Jump to content

User talk:Jayzlimno

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

A belated welcome!

The welcome may be belated, but the cookies are still warm!

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Jayzlimno. I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page, consult Wikipedia:Questions, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there.

Again, welcome! Nick Moyes (talk) 20:38, 29 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

Hi Jayzlimno! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

-- 17:28, Tuesday, January 10, 2017 (UTC)

Mission 1	Mission 2	Mission 3	Mission 4	Mission 5	Mission 6	Mission 7
Say Hello to the World	An Invitation to Earth	Small Changes, Big Impact	The Neutral Point of View	The Veil of Verifiability	The Civility Code	Looking Good Together

About The Wikipedia Adventure | Hang out in the Interstellar Lounge

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

Hi Jayzlimno! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

-- 17:45, Tuesday, January 10, 2017 (UTC)

Mission 1	Mission 2	Mission 3	Mission 4	Mission 5	Mission 6	Mission 7
Say Hello to the World	An Invitation to Earth	Small Changes, Big Impact	The Neutral Point of View	The Veil of Verifiability	The Civility Code	Looking Good Together

About The Wikipedia Adventure | Hang out in the Interstellar Lounge

Your draft article, Draft:Wikipedia:WikiProject Limnology

Hello, Jayzlimno. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Wikipedia:WikiProject Limnology".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Legacypac (talk) 22:28, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Wikipedia:WikiProject Limnology and Oceanography has been accepted

Wikipedia:WikiProject Limnology and Oceanography, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Project-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Bkissin (talk) 16:21, 22 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, Jayzlimno. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by Nick Moyes (talk) 22:49, 29 October 2018 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi Jayzlimno! You created a thread called Automated WikiProject tagging at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread.

Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:00, 3 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Limnology and Oceanography articles categories

Hello, Jayzlimno,

I noticed that you recreated these categories even though they are not being used. Could you please assign parent categories to them so they are not isolated? That would tie them into a WikiProject or wherever else they might be used, they'd be part of Wikipedia categorization organization. Doing that would help avoid deletion but they should really be used with articles assigned to these categories or they are likely to be deleted in the future. Empty categories that are not being used are regularly deleted on Wikipedia. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:03, 27 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Oops, sorry about that. I will assign parent categories and articles to the L&O article category. Thanks, Liz! Jayzlimno (talk) 14:41, 27 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You are among the few

Watch here to see how few people have figured out the globe like you did. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 01:13, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Cool I'll check it out. Thanks Anna Frodesiak. Jayzlimno (talk) 13:09, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Emily Bernhardt has been accepted

Emily Bernhardt, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Bkissin (talk) 18:43, 14 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

trying to see how the scope of wikiproject oceans can be re-written

I recently re-activated wikiproject oceans - and think, just think, I can see how the two projects - oceans and limnology and oceanography can co-exist very well - but I need at least one editor involved in the setup of the newer and much smaller by edit project - to see if there can be some ground for a good positive discussion about the scopes. I would really appreciate if I could have the discussion with you - but if there is a problem with that - someone on the newer project you might recommend... The issues are simply working out where one starts and the other ends in the scope and category tree - I think it can be done, just hope I find some opportunity to work it out with someone ! cheers JarrahTree 00:52, 18 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for reaching out JarrahTree, and I'm glad to hear that WP Oceans is back up and running! I'd be happy to discuss the scope of both projects and how they can coexist - should we have that here or on one of the WP talk pages? What were your thoughts on the scope for WP Oceans? Jayzlimno (talk) 14:15, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

For starters oceanography from my university days, would suggest processes - while oceans seems more geopolitical - IMO things - if we could come to some personal levels here - then take it to the two projects - oceanography reminds me of newspapers - new - low level edits but more sensible to be paired with journalism - so with oceans and oceanography something similar - just as long as we don go the way of espionage and intelligence - that was a horrible mistake - or transport /maritime task force - if we can keep separate projects with coherent and intelligibly apart scopes - would be very good. JarrahTree 20:33, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

That sounds like a reasonable split, JarrahTree. I think that's similar to the split between Limnology and WP Lakes or WP Rivers where the later two are more focused on specific water bodies or more geopolitical (like you said). We'll continue to try to refine our scope along these lines - apologies if there is a little overlap in the beginning as we are expanding, giving workshops to scientists, and newcomers might also bring along their own definition of what oceanography means to them. Feel free to check in on the WP L&O talk page if you have any concerns. Cheers, Jayzlimno (talk) 19:35, 21 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Wikipedia:WikiProject Limnology/to do

Hello, Jayzlimno. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Wikipedia:WikiProject Limnology/to do, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. Bot0612 (talk) 04:01, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Wikipedia:WikiProject Limnology and Oceanography/to do

Hello, Jayzlimno. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Wikipedia:WikiProject Limnology and Oceanography/to do, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. Bot0612 (talk) 08:01, 23 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

/* Education */ Introducing my upcoming Wetland Ecology course and associated student editors

I just wanted to reply to you here so that I don't clutter the Project page.

Thank you so much for the warm welcome. I am really excited to get the project going with my students. I am new to the Wikipedia editing community and it certainly seems overwhelming right now but the WikiEdu dashboard has been so incredibly helpful. Their training is great and I think my students will be well prepared for this assignment.
If everything goes well, I would love to contribute some kind of "lessons learned" section and maybe some resources.
The logo for WP L&O is beautiful, I would love a few stickers. Would you be able to send me 8? Can I email you my address?

KHillWells, glad to hear that the WikiEdu dashboard is helpful - from what I briefly saw, it seems like an excellent tool with lots of assistance if needed. Yes, I can ship you 8 stickers, just email me your address at jayzlimno[at]gmail[dot]com Jayzlimno (talk) 18:34, 17 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Amina Pollard has been accepted

Amina Pollard, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Bkissin (talk) 14:04, 23 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bess Ward has been accepted

Bess Ward, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Bkissin (talk) 18:39, 16 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:20, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Finding intersecting categories of articles

Plagiarism tool

https://copyvios.toolforge.org/?lang=en&project=wikipedia&title=Lake+metabolism&oldid=&action=search&use_engine=1&use_links=1&turnitin=1

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:53, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:47, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:33, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Jayzlimno&oldid=1124488980"