Jump to content

User talk:Jbsmitty

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

[edit]

Hello, Jbsmitty, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions.

I noticed that one of the first articles you edited appears to be dealing with a topic with which you may have a conflict of interest. In other words, you may find it difficult to write about that topic in a neutral and objective way, because you are, work for, or represent, the subject of that article. Your recent contributions may have already been undone for this very reason.

To reduce the chances of your contributions being undone, you might like to draft your revised article before submission, and then ask me or another editor to proofread it. See our help page on userspace drafts for more details. If the page you created has already been deleted from Wikipedia, but you want to save the content from it to use for that draft, don't hesitate to ask anyone from this list and they will copy it to your user page.

One rule we do have in connection with conflicts of interest is that accounts used by more than one person will unfortunately be blocked from editing. Wikipedia generally does not allow editors to have usernames which imply that the account belongs to a company or corporation. If you have a username like this, you should request a change of username or create a new account. (A name that identifies the user as an individual within a given organization may be OK.)

In addition, if you receive, or expect to receive, compensation for any contribution you make, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation to comply with our terms of use and our policy on paid editing.

Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{Help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! tedder (talk) 16:11, 16 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

March 2023

[edit]

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Tim Sheehy. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. tedder (talk) 16:52, 16 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, it appears that you and 96.83.159.121‎ (talk) are making COI/promotional edits to various forms of Tim Sheehy articles (see also Draft:Tim Sheehy (businessman)). That involves reverts, undoing edits, repeatedly pasting in the same content, and so on. You're doing this without communicating your intentions. Please use article talk pages, preferably Draft talk:Tim Sheehy (businessman), to explain your intent. Otherwise editors will continue to think that you are just attempting to spam Wikipedia.
Further, if you are editing as the IP address, either edit as this IP address, or as the user, not both. tedder (talk) 16:51, 16 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hi! I am just trying to help an acquaintance with tweaks to keep this page live. I have made an additional round of updates to the draft page: Draft:Tim Sheehy (businessman). Are there other tweaks you would recommend to keep this page live? Feels like it's being targeted a bit by a single user (who is stonewalling, and not being helpful like some of the other editors). Jbsmitty (talk) 17:18, 16 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
It's not "a single user", it's about a half-dozen editors who are attempting to maintain some sort of order. Having the exact article pasted in by an IP and two different registered users (Shallmonthly (talk · contribs)) catches eyes of people who are doing various things like looking for new articles that have been created, disambiguation pages that are stomped on, and COI filters. When the article was moved to Drafts it had a button to put it through review when you're done editing. You removed that. A bot added a category template and the possibly-related-to-you IP removed it. Thankfully @KylieTastic: put the draft template back there. I'd suggest using the talk page (Draft talk:Tim Sheehy (businessman)) to ask questions for improvement, but you need to be patient and follow the process rather than "fighting" over things like basic templates, it doesn't lead to good will. tedder (talk) 17:49, 16 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for the guidance. This is the first time I've worked on a page, and to be honest, I know there are a few others trying to get it approved as well. I'm not invested in a long-term presence on the platform -- just trying to help someone out. I will see if there are any suggestions via the talk option before submitting it. Thanks again. Jbsmitty (talk) 19:02, 16 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hi! I am still being stonewalled by the same editor. He mentions "Conflict of interest (COI) editing involves contributing to Wikipedia about yourself, family, friends, clients, employers, or your financial and other relationships."
None of these are the case.
Furthermore, I cannot directly respond to the user in question because the option is grayed-out on my end.
He also mentions the issue of notability, which can widely be subjective.
My main point here is, if the business the subject founded and is currently the CEO of (among other achievements) is considered 'noteworthy' enough to be published, why would said founder and CEO not also be considered noteworthy? The page here has been live since October of 2022: Bridger Aerospace Jbsmitty (talk) 17:14, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tim Sheehy (businessman) (March 17)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Onel5969 was:
Aside from lacking notability. This article is being created by a group of UPE/COI editors who have not addressed that issue. Until that issue is addressed, this draft should remain in draftspace.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Onel5969 TT me 17:04, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
You mentions "Conflict of interest (COI) editing involves contributing to Wikipedia about yourself, family, friends, clients, employers, or your financial and other relationships."
None of these are the case. No one is getting paid to set this page up.
You mention the issue of notability, which can widely be subjective. If the business the subject founded and is currently the CEO of (among other achievements) is considered 'noteworthy' enough to be published, why would said founder and CEO not also be considered noteworthy? The page here has been live since October of 2022: Bridger Aerospace
The page appears to be well-sourced -- and many national news sources regularly mention the subject. Jbsmitty (talk) 17:21, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I also see where you have nominated the photo on the page for deletion. You claim that it has violated copyright. This is not the case, as far as I am aware. Can you show where copyright has been violated or was the a subjective conclusion? I also see where you made the same claims with the photo that was listed prior -- which is the headshot the subject uses on a company website. Can you show where this first photo violated copyright? Jbsmitty (talk) 17:23, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Jbsmitty! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Onel5969 TT me 17:04, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

