User talk:Jay Odin

Welcome

Hello, Jay Odin, and welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 16:23, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
Introduction Contributing to Wikipedia The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Intuitive guide to Wikipedia
Finding your way around
Table of contents Department directory Help directory
Editing articles
How to develop an article Simplified Manual of Style

Getting help
Frequently asked questions Cheatsheet Our new user help forum, the Teahouse Where to ask a question Help pages New contributors' help page Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
How you can help
Community Portal Join a WikiProject Follow Wikipedia etiquette Practice civility Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community

Jay Odin, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Jay Odin! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! ChamithN (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 16:07, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sourcing

Hi. I noticed that you've added content to cult film. The problem is that it's unsourced. This is a meticulously-sourced article that has passed the Good Article quality check. When you add unsourced content, including original research, it puts the article in jeopardy of losing its GA quality badge. That is why I've reverted your additions there. Discussion on the talk page have lead to a consensus that the article is already a bit long and overdetailed. There really isn't enough room to discuss any more individual cult films. This is one of the reasons why we have list of cult films – to be a collection of films that demonstrate what it is to be a cult film, so that the main article can be an overview. I understand wanting to keep expanding the article indefinitely to cover every topic imaginable, but it's supposed to be an overview, not an exhaustive academic treatise. One possibility is to raise the question of whether certain parts of the article should be spun off into their own articles. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 16:23, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Possible COI

You seem to be promoting the work James O'Brien (filmmaker) on Wikipedia. If you are O'Brien or you have some kind of business/personal relationship with him, you should read Wikipedia's guideline on how to manage a conflict of interest. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 00:03, 27 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Jay Odin. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

June 2018

Hello, I'm LittlePuppers. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to QAnon seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. LittlePuppers (talk) 04:52, 21 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Jay Odin. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Venice Bound) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Venice Bound.

I have just reviewed the page, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Be careful of simply copying and pasting material from other sources.

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Onel5969}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 14:43, 8 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Mark L. Hunt

Until there is another person named "Mark L. Hunt" with a Wikipedia article, the film producer article you created should stay at Mark L. Hunt. Please do not move the article back to Mark L. Hunt (producer) again. GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 16:09, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Also, please read WP:SOURCES so that you are able to determine which sources are valid and which are not. LinkedIn, the producer's website, Vimeo, and anything that is user-generated is not not a valid reference. The claim to notability is entirely related to his Grammy nom; add a valid cite for that. JSFarman (talk) 16:50, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Alan Tafoya (actor)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Alan Tafoya (actor), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, such as at Articles for deletion. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Wgolf (talk) 02:23, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

March 2019

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from Alan Tafoya (actor), a page you have created yourself. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. Wgolf (talk) 02:32, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with Alan Tafoya (actor). If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion, which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. Wgolf (talk) 02:40, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to remove speedy deletion notices from pages you created yourself, as you did at Alan Tafoya (actor), you may be blocked from editing. Wgolf (talk) 02:46, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove a speedy deletion notice from a page you have created yourself, as you did at Alan Tafoya (actor). Wgolf (talk) 02:54, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

WP:COI

Please be aware of our conflict-of-interest and paid-editing policies. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 03:16, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Alan Tafoya (actor)

Hello, I'm Ronz. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person on Alan Tafoya (actor), but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source, so I removed it. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! --Ronz (talk) 20:00, 13 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I appreciate the contribution. Looking to make the content as accurate as possible. --Jay Odin (talk) 20:17, 13 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You don't seem to understand. Working on BLP content requires strict adherence to Wikipedia's content policies. Since you're an inexperienced editor, I recommend you stop all BLP work and find ways to learn Wikipedia far better, perhaps by working through some tutorials. --Ronz (talk) 22:44, 13 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

March 2019

Hello Jay Odin. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially egregious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to Black hat SEO.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists, and if it does not, from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Jay Odin. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Jay Odin|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. ‡ Єl Cid of ᐺalencia ^ᐐT₳LKᐬ 12:16, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you continue to edit and create articles to promote individuals you may be banned. ‡ Єl Cid of ᐺalencia ^ᐐT₳LKᐬ 12:17, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I am not being paid, nor do I expect to receive any compensation for the editing I do on Wikipedia. I am familiar with the work of the subjects I have chosen or deemed worthy to create Wikipedia pages for, that is all. I am not interested in going into Articles on world famous personages like Michael Jordan and making minor edits on their page before someone else, but rather looking for people specifically in the arts and entertainment business that may deserve note in Wikipedia based on at least one or more notable film works that do have Wikipedia Articles and in which that person is associated with in a substantial or notable way. Example: the film Tom Dowd & the Language of Music which I have seen and noted had an Article, but the main producer for it did not have one. I did as much research as possible online in all sources to get info on the producer, including on Linkedin and bio related sources like that. The person in question may not be world famous, but if he was, someone else would likely have done the page long before me. I am making a best effort in good faith to do Articles on people I have heard of through interest in the arts. I also have a strong interest in Native American culture. The Native actor I chose, I feel is absolutely worthy of an Article. I scoured the internet for references and found some very interesting material that I felt made him a person of note. It seems like one particular admin has had an issue with this entry from the start. I have made my best efforts on both these pages for them to qualify for no compensation whatsoever. Wikipedia can decide what to do with them. I will take the time to consider whether this work is worth it on my end, ie: having to make such a case for Articles, which is turning out to be more work than creating something new on Wikipedia. --Jay Odin (talk) 17:11, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi Jay Odin! You created a thread called Help with Talk Page at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread.

Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:02, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Wish You Were Here (2013 film) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Wish You Were Here (2013 film) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wish You Were Here (2013 film) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Sheldybett (talk) 10:21, 17 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:18, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]