User talk:Jj137/Archive 10

This is an archive of past discussions about User:Jj137. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Archive 5

←

Archive 8

→

Hello!

Scooby Dooby Doo

Now that thats is out of my system, about the newsletter.

What are we doing for it this week? --HPJoker ^{Leave me a message} 23:50, 15 January 2008 (UTC)

VandalProof

This is weird. I signed up fro VandalProof like two days ago. (along with like 5 other people) And I also sent Betacommand (who approves almost everyone, he seems the only one who does it) that please check the list, and approve me. And then he ended up skipping over my message, answering the message after mine, and not approving me. ANd I'm waiting for this. Ohmpandya (Talk to Me...) 02:49, 16 January 2008 (UTC)

Also please block User: Poopmouthyy - inappropriate username. I put {{username}} but obviously I can't block him. Ohmpandya (Talk to Me...) 02:52, 16 January 2008 (UTC)

Same thing with User: Omgwtfz Ohmpandya (Talk to Me...) 02:53, 16 January 2008 (UTC)

My RfA

My request for adminship was successful at 64/1/2! Many thanks for your participation and I will endeavor to meet your expectations. Cheers, Sephiroth BCR ^(Converse) 09:19, 16 January 2008 (UTC)

not again...

"You know, if you wanted something on the Bobby Farrell article, all you had to do was ask in at least a somewhat polite manner instead of vandalizing my talk page repeatedly. jj137 ♠ 23:05, 14 January 2008 (UTC)"

Well, you're not being honest... again, which does not surprise me. Long before I resorted to this so-called 'hobby', I left you a polite message on your very page, which you just brushed off with an invalid reason. Nothing on farrell's page was in violation - it was you who made that subjective interpretation, when in fact there was no violation. The problem was that this dude from holland started all that mess and you just took his word for it. Then that republican guy supposedly tried to communicate with you, only to chicken out later on. So, this is where I came in - for the first time since farrell's page got protected under a fraudulent request by that dutch guy, whom you gladly trusted blindly. That dutch guy was the culprit of the problem, whereas the republican guy was some ball-less sissy who backed down very soon. Now, going back to me - I did ask you politely BEFORE I trashed anything - so, please, stop twisting the facts, just like you did with your "open interpretation" of why that video was in violation. There is a difference between "violation to include" and "preferred not to be included". Please, stop twisting things around.

That's exactly what I'm talking about! I leave a decent message and I get reverted by yet another one of your posse, for no reason. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.141.221.252 (talk) 02:19, 16 January 2008 (UTC)

RE your question: Yes that was all. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.141.221.252 (talk) 02:32, 16 January 2008 (UTC)

You asked me - I answered. What's next? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.141.235.178 (talk) 23:26, 16 January 2008 (UTC)

Three articles

You prodded three articles (Miniatures: Views of Islamic and Middle Eastern Politics, Infiltration: How Muslim Spies and Subversives have Penetrated Washington, and Jihad in the West) with concerns that they did not cite original third-party sources; I eventually deleted them because of an expired PROD tag. The original author requested the pages be undeleted, and said he would work on the sources. Would it be all right if you if I undelete them? jj137 ^♠ 20:28, 16 January 2008 (UTC)

I recommend that you ask him if he has reliable third-party sources for any of them. Before prodding, I did a cursory search and was unable to find any such sources. It's certainly possible I may have missed something. If he does cite such sources, then I would be OK with undeletion. Be sure that they meet the reliability test, and aren't just random political blogs or some such. The article creator has a history of tendentious editing related to the issue of Islam (he's been trying to violate WP:BLP on the Barack Obama featured article for some time). *** Crotalus *** 20:42, 16 January 2008 (UTC)

Copyright

Save the Poles is a copyvio of http://ericlarsenexplore.com/savethepoles.php. I placed a speedy on it. Please delete it. Ohmpandya (Talk to Me...) 21:08, 16 January 2008 (UTC)

Sorry

Sorry about the recent edit to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Two_%2B_two_%3D_five My mentally-challenged cousin was playing with my computer. :( Again, sorry. --74.71.207.64 (talk) 00:41, 17 January 2008 (UTC)

Block

Hello. Please block User: General Westmoreland. He put an article for deletion, the reason being "bullshit". I sent him a notice of vandalism, and he replied on my talk page with more vandalism. Please block him, if it meets the guidelines. Ohmpandya (Talk to Me...) 00:50, 17 January 2008 (UTC)

Also, please block: User talk:Yodog3536. You should know the reason... on his talk page. Ohmpandya (Talk to Me...) 00:54, 17 January 2008 (UTC)

We do not block users for edit war. Why not bring the issue to WP:ANI if you cannot talk to the user. Igor Berger (talk) 00:56, 17 January 2008 (UTC)

farrell

Thanks for reverting it. And for what it's worth - I wish to offer you my most sincere apology for my extremely foul-mouthed persuasions to have the low-life performer exposed for what he really was. Please forgive me, if possible. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.141.214.125 (talk) 02:07, 17 January 2008 (UTC)

Thanks & my respect, man. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.141.212.93 (talk) 02:32, 17 January 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for creating me!

