Jump to content

User talk:Jbeans

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

[edit]
Hello, Jbeans! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! MBisanz talk 06:46, 11 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Getting started
Getting help
Policies and guidelines
The community
Writing articles
Miscellaneous

fact templates

[edit]

The date syntax is: {{fact|any other arguments|date=March 2008}}, but if you leave the date off it will be added by a WP:BOT. Rich Farmbrough, 09:24 13 March 2008 (GMT).

Largo

[edit]

Are you a Largoan? Dlohcierekim 13:15, 20 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yes; you?--Jbeans (talk) 03:12, 21 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

More quieter

[edit]

Quite correct! My husband came in as I was editting and so you see the results!

Auchick (talk) 05:40, 21 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Historical Fiction

[edit]

Nice edit. I had written that a long while ago and didn't quite like the way it sounded, but I couldn't for the life of me make it sound any better on my own. That's exactly the point I was trying to get across. At the time Historical Fiction had been redirected toward Historical Novel, which indicated that in order for it to be Historical Fiction it had to be a book. I just wanted to try to expand the term past that. I hadn't intended for the article to become a list of random books and authors but that seems to have snowballed on it's own.

The only reason I used the numbered citations is that I'm a fan of formatted citations, and if they're the citations I used I may have been paraphrasing those cites so I thought citing them in the text was relevant. I guess unformatted footnotes could be used, but we'd have to be careful to avoid plagiarism. Hewinsj (talk) 19:42, 29 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Pride and Prejudice

[edit]

Thank you for the edits, you did a pretty good job on the article. However, I don't understand the comments you made on the talk, you may want to clarify what you mean for other editors. SADADS (talk) 15:37, 22 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. In Arthur De Wint Foote, you recently added a link to the disambiguation page North Star House (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:53, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

01 RE: disam-link notice/for: Arthur Dewint Foote^[North Star House] date=07Sep2013== <CORRECTED

02 RE: dis-link notice/for ___: date=22Oct__?=== CORRECTED

[edit]

01 RE: disam-link notice/for: Joseph Story^[Whigs] date=20Dec2012== <CORRECTED

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Secession in the United States, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Madison and Hamilton (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:50, 6 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Secession in the United States, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Nullification (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:00, 13 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Secession in the United States, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Liberator (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:33, 26 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ototoxicity, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Utricle and Vestibule (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:08, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

November 2013

[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Wide Sargasso Sea may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • ] [[postcolonial literature|postcolonial]] [[parallel novel]] by [[Dominica]]-born British author [[Jean Rhys], who had lived in obscurity after her previous work, ''[[Good Morning, Midnight]]'',

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 12:15, 20 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Jean Rhys may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • years drafting and perfecting it. Begun well before she came to Bude, the book won the prestigious [[WH Smith Literary Award in 1967. Rhys returned to themes of dominance and dependence, especially re

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 04:24, 27 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Isaac Hayes, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tipton County (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:08, 23 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

January 2014

[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Carson McCullers may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • attended night classes at Columbia University and studied creative writing under the Texas writer [[Dorothy Scarborough] and with Sylvia Chatfield Bates at Washington Square College of [[New York

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 14:38, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Gmina Rokitno may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • gmina]] (administrative district) in [[Biała Podlaska County]], [[Lublin Voivodeship]], in eastern [[Poland] on the border with [[Belarus]]. Its seat is the village of [[Rokitno, Biała Podlaska

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 23:08, 18 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

[edit]
Hi ! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

-- 12:23, Sunday, November 24, 2024 (UTC)

Mission 1 Mission 2 Mission 3 Mission 4 Mission 5 Mission 6 Mission 7
Say Hello to the World An Invitation to Earth Small Changes, Big Impact The Neutral Point of View The Veil of Verifiability The Civility Code Looking Good Together


[edit]

RE: disam-link notice/for: Brassica^[Mustards] date=07Mar2014== <CORRECTED

April 2014

[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Adverbial clause may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • #Subordinating conjunctions|subordinate conjunction]]{{mdash}}sometimes called a trigger word).

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 01:40, 26 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Re: above notice for fix needed>> DONE 042614

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Raymond A. Spruance, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Yamato. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:56, 19 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Working Wiki Barnstar

[edit]
The Working Man's Barnstar
Thank you very much for taking on the project of panina. I apologise for kicking the can the firt step on the road an abandoning it but am glad to see the work being done.SPACKlick (talk) 15:03, 21 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 14 June

[edit]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:20, 15 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

FIXED. Jbeans (talk) 03:02, 15 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for ...disambiguation page Pan talk]]) 09:07, 7 July 2015 (UTC)

FIXED Jbeans (talk) 12:19, 7 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Introducing the new WikiProject Evolutionary biology!

