User talk:Jdhsk
Ways to improve Luiz Antonio Nabhan Garcia
[edit]Hello, Jdhsk,
Thank you for creating Luiz Antonio Nabhan Garcia.
I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:
Hi there:, thanks for the article. It still has a lot of large sections that are not cited: per our policy on living persons, could you cite this information? Each paragraph should idealy have at least one citation. Thanks,
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Schminnte}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.
Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
Schminnte (talk • contribs) 16:39, 20 July 2023 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Monarquia Wiki
[edit]
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Monarquia Wiki requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. MrOllie (talk) 14:34, 6 August 2023 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vikidia (3rd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
Bbb23 (talk) 14:47, 6 August 2023 (UTC)
October 2023
[edit]
Hello, I'm DrKay. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Wedding of Princess Isabel and Gaston, Count of Eu, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. DrKay (talk) 15:34, 14 October 2023 (UTC)
- Further to this, your edit to Queen Silvia of Sweden was extremely unwise. The city of her birth, Heidelberg, is in Europe, so she clearly wasn't born outside of Europe. Your claim that she was the first non-royal queen consort of Sweden is also false. DrKay (talk) 15:42, 14 October 2023 (UTC)
- Hello, sorry for the inconvenience. I want to thank you for reviewing my articles so that I can be more confident in my edits. In the article about Princess Isabel's wedding, I didn't have many reliable sources, as it was also a 19th century wedding and had few sources. Jdhsk (talk) 15:46, 14 October 2023 (UTC)
- Regarding the article by Queen Silvia of Sweden, I clearly made a mistake, I confess, I was confused when adding the information. I hope you still trust me as an editor. And once again, thanks for the guidance. Jdhsk (talk) 15:49, 14 October 2023 (UTC)
- Hello, sorry for the inconvenience. I want to thank you for reviewing my articles so that I can be more confident in my edits. In the article about Princess Isabel's wedding, I didn't have many reliable sources, as it was also a 19th century wedding and had few sources. Jdhsk (talk) 15:46, 14 October 2023 (UTC)
Nomination of Imperial Family Mausoleum in Vassouras for deletion
[edit]The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Imperial Family Mausoleum in Vassouras until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
Rkieferbaum (talk) 20:21, 30 October 2023 (UTC)
Transfermarkt
[edit]Since much of its content is user-edited, Transfermarkt is not considered a reliable source. Please do not cite the website in articles. Thank you. Sir Sputnik (talk) 16:02, 5 November 2023 (UTC)
Alan Guedes
[edit]Thanks for your article on Alan Guedes, can you cite some sources in the early life and career sections? If you can't seem to find sources i would advise completely removing this. Ping me once you have this fixed. Jamiebuba (talk) 16:18, 19 November 2023 (UTC)
CS1 error on Nabhan family
[edit]
Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Nabhan family, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
- A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 19:04, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for January 11
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detectedthat when you recently edited Luiz Antonio Nabhan Garcia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lebanese. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 05:49, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Monarchs diagnosed with cancer
[edit]A tag has been placed on Category:Monarchs diagnosed with cancer indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz Read! Talk! 01:08, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
Category:Monarchs diagnosed with cancer has been nominated for deletion
[edit]Category:Monarchs diagnosed with cancer has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Векочел (talk) 21:06, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Monarchs by disease
[edit]A tag has been placed on Category:Monarchs by disease indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz Read! Talk! 02:32, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
I have sent you a note about a page you started
[edit]Hello, Jdhsk. Thank you for your work on November 2023 Brazil heat wave. North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:
Good start
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
North8000 (talk) 16:28, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
Deletion discussion about Alan Guedes
[edit]Hello Jdhsk, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.
While your contributions are appreciated, I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Alan Guedes, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alan Guedes.
Deletion discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. Our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. The most common issue in these discussions is notability, but it's not the only aspect that may be discussed; read the nomination and any other comments carefully before you contribute to the discussion. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.
If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Vanderwaalforces}}. And don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!
(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
Vanderwaalforces (talk) 07:31, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
Deletion discussion about Nabhan family
[edit]Hello Jdhsk, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.
While your contributions are appreciated, I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Nabhan family, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nabhan family.
Deletion discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. Our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. The most common issue in these discussions is notability, but it's not the only aspect that may be discussed; read the nomination and any other comments carefully before you contribute to the discussion. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.
If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Dclemens1971}}. And don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!
(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)