Hi Jj137 - thanks for dealing with the 'too similar user name' and creating my account - and I'm really impressed that it was done so quickly! :-) Cheers Jay*Jay (talk) 02:57, 17 January 2008 (UTC)

Parish of St. Monica and St. James, Capitol Hill

Hello, This topic is re "03:46, 1 January 2008 Jj137 (Talk | contribs) deleted "Parish of St. Monica and St. James, Capitol Hill" ‎ (Deleted because "CSD G11 - spam". using TW)" I created this page. As someone new to Wikipedia I am not sure what "CSD G11 - spam" means, but to the best of my understanding the page is not spam. Can the page be reinstated? Thanks, StMJStMJ (talk) 19:38, 14 January 2008 (UTC)

Some parts were OK, but others were written like an advertisement (see this for my reason of deletion). I'd be willing to restore it, removing the advertisement parts. jj137 ^♠ 20:18, 14 January 2008 (UTC)

That would be fine with me. For my edification would you paste the sentences that struck you as ad-like into this talk thing? Language connotations in the "church world" may be somewhat different from those in the "wiki world". Reading the specific sentences that did not conform would be the easiest way for me to get a handle on "wiki world" connotations. Also, seeing them might suggest a rephrasing, so that useful content if any could be retained. Thanks, StMJ (talk) 20:37, 14 January 2008 (UTC) Thanks for providing the deleted material (on my talk page). I see what you mean. Even though there actually is suitable content buried in there, you have to be in "church thinkspace" to pick up on it, so it should be rephrased. This was useful, thanks.

Incidentally, it seems to me that a whole lot of already-existing pages on individual churches would benefit from a similar "style" reprimand... It's such a different style between church and Wikipedia that it's very easy to make stylistic errors.

Of course, you guys are already working very hard... No pressure :)

Best,StMJ (talk) 22:16, 14 January 2008 (UTC)

Don't worry about the difference between them, it is a pretty common mistake. (Also, if you would like to point out some of the other church articles that need cleanup, that may help) :) So, would you like me to restore the article without the above text? jj137 ^♠ 23:32, 14 January 2008 (UTC)

Sure, please go ahead and restore it without that text. Thanks! Re other pages - Hm - There are an awful lot of individual church pages out there. I'd be happy to point out a few, but my efforts would necessarily be pretty scattershot. Let's see how my own editing goes. If it works out, maybe I could contribute more effectively by suggesting some general editing strategies that make sense to churchgoers.StMJ (talk) 16:25, 17 January 2008 (UTC)

copyediting template transclusion

Hi,

I see that you've been changing {{refs}} to {{reflist}} on various articles, with the edit summary "copyediting". There isn't really a need to replace template redirects like this, either for readability ("reflist" is still an abbreviation) or for WP:PERFORMANCE reasons. I'm just curious as to why you're doing it. Chris Cunningham (talk) 10:55, 17 January 2008 (UTC)

Well, {{refs}} redirects to {{reflist}}, and sometimes I find it confusing with so many different templates, etc.; without actually going to the template page, people may think {{refs}} and {{reflist}} are two different reference templates, but they're not. I'm just trying to make things at least slightly clearer to editors, mainly not-so-experienced ones. Hope that answers your question. jj137 ^♠ 23:36, 17 January 2008 (UTC)

Block

You may want to indef-block 75.68.6.104. Look at his talk page. Thanks. Ohmpandya (Talk to Me...) 20:19, 17 January 2008 (UTC)

Also any admin can approve for NPWatcher. Please approve me (If I meet guidelines, which I think I do), along with anyone else that needs to be approved. Changed my sig again :) - Ohmpandya ^{We need to talk... ♦ contribs} 22:14, 17 January 2008 (UTC)

Please also block User talk:70.180.143.108, he has vandalized "past the mark" - Ohmpandya ^{We need to talk... ♦ contribs} 23:33, 17 January 2008 (UTC)

Can you approve me for NPWatcher? Also, he put a unblock reason, but I don't think -- no, I KNOW that's not going to cut it. - Ohmpandya ^{We need to talk... ♦ contribs} 23:44, 17 January 2008 (UTC)

Victoria Williams (actress) seems to have almost no content. Placed a speedy on it. - Ohmpandya ^{We need to talk... ♦ contribs} 23:46, 17 January 2008 (UTC)

Thanks! Two questions: When I download the old NP Watcher, it says to download the new one. When I download the new one, (Extract it...) it says: The application failed to start because the application configuration is incorrect..... any suggestions. - Ohmpandya ^{We need to talk... ♦ contribs} 01:32, 18 January 2008 (UTC)

Well, I have been trying since I gave you the message. I still don't get it the old one works, but the new one doesn't? Weird... - Ohmpandya ^{We need to talk... ♦ contribs} 02:02, 18 January 2008 (UTC)

NP Watcher

Yeah. - Ohmpandya ^{We need to talk... ♦ contribs} 02:06, 18 January 2008 (UTC)

It's OK. Take your time, you have resolved pretty much all my issues. :) - Ohmpandya ^{We need to talk... ♦ contribs} 02:09, 18 January 2008 (UTC)

Anything? It's weird, the icon comes up and everything, just won't open. Try this: Whenever you download NP, email me the zip file. I'll see if it works. - Ohmpandya ^{We need to talk... ♦ contribs} 02:50, 18 January 2008 (UTC)

Did you send it? Usually when you send it from yahoo it goes to Gmail pretty fast... Taking a while- Ohmpandya ^{We need to talk... ♦ contribs} 03:02, 18 January 2008 (UTC)

BTW, did you here about Mike Lowell? (Didn't receive it yet) - Ohmpandya ^{We need to talk... ♦ contribs} 03:06, 18 January 2008 (UTC)

Signpost updated for January 14th, 2008.