[edit]

Greetings!

A photograph of Charles Darwin

I am happy to introduce you to the new WikiProject Evolutionary biology! The newly designed WikiProject features automatically updated work lists, article quality class predictions, and a feed that tracks discussions on the 663 talk pages tagged by the WikiProject. Our hope is that these new tools will help you as a Wikipedia editor interested in evolutionary biology.

Hope to see you join! Harej (talk) 21:06, 10 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move for Haplogroup R1

[edit]
Hello, Jbeans. You have new messages at Talk:Haplogroup R-M173.
Message added Khestwol (talk) 16:52, 20 July 2015 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Omo remains

[edit]

Good call. I have replied at talk:Omo remains. --John Maynard Friedman (talk) 21:34, 23 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Persuasion by Jane Austen

[edit]

Jbeans, from an edit you did a long time ago, is there any chance you have the isbn for the book? It is this ref Le Faye, Deirdre (1998). Jane Austen. New York: Oxford University Press. p. 90. in Persuasion (novel). I have hunted about, finding other books by Deirdre Le Faye, but not one published in 1998 by Oxford University Press with the title just those two words. There is a fourth edition printed in 2011 of Jane Austen's Letters, indicating first edition in 1997 by OUP, but that might not be the book you cited. I hunted for the isbn for her 2003 book, which I found; WorldCat says that it was published that year by Frances Lincoln of London, so I added that information to the citation. I hate bothering you, as you are pretty much the only person to add reliable sources to that article, in all these years. --Prairieplant (talk) 07:53, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Prairieplant, Your request is certainly not a bother---in fact it's a treat to hear from one who is making such fine improvements to the article of my very favorite novel by my very favorite writer! But indeed it's been a while since I have been stalking the JA articles. Regrets, I do not have the book nor isbn you asked about; I vaguely remember consulting the Jane Austen Letters volume by Le Feye---which I (must have) borrowed from the local library---but not the book you are chasing. I note from perusing the History file that the reference was apparently not my post---instead it was by Rborgo on 21 October 2014. Unfortunately, he/she hasn't posted for a while. Would I could be of more info, but pls try me again if you think so. Thanks for your good work, and Best Regards. Jbeans (talk) 19:42, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Ah Jbeans it is my favorite book by my favorite author as well. Thanks so much for your reply, and your work to find the right person. I put a message on Rborg's talk page, can only hope that person will do some more work on Wikipedia soon enough. I thought you did it, from reading the Talk page for the article, instead of looking at the article history, which is the more logical thing to do. I did add a quote on the article's Talk page regarding over 7 years, 8 years, 8.5 years ago in the novel. The novel begins by saying over 7 years ago Anne met Frederick, then when Anne is with her married sister in the late autumn and meets him in person, Anne says 8 years ago, and in the letter Frederick writes to her in the hotel in the early spring (which I quoted out of the Project Gutenberg copy) he says 'eight and a half years ago when you broke my heart'. Time marches on through the story. Thanks for checking to find the actual editor who added that reference. --Prairieplant (talk) 12:00, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Australopithecus africanus, you added links ...... ..........Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:20, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

>>>FIXED Jbeans (talk) 00:04, 22 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

[edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:49, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

March 2016

[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Elizabeth Gaskell may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • ''[[Cranford (novel)|Cranford]]'' and ''[[North and South (Gaskell novel)|North and South]])'', her novella ''[[My Lady Ludlow]]'', and short stories.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 04:26, 30 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[][]> FIXED // Jbeans (talk) 17:14, 30 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 11 May

[edit]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:16, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Parameter, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Function, Variable and Attribute. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:58, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

House of Plantagenet

[edit]

