Jump to content

User talk:Jasper Deng/Archive 35

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 30←Archive 33Archive 34Archive 35

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:33, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Recent Revert on Fork (chess)

I have noticed that you have reverted my change on the page Fork (chess) and that you have provided a supposedly winning continuation for black. However, it is to note that your proposed 6...Nxc3 is illegal, as there is nothing on c3. The previous moves were 1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bc4 Nf6 4.Ng5 Nxe4 5.Bxf7+ Ne7 6.d4. As shown, white has never noved any piece to c3. Could you please recheck your analysis and provide an unbiased analysis of the position? Thank you for reconsidering my contributions. 2003 LN6 (talk) 16:28, 3 December 2023 (UTC)

@2003 LN6: I'm really not interested, because your addition is still original research and unsourced. Also, the move cited in the article is 4.Nc3, not 4.Ng5, so your analysis is completely wrong. This is why we do not allow original research on Wikipedia.--Jasper Deng (talk) 19:12, 3 December 2023 (UTC)

Yo Ho Ho!

Lord Sjones23 (talk - contributions) is wishing you Seasons Greetings! Whether you celebrate your hemisphere's Solstice or Christmas, Diwali, Hogmanay, Hanukkah, Lenaia, Festivus or even the Saturnalia, this is a special time of year for almost everyone!

Spread the holiday cheer by adding {{subst:User:WereSpielChequers/Dec19b}} to your friends' talk pages.


Lord Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 07:35, 26 December 2023 (UTC)

An automated process has detectedthat when you recently edited Mahindra Racing, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Fortune.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:48, 15 January 2024 (UTC)

Figure skating at the 2022 Winter Olympics – Women's singles

I apologize; I misread that table as being new records set during the women's event, not the previous records held. Bgsu98 (Talk) 01:07, 30 January 2024 (UTC)

Thanks, though feel free to delete the Europeans number specifically, since it's now voided indeed.--Jasper Deng (talk) 01:14, 30 January 2024 (UTC)

Hello Jasper

I read an article about Typhoon Jova and it said that it was one of the five fastest intensifying Pacific hurricane on record, however, they did not specify that besides Jova in 5th or 6th place, otherwise, what is the name of the storm ranked above? Can you list the storm name for me? Vệ Thần - Talk 12:12, 30 January 2024 (UTC)

@Jasper Deng... Vệ Thần - Talk 16:13, 7 February 2024 (UTC)

Invitation to join New pages patrol

Hello Jasper Deng!

  • The New Pages Patrol is currently struggling to keep up with the influx of new articles needing review. We could use a few extra hands to help.
  • We think that someone with your activity and experience is very likely to meet the guidelines for granting.
  • Reviewing/patrolling a page doesn't take much time, but it requires a strong understanding of Wikipedia’s CSD policy and notability guidelines.
  • Kindly read the tutorial before making your decision, and feel free to post on the project talk page with questions.
  • If patrolling new pages is something you'd be willing to help out with, please consider applying here.

Thank you for your consideration. We hope to see you around!

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:20, 22 February 2024 (UTC)

Reminder to vote now to select members of the first U4C

You can find this message translated into additional languages on Meta-wiki. Please help translate to other languages.

Dear Wikimedian,

You are receiving this message because you previously participated in the UCoC process.

This is a reminder that the voting period for the Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) ends on May 9, 2024. Read the information on the voting page on Meta-wiki to learn more about voting and voter eligibility.

The Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) is a global group dedicated to providing an equitable and consistent implementation of the UCoC. Community members were invited to submit their applications for the U4C. For more information and the responsibilities of the U4C, please review the U4C Charter.

Please share this message with members of your community so they can participate as well.

On behalf of the UCoC project team,

RamzyM (WMF) 23:18, 2 May 2024 (UTC)

Happy First Edit Day!

