Hello, Jenes! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! I dream of horsesIf you reply here, please ping me by adding {{U|I dream of horses}} to your message. (talk to me) (My edits) @ 22:55, 13 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, I'm Netherzone. I noticed that you added a new section to Meiji (era) on Music (and info added to other pages as well), but you did not provide a verifiablereliable source in the form of a citation (reference). Please add a citation to the article, otherwise the information you added may be deleted. If you need help adding citation, please consider asking at the Help Desk, Tea House, or you may also contact me on my talk page. Thank you. Netherzone (talk) 21:34, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you very much for your contributions, they are appreciated. I'm not sure what you mean by I will make this block but I did see the two citations you added. There are a couple things I want to mention: I removed the wikilinks to authors that were placed in the citations, as they are not compliant with Manual of Style (and because both authors are non-notable they were red links.) The first citation to the Suda book is in Russian. Is there a source in English that you can find? Especially for a citation that you are using on several paragraphs in the section. There is no way to check if the cited paragraphs correspond to the citation at this time to confirm their verifiability. I also removed the citation to Howe that you added, since it seemed like an unpublished paper. I then replaced it with a work by Howe that I found in a published journal article. Lastly, the new section on Music seems heavily weighted in military and christian music, however when I search online, I cannot find anything that mentions these genres of music in relation to the Meiji era. I can however find other types of Western musical influences for era. It seems that it might be a case of non-WP:UNDUE (see section on "Due and undue weight" in the link); or perhaps it's original research (see WP:OR)? All new content should include citations (also sometimes called sources or references.) Some other helpful policies to read about are verifiability (see WP:V) and what are considered reliable sources WP:RS. Please don't hesitate to ping me on my talk page if you don't understand or need help with any of this. I will also continue to look to find citations for the new section on Music. Best regards, Netherzone (talk) 16:28, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I used these two texts. The monograph, for example, contains 398 references (in Russian, English and Japanese). I will add other links. Maybe we need to create a page of Japanese people. I will try to do everything step by step. Jenes (talk) 10:46, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
There was very little information about this on the Internet. I worked with a monograph, the author of which worked with the archives of various libraries (in Japan, England, US, Japan). He added several references to thorough research in the form of books: 1, 2Jenes (talk) 22:11, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Radu Poklitaru, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Karl Weber. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
An article you recently created, Kyiv Modern-Ballet, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969TT me13:49, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Onel5969, thank you for your attention to the sources. They are very important! The article was supplemented and submitted for review. If you see any additional points for improvement – please write to me about it. Jenes (talk) 17:37, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Kyiv Modern-Ballet, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
Hello, Jenes. Thank you for your work on Pamfir. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:
Thank you for writing the article on Wikipedia! I genuinely appreciate your efforts in creating the article on Wikipedia and expanding the sum of human knowledge in Wikipedia. Wishing you and your family a great day!
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
Hello Jenes. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being employed (or being compensated in any way) by a person, group, company or organization to promote their interests. Paid advocacy on Wikipedia must be disclosed even if you have not specifically been asked to edit Wikipedia. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.
Paid advocates are strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.
Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Jenes. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Jenes|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. 86.97.145.183 (talk) 21:41, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident with which you may be involved. Thank you. 86.97.145.183 (talk) 21:41, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