Hi Beans, thought I would take this conversation here. Whatever the rights or wrongs of your debate with Ealdgyth, and she can be a right pain, your edits don't belong in this article. This is dynastic rather than a general history and the consensus has always been amongst a lot of editors that only information about the family, their actions and their impact should be included. You can see that in the archived talk and the various reviews. Now your edits might make more sense in England in the Late Middle Ages. Btw, you can also see in the talk of this article the accepted way of attributing copying text between articles, which I expect Ealdgyth would have acknowledged. Norfolkbigfish (talk) 14:07, 23 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Hi, Norfolkbigfish, I am Jbeans---thank you for your response.
Please let me be clear on a key point: I am not "debating" with Ealdgyth; nor with anyone else at Wikipedia; nor am I willing to. Instead I am looking for discussion with her. I have been a debater; there are rules and behaviours to maintain honesty and mutual respect among the participants. I am not willing to indulge in what passes for "debating" at Wikipedia---it is typically sophomoric and disrespectful of other editors and other editors' work; and it is always unprofessional. It doesn't advance the purposes of Wikipedia, nor the quality of work-product, nor the quality of working conditions, at Wikipedia as much as it impedes.
"High-schooling" at Wikipedia is not more than a 'drive-by' rejecting of other people's work without regard to its content---or as to whether the edit is from a vandal or a newbie; or even perhaps from another editor who could (perhaps) be as competent even as some members the "debate team". (IMO, even vandalism doesn't justify projecting low standards of treating with other people or with their efforts and feelings as a good-faith editor.) Time is precious, and shorter than we think; wasting people's time and good will---whether personally or writ large, as at Wikipedia, is very poor policy. Dissing first, then deprecating another editor's work, and then dismissing their contribution outright---as unworthy even of discussion---is extremely destructive of Wikipedia's prospects for the future.
Unfortunately, any editor's unwillingness to discuss, combined with a strategy to 'destroy-by-debate' rather than discuss, wastes (a great deal of) time, collegiality, and opportunity for consensus at Wikipedia---typically with complete disregard of the damage by members of the "debate team". //Jbeans (talk) 23:49, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

[edit]

Hello, Jbeans. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

References

[edit]

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Remember that when adding content about health, please only use high-quality reliable sources as references. We typically use review articles, major textbooks and position statements of national or international organizations (There are several kinds of sources that discuss health: here is how the community classifies them and uses them). WP:MEDHOW walks you through editing step by step. A list of resources to help edit health content can be found here. The edit box has a built-in citation tool to easily format references based on the PMID or ISBN. We also provide style advice about the structure and content of medicine-related encyclopedia articles. The welcome page is another good place to learn about editing the encyclopedia. If you have any questions, please feel free to drop me a note. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 19:16, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, Jbeans. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Cardiac cycle, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Ventricle and Atria (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:21, 19 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Wars of the Three Kingdoms, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Convention Parliament (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:05, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

[][] FIXED> Jbeans (talk) 04 April 2018 (UTC)

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Neutron scattering, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page MEV (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:22, 2 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

[][] NO adjustment> The link is valuable as-is because: this dab page does provide the distinction between MeV and meV---and UPfront, ie, at the top of the page. Jbeans (talk) 02 May 2018 (UTC)

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mess, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page CPO (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:49, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

[][] FIXED> Jbeans (talk) 03 June 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, Jbeans. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Apsis, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ganymede (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:10, 28 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

[][] FIXED> Jbeans (talk) 28 May 2019 (UTC)

Italics or quotemarks for marches

[edit]

I noticed that back in April you changed the articles for several marches from the prevailing style of quotation marks (per MOS:MINORWORK) to italics (MOS:MAJORWORK, usually reserved for large-form works like suites, symphonies and albums). Was there a consensus to revise marches to be treated as major works? Ibadibam (talk) 20:39, 29 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Having not heard anything I have begun to roll back these edits to conform to the prevailing Wikipedia style, but I would relish the opportunity to discuss this further when you resume activity here. Ibadibam (talk) 05:01, 11 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:10, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:40, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:25, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:32, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you

[edit]

For your creative and very helpful improvements to Free indirect speech. Novellasyes (talk) 21:01, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder to vote now to select members of the first U4C

[edit]
You can find this message translated into additional languages on Meta-wiki. Please help translate to other languages.

Dear Wikimedian,

You are receiving this message because you previously participated in the UCoC process.

This is a reminder that the voting period for the Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) ends on May 9, 2024. Read the information on the voting page on Meta-wiki to learn more about voting and voter eligibility.

The Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) is a global group dedicated to providing an equitable and consistent implementation of the UCoC. Community members were invited to submit their applications for the U4C. For more information and the responsibilities of the U4C, please review the U4C Charter.

Please share this message with members of your community so they can participate as well.

On behalf of the UCoC project team,

RamzyM (WMF) 23:18, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Homininae, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Pan and Panini.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:44, 21 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

correctd.. thnx Jbeans (talk) 12:07, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:18, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Jbeans&oldid=1258268898"