The Wikipedia Signpost Weekly Delivery


Volume 4, Issue 3	14 January 2008	About the Signpost

From the editor: A new weekly feature
Special: 2007 in Review	Wikimania 2009 bidding ends, jury named
Controversial non-administrator rollback process added	Supposed advance draft of Jobs keynote surfaces on talk page
WikiWorld comic: "The Nocebo Effect"	News and notes: Fundraiser ends, $500,000 donation, milestones
Wikipedia in the News	Tutorial: Fundamentals of editing
Features and admins	Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Report on Lengthy Litigation


Home \| Archives \| Newsroom \| Tip Line \| Single-Page View	Shortcut : WP:POST

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 08:27, 18 January 2008 (UTC)

Bobby Farrell

Hi, I must admit that I am confounded by your edit to Bobby Farrell. Why did you reverse your earlier decision? How is this in compliance with WP:RSUE? Jvhertum (talk) 08:38, 18 January 2008 (UTC)

Re: Mike Lowell

I was going to summaries the story, but whats the point of that?[1]. Now that's what I call an innocent guy :). Oh yeah, I don't think you sent the email, I have not received it yet. - Ohmpandya ^{We need to talk... ♦ contribs} 20:43, 18 January 2008 (UTC)

Badness on talk:Chrysler Hemi engine

Hi, Jj137. If you get a moment, could you please take a look at the recent unpleasantness? Chrysler Hemi engine was permanently semi-protected due to persistently, doggedly disruptive behaviour by an unrego who, as you can see on the talk page, has a lengthy history of abusive personal attacks and incivility. This is not the same individual who was disrupting Dodge Dart and Plymouth Valiant. His (or her) newest brand of disruption is to intersperse abusive comments amongst existing text on the talk page. This is in addition to his/her bizarre refusal to sign posts, even to the extent of going back in to delete the autosignature provided by SineBot. It seems to me this talk page is an excellent candidate for permanent semi-protection in line with that of the article, but I don't know if talk pages are ever semiprotected. I'd like to get your view on this before I proceed to RfPP. Thanks. --Scheinwerfermann (talk) 23:51, 18 January 2008 (UTC)

Block

Please block User talk:86.3.238.12. He vandalized my talk page, along with a lot of other stuff. - Ohmpandya ^{We need to talk... ♦ contribs} 16:47, 19 January 2008 (UTC)

I blocked the vandal for three days. jj137 ^♠ 17:47, 19 January 2008 (UTC)

Thanks. By the way.... did you ever send me the email? - Ohmpandya ^{We need to talk... ♦ contribs} 17:51, 19 January 2008 (UTC)

Oh... Ok thanks anyway. - Ohmpandya ^{We need to talk... ♦ contribs} 17:54, 19 January 2008 (UTC)

Looks like I have to remove the fake new message bar (Friday's notice) :( - Ohmpandya ^{We need to talk... ♦ contribs} 18:53, 19 January 2008 (UTC)

here[2]. - Ohmpandya ^{We need to talk... ♦ contribs} 19:08, 19 January 2008 (UTC)

Deleting Doug

Wow, you move like greased lightening!! --Kralizec! (talk) 18:36, 19 January 2008 (UTC)

Well, I just used this script for help. jj137 ^♠ 18:42, 19 January 2008 (UTC)

Is that your excuse for hogging all the prod-deletion-fun for yourself?!?

--Kralizec! (talk) 19:00, 19 January 2008 (UTC)

RE:WP:PACKERS

Hi, and welcome to WikiProject Green Bay Packers! We are a group of Wikipedians with one common interest, the Green Bay Packers!

There are many things you can do to help out and get yourself involved. Here is a few suggestions.

First visit the main page and our discussion page to see whats going on.
You can add {{WikiProject Green Bay Packers}} to talk pages of Green Bay Packers-related articles, and please assess them as well.
You can categorize Green Bay Packers articles into their proper categories.
Visit the main page and look under Tasks to see any other things that need to be done.

If you have any comments, suggestions, or would like to talk about the project in general, feel free to leave a message on the talk page or contact User:Gonzo fan2007. Thanks for your interest in the project, and lets go out and work on those articles!

