User talk:Hewinsj

Thanks!

For cleaning up after the miss I dumped on Dead Rising, I had to run spontaneously but TTN's delete via un-merged merging lost information that would be useful... Kyaa the Catlord (talk) 05:54, 5 January 2008 (UTC)

Centralized TV Episode Discussion

Over the past months, TV episodes have been reverted by (to name a couple) TTN, Eusebeus and others. No centralized discussion has taken place, so I'm asking everyone who has been involved in this issue to voice their opinions here in this centralized spot, be they pro or anti. Discussion is here [1]. --Maniwar (talk) 23:34, 15 January 2008 (UTC)

John C. West InfoBox

The InfoBox you recently added to the John C. West article contains inaccurate information. I tried to fix it myself, but I kept getting error messages every time I hit the "show preview' button. If possible, could you please correct the InfoBox? --TommyBoy (talk) 08:19, 25 January 2008 (UTC)

I just got your message and checked the article to see if your attempt at correcting the InfoBox worked, however it appears that your attempt was unsuccessful as well. The InfoBox now lists August 27, 1922 as both his birthdate and deathdate. --TommyBoy (talk) 23:05, 25 January 2008 (UTC)

Avatar

Thank You, i did not know that. But i am happy that Avatar is taking a break, it allows us to improve the articles with out having to do numerous reverts throughout the process. During the break the Aang article made it to GA, the season articles are at B, and Aang is currently being prepped for FC while Azula is being prepped for GA. Rau's talk 18:06, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

We Are Wizards

I read about it on AICN. :-) I think the place it would work best would be in Harry Potter fandom, though I'm not an editor of that page. It could probably do with its own article as well, once more information is known about it. Serendi^podous 13:12, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

The Shadow move

I noticed your comments; I'll take care of the requested move for you. Please check to make sure that the redirects are the way you want them. If you have any questions or problems, let me know. Accounting4Taste:talk 03:12, 18 June 2008 (UTC)

Happy to be of assistance, and thanks for taking care of changing over the redirects so that they're not "double" (redirecting from "whatever" to "(fictional character)" to "The Shadow"), as I understand that's a bad thing ;-). If you ever run into this situation in the future, let me know, I'm happy to help on any kind of media franchise topics (as long as I know what I'm doing). Accounting4Taste:talk 03:26, 18 June 2008 (UTC)

Oops on Bridge

Go ahead and continue formatting again. I was trying to fix an inaccuracy in the article, and we had been editing at the same time. I thought I had merged your edits into the new revision, but I must have missed a few. Sorry about that. Duuude007 (talk) 17:11, 24 September 2008 (UTC)

GWB

GWB not GBW. George Walker Bush, current President of the USA and whose wikipedia page is notorious site of edit wars. I actually did not notice the other editor until I looked at the history since it seemed such an obvious change. Ludicorus AMErico-centrism (actually NY centrism). --Stroika (talk) 00:28, 29 October 2008 (UTC)

Reply

Well, since I presume the articles Naruto and Bleach (manga) are the best to follow, I've been doing that for every article I've worked on. DragonZero (talk) 15:14, 21 March 2009 (UTC)

Re: Shaman King

That could be explained in the plot section but it needs some fixes. See the Rurouni Kenshin plot section as an example.Tintor2 (talk) 15:33, 29 May 2009 (UTC)

I meant about how the plot should be written. For the end it could be something like "when Yoh and his friends arrive the 5th, the manga ended, but the plot continues during the kanzenban rerelease".Tintor2 (talk) 23:36, 29 May 2009 (UTC)

That is explained in the manga section from Shaman King. By what Takei wrote in an interview from the kanzenban, he was too exhausted to continue writting the manga, and had problems with writting the ending. I was going to add a production section in the Shaman King article, but due to the few things I found, I m going to wait a bit. I also found that in Shonen Jump, there are two interviews with Takei, and I asked an user who has an interview to write it. Regards.Tintor2 (talk) 15:23, 3 June 2009 (UTC)

No problem ^_^Tintor2 (talk) 19:50, 3 June 2009 (UTC)

Please update your status with WP:VG

Dear WikiProject Video games member,

You are receiving this message because you have either Category:WikiProject Video games members or {{User WPVG}} somewhere in your userspace and you have edited Wikipedia in the recent months.

The Video games project has created a member list to provide a clearer picture of its active membership.

All members have currently been placed in the "Inactive" section by default. Please remove your username from the "Inactive" listing and place it under the "Active" listing if you plan on regularly:

• Editing video game-related pages in the Article namespace
• Participating in video game-related discussions in the Project namespace (WT:VG, WP:AfD, WP:GAN, etc.)

Ideally, members are encouraged to do both, but either one meets our criteria of inclusion. Members still listed inactive at the beginning of November 2009 may be removed. You may re-add yourself to the active list at any time. Thank you for your help, and we look forward to working with you.

—WikiProject Video games (delivery by xenobot 03:30, 24 September 2009 (UTC)

Asakura Hao

Excuse me, I'm sorry to bother you but I wish to know why the Asakura Hao page along with his template link and his little bit of info on the character list was removed? Since your a participant of WikiProject Anime and Manga I thought I might ask you. I checked the article's talk page and I saw no discussions about its removal, furthermore no one has bothered to fill out his info on the character list or even the Hao's follower section, would you mind telling me what exactly happened? -24.55.173.212 (talk) 18:44, 2 January 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for contacting me. Based on the edit history of the Hao Asakura article, it looks like some editors closed it because it only consisted of a retelling of the plot of Shaman King. They redirected the article to point to the Hao section of the List of Shaman King Characters, but it looks like the Hao section was deleted after that occurred.

