User talk:Jilvinjacob

Draft:St. Stephen's Malankara Syrian Catholic Church, Kattanam concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:St. Stephen's Malankara Syrian Catholic Church, Kattanam, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:40, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:St. Stephen's Malankara Syrian Catholic Church, Kattanam

Hello, Jilvinjacob. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "St. Stephen's Malankara Syrian Catholic Church".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. 1989 (talk) 02:31, 12 January 2017 (UTC) [reply]

This blocked user is asking that his block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Jilvinjacob (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #21213 was submitted on Apr 14, 2018 06:31:43. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 06:31, 14 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of St. Stephen's Malankara Orthodox Syrian Church, Kattanam

Hello Jilvinjacob,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged St. Stephen's Malankara Orthodox Syrian Church, Kattanam for deletion, because it seems to be copied from another source, probably infringing copyright.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to rewrite it in your own words, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Josey Wales^Parley 15:58, 21 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have updated the content and have added the modified content to the talk page since the article is deleted as of now. If the content seems fine, we could create the article again.

Talk:St. Stephen's Malankara Orthodox Syrian Church, Kattanam

Thank you. :) jilvin (talk) 16:26, 21 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia and copyright

Hello Jilvinjacob! While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.

You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
We have strict guidelines on the usage of copyrighted images. Fair use images must meet all ten of the non-free content criteria in order to be used in articles, or they will be deleted. To be used on Wikipedia, all other images must be made available under a free and open copyright license that allows commercial and derivative reuse.
If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into either the public domain (PD) or under a suitably free and compatible copyright license. Please see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps described at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. See also Help:Translation#License requirements.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 16:04, 21 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have edited the content and have added the edited content as a section to the talk page as requested by User:Joseywales1961. If the content looks fine, we could create the article. I understand the concern and thanks a lot for helping wikipedia. :) jilvin (talk) 16:20, 21 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:St. Stephen's Malankara Orthodox Syrian Church, Kattanam jilvin (talk) 16:24, 21 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have deleted the talk page. You cannot alter some words from a copyrighted source. That is close paraphrasing and is still a copyright violation. You must write using your own words. -- Whpq (talk) 18:00, 21 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ok thank you. :) jilvin (talk) 04:32, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Pope Pius XI Higher Secondary School, Kattanam (January 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Pope Pius XI Higher Secondary School, Kattanam and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 19:18, 23 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Jilvinjacob! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 19:18, 23 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Pope Pius XI Higher Secondary School, Kattanam (April 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MicrobiologyMarcus was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Pope Pius XI Higher Secondary School, Kattanam and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

microbiologyMarcus ^{[petri dish·growths]} 16:45, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Pope Pius XI Higher Secondary School, Kattanam has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Pope Pius XI Higher Secondary School, Kattanam. Thanks! DoubleGrazing (talk) 16:18, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:St. Stephen's Malankara Orthodox Syrian Church, Kattanam

Hello, Jilvinjacob. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:St. Stephen's Malankara Orthodox Syrian Church, Kattanam, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:05, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:St. Stephen's Malankara Orthodox Syrian Church, Kattanam

Hello, Jilvinjacob. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "St. Stephen's Malankara Orthodox Syrian Church".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 17:05, 21 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Pope Pius XI Higher Secondary School, Kattanam (September 15)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Per WP:ORG, we need to see significant coverage, directly of the school itself, in multiple secondary sources that are both reliable and independent.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Pope Pius XI Higher Secondary School, Kattanam and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 13:48, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]