Thanks :-) It was a heck of a lot of work assessinga bunch of articles, and getting everything organized. I still want to make a sort of Collaboration of the Week/Month and a type of weekly/monthly newsletter, but I have basically got everything set-up. Now its time to start working on the articles. When things slow down a bit I'm going to start working on Green Bay Packers and some other core articles, so any help there would be great (well any help anywhere would be great :-) But thanks for the kind words (on my talk page and my rfa) and if you need anything feel free to knock on my door.
Gonzo fan2007 ^{talk ♦ contribs} 21:46, 19 January 2008 (UTC)

That would be fine with me!! Feel free to go at it. I have a lot going on right now, so I probably wouldnt be able to get to it for a little bit, so if you want to take over those sections (like be the coordinator or something to that affect), that would be great! If you have any questions or anything, feel free to ask, but I trust your judgment to do some good work :-)
Gonzo fan2007 ^{talk ♦ contribs} 21:53, 19 January 2008 (UTC)

That would be great! Here's the red link to create Wikipedia:WikiProject National Football League/Green Bay Packers subproject/Newsletter. If you didn't know, the html color codes for the Packers colors are #FFCC00 (the Gold color) and #213D30 (the dark green). And if you do create the template, throw {{GreenBayPackersProject|class=NA}} on the talk page for me please!! Thanks for your help!
Gonzo fan2007 ^{talk ♦ contribs} 22:01, 19 January 2008 (UTC)

Yeah it is a template, but i need the template to float to the right in every other page except for the main project page, where it needs to be centered. I couldnt figure out how to make it centered except for just copying the content right onto the page and then changing it to float:center.
Gonzo fan2007 ^{talk ♦ contribs} 22:09, 19 January 2008 (UTC)

Here's the link Template:WP-PACKERS.
Gonzo fan2007 ^{talk ♦ contribs} 22:11, 19 January 2008 (UTC)

Looks like a good start! I dont have the time to do some template work right now (college reading) but I will try and get to it in the coming day. Keep on working on it though, it seems like you know what you are doing!
Gonzo fan2007 ^{talk ♦ contribs} 22:25, 19 January 2008 (UTC)

I think it may need delaying again this week. News is, again, slow. jj137 ^♠ 18:10, 19 January 2008 (UTC)

Yes, I agree. STORMTRACKER 94 22:29, 19 January 2008 (UTC)

All right, I fixed all of the moves. jj137 ^♠ 02:06, 20 January 2008 (UTC)

Fine with me. --HPJoker ^{Leave me a message} 05:51, 20 January 2008 (UTC)

Ban this guy please

He vandalized my user page once, and has a photo of a vagina on his user page. Noobhunter456 is his user name. Thanx, dude!

Lol. Wikiproject Green Bay Slackers. =) --HPJoker ^{Leave me a message} 23:43, 19 January 2008 (UTC)

Nevermind. He's been banned for other reasons. --HPJoker ^{Leave me a message} 00:14, 20 January 2008 (UTC)

A7 reasons

did you make in deleting Saint Champ Road as A7? It does not seem to fall in any of the A7 categories. not that i think the article can be defended, but I really dont see any way to do it by speedy--the context is clear enough, too. DGG (talk) 02:39, 20 January 2008 (UTC)

Hmm... I changed it to a PROD. jj137 ^♠ 02:43, 20 January 2008 (UTC) Good idea.DGG (talk) 02:44, 20 January 2008 (UTC)

Re: JS

Cool. I'm checking it out right now. BTW, I put two new featured pics candidates (I'm putting in the second one right now), which I uploaded. Please vote support/oppose. And anything about the message bar thing? I left a link in the previous section message. - Ohmpandya ^{We need to talk... ♦ contribs} 03:29, 20 January 2008 (UTC)

Are you going to vote :)? Here is a link if you are. - Ohmpandya ^{We need to talk... ♦ contribs} 03:38, 20 January 2008 (UTC)

Can you delete: Image:Concption HD 189733b.jpg

There is already the same one uploaded. - Ohmpandya ^{We need to talk... ♦ contribs} 03:59, 20 January 2008 (UTC)

Talk:Bee Movie

After the nonsense vandalism, I originally protected the page for a day. However, I rangeblocked 222.166.160.0/24 for a day instead and unprotected the page. -- Flyguy649 ^talk 04:13, 20 January 2008 (UTC)

Sounds good. jj137 ^♠ 04:14, 20 January 2008 (UTC)

You also...

		The Original Barnstar
		For continuing contributions of high caliber to the project; I Mercury, award this "Original Barnstar". Mercury at 04:37, 20 January 2008 (UTC) 04:37, 20 January 2008 (UTC)

Wow, thank you. That was really unexpected. jj137 ^♠ 04:38, 20 January 2008 (UTC)

Barnstar

100px		The Reference Barnstar
		Hello. I just created the reference barnstar! Thought you should be the first one to get it because of all you contributions trying to fix and add references! Here you go! - Ohmpandya ^{We need to talk... ♦ contribs} 17:40, 20 January 2008 (UTC)

Thanks a lot. Just wondering, what page is that with the references? :) jj137 ^♠ 17:51, 20 January 2008 (UTC)

Copyright... :(

Everard Arundell, 13th Baron Arundell of Wardour is copyvio of http://www.thepeerage.com/p2508.htm,, added a speedy one it - Ohmpandya ^{We need to talk... ♦ contribs} 17:32, 20 January 2008 (UTC)

Also, ZaZa's Pub & Pizzeria is advertising, but the page has been contested, although I'm 100% sure it is advertising. - Ohmpandya ^{We need to talk... ♦ contribs} 17:42, 20 January 2008 (UTC)

Oh.... uhh.... I guess because of this. - Ohmpandya ^{We need to talk... ♦ contribs} 18:16, 20 January 2008 (UTC)

Oh! That! Think about it. Where is always a place where you can find an article with alot of references?

Click here for a clue.
Click here for the answer.

