User talk:JasDhaliwal

September 2014

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to AVG (software) , without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Meters (talk) 17:08, 12 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did at AVG (software), you may be blocked from editing. Per WP:BRD you need to discuss this on the article's talk page. Meters (talk) 17:20, 12 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

January 2015

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to AVG (software) has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: AVG (software) was changed by JasDhaliwal (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.952803 on 2015-01-29T03:36:55+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 03:36, 29 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Edits to AVG Technologies

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did at AVG Technologies, you may be blocked from editing. Seeing your contributions of repeated section blankings on AVG articles, I did some checking, and your name matches the current Social Media Director at AVG Technologies. Conflict of Interest is one of Wikipedia's core policies, it is not right for you to use Wikipedia as a way to remove the visibility of well-sourced criticism from your company. PR editing for a company you work for is against Wikipedia policy, which is why many of your edits have been reverted. You should read through WP:PAY and WP:COI. This is not to say that all of your edits were bad, you did improve some of the links and update the pages after all, but you should follow this advice for future edits to articles you have a financial incentive from: WP:COIADVICE --Padenton (talk) 12:10, 24 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mike Foreman (executive) (March 31)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Oo7565 was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability—see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing, so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia.
What you can do: Add citations (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners) to secondary reliable sources that are entirely independent of the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Mike Foreman (executive) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Oo7565 (talk) 06:13, 31 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Oo7565 (talk) 06:13, 31 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mike Foreman (executive) (April 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Timtrent was:

The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Mike Foreman (executive) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Fiddle Faddle 16:37, 2 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mike Foreman's AVG Profile Image.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Mike Foreman's AVG Profile Image.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Fiddle Faddle 16:39, 2 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, JasDhaliwal. You have new messages at Timtrent's talk page.
Message added 10:32, 24 April 2015 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Fiddle Faddle 10:32, 24 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mike Foreman (executive) (April 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Onel5969 was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability—see the guidelines on the notability of people and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing, so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia.
What you can do: Add citations (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners) to secondary reliable sources that are entirely independent of the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Mike Foreman (executive) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Onel5969 (talk) 17:44, 24 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Mike Foreman (executive) concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Mike Foreman (executive), a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:32, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, please mark the article for deletion.

Your draft article, Draft:Mike Foreman (executive)

Hello, JasDhaliwal. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Mike Foreman".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 22:00, 26 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]