User talk:JimPlamondon
The article ThumMusic System has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group or service and which would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. NawlinWiki (talk) 03:14, 21 April 2008 (UTC)
- The whole thing was not written as a description of a notable product ("notable" per WP:N, having been recognized as such by reliable independent sources), but as a "here's a problem, and here's how my product is best at solving it" article. Just deleting the links to the website doesn't keep it from being advertising. This is why it's not a good idea to write about your own product or company; see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest. What seems to you like neutral description seems to other people like promotion. NawlinWiki (talk) 03:30, 21 April 2008 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of File:Thummer.jpg
[edit]
A tag has been placed on File:Thummer.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Eusebius (talk) 22:48, 15 January 2010 (UTC)
Please grant to permission for the use of File:Thummer.jpg on Wikimedia Commons
[edit]Hello, JumPlamondon
Recently, I found your uploaded image on English Wikipedia is nominated for deletion.
The reason for deletion may be "copyright infringement".
But, on Wikimedia Commons, if you send permission mail to Wikimedia Foundation,
the image is kept, and it can be referred from other Wikipedia Projects (including English Wikipedia).
If you kindly grant to permission for use of the image on Wikimedia Commons,
please send a permission mail (OTRS [1]) in the formats of Email templates [2]
to Wikimedia Commons <permissions-commons@wikimedia.org>.
- [1] OTRS: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:OTRS/
- [2] Email templates: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/COM:ET
Best Regards, --Shoulder-synth (talk) 00:02, 16 January 2010 (UTC)
- P.S. Message from sysop of Wikimedia Commons ... (original discussion is here)
- When the e-mail has been sent, please apply {{OTRS pending}} on the image page (in the "permission" field) to tell us so (and to prevent the file from being deleted). Please don't ignore this message, contact the sysop instead if you want to discuss the issue or if you have a question about the procedure.
- (underline part is modified by me) --Shoulder-synth (talk) 03:23, 17 January 2010 (UTC)
Articles for deletion nomination of Technology evangelism
[edit]I have nominated Technology evangelism, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Technology evangelism. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.
Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. - EdoDodo talk 08:51, 27 June 2010 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:49, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
[edit]
Hello, JimPlamondon. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
[edit]Hello, JimPlamondon. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Wikipedia and copyright
[edit]
Hello JimPlamondon, and welcome to Wikipedia. Your additions to Dynamic tonality have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.
- You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
- Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
- Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Wikipedia:Copyrights. You may also want to review Wikipedia:Copy-paste.
- If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
- In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are PD or compatibly licensed) it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions, the help desk or the Teahouse before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Wikipedia:Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
- Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps in Wikipedia:Translation#How to translate. See also Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.
It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 20:08, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Ways to improve Tony Seba
[edit]Hello, JimPlamondon,
Thank you for creating Tony Seba.
I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:
Links to books on Amazon, while worthy, do not satisfy Wikipedia requirements for notability. Please find more references, and get them onto the article before somebody puts it up for deletion. The article resides at this level of risk. Thank you.
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Whiteguru}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.
Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
Whiteguru (talk) 03:22, 28 July 2021 (UTC)
- @Whiteguru: Re the article on Tony Seba
- The Tony Seba article is not unambiguously promotional, because:
- It cites literally dozens of secondary sources which prove that his books (especially his recent ones) have sparked international discussion.
- It cites a list of specific predictions, made in his books, that were highly controversial when published, which have since proven to have been accurate -- citing secondary sources accordingly.
I cannot help but wonder:
- What factual statements in the article are considered to be promotional?
- What sources of evidence would render those factual claims "non-promotional"?
- Respectfully,
- --JimPlamondon (talk) 07:39, 28 July 2021 (UTC)
- JimPlamondon A lot of editors have looked at this article today, and it has gone from New Page Review to Articles for Deletion (edit conflict) Draftspace, and then formally moved back to draft by an uninvolved editor. You have the grace, and the opportunity to find what we call reliable sources for this article. It's hard yakka, and I know you have been pushed and shoved around today; but it is all a learning experience. Please treat this like so. --Whiteguru (talk) 08:26, 28 July 2021 (UTC)
An article you recently created, Tony Seba, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Yeeno (talk) 🍁 03:33, 28 July 2021 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Tony Seba
[edit]
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Draft:Tony Seba, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Riteboke (talk) 06:37, 28 July 2021 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Tony Seba (July 28)
[edit]
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Tony Seba and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Tony Seba, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
- If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
|
Hello, JimPlamondon!
Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 06:40, 28 July 2021 (UTC)
|
AfC notification: Draft:Tony Seba has a new comment
[edit]
Using Wikipedia for personal promotion
[edit]Please do not use WP for personal promotion as you have done here. I reverted your edits so that a neutral editor who is not the subject of the article can have a chance to improve the article. They might even use the sources you contributed. I encourage you to read WP:COI carefully. With that in mind, do you have a conflict of interest on Draft:Tony Seba? That would include having a financial interest in the subject's work, knowing them, or being paid to create the article. --- Possibly ☎ 07:48, 28 July 2021 (UTC)
- @Possibly:,
- I did not use the article on the Thummer for personal promotion.
- Given that an previous editor threatened to delete the article on the Thummer due to its claimed lack of notability, I added content and references to the article that demonstrated that the Thummer, the company that created it, and I as its inventor had received awards and government grants related to it, as evidence of its notability. How were these NOT evidence of the instrument's notability? Why edit them out?
- The company had filed many patents and trademarks on the Thummer -- also evidence of notability. This IP is now in the public domain, so that anyone can now use it. A reader visiting the Thummer page might well want to know this. The information was contained in a sentence or two, with a list of references to the relevant entries in the government IP database -- what purpose is served by editing this information out of the article?
- Respectfully,
- --JimPlamondon (talk) 08:23, 28 July 2021 (UTC)
- You need to declare your very obvious conflict of interest, per We our WP:COI guideline. Editing a page on a product that you invented is a COI.
- I can't help but notice that his advice was provided to you 13 years ago (see top of talk page). You are describing your product from a marketing viewpoint and not an encyclopedic viewpoint. Also, patents, trademarks and grants have no role in determining notability. I have nominated the Thummer keyboard for deletion. It does not need ot be standalone and can be merged into the Jammer keyboard. --- Possibly ☎ 08:26, 28 July 2021 (UTC)
Jim's Conflicts of Interest re Tony Seba
[edit]None. I am a fan of Tony's work. I've never met him or corresponded with him, though. He hasn't even accepted my LinkedIn connection request. 😉 --JimPlamondon (talk) 06:32, 28 July 2021 (UTC)
- This isn't technically WP:COI then, so you don't have to declare it. Just so you know in the future. A COI requires a personal or financial connection to a person or entity. Happy editing. –Novem Linguae (talk) 09:25, 29 July 2021 (UTC)
Notability of Tony Seba
[edit]I was gently reminded by Whiteguru that links an author's books to Amazon pages do not, by themselves, prove notability. Fair enough.
However, it is unclear to me whether an article on Tony Seba needs to prove that HE is notable, or that his BOOKS are notable.
I have addressed this issue in two ways:
- First, I have added the phrase "sparked international discussion" to each of his latest books (listed at the top of the article's Bibliography section), followed by references to articles that mentioned that book soonishly after its publication. This should address the "notability of his books" issue.
- Second, I added a section titled "Predictions" that lists the predictions that Tony has made, citing his books (to enable people to verify his predictions) and secondary sources (to enable people to verify the outcomes).
Contested deletion of Tony Seba article
[edit]The article on Tony Seba is not unambiguously promotional, because:
- It cites literally dozens of secondary sources which prove that his books (especially his recent ones) have sparked international discussion.
- It cites a list of specific predictions, made in his books, that were highly controversial when published, which have since proven to have been accurate -- citing secondary sources accordingly.
The Wikipedia article on RethinkX, the company that Tony Seba co-founded, has more discussion of the criticisms of the ideas presented in Tony's books. If that's what you think is missing, please let me know, and I will add some of that discussion to this page.
Which begs the question:
- What factoids stated in the article on Tony are deemed to be promotional, and why?
Respectfully, --JimPlamondon (talk) 08:23, 28 July 2021 (UTC)
- This statement goes on the article's talk page. The deleting administrator will not see it here. --- Possibly ☎ 08:28, 28 July 2021 (UTC)
- Yes, this statement belongs on the article talk page, not your personal talk page. Liz Read! Talk! 22:34, 28 July 2021 (UTC)
- Thank you. I have copied & pasted the section above into Draft_talk:Tony_Seba.
- --JimPlamondon (talk) 23:47, 28 July 2021 (UTC)
AfC notification: Draft:Tony Seba has a new comment
[edit]Your submission at Articles for creation: Tony Seba (July 29)
[edit]- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Tony Seba and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Tony Seba, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
- If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Concern regarding Draft:Tony Seba
[edit]
Hello, JimPlamondon. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Tony Seba, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:01, 6 January 2022 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:Tony Seba
[edit]
Hello, JimPlamondon. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Tony Seba".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 18:12, 23 March 2022 (UTC)
July 2022
[edit]
Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Dynamic tonality. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Drmies (talk) 04:06, 28 July 2022 (UTC)