User talk:Jgqdg

Speedy deletion nomination of Madarchod (Slang)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Madarchod (Slang) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://simplechefrecipe.com/what-is-a-blue-mother-f-drink/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 11:33, 31 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Onel5969, Seriously? I copied it word by word from the already existent wiki entry of Motherfucker. The site you're referring to is itself a Wiki mirror and has copied from Wiki. . Jgqdg (talk) 14:24, 31 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I'm contesting that this page should be brought back. Thanks. Jgqdg (talk) 14:25, 31 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I can't look since the page has been deleted, but did you give attribution in the edit summary when you copied from another WP page? If you did, my apologies, as I did not see it. That being said, why is another page needed when it simply has been copied "word for word" from another WP page? Simply create a redirect.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 19:11, 31 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Onel5969, Hi, not literally word for word, but with required changes I meant. A redirect here won't work, cause it's totally a different topic. It just shares similar premise with the already existing wiki article. This article can be lengthened further, I myself would, or any other editors might expand it. Yesterday I just started an initial stub. Can't this page be brought back? Thank you. Jgqdg (talk) 07:00, 1 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi again. If you would like the page restored, you should start with the admin who deleted it (I'm not an admin). Explain to them what you said to me above. Hope that helps.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 10:03, 1 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I'm confused as https://simplechefrecipe.com/what-is-a-blue-mother-f-drink/ is about a drink. However, the article, Madarchod, is about a slang word. There is nothing in the https://simplechefrecipe.com/what-is-a-blue-mother-f-drink/ that is included in our article and doesn't include the word Madarchod. And I'm not sure that the recipe page was copied fromWikipedia. What part was copied from Motherfucker? Even if changed it should indicate in Madarchod that material was used and from where. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 13:14, 1 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Madarchod for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Madarchod is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Madarchod (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Spicy (talk) 23:58, 4 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Tauhid Anwar Avik moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Tauhid Anwar Avik, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. PICKLEDICAE🥒 16:05, 8 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Praxidicae, "It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources."?

Hi, can you point out the information that are unreferenced? I'll be gladly to provide you with the sources. Thank you. Jay (talk) 16:10, 8 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Bangladeshi racing drivers

A tag has been placed on Category:Bangladeshi racing drivers indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:19, 9 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Mostly shoaib per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Mostly shoaib. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. --Blablubbs (talk) 16:46, 20 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Are there any ways to get unblocked at all? Albeit a few early mistakes, All I've tried to do is make Wiki a better place than it was yesterday. Is there any way I can get unblocked and be forgiven for violating some policies? Jay (talk) 20:15, 20 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Blablubbs Jay (talk) 20:15, 20 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please see the instructions in the template above (and especially the linked guide to appealing blocks) for guidance on how to appeal. --Blablubbs (talk) 20:24, 20 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Jgqdg (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I know I've violated some policies and made two articles about self-promotion. But I'd take pride in stating that I've contributed to this project significantly, and all I've wanted was to make the wiki a better place than it was yesterday. Please review my previous account in which I became a trusted user, I massively contributed to the WIR project, also an AFC reviewer, DYKs, and New Page Patrol reviewer. But yes, I've done some wrong things, which I've learned my lessons from. And I'd not self-promo ever again. Please consider reviewing my 99% edits which are undisputedly helpful to this project, that's all my intention. Yes, I admit, I sidetracked and tried to benefit from self-exposure, but please also do take into account my majority of edits that were beneficial for this project. I admit to each of my self-promo wrongdoings, and I'd never performed any such acts ever again. I've not even in this account or in the previous one whereas I stated almost every bit of edits were to make this wiki a better place, except those tiny few ones which were of self-promotion. I do take full responsibility for my wrongdoings and malicious actions, and I vow not to disrupt this project by any such means ever again. Please I ask for another chance to make keeping this wiki better every day. I'd keep doing anything to show my sincerity to this project and earn trust again. Thanks, and I really hope to be back. Jay (talk) 21:58, 20 September 2022 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Per the consensus over at Blablubbs' talk page. — Daniel Case (talk) 06:35, 30 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Jay (talk) 21:58, 20 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Which account would you edit from if unblocked? And disclose any other accounts you created that we are not aware of. Daniel Case (talk) 06:13, 21 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Daniel Case, Hi thanks for your response, I'd like to get back my old main account. Tamingimpala (from which I contributed the most; I became a page mover, new page reviewer, AFC reviewer, etc.). I really promise (and my actions will show) I'll not perform any self-promo attempt ever again. I'll keep doing as always things that are beneficial for this project, and collectively make it a better place. Again, I'm incredibly regretful that I misused my privileges few times and used them to my benefit creating pages about myself and my magazine, my book, not complying with the policy. There's another unnoticed account I've made edits from, IP:45.115.13.146. You'll notice I made edits to my self-promo magazine and submitted it for review from that account. Which obviously got rejected.

Thanks again, I really do hope to get back to contribute to this project. Jay (talk) 06:36, 21 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Daniel Case, Hi, can I possibly get an update? Thank you. Jay (talk) 14:33, 29 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

OK ... sorry. Let me run this past the blocking admin. Daniel Case (talk) 18:42, 29 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]