- Ohmpandya ^{We need to talk... ♦ contribs} 18:24, 20 January 2008 (UTC)

Also:

It looks like 1 image is definitely going to get promoted. :)
It looks like 1 image is definitely not going to get promoted. :(
It looks like 1 image might get promoted -.-

- Ohmpandya ^{We need to talk... ♦ contribs} 18:30, 20 January 2008 (UTC)

Yeah. only 1 hours and 15 mins left :) - Ohmpandya ^{We need to talk... ♦ contribs} 18:40, 20 January 2008 (UTC)

Just want to take an opinion, do you think this[3] might pass? - Ohmpandya ^{We need to talk... ♦ contribs} 18:51, 20 January 2008 (UTC)

Ok! Nominated it! Take a look at my other nominated images as well. - Ohmpandya ^{We need to talk... ♦ contribs} 19:51, 20 January 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for the support. There's this guy going around "strong opposing" on every picture. -.- - Ohmpandya ^{We need to talk... ♦ contribs} 20:20, 20 January 2008 (UTC)

His reasons don't all even make sense at all. He's like "Mr. Opposite". He votes the exact opposite of the majority. - Ohmpandya ^{We need to talk... ♦ contribs} 20:28, 20 January 2008 (UTC)

Thanks! Look at the new image I just nominated. I have to say... that;s probably the best one! If he votes oppose on this.... - Ohmpandya ^{We need to talk... ♦ contribs} 21:38, 20 January 2008 (UTC)

Could you block this guy?

This IP has done enough damage, 68.147.110.12

Thanx, dude!

I feel like a great vandal fighter now! --HPJoker ^{Leave me a message} 20:57, 20 January 2008 (UTC)

No, I didn't. --HPJoker ^{Leave me a message} 00:06, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

1400!

Couldn't resist. =) --HPJoker ^{Leave me a message} 00:07, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

CRAP! You know a radio station thats streaming the Giants at. Packers game? WFAN isn't due to blackout restrictions. --HPJoker ^{Leave me a message} 00:30, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

My RfA

Hey there, I'm writing to inform you that I have withdrawn my request for adminship, which was currently standing at 11 supports, 22 opposes and 6 neutrals. This count could have been so much better if I had understood policy, although I believe that 17 questions is a lot to ask of a user's first RfA. I will take on all comments given at the RfA and will endeavour to meet the high expectations of the RfA voters. _{WEBURIEDOURSECRETSINTHEGARDEN}^{play it cool.} 21:01, 20 January 2008 (UTC)

RE: WP:FPC

I'm a little confused by your comments here and here; I don't participate in FPC often, but I'm still sort of confused. jj137 ^♠ 20:35, 20 January 2008 (UTC)

Hello, The second row of examples at [4] illustrate jpeg artifacting pretty well. Hope that clarifies your question. These artifacts are only there because of a desire to reduce image file size, not because of the optics, and therefore they are a standard on which we can be picky. de Bivort 22:16, 20 January 2008 (UTC)

Aah, yes, that answers my question. Thanks. jj137 ^♠ 23:57, 20 January 2008 (UTC)

Image

And then you have this random guy going around going "Oppose per ____________" - Ohmpandya ^{We need to talk... ♦ contribs} 23:44, 20 January 2008 (UTC)

Oh yeah.... PATS WIN!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! (Again) :) Who are you going for GB, or Giants? - Ohmpandya ^{We need to talk... ♦ contribs} 23:46, 20 January 2008 (UTC)

Yeah... oh well wel will just have to wait and see... how long (do you know) does it take till they decide on a picture? - Ohmpandya ^{We need to talk... ♦ contribs} 00:14, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

Thanks. Looks like:

Clay Anderson's spacewalk will need one more vote - you haven't voted yet
Delta II might pass with a couple more votes.
Space shuttle discovery is tied 4-4.

The other have no chance... We'll see... - Ohmpandya ^{We need to talk... ♦ contribs} 00:21, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

It actually reduces the resolution. :( - Ohmpandya ^{We need to talk... ♦ contribs} 00:28, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for your support. Giants are winning, now if they win, there won't really be a point of watching the super bowl... - Ohmpandya ^{We need to talk... ♦ contribs} 00:32, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

Yep. And there paying 2.5 mil to run a 30 second ad... - Ohmpandya ^{We need to talk... ♦ contribs} 01:07, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

Question: There is an image that is featured on Commons, does it mean you can't nominate it for Wikipedia? - Ohmpandya ^{We need to talk... ♦ contribs} 01:15, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

I'm really unsure of that. jj137 ^♠ 02:15, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

works[5] pretty good with Picasa.