A-class review

Hey pal, some members of WikiProject Figure Skating have finally set up an A-class assessment procedure. Our very first article to be nominated is Yuna Kim. We're having challenges finding reviewers (we need at least three) because so many of us have worked on Kim's bio. Would you mind reviewing it? It'd be much appreciated. Thanks, long time no talk to, hope you're doing well. Wikipedia:WikiProject Figure Skating/Assessment/Yuna Kim. Christine (Figureskatingfan) (talk) 17:28, 17 May 2024 (UTC)

June 2024 — Administrators’ noticeboard/Incidents notification

Information icon There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.The Weather Event Writer (Talk Page) 18:10, 18 June 2024 (UTC)

Yuna Kim A-class assessment

Hey pal, I thought I'd ping you again, since my last request got archived, and you might not have seen it. We need a third reviewer, please help! It's here: Wikipedia:WikiProject Figure Skating/Assessment/Yuna Kim. Thanks and best, Christine (Figureskatingfan) (talk) 22:27, 19 June 2024 (UTC)

Notice of noticeboard discussion

Information icon There is currently a discussion at WP:Administrators' noticeboard regarding Rollback abuse. Thank you. — Jeaucques Quœure (talk) 07:45, 8 August 2024 (UTC)

PD-NWS Violations Update #2 (Key To Read Third Section)

I am providing members of the WikiProject of Weather along with users who frequently edit weather-related articles an new update (2nd update) to the discussions regarding the PD-NWS image copyright template.

On the Commons, an RFC discussion is taking place to figure out how to manage the template. No "formal" administrative-style rules have occurred, so nothing has changed. That is not a surprise as the RFC is still ongoing.

What is new?

  • The entire Template:PD-NWS has been placed inside a "License Review" template, which is viewable via the link aforementioned.
  • Most of the photographs which were uploaded to the Commons originally under the PD-NWS template (approximately 1,500) have been reviewed. Out of those ~1,500 images, only about 150 are requiring additional looks. Most images have been verified as free-to-use and switched to a respective, valid template.
  • As of this moment, approximately 50 photos have been nominated for deletion (results pending).
  • A handful of images have been deleted (either confirmed copyrighted or under the Commons precautionary principle).
  • One image has been kept following a deletion request under the PD-NWS template.

How to deal with new photos?

Given all of this, you might be wondering how the heck you use weather photos while creating articles? Well, here is what you can do!

What about third-party photos?

In the case of third-party photos...i.e. ones not taken by the National Weather Service themselves...there is an option which was discussed and confirmed to be valid from an English Wikipedia Administrator.

  • KEY: Third party images of tornadoes & weather-related content can potentially be uploaded via Wikipedia's Non-Free Content Guidelines!
  • Experiments/testing has been done already! In fact, I bet you couldn't tell the difference, but the tornado photograph used at the top of the 2011 Joplin tornado was already switched to a Non-Free File (NFF)! Check it out: File:Photograph of the 2011 Joplin tornado.jpeg! That photo's description can also be used as a template for future third-party tornado photographs uploaded to Wikipedia...with their respective information replaced.
  • NFFs can be uploaded to multiple articles as well!
  • The absolute key aspect of NFFs is that they relate to the article and are not decoration. For example with the Joplin tornado, the photograph: (1) shows the size of the tornado, (2) shows the "wall of darkness", which was described by witnesses, (3) shows a historic, non-repeatable event of the deadliest tornado in modern U.S. history. The exact reasoning does not have to be extremely specific as Wikipedia's NFF guidelines "is one of the most generous in the world" (words of Rlandmann (not pinged), the administrator reviewing all the PD-NWS template images).
  • Tornado photographs will almost certainly qualify under the NFF guidelines, especially for tornadoes with standalone articles or standalone sections.
  • NFFs cannot be used when a free-photograph is available, no matter the quality, unless the section is about that specific photograph. For example, the photograph used at the top of the 2013 Moore tornado article is confirmed to be free-to-use, therefore, no NFFs of that tornado can be uploaded on Wikipedia. However, the "Dead Man Walking" photograph could almost certainly be uploaded as an NFF to the 1997 Jarrell tornado article as that photograph is the topic of a section in the article.
  • NFFs currently on Wikipedia can and should be placed in this category: Category:Non-free pictures of tornadoes.

Update Closing

Hopefully all of that information kept you informed on the Commons copyright discussion process and how you can still create the best articles possible! If you have a question about something mentioned above, reply back and I will do my best to answer it! Also, ping me in the process to ensure I see it! Have a good day! The Weather Event Writer (Talk Page) 01:07, 5 September 2024 (UTC)

About the deletion nominations.

