User talk:JeanetteMartin/Archive 9
 | This is an archive of past discussions about User:JeanetteMartin. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 5 | ← | Archive 7 | Archive 8 | Archive 9 | Archive 10 | Archive 11 | → | Archive 14 |
The Months of African Cinema Contest Continues in November!
Greetings,
Thank you very much for participating in the Months of African Cinema global contest/edit-a-thon, and thank you for your contributions so far.
It is already the middle of the contest and a lot have been achieved already! We have been able to get over 1,500 articles created in over fifteen (15) languages! This would not have been possible without your support and we want to thank you. If you have not yet listed your name as a participant in the contest page please do so.
Please make sure to list the articles you have created or improved in the article achievements' section of the contest page, so that they can be easily tracked. To be able to claim prizes, please also ensure to list your articles on the users by articles page. We would be awarding prizes to different categories of winners:
- Overall winner
- 1st - $500
- 2nd - $200
- 3rd - $100
- Diversity winner - $100
- Gender-gap filler - $100
- Language Winners - up to $100*
We are very excited about what has been achieved so far, but your contributions are still needed to further exceed all expectations! Let’s create more articles before the end of this contest, which is this November!!!
Thank you once again for being part of this global event! --Jamie Tubers (talk) 10:30, 06 November 2020 (UTC)
You can opt-out of this annual reminder from The Afrocine Project by removing your username from this list
The article Edwin Adams Cotto has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
The subject appears to be non-notable. The applicable standard is WP:CRIME. Since there is no other article into which the content could be incorporated, that standard provides that a criminal should have an article only if either a) the victim is a renowned figure or b) the motivation for or execution of the crime was unusual or otherwise noteworthy. Neither applies: there was no apparent victim, and the commission of the crime appears perfectly ordinary. (The article also fails WP:GNG since there is only one reference.) Therefore, the subject is not notable, and the article should be deleted.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 18:11, 18 November 2020 (UTC)
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
 | Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Nomination of List of Puerto Rican television series for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of Puerto Rican television series is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Puerto Rican television series until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Jalen Folf (talk) 07:24, 19 December 2020 (UTC)
Nomination of Edwin Adams Cotto for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Edwin Adams Cotto is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Edwin Adams Cotto until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 18:59, 19 December 2020 (UTC)
Hopes and wishes for Puerto Rico
Hi, Antonio! It's been awhile!
It's not entirely about Wikipedia but I still recall one of our first Wikipedia discussions was about how to treat Puerto Rico in a list in regards to the U.S. I know Puerto Rico being distinct was something of your POV. I have some thoughts:
Based on the GA senate runoffs there's a chance Puerto Rico will be admitted into the union as our first majority Spanish-speaking state! My state, Texas, has a bit of an identity as its own nation as it was independent for years and still flies the state flag as the same height as the federal one. While it's firmly a part of the U.S. now it has its own identity and flavor.
I'm personally hoping Puerto Rico is admitted soon so it can be a nation of its own, with its own culture, language, and people, that also a part of the American fabric that is equal to New York, California, etc., one that can vote for U.S. president and Congress. That way it has the best of both worlds so to speak.
WhisperToMe (talk) 04:40, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
- Hi Whisper!
That must have been years ago! Probably even a decade or more ago! I still hope for Puerto Rican independence, but I guess now we will have to see. The last election was sort of a winning and losing proposition for me: I wanted Biden to win but knew Puerto Rico could become a state if he did...so I guess I won some but I might lose some (?) lol...
Or maybe things will never change..I mean look at me Im 48 now and still wearing my Billy Eilish t-shirt I bought yesterday at Hot Topic so there are things that never truly change, like me wearing what I want without caring for others' opinions..lol
Anyways, as I said, we'll have to wait and see!