Typically an article having to do with fictional subjects or stories should try to demonstrate real world information related to the subject in addition to giving an account of the plot of that story. I try to add information to the main Shaman King article that discusses the production of the series whenever I find it, in an effort to show real world relevance. In the case of the Hao article, there may not have been enough information about Hao outside of the series for the article to stand on it's own (how he was created, what critics think of him, etc). It does however surprise me that his section was removed from the list of characters. If I have some free time I'll see if I can replace what was removed or add something new to that article. Hewinsj (talk) 00:59, 4 January 2010 (UTC)

re: Neshaminy High School

Unless they removed one, the High School has Three Gynasiums... ??? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.20.219.196 (talk) 16:26, 3 May 2010 (UTC)

There should be 3 by my recollection. Was one removed in the remodeling? Hewinsj (talk) 16:54, 3 May 2010 (UTC)

it actually was not removed, it is now located in the Learning Center, a group of old 1950s classrooms on the north side of the school that were not removed during the renovation, but are now marooned on the oppisite side of the bus parking lot. they are used for computer labs and special ed. i know this because i'm a student, but im sure it will be impossible to find any sources about this.Bajor9 (talk) 00:42, 21 March 2015 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for File:Gungrave-screen01.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Gungrave-screen01.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:42, 15 October 2010 (UTC)

Re: Shaman King

Because most of those statements were unsourced. The fact Viz only published the tankobon volumes already tells that they did not publish the kanzenban chapters. Any mention regarding the plot has to be mention in the plot section of the article. Creating these subection would imply we make more and more (like "Japanese publication", "English publication", etc) and reading it would be very confusing when it can be all summarized in two paragraphs.Tintor2 (talk) 16:21, 10 January 2011 (UTC)

As long as it backed up by WP:Reliable sources it is okay.Tintor2 (talk) 16:51, 10 January 2011 (UTC)

According to wp:verifiability, everything needs to be sourced. In this case, the sentence "Called Shaman King Kanzen-Ban, or Perfect Edition, this release reprinted the entire series in 27 volumes, concluding with the never-before-published "true ending" to the series." already states that the original's story did not end and it's sourced.Tintor2 (talk) 17:08, 10 January 2011 (UTC)

FM3

greetings! christiaan here from fm3. thanks for your help to prevent the deletion of the FM3 page... i would like to get it back up. There have been articles as well in Wall Street Journal about the Buddha machine and many other major media. i think the WSJ and Wire and other articles are behind a paywall, though... i dont think there is much of an argument that the band is not significant. in china we were the first live electronic band and we remain one of the top selling chinese acts of all time... what can we do to get the page back? Mandopop (talk) 07:47, 8 July 2011 (UTC)

FM3 new items

thanks for getting back to me! the louvre thing was in 2004, and the french really didnt get all their media online until recently. we did a very big interview with Liberation recently, but all the big papers there are still behind paywalls! i have a lot of print clippings from france about the louvre project, in which we made a soundtrack for the classic french film la Croisière jaune and performed it live in the louvre auditorium in june 2004... but not to worry. ive added about 8 sources for some basic band info, and currently every sentence in the short bio is sourced to a mainstream media report... ill slowly build up links to published articles over the next weeks and then perhaps things can be fleshed out by our overseas fans... i can also compile a list of links and send to you if you wish to add... im a bit slow cos im behind the Great Firewall and also just very busy with a new compiliation album and film soundtrack we are working on... slowly slowly... — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mandopop (talk • contribs) 19:09, 15 July 2011 (UTC)

here is a link to an article about the band which appeared in the July 2006 edition of the the Wire magazine. there are a few errors, but the basic band history is accurate. http://marcusboon.com/node/78 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mandopop (talk • contribs) 19:25, 15 July 2011 (UTC)

Gungrave

Hmmmm. You look too experienced to suggest a "disambiguation" page. In any case, I've written a response to you at Talk:Gungrave.
ProResearcher (talk) 18:20, 24 August 2011 (UTC)

I just read the article "Wikipedia:Disambiguation". The result--in the case of Gungrave, I think a "franchise" page is correct.

Here's a good example for you . . .

On a "franchise" page, I would include:

• "Godfather" books by Mario Puzo
• Godfather movies based on the books
• Godfather games based on the books / movies

On a "disambiguation" page, I would include:

• all items from the above "franchise" page plus
• a general article about the concept of a mafia Godfather
• a general article about the concept of a familial godfather

Do you see the difference?

Thus, I truly believe that your Gungrave disambiguation page should be renamed to a franchise page. Sorry.
ProResearcher (talk) 15:06, 25 August 2011 (UTC)

Last explanation :-)

A "series" article is a subset of a "franchise" article (e.g. a series of video games is a subset of "The Godfather" franchise)

A "franchise" article is a subset of a "disambiguation" page (e.g. "The Godfather" franchise is a subset of all Wiki articles related to the word godfather)
ProResearcher (talk) 18:11, 25 August 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:SamuraiJack-Spartan.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:SamuraiJack-Spartan.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 15:10, 29 May 2014 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:SamuraiJack-lonewolf.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:SamuraiJack-lonewolf.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:31, 19 May 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:06, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Women in Red World Contest

Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Hewinsj. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Hewinsj. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Bebopkgame.gif

The file File:Bebopkgame.gif has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unused non-free image.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 25 October 2019 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Bebopkgame.gif

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Bebopkgame.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:30, 25 October 2019 (UTC)

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Etrigan batman tas.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Etrigan batman tas.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 4 April 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:GG-Cerberus.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:GG-Cerberus.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:12, 30 November 2022 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Invasion America logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Invasion America logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:24, 21 October 2024 (UTC)