I am fine with the articles getting nominated for deletion, just give me one week and I'll transfer all the articles to linguifex.com, thanks!

12:43, 6 September 2024 (UTC) Sisixive (talk) 12:43, 6 September 2024 (UTC)

Found evidence for my edit on the battle of Britain class unrebuilt engines

You have recently taken down my edits for the personal account I added onto Wikipedia, I have found evidence of the events occuring as this person recorded the events in a video format. Watch from 17:04 minutes in. https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=1ehZJSi9ID0

Here is another video of it stuck at Kirkby Stephens. Watch from 1:04 minutes in. https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=G9QLX7QRzjg Aarondrankatartruckoftar (talk) 16:42, 25 September 2024 (UTC)

Forum post: https://www.railforums.co.uk/threads/tangmere-failure-on-cumbrian-mountain-express-today-21st-september.274340/

Official notes from company https://settlecarlislesteam.co.uk/2024/21st-september-2024-cumbrian-mountain-express

States that 'Tangmere failed in the Crosby Garrett Area. The train was eventually taken forward to Kirkby Stephen where Tangmere was removed. The Class 47 then returned the coaches to Carlisle where the train was terminated and passenger made their way hom on service trains. Tangmere was retrieved from Kirkby Stephen by a diesel the following day.' — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aarondrankatartruckoftar (talk • contribs) 17:37, 25 September 2024 (UTC)

@Aarondrankatartruckoftar: Thanks for providing sources, but only the last one is a reliable source (see WP:YOUTUBE and WP:SPS). The official report might not make it a notable-enough of an event but this is not my subject area.--Jasper Deng (talk) 03:34, 27 September 2024 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Hurricane Helene (2024), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Georgia.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:52, 27 September 2024 (UTC)

You have just edited my Hurricane Kirk article.

Since you have edited my article, can you help me in my quest of getting this article submitted? HurricaneKirk2024 (talk) 00:41, 5 October 2024 (UTC)

This is my first article and I really want it submitted. HurricaneKirk2024 (talk) 00:41, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
@HurricaneKirk2024: This particular one is a lost cause because there is consensus against having a separate article for Kirk at the MfD. Please read Wikipedia:Your first article for more information on how you should go about making an article. At the least, do not use AI to write it; it will not teach you how to properly write Wikipedia articles.--Jasper Deng (talk) 07:46, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
Hey, at least you tried to help by getting rid of the AI-generated stuff, right? HurricaneKirk2024 (talk) 09:54, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
If I'm being honest, it was more to curb the spread of misinformation.--Jasper Deng (talk) 10:39, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
Well, thank you, nonetheless. HurricaneKirk2024 (talk) 10:47, 5 October 2024 (UTC)

Milton

Milton might hit sub-900 by the next recon pending any ERC or other weakening. Noah, BSBATalk 16:01, 7 October 2024 (UTC)

Will you draft my Hurricane Leslie article for me?

I really want to “change” Wikipedia with more information about hurricanes. And, I can do it with your help. HurricaneKirk2024 (talk) 10:51, 5 October 2024 (UTC)

Hurricane Leslie (2024) HurricaneKirk2024 (talk) 10:59, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
@HurricaneKirk2024: It doesn't need an article. Please stop asking others for help on making articles without first confirming that said articles are warranted in the first place.--Jasper Deng (talk) 03:46, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
Yeah, I agree, on further notice, Leslie will not hit land at all. HurricaneKirk2024 (talk) 16:24, 7 October 2024 (UTC)

Reversion

Hi Jasper, please note that this edit undid several positive changes that I had made. I have reinstated my other changes besides the last citation. ✶Quxyz✶ 21:13, 8 October 2024 (UTC)

It doesn't really matter. Don't restore bad edits. You're responsible for making sure your entire edit is good.--Jasper Deng (talk) 21:14, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
Or maybe you can have a bit of humanity and take the few seconds it would take to correct my error instead of forcing me to go back into the source code, figure out what was wrong, and modify the code back to how I had it while dancing around new edits that were made during that time. ✶Quxyz✶ 22:05, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
That's not my problem. You should look at the totality of your edit.--Jasper Deng (talk) 22:21, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Jasper_Deng/Archive_35&oldid=1256384634"