User talk:Jhanilesh28

August 2022

Hello, I'm Yamaguchi先生. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Bhayandar have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Yamaguchi先生 (talk) 15:49, 25 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Avado Learning has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Avado Learning. Thanks! -- NotCharizard ^🗨 12:03, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Avado Learning (May 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by DreamRimmer were:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Avado Learning and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

– DreamRimmer (talk) 12:13, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello DreamRimmer, Apologies if it seemed to be promotional in any manner. I referred the template of ICS Learn to understand the pattern and write my experience with Avado learning on Wikipedia. Can you please have a look once again and mention me what changes are needed specifically. Jhanilesh28 (talk) 10:21, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This draft was entirely promotional. It has been deleted accordingly. And you you have been blocked from editing for the same reason. I'm just pointing this out, in case it wasn't clear. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 10:26, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

So, ICS learn is a lot different then? I am slightly misreading it. If the reference is live and active why is the new one deleted? If you can probably help me with another sample that might be helpful here to work because I have been editing multiple changes in different posts solving errors adding context and I believe this could be a way to increase impact on wikipedia audience. Let me know how can I resolve it ahead. Jhanilesh28 (talk) 10:33, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Jhanilesh28! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! – DreamRimmer (talk) 12:13, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Avado Learning

Hello, Jhanilesh28. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Avado Learning, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 13:07, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Avado Learning (October 30)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by DoubleGrazing were:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Avado Learning and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:32, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Avado Learning

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Avado Learning, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:34, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

October 2024

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for advertising or promotion.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Jimfbleak - talk to me? 09:46, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]