God bless you! Antonio Billie Eilish Fan Martin (here) 00:03, 7 January, 2021 (UTC)
Thank you! God bless you too! WhisperToMe (talk) 05:15, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
I tried to ping you, but failed miserably
See Talk:Deaths in 2021#Tocantinense crash victims?, somebody wants to ask you a question, should be relatively easy. InedibleHulk (talk) 03:07, 25 January 2021 (UTC)
- Hi Inedible Hulk! Answered...and, don't turn green very often, I heard it's bad for Hulk's blood pressure :) God bless! Antonio superloco Martin
- A common first impression, but I'm actually a cheap imitation of the orange Hulk. When I get "angry" night after night here, I just point the finger, bounce off the ropes and land on my own ass, beats hurting my opponents for real. That comic book version is a legit dangerous yahoo, though, I hope the Army does catch him one day! InedibleHulk (talk) 06:36, 25 January 2021 (UTC)
Timestamps
Hi. Because I use a script (based on one used by others: Wikipedia:Comments in Local Time) that renders timestamps on talk pages adjusted to local time and in a format I prefer, I noticed that you appear to be manually inserting your own timestamps instead of using 5 tildes, or using 4 tildes to insert the complete signature. Sometimes, they include a comma after the month name, which doesn't match the standard format (or the search string in the script). The times are also usually incorrect, which can be confusing. They are about an hour later than UTC, plus or minus a couple minutes, based on the page history. Example: Special:Diff/998765780 ends with the text "00:03, 7 January, 2021 (UTC)", but was posted at 23:04, 6 January (UTC). I'd suggest using the automatic timestamps. Thanks! —[AlanM1 (talk)]— 05:18, 2 February 2021 (UTC)
The article Lintoy has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline nor the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (companies)'s section for products requirement. WP:BEFORE did not reveal any significant coverage on Gnews, Gbooks or Gscholar. If you disagree and deprod this, please explain how it meets them on the talk page here in the form of "This article meets criteria A and B because..." and ping me back through WP:ECHO or by leaving a note at User talk:Piotrus. Thank you.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 05:10, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
Nomination of Lintoy for deletion
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lintoy until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 01:17, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
Editing other people's closes
Knock it off [1][2][3][4]. If you disagree with the close, talk to the closer, or take it to DRV. This sort of disruption won't be tolerated. SQLQuery me! 02:41, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
- And writing "no consensus", in order to benefit a contributor's deleting agenda when a consensus was clearly reached will be? Why don't you instead tell them to stop doing that? Antonio Coffee is my Drug Martin (yes?) 03:54, 9 February, 2021 (UTC)
- If you have an issue with the close, take it to WP:DRV. That's pretty much the entire purpose of DRV. The first two lines at Wikipedia:Deletion_review#Purpose read "
Deletion review may be used: if someone believes the closer of a deletion discussion interpreted the consensus incorrectly;
". Please see WP:TPO, where one of the first lines read "Never edit or move someone's comment to change its meaning, even on your own talk page.
". We don't edit others comments - even if they are wrong. I haven't read the AfD, and I don't have an opinion on whether or not Ritchie333 for it wrong or right. SQLQuery me! 02:59, 9 February 2021 (UTC) - I see you've started a DRV. Thank you. If I came off too harsh here - I apologize. SQLQuery me! 03:12, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
- No problem, SQL. I should apologize too. Coronavirus and everything is really taking it's mental toll too! Thanks for the apology and God bless you! Antonio Superman Boricua Martin (yes?) 04:17, 9 February, 2021 (UTC)
- On no, I hope not you too! I tested positive 5 days ago :( I hope everything gets better for you! SQLQuery me! 03:20, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
- Oh no, no no! I was referring to having to stay at home without socializing or meeting friends! I hope you get better real soon and will be praying for you! God bless! Antonio God's beautiful creation Martin (aqui) 20:09, 9 February, 2021 (UTC)
- If you have an issue with the close, take it to WP:DRV. That's pretty much the entire purpose of DRV. The first two lines at Wikipedia:Deletion_review#Purpose read "
Timestamps II
Please see #Timestamps above. Your timestamps continue to be in the wrong format and, more importantly, have the wrong time values. —[AlanM1 (talk)]— 05:43, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
- I'll also note that you're marking all your contributions lately as "minor", most of which should not be according to WP:MINOR. —[AlanM1 (talk)]— 20:49, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
- Hi Alan thanks for the comments. I'd answered right away but have been battling pain on each of my bones these days so as you can imagine, it's easier to be playing GTAV on my computer (which I love) than doing Wikipedia chores ..lol but I read WP:Minor and you're right. I should at least explain some of the edits. To be honest I don't spend a lot of time reading Wikipedia policy, because there are SO many of them. I am from the time when there was fewer policies and Wikipedia was-or at least, seemed-more relaxed. Nowadays we have rule 1, version 3,000, line 65 of that version, and section A, B, C, D. E, F, etc etc, of line 65. That sounds like too much to read to me! Thanks for your messages and I also will see Timestamps, God bless you! Antonio Man Getting Old Martin (dime?) 01:18, February 15, 2021 (UTC)
- Just make the time stamp with five
~~~~~instead of writing the time manually. Signatures should use UTC time and not your own time zone. The normal way to sign is four~~~~but I see you vary what to say on the user talk link. That's very unusual and doesn't work with the normal way to make signatures at Special:Preferences. It also means that you may have problems pinging other users. PrimeHunter (talk) 17:26, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
- Just make the time stamp with five
- Hi Alan thanks for the comments. I'd answered right away but have been battling pain on each of my bones these days so as you can imagine, it's easier to be playing GTAV on my computer (which I love) than doing Wikipedia chores ..lol but I read WP:Minor and you're right. I should at least explain some of the edits. To be honest I don't spend a lot of time reading Wikipedia policy, because there are SO many of them. I am from the time when there was fewer policies and Wikipedia was-or at least, seemed-more relaxed. Nowadays we have rule 1, version 3,000, line 65 of that version, and section A, B, C, D. E, F, etc etc, of line 65. That sounds like too much to read to me! Thanks for your messages and I also will see Timestamps, God bless you! Antonio Man Getting Old Martin (dime?) 01:18, February 15, 2021 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:Amador Granados
Hello, AntonioMartin. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Amador Granados".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 20:35, 28 February 2021 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for March 2
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sports marketing, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Nike.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:11, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Jaime Claudio Villamil (March 6)
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Jaime Claudio Villamil and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Jaime Claudio Villamil, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
- If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
|
Hello, AntonioMartin!
Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! TJMSmith (talk) 17:06, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
|
Margarita Darbinyan moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Margarita Darbinyan, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Gpkp [u • t • c] 06:32, 10 March 2021 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Margarita Darbinyan (March 10)
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Margarita Darbinyan and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Margarita Darbinyan, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
- If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
Women in Red
Hi there, AntonioMartin, and welcome to Women in Red. It's great to have an editor from 2002 who has created over 2000 articles as a member of our project. If you haven't already done so, you might find it useful to look through our Primer for creating women's biographies. Please let me know if you run into any difficulties or need assistance. Happy editing!--Ipigott (talk) 20:00, 8 March 2021 (UTC)
- Thanks Ipigott! I had no idea that women were so miss-represented on Wikipedia until a couple years ago...might have to do with the fact that in certain areas, like politics and sports, men tend to get all the media attention (and in some cases were the only ones allowed to participate until recently, and in cases like baseball are still the only ones allowed to participate)...time to change that! Thanks foryour message! God bless you! Antonio Member of Def Leppard Martin, 22:31, 8 March, 2021 (UTC)
- If you're interested in the coverage of women in the various professions and occupations, have a look at this listing from Denelezh.--Ipigott (talk) 12:54, 10 March 2021 (UTC)
Nomination of Marilyn Pupo for deletion
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marilyn Pupo until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
Celestina007 (talk) 20:05, 15 March 2021 (UTC)
April editathons from Women in Red
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 20:15, 22 March 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
WikiProject Ricky Martin invitation
|
Hello! I noticed you've made edits to Ricky Martin articles. I thought you may be interested in joining Wikipedia:WikiProject Ricky Martin We are a group of editors working to improve Wikipedia's coverage of topics related to Ricky Martin and his discography. If you would be interested in joining feel free to visit the Participants Page! |
آرمین هویدایی (talk) 16:42, 25 March 2021 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for April 27
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Baghdad hospital fire, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mohammed Jaber.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:54, 27 April 2021 (UTC)
May 2021 at Women in Red
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 21:35, 28 April 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
The book Book:Boxing's greatest fights has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Wikipedia:Proposed deletion (books)#The book does not comply with existing policies: non-neutral.
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, books may be deleted for several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated book prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the book's talk page.
Please consider improving the book to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated book prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes still exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and the miscellany for deletion process allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ~~~~
User:1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 22:24, 1 May 2021 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for May 4
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Carrier Dome, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bernard Taylor.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:51, 4 May 2021 (UTC)
The article 1:600 scale has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Fails WP:GNG
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Rusf10 (talk) 18:45, 5 May 2021 (UTC)
Nomination of 1:600 scale for deletion
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/1:600 scale until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
Rusf10 (talk) 22:15, 5 May 2021 (UTC)
I have sent you a note about a page you started
Hello, AntonioMartin
Thank you for creating Gretchen Hau.
User:Celestina007, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:
Thanks for creating
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Celestina007}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .
(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
Celestina007 (talk) 00:21, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
June 2021 at Women in Red
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 18:48, 28 May 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Disambiguation link notification for June 22
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Rafael Ramos (boxer), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Carlos Salazar.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:55, 22 June 2021 (UTC)
July 2021 at Women in Red
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 16:04, 22 June 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
The article Villa sin Miedo has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
A village of squatters with no significant coverage. Prodding for deletion.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. The Eloquent Peasant (talk) 17:17, 4 July 2021 (UTC)
August Editathons at Women in Red
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 22:23, 23 July 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Concern regarding Draft:Amador Granados
Hello, AntonioMartin. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Amador Granados, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 14:02, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
Concern regarding Draft:Jaime Claudio Villamil
Hello, AntonioMartin. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Jaime Claudio Villamil, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:01, 6 August 2021 (UTC)
September 2021 at Women in Red
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 22:28, 26 August 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
The article Bruce Wilkinson has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.
If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. DuncanHill (talk) 21:54, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
ITN recognition for Yolanda López
On 10 September 2021, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Yolanda López, which you created. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. TJMSmith (talk) 22:04, 10 September 2021 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for September 11
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Milagros Flores, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kid.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:55, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
October 2021 at Women in Red
Special event:
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 01:34, 29 September 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Nomination of Cemento Cruz Azul for deletion
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cemento Cruz Azul until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
Imcdc (talk) 13:32, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Trans Tropic Airlines
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Trans Tropic Airlines requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 10:20, 10 October 2021 (UTC)