[edit]
Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively as a sockpuppet of User:Shallmonthly per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Shallmonthly. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.
Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.
Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.
ST47 (talk) 03:20, 18 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
{{unblock| Not sure what a 'sock puppet' is. Shallmontlhy was an initial account that was made, but without a verified email. I was getting a password error on attempts to re-login, and ended up setting up a new account entirely. I believe whatever logs you have access to will show that the account was locked due to incorrect password. Sorry for the prior comment; it wasn't letting me login, which I assumed was connected to the block. ~~~~}} Jbsmitty (talk) 17:01, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
{{unblock | Looking to keep this moving forward. The other account in question is one that I do not have access to, as the password it was set up with is coming back as 'invalid' and no email was tied to the account to have it reset. It is an inactive account. ~~~~}} Jbsmitty (talk) 14:46, 23 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
{{unblock | Hi -- still waiting input here. ~~~~}} Jbsmitty (talk) 17:31, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Jbsmitty (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Not sure what a 'sock puppet' is. Shallmontlhy was an initial account that was made, but without a verified email. I was getting a password error on attempts to re-login, and ended up setting up a new account entirely. I believe whatever logs you have access to will show that the account was locked due to incorrect password. 96.83.159.121 (talk) 16:14, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Procedural decline. You must sign in to your account for your unblock request to be considered. Make sure you read and thoroughly understand WP:SOCK before you do so. Yamla (talk) 16:50, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

So when you were asked about using multiple accounts above, you stated "This is the first time I've worked on a page, and to be honest, I know there are a few others trying to get it approved as well." tedder (talk) 17:05, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Tedder -- Replying here because it won't let me reply below without re-submitting. To my knowledge, there are several other people trying to get this page approved. I am not the only person working on this page. This is indeed my first time working on a wiki page. Jbsmitty (talk) 17:16, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

(de-indenting for list) You were consistently using the IP account and this account at the same time. Here's the problem: 

Mar 15
IP edited at 18:05
user at      18:08
IP edited at 18:10
IP edited at 18:13
user at      18:14
user at      18:15
IP edited at 20:28

Mar 16
user at      13:43
IP edited at 13:48
user at      13:55
user at      14:18
user at      14:24
IP edited at 16:13
user at      16:29
IP edited at 16:32
user at      16:44
user at      16:47
IP edited at 17:08

Please read WP:SOCK. tedder (talk) 17:29, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! I am not sure how that would be possible because the account here was only created after the other one was locked. I am not sure what the inherent advantage would be of having two accounts. As a first-time user, I have been asking how I can get the page approved in a way that conforms to community standards. You have been the only editor willing to spend time helping through this process. I replied directly to the user who has been stonewalling, and never received a reply. I believe I raised valid points regarding notability, but have not received a response there either. Jbsmitty (talk) 15:06, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
{{unblock | Looking to keep this moving forward. The other account in question is one that I do not have access to, as the password it was set up with is coming back as 'invalid' and no email was tied to the account to have it reset. It is an inactive account. ~~~~}} Jbsmitty (talk) 17:13, 22 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

{{unblock|Hi -- still waiting input here.}}

Deactivating this unsigned non-appeal as there is an appeal at ArbCom which is under consideration. Cabayi (talk) 08:13, 19 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Jbsmitty, let me correct some of your misunderstandings.

  • "there are a few others trying to get it approved"
A few others are correcting the errors in your edits. They are long-term editors who want to ensure your draft complies with the project's standards.
  • "I am just trying to help an acquaintance with tweaks to keep this page live."
That is a conflict of interest. It may not be paid, but it is a COI.
  • "I'm not invested in a long-term presence on the platform -- just trying to help someone out."
Just about everyone you have interacted with is invested. You're trying to help an acquaintance, everyone else is trying to build an encyclopedia.
  • "the issue of notability, which can widely be subjective"
Maybe elsewhere, but notability is a long established guideline on Wikipedia.
  • "If the business the subject founded and is currently the CEO of (among other achievements) is considered 'noteworthy' enough to be published, why would said founder and CEO not also be considered noteworthy?"
Because he does not WP:INHERIT notability from the company. Navy lieutenants are not generally notable unless they have done something notable. Bronze stars don't exhibit that level of notability. Politicians are notable once they are elected, not when they are possibly, maybe, contemplating the possibility of perhaps running for office.
  • " I am not sure what the inherent advantage would be of having two accounts."
Read WP:SOCK. In this case, astroturfing would be a plausible reason. It also has a downside, impacting politicians' credibility when they're caught.
-- Cabayi (talk) 09:33, 19 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Appeal accepted

[edit]

The Arbitration Committee has resolved to grant your appeal, and I have unblocked your account.

On behalf of the Arbitration Committee,

Cabayi (talk) 09:54, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

As a personal note I'll advise against any further campaigning on Wikipedia, and that you take more care of your account's login credentials. Cabayi (talk) 09:54, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

May 2023

[edit]

Hello, I noticed that you may have recently made edits while logged out. Please be mindful not to perform controversial edits while logged out, or your account risks being blocked from editing. Please consider reading up on Wikipedia's policy on multiple accounts before editing further. Additionally, making edits while logged out reveals your IP address, which may allow others to determine your location and identity. If this was not your intention, please remember to log in when editing. Thank you. Primefac (talk) 09:32, 5 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tim Sheehy (businessman) (September 6)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Nagol0929 was:
This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Nagol0929 (talk) 13:15, 6 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tim Sheehy (businessman) (June 26)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by SafariScribe were:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 08:39, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tim Sheehy (businessman) (July 22)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SafariScribe was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 18:47, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Jbsmitty&oldid=1236069616"