject talk page if you need help or just want someone to look over your article. | |
| ||
|
To stop receiving this newsletter, or to receive it in a different format, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. | ||
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 02:41, 3 December 2008 (UTC)
Since you are the main contributor for this article, I was wondering if you would let me co-nominate this article for Feature list nomination with you after I fix this article to to complete FL criteria. -- SRE.K.Annoyomous.L.24[c] 00:11, 5 December 2008 (UTC)
- Sounds good to me. By the time you are finished working on it, you'll probably be more of the main contributor, but I can co-nominate anyway if you want :) jj137 (talk) 00:53, 6 December 2008 (UTC)
The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXXIII (November 2008)
The November 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 16:42, 6 December 2008 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.
P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- ForteTuba (talk) 15:28, 12 December 2008 (UTC)
- Danke schön. jj137 (talk) 01:26, 13 December 2008 (UTC)
Red Sox Project Inactive?
It's been a while since anyone has updated/edited it, the last constructive edit being on March 20. I propose we try to bring it back up, maybe write/improve a few articles. Good idea? RedThunder 13:19, 14 December 2008 (UTC)
- Sounds like a good idea to me. Maybe we could send out some kind of notice to everyone to let them know we want to revamp it? jj137 (talk) 15:56, 14 December 2008 (UTC)
(74.160.100.161 (talk) 04:27, 18 December 2008 (UTC)) i am wondering why you reverted my change to Amos lee's page it is a true fact i have seen him in concert 3 times two of those times he smoked a blunt throughout the concert he also has said this many times
- Yet it doesn't necessarily mean it is appropriate for an encyclopedic article. jj137 (talk) 16:03, 18 December 2008 (UTC)
(74.160.100.161 (talk) 18:45, 18 December 2008 (UTC))aight
template synonyms
Re this edit and others replacing {{dab}} or {{disambiguation}} with {{disambig}} -- what was the point of those? They weren't copy edits, since the copy (displayed text) didn't change. Are {{dab}} etc. deprecated for some reason? -- JHunterJ (talk) 22:16, 18 December 2008 (UTC)
- I explained it to someone else here a while ago. Hopefully that makes sense. jj137 (talk) 03:02, 19 December 2008 (UTC)
- It says there that you find so many different templates "confusing" and that "people may think [the synonyms] are two different reference templates, but they're not. I'm just trying to make things at least slightly clearer to editors, mainly not-so-experienced ones. Hope that answers your question." It does answer, but I'd still suggest that editing a page solely to replace such a template with its synonym is unneeded -- if there are other fixes to be made and you can also standardize on the "real" template, peachy. Or if you do want to replace redirects, could you use a more descriptive edit summary, such as "replacing redirect template"? Cheers! -- JHunterJ (talk) 02:25, 20 December 2008 (UTC)
- Of course. I've somewhat been "working on" lately to try and, if I am going to do that, fix anything else on the page while I'm there (which is what you suggested). I think from now on I won't save the page unless other (visible) things are being fixed as well. jj137 (talk) 03:08, 20 December 2008 (UTC)
- It says there that you find so many different templates "confusing" and that "people may think [the synonyms] are two different reference templates, but they're not. I'm just trying to make things at least slightly clearer to editors, mainly not-so-experienced ones. Hope that answers your question." It does answer, but I'd still suggest that editing a page solely to replace such a template with its synonym is unneeded -- if there are other fixes to be made and you can also standardize on the "real" template, peachy. Or if you do want to replace redirects, could you use a more descriptive edit summary, such as "replacing redirect template"? Cheers! -- JHunterJ (talk) 02:25, 20 December 2008 (UTC)
Re: WikiCup
Oh no!! I'm really sorry. I should've decided sooner, but I thought I had until the New Year. Yea, I have a busy year coming up, and I'm not sure how much I'll be able to edit. Sorry, but the cup looks great! ♬♩ Hurricanehink (talk) 04:43, 20 December 2008 (UTC)
- Heh, well if someone else does join, you'd have to stick them in the middle. After all, I was the last country! --♬♩ Hurricanehink (talk) 04:55, 20 December 2008 (UTC)
My Return
I have decided to return to Wikipedia. I saw you protected my userpage, so could you unprotect it and restore my old userpage? Thanks. --LAAFansign review 02:38, 23 December 2008 (UTC)
- Done. I restored all of your old userpage history, as well as a couple of the deleted subpages that were transcluded on your userpage. Hope that helps. jj137 (talk) 03:11, 23 December 2008 (UTC)
- Thanks. Cheers.--LAAFansign review 03:12, 23 December 2008 (UTC)
- No prob. Good to see you back BTW. jj137 (talk) 03:12, 23 December 2008 (UTC)
- Yep, I do. Thanks. Here you go!
- No prob. Good to see you back BTW. jj137 (talk) 03:12, 23 December 2008 (UTC)
- Thanks. Cheers.--LAAFansign review 03:12, 23 December 2008 (UTC)
|
The Original Barnstar | |
| For restroing my subpages after my un-retirement, I, LAAFan, award Jj137 this barnstar. Cheers. LAAFansign review 03:22, 23 December 2008 (UTC) |
- Heh, thanks :) It was really no problem though- fairly easy to do. jj137 (talk) 03:23, 23 December 2008 (UTC)