Love the comment below BTW>> It's an awesome game right now... - Ohmpandya ^{We need to talk... ♦ contribs} 02:19, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

I really don't mind whoever wins. Giants, well there really shouldn't be a Super Bowl played, with the Packers, it's gonna be a good game! - Ohmpandya ^{We need to talk... ♦ contribs} 02:26, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

If the Packers win, who are you going for in the Super Bowl? - Ohmpandya ^{We need to talk... ♦ contribs} 02:28, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

...Well I've lived in MA all my life.... Oh...pass interference... :( - Ohmpandya ^{We need to talk... ♦ contribs} 02:34, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

NO GOOD = KICK! - Ohmpandya ^{We need to talk... ♦ contribs} 02:38, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

hey Jj137

your mean! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mr.Smiley777 (talk • contribs) 01:04, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

Hmm? Why? jj137 ^♠ 02:11, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

Deletion of "great turning"

The article I wrote on "great turning" was deleted earlier this month. Can you tell me why? - Mike Ignatowski Mike ignatowski (talk) 01:48, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

There was an expired PROD tag, the concern being: lack of independent reliable sources to establish notability. jj137 ^♠ 02:13, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

WP:AWC

Yes, I mean in 2008. Marlith ^T/C 03:24, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

I will use an editcounter that does undeleted edits. Yes, I do know that editcountitis is bad, but it does show dedication. Marlith ^T/C 03:26, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

RE: Barnstar

Thanks very much for the barnstar you awarded me. All the vandalism and spam on Wikipedia has really started to get my goat so I thought it was time I joined the campaign to stop it. --Astral (talk) 03:37, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

Thanks. I've been using a brilliant tool called Huggle to help me fight vandals and as I had some free time over the weekend, I thought I'd make a concerted effort rather than jist do a few reverts and then think "Well, that's my contributions done for the day". :-) Astral (talk) 03:52, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

farrell... again

Not again, man, make up your mind. Why let that dutch character mess with your mind? That was not a compromise, that was called obliteration. We've been there before. If you put it in the link, put the appropriate context to it, don't just say an 'interview'. It makes no sense, and that's what that dude wants. Come on, man, you can do better than that. You've earned my respect not for nothing. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.144.179.17 (talk) 22:54, 18 January 2008 (UTC)

Hey man, it's been a day. What's going on? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.141.209.177 (talk) 15:12, 19 January 2008 (UTC)

See response on 99.141.209.177 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.141.220.32 (talk) 18:45, 19 January 2008 (UTC)

99.141.220.32 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.141.220.32 (talk) 01:20, 20 January 2008 (UTC)

99.141.220.32 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.141.220.32 (talk) 03:03, 20 January 2008 (UTC)

Responded on 99.141.220.32 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.141.220.32 (talk) 03:15, 20 January 2008 (UTC)

Responded again —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.141.220.32 (talk) 04:58, 20 January 2008 (UTC)

Thanks. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.141.230.106 (talk) 00:22, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

99.141.230.106 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.141.214.119 (talk) 06:30, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

99.141.230.106 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.141.230.185 (talk) 22:18, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

Responded on the above IP page —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.141.230.185 (talk) 22:39, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

Super Bowl

Yep... :(

Every game has been a upset except the Pat's games.
Did you see the 35 yard attempt at the last second of the 4th quarter - I could have kicked a better one. (Ok maybe not...)
Pats vs. Giants = Game 16 all over again.
It's not going to be the most exciting Super Bowl.
Looks like another ring on Brady. Eventually he might have to move on to his toes... I hope :)
Thats all I have to say.... - Ohmpandya ^{We need to talk... ♦ contribs} 15:34, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

You're right, it will probably be Week 17 all over again. I think the Pats will win, but it may be close. jj137 ^♠ 15:52, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

Yeah. The Giants did put up a decent fight last time, and they have more experience to now. We'll just have to wait and see, February 3rd, seems so far away... - Ohmpandya ^{We need to talk... ♦ contribs} 15:56, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

Ok... No idea where you live, but last time I checked it was 13 days away from here :) Isn't it on Feb. 3rd?.. - Ohmpandya ^{We need to talk... ♦ contribs} 16:04, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

And then a week later is Hawaii - Pro Bowl - always fun to watch. - Ohmpandya ^{We need to talk... ♦ contribs} 16:07, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

New Pages

Hey. Can you go to newpages and delete all of the new pages made by Vividenblem. All of them are {{db-bio}} or little or no context. Thanks! - Ohmpandya ^{We need to talk... ♦ contribs} 16:58, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

Or go to his/her's contribs. - Ohmpandya ^{We need to talk... ♦ contribs} 17:01, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

All the same :) Thanks. Shouldn't you have deleted them? - Ohmpandya ^{We need to talk... ♦ contribs} 17:50, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

I'm surprised today's featured article is featured? Isn't it required that all featured articles have an image? - Ohmpandya ^{We need to talk... ♦ contribs} 19:13, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

No. Most have pictures, but occasionally they won't. jj137 ^♠ 02:15, 22 January 2008 (UTC)

Well it doesn't matter - it has an image now :) - Ohmpandya ^{We need to talk... ♦ contribs} 02:16, 22 January 2008 (UTC)

Thanks!- Ohmpandya ^{We need to talk... ♦ contribs} 02:21, 22 January 2008 (UTC)

Page prot

I curious, not upset or anything, just curious, about why you protected my user page. — Rlevse • Talk • 19:03, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

Nice to see you back. I protected it mainly because, basically, if you said "I quit", then nobody else should change that until you came back. (For example, when RickK left, his userpage received basically no constructive edits but vandalism before he came back to protect it.) You can (obviously) go ahead and unprotect it if you want. jj137 ^♠ 22:10, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

Returning

After much thought and deliberation I have decided to return. Many wikians contacted me by various means and I truly appreciate the support from all of them. Man, did I need that wiki break! I have learned from it and will use the experience to improve. — Rlevse • Talk • 19:13, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

Re:Userpage - The Random Editor

Thanks for the piece of information; I had heard that he was back under a new username, and that just left me wondering... I would remove the portion on his departure, but it seems that he's also abandoned the new username... ♠TomasBat 21:26, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

Yes, after his account was compromised and the Main Page was deleted. jj137 ^♠ 02:13, 22 January 2008 (UTC)

Challenge.......

