User talk:Jizzygizzyfoshizzyyy

This is Jizzygizzyfoshizzyyy's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Undercurrent (Matisyahu Album) has been accepted

Undercurrent (Matisyahu Album), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 19:15, 9 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Jizzygizzyfoshizzyyy, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Jizzygizzyfoshizzyyy! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Lectonar (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:01, 10 August 2021 (UTC)

August 2021

Hello, I'm FlightTime Phone. Please refrain from changing genres, as you did to Bleach (Nirvana album) even if you provide a/some source(s), you'll still need to start a discussion on the article talk page to allow editors who regular watch that page a chance to discuss the reliability of the source(s) you provided. One reason is, genre sources can easily be considered an opinion and not fact. Genre's are a touchy subject here on Wikipedia and without discussion/consensus, regardless of your source(s), your addition or removal will most likely be reverted. Your edit has been reverted and archived in the page history for now.

Unsourced genre changes to suit your own point of view are considered disruptive.

Thank you. - FlightTime Phone (open channel) 21:28, 16 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Back in Black shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Magatta (talk) 01:53, 24 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Magatta No no no, YOU'RE the one in the edit war against three other users... The article was changed twice by other editors before me, and YOU are the one who has been reverting them. I only supported the previous editors who've YOU locked out of the article... Jizzygizzyfoshizzyyy (talk) 01:57, 24 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hi Jizzygizzyfoshizzyyy! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:52, 19 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Back to drafts for Ziggy

Hi — it seems you moved the very under-referenced draft into the main space at Ziggy (band), on the basis that "after listening to some of the music, I trust the information is accurate". Sorry, but that's not quite how this works. I've moved it back to drafts now, where it can wait for better referencing and a proper AfC review, preferably in that order. Thanks, --DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:52, 19 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Undercurrent

Please note that this is not "your" article – you do not WP:OWN it, nobody owns any article on Wikipedia, and the whole point of Wikipedia is that anyone can make edits that they feel are constructive and improve the article. I've pointed you in the direction of Wikipedia guidelines that you and every other editor are expected to follow, and why I edited the article according to these guidelines. As for the chronology, please see this discussion, where the consensus was that only one chronology should be used for all album types. Richard3120 (talk) 02:48, 20 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Then if you're going to edit this one, you need to edit every other album that apparently does this "incorrectly." I don't see why the "extra chronology" codec exists if it's not supposed to be used... This makes navigation between Matisyahu albums much more streamlined, as before, it was a mess. I spent three hours fixing up the chronology on the Matisyahu albums last week, to appear like every other artist's chronology. It's fine. (Jizzygizzyfoshizzyyy (talk) 02:04, 23 August 2021 (UTC))[reply]

Your move

Welcome to Wikipedia! - Welcome to the concept of consensus. (WP:Consensus) - 15 versus 13 is no consensus, and then it stays as it is. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:53, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Jizzygizzyfoshizzyyy reported by User:Magatta (Result: ). Thank you. Magatta (talk) 02:08, 24 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

I have blocked you for two weeks for disruptive editing, including edit-warring, and pervasive, abusive editing while logged out. See WP:GAB for your appeal rights.--Bbb23 (talk) 02:34, 24 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for sockpuppetry

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Jizzygizzyfoshizzyyy. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ~TNT (she/they • talk) 20:23, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Hollandia (matzo brand)

Hello, Jizzygizzyfoshizzyyy. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Hollandia (matzo brand), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 00:01, 2 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Hollandia (matzo brand)

Hello, Jizzygizzyfoshizzyyy. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Hollandia".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:09, 1 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]