User talk:Jen Luez

February 2022 Edits on Cambodian Premier League and Cambodian Second League

Please stop removing information and tables from both pages. This is your second warning before you'll be reported for vandalism.

February 2022 Edits on Cambodian Premier League and Cambodian Second League

Please stop removing information and tables from both pages. These information and tables are similar and identical to dozens of other domestic league pages on Wikipedia. A lot of time and effort has been put into contributing to both pages.

February 2022

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Cambodian Premier League have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Cambodian Premier League was changed by Jen Luez (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.928464 on 2022-02-17T05:50:50+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 05:50, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of edit warring

Your recent editing history at Cambodian League 2 shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Adakiko (talk) 07:28, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

March 2022

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 10:02, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for continuing the same kinds of disruptive editing which led to your earlier block, including resuming some of the same edit-wars from before the block. Naturally this time the block is for a significantly longer time than the previous one. I also note that in edit summaries in your edit-warring you have had the nerve to instruct other editors to discuss on the talk pages to seek agreement, despite the fact that you have made no attempt to do so. In fact the only editing you have ever done in any talk page has been to repeatedly remove another editor's message. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. JBW (talk) 22:18, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

June 2022

Hello, I'm Mako001. I noticed that in this edit to Cambodian League 2, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Mako001 (C) (T) 🇺🇦 12:55, 25 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for continuing with the same editing problems which led to previous blocks. You have also made personal attacks on an editor, which is unacceptable. "Indefinitely" does not mean forever. It means that at present no time has been set for the block to end, but it can be ended if and when you can persuade an administrator that in future you will edit without similar problems.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. JBW (talk) 08:44, 30 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@JBW: The only user that get on the editorial war with me is User:Dannywithay. I did not know how to make the reports but he do. All he did is going to that vandalism report page and repeatedly make reports to try to get me blocked. His last report was declined, then he immediately make the exact same report again. He is the one who put in unreferenced information at first, I'm the one who revert it and the first who asked for it to be discussed and explained, in the edit summary. He didn't even write any edit summary while keep on silently reverting, while I'm the one writing all the edit summaries to explain. All he did is leaving a vague warning in my talk page that warn me to "stop removing those tables and useful information or I will report you" (please note that those information are newly added and unreferenced, so I revert/remove them) while speak nothing about my explanation in the edit summary. He didn't say a single word about asking or inviting to me to discuss, only making threats to report me.

The problem here is miscommunication. Right before this, I am actually attempting to create a full and clear discussion to settle this miscommunication, but I'm surprised you just blocked me. Please unblock me so that I can discuss with him and the two can find solutions so as to be sure that this miscommunication as well as editorial war and disruption won't happen again; I am always looking to discuss but the miscommunication here is the reason because the user that is in edit war with me speak too little and we did not get each other, we haven't talked much, but we can settle towards a much more cooperative perception after finally a proper discussion in a talk page and we can work together, so please keep way for the chance. Jen Luez (talk) 13:16, 30 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]