You willing to perm ban this guy? --HPJoker ^{Leave me a message} 00:24, 22 January 2008 (UTC)

We're not allowed to indef-block IPs except in extreme circumstances, but I blocked him for 5 days. jj137 ^♠ 02:12, 22 January 2008 (UTC)

Neat. --HPJoker ^{Leave me a message} 02:28, 22 January 2008 (UTC)

Template

How do you start a template - My talk page is a mess. - Ohmpandya ^{We need to talk... ♦ contribs} 02:18, 22 January 2008 (UTC)

Thanks! - for the template - and the barnstars! No wonder I kept on searching {{<title here>}} trying to create it that way, now I see :) - Ohmpandya ^{We need to talk... ♦ contribs} 02:24, 22 January 2008 (UTC)

Yeah. I got 5 barnstars for edits on 1 page (well...I made 100 edits) the person thought I deserved them. Also: if you see the "tireless contributor barnstar" (the little image on the top right), it looks "weird" compared to the others, I know it's suppose to be spinning, but its small and...(can't think of the word). Can you fix that? - Ohmpandya ^{We need to talk... ♦ contribs} 02:27, 22 January 2008 (UTC)

If you make the following changes:

right:386px;
top:6.4px
And make it 22px as you said, it looks great!

Thanks for the help! - Ohmpandya ^{We need to talk... ♦ contribs} 02:40, 22 January 2008 (UTC)

Is there an "infoxbox" for a novel? - Ohmpandya ^{We need to talk... ♦ contribs} 02:42, 22 January 2008 (UTC)

Thanks. - Ohmpandya ^{We need to talk... ♦ contribs} 02:58, 22 January 2008 (UTC)

Paprika (novel)

Regarding Paprika (novel), the plot summary is just about the same thing as the movie. (Few minor changes). Can I copy and paste it? - Ohmpandya ^{We need to talk... ♦ contribs} 03:01, 22 January 2008 (UTC)

Alright, also check this[6] out! It's like Red Sox Wikipedia! - Ohmpandya ^{We need to talk... ♦ contribs} 03:05, 22 January 2008 (UTC)

"The only place where you can edit the Main Page" :) - Nice new sig. - Ohmpandya ^{We need to talk... ♦ contribs} 03:09, 22 January 2008 (UTC)

Yep: Now I don't have to worry about clicking on that little "spade/diamond" anymore :) - Ohmpandya ^{We need to talk... ♦ contribs} 03:13, 22 January 2008 (UTC)

I made a good amount of edits to the article - would you still consider it a stub? - Ohmpandya ^{We need to talk... ♦ contribs} 03:20, 22 January 2008 (UTC)

And....how do you find out if an article has already been nominated for "Good article status" - (I'm not nominating this one) - Ohmpandya ^{We need to talk... ♦ contribs} 03:24, 22 January 2008 (UTC)

Well, yeah. How do you find out if it's already one, is a better way to rephrase it. Is there any way other than looking through the long list? 20px - Ohmpandya ^{We need to talk... ♦ contribs} 03:29, 22 January 2008 (UTC)

Thanks! (for the 150,000th time) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ohmpandya (talk • contribs) 03:32, 22 January 2008 (UTC)

re: Main Page

How far down the history list is that?

But no, it is an artifact, like my very low internal id, due to an early software update that seemed to remove a lot of user and history data. TwoOneTwo (talk) 15:23, 22 January 2008 (UTC)

Well, if you go all the way back in the history, you will find this (it wouldn't let me show a diff). jj 137 20:37, 22 January 2008 (UTC)

Idea...

Question: There is a Wikipedia "thing" called a Wikiworldcup. If you want to create one of these, the idea I'm thinking of is something totally different, just using that as an example - can you? - Ohmpandya ^{We need to talk... ♦ contribs} 20:38, 22 January 2008 (UTC)

No, I might sign up. Okay: What I want to do is something like "Admin of the year/month" - you get the picture. It should be like - wow. ok the sun is out and its snowing hard - weird - back to this. I have a format of how it should be set up ready, you thing this is a good idea - WIkipedia does not have this - or I don't know about it. - Ohmpandya ^{We need to talk... ♦ contribs} 20:49, 22 January 2008 (UTC)

Yeah, I have that all set up, just going to take a while to type it (its all in my head). Should we create a user subpage or a new page itself. Hopefully you stay 'online' if you know what I mean. I could use your help! - Ohmpandya ^{We need to talk... ♦ contribs} 21:01, 22 January 2008 (UTC)

Ok, this look good?. Well we should have a trophy similar to the Wikiworldcup thing - I think I can design that - that would be uploaded under "Its my own work" right?- Ohmpandya ^{We need to talk... ♦ contribs} 21:08, 22 January 2008 (UTC)

I was thinking of having votes, would that work? - Ohmpandya ^{We need to talk... ♦ contribs} 21:12, 22 January 2008 (UTC)

I can think of a way to get enough people....but I mean you can nominate yourself... would that count for bureaucracy? - Ohmpandya ^{We need to talk... ♦ contribs} 21:20, 22 January 2008 (UTC)

Check your email. Which do you like best? The first two are pretty bad... Whatever you like. Ok. Yes something like what you are talking about. We should have two parties (something like the presidential election) one party will be called _______________, and the other will be called _________________. The people who get the most opposes are eliminated. Next round. Next round. etc. - Ohmpandya ^{We need to talk... ♦ contribs} 21:27, 22 January 2008 (UTC)

Oh yeah: IGNORE THE CAPTION ON THE FIRST ONE GOT IT ONLINE _ DIDN'T See it till now. - Ohmpandya ^{We need to talk... ♦ contribs} 21:28, 22 January 2008 (UTC)

Idea - Part II

Alright - whoops! We'll just use the original[7]. Is that ok? here is a basic layout:

The admin people who got nominated and/or self-nom. (using random names)

__________________ party

JJ137
JP1123232
JC1322
hi5ggh
johnpppppar
ilovegolfnot
alrightwiki11252

___________________ party

jko123
youw12221
wikfiiereesd123
jjjjohnnnn
hhhheejjs
newenglandredsox1234
pats111444222

Ok lets say:

__________________ party

JJ137 - support + oppose + support + support
JP1123232 - oppose + oppose + oppose + oppose
JC1322 - you get the point
hi5ggh
johnpppppar
ilovegolfnot
alrightwiki11252

First Round: 3 people are eliminated from each party Second Round: 2 people are eliminated from each party Third Round: 1 guy from each party.

- As the rounds go on the admins will have to show proof of why they deserve the trophy, and the votes from other people may also effect. I think you get the basics. :) - Ohmpandya ^{We need to talk... ♦ contribs} 21:49, 22 January 2008 (UTC)

Sorry I meant to write: Proof of there recent edits, which shows they have been using tools well, right way, editing a good amount every day.... you get the point. - Ohmpandya ^{We need to talk... ♦ contribs} 22:45, 22 January 2008 (UTC)

Alright, I put some rules for admins look at the page, can you think of anything else? - Ohmpandya ^{We need to talk... ♦ contribs} 23:00, 22 January 2008 (UTC)

I've added a lot more, PLEASE edit the page, and whatever you can do to make it looks better, just don't blank it :) - Ohmpandya ^{We need to talk... ♦ contribs} 23:51, 22 January 2008 (UTC)

Re:AWB

Thanks, but I can't download it. Is there any other way of downloading it? Juliancolton (talk) 22:04, 22 January 2008 (UTC)

Not that I know of... jj 137 22:37, 22 January 2008 (UTC)

Ok, I will try on my other computer to download it. Juliancolton (talk) 22:39, 22 January 2008 (UTC)

OK, let me know if that doesn't work and I'll try to find a solution. jj 137 22:41, 22 January 2008 (UTC)

Sure, I will do that in a bit. Juliancolton (talk) 22:45, 22 January 2008 (UTC)

Hmm, it doesn't seem to work. Juliancolton (talk) 00:42, 23 January 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for the lock on the Free Republic article.

It was turning into a sock puppet revert war. --BenBurch (talk) 22:11, 22 January 2008 (UTC)

No problem. jj 137 22:36, 22 January 2008 (UTC)

Template:Baseball Year

I made some comments on the talk page; let me know what you think. MisfitToys (talk) 22:15, 22 January 2008 (UTC)

I responded there. jj 137 22:35, 22 January 2008 (UTC)

Re: User:Ohmpandya/adminofthemonth

Oh...yeah....per month:) I'll add that. Add you name to the moderators list. - Ohmpandya ^{We need to talk... ♦ contribs} 00:18, 23 January 2008 (UTC)

Also how do you put vertical text or an image?- Ohmpandya ^{We need to talk... ♦ contribs} 00:20, 23 January 2008 (UTC)

I did something different. Look at the page now. New new new sig. Now you definitely can't miss :) - Ohmpandya ^{We need to talk... ♦ contribs} 01:30, 23 January 2008 (UTC)

I did didn't I? What did I miss? We just have to make that work now. Can you do that? - Ohmpandya ^{We need to talk... ♦ contribs} 01:38, 23 January 2008 (UTC)

Whoops! So, can you help make everything "work"? - Ohmpandya ^{We need to talk... ♦ contribs} 01:41, 23 January 2008 (UTC)

Wow! This is great! Is there any way non-admins will be redirected to a message that they cannot be a candidate and only vote? Also, what are some basic questions they should have to answer? - Ohmpandya ^{We need to talk... ♦ contribs} 02:00, 23 January 2008 (UTC)

Alright. Yeah, the edit stats should play some part, I think that to. We'll continue tomorrow. - Ohmpandya ^{We need to talk... ♦ contribs} 02:02, 23 January 2008 (UTC)

I really want to request a name change - my username is way to similar to my real name, and would rather have it changed. Going to do that right now. - Ohmpandya ^{We need to talk... ♦ contribs} 02:05, 23 January 2008 (UTC)

Just thought up a good enough name :) - Ohmpandya ^{We need to talk... ♦ contribs} 02:09, 23 January 2008 (UTC)

Will everything in "History" change as well? - Ohmpandya ^{We need to talk... ♦ contribs} 02:10, 23 January